Puppet Masters
I was not expecting Maria Butina to be still languishing in solitary confinement in a high-security prison in Virginia awaiting trial as an agent of foreign influence, over four months later. Yet this is what has happened to this unfortunate young aspiring lobbyist for better US-Russian relations.
The Russian Government considers her, with good cause in my view, to be an innocent political prisoner who has been sorely mistreated - a victim of current American elite Russophobia.
According to the documents published by the hacktivists known as Anonymous, the Integrative Initiative is funded by the Institute for Statecraft, whose director appears to be Christopher Donnelly, a special advisor to the House of Commons Defence Committee.
A piece of leaked data from 2014 indicates that Donnelly laid out a number of suggestions to the British authorities just days before Crimea's reunification with Russia that included mining Sevastopol harbour.
"Set up a cordon sanitaire across the Crimean Isthmus and on the coast N. of Crimea with troops and mines. Mine Sevastopol harbour/bay. Can be done easily using a car ferry if they have no minelayers. Doesn't need a lot of mines to be effective. They could easily buy some mines", he proposed, according to the group.
What could be more evil and nefarious than that? Imagine the audacity of a Russian trying to make friends with the United States! What could possibly have been going through her mind? Lock her up!
Okay, it's true that that wasn't the actual charge to which Butina pled guilty. Technically, she pled guilty to conspiring to fail to register as an agent of the Russian government. But it is clear that that "crime" is just a sham. Her real offense is befriending the United States on behalf of the Russian government, which is a grave crime in the eyes of the U.S. national-national establishment (i.e., the Pentagon, CIA, and NSA), whose existence has depended on a hostile relationship with Russia since the time the U.S. government was converted from a limited-government republic to a national-security state after World War II.
Comment:
- After 67 days in solitary confinement - and close to breaking - Russian hostage Maria Butina offered plea deal by US
- Lavrov: Months of torture-like conditions forced Maria Butina to plead guilty in order to escape
- Alleged 'Russian agent' finally worn down: Butina enters guilty plea to 'engaging in conspiracy against US'
The unification council kicks off on Saturday in Kiev. The event, announced by Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko himself in early December, is supposed to "bring together" members of various Orthodox Churches of the country to create a new, "independent" church.
While the event has been pompously hailed by the country's senior officials, things look rather bleak since the only canonical religious organization - the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Moscow Patriarchate - refused to take part. The head of the Church, Kiev Metropolitan Bishop Onufriy, returned his "invitation" (effectively an ultimatum) back to the sender.
The mailbox of the man who sent the invitations - the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I - has apparently been full of late, since 56 hierarchs have already followed suit, the Church said on Thursday. Apart from them, the Church's bishops refused to take the invitations in the first place.
While Ukraine boasts two other self-styled Orthodox 'churches', one of which even has its own self-proclaimed 'patriarch', any sort of unification council with the majority of schismatics in attendance would effectively be void, experts have repeatedly warned.
Comment: The soulless government wants to aggregate all independent institutions under its control, or at the very least alienate Russia and congregations with some religious ties to people who happen to be Russian. That assures a domination of message and information, further cutting off mankind from its spiritual legacy, to service the state. See also:
- Ukrainian President Poroshenko calls for Russian Orthodox Church to be expelled: 'Go home!'
- Ukrainian president Poroshenko calls Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine a 'national security threat'
- Fusion of church and state: Kiev's split from Russian Orthodoxy will boost 'nationalism' and 'chaos' in Ukraine
- Poroshenko's meddling with church violate Ukraine's constitution
- Ukraine government manipulates Orthodox church to break its thousand year old ties with Russia
"It happened," Poroshenko told a crowd awaiting the council's decision in central Kyiv on December 15. "This day will go down in history as the sacred day of the creation of the autocephalous local Orthodox Church of Ukraine. The day we finally receive our independence from Russia."
That's rich, coming from someone as unspiritual as Poroshenko.
Metropolitan Epifaniy was elected by the council to head the new church.
The meeting in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, was a crucial step in years of efforts to create a church in Ukraine that is independent of Moscow.
Several thousand people rallied outside the ancient St. Sophia's Cathedral in Kyiv where the meeting had taken place behind closed doors.
For or against?
Poroshenko has made an independent church a campaign pledge as part of his campaign for reelection in 2019.
Which he has no chance of winning legitimately.
"Let's stand and pray for a Ukrainian church to be created today," Poroshenko said as he greeted several of the rally's participants before going into the cathedral.
"The creation of our Church is another declaration of Ukraine's independence and you are the main participants of this historic event," he added.
Meanwhile, Poroshenko's press secretary, Svyatoslav Tsegolko, posted on Facebook a photo from inside the cathedral where the priests are meeting.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate said on December 13 that Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, the "first among equals" in the global Eastern Orthodox faith, will hand over a "tomos" -- a decree granting autocephaly, or independence -- to the future head of the local Orthodox Church in Ukraine on January 6.
There are two goals the enemies of Iran are currently pursuing in the UN, Dr Seyed Hadi Afghahi, an Iranian political scientist, leading expert on the Middle East, diplomat and a former official of the Iranian Embassy in Lebanon, told Sputnik Persian.
On 11 December, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres reported that the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen found two launch units for anti-tank guided missiles allegedly manufactured by Iran in 2016 and 2017.
A UN resolution that came into force in January 2016 prevents the Islamic Republic of Iran from importing and exporting weapons without the Security Council's approval.
"The Secretariat found that they had characteristics of Iranian manufacture and that their markings indicated production dates in 2016 and 2017", Guterres said at the Security Council's meeting. However, he avoided blaming Tehran for an apparent violation of the UN resolution.
Comment: Iran's foreign minister denies the latest allegations:
"We've never provided weapons to Houthis. The Houthis use the weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia... with Saudi money buying weapons from Russia, buying weapons from China, and buying weapons from North Korea... You are looking at the wrong address if you ask Iran", Zarif said at the Doha Forum in Qatar.The fact is, Iran has never been caught actually sending weapons to the Houthis. Yemen is under a full blockade. All we have are accusations from Iran's enemies - not exactly a reliable source in a time of war.
At the same time, Zarif stressed that the Saudi-led coalition's bombing of Yemeni people was an obvious fact that needed no extra evidence.
"I don't need to show any evidence about the jets that are flying in Yemen, bombing the Yemenis. Those are American-made jets, and those are Saudi fighters, I assume... There are facts about US weapons, there are facts about Saudi bombing", he said.
Saudi Arabia is interested in increasing tensions in the region, and the examples of a blockade of Qatar and the military operation in Yemen prove that the minister stressed.
"Unfortunately, Saudi Arabia does not want to reduce tensions. Actually, Saudi Arabia believes that it is in its interest to increase tensions. Look at what they did with Qatar. Look at how they imprisoned the prime minister of another country. Look at what they are doing in Yemen", Zarif said.
...
Zarif also addressed the humanitarian aspect of the situation in Iran, stressing that Tehran decisively opposes human rights abuses.
"Obviously, everybody's record of human right can be improved... Of course, our human rights record can be improved, of course we have excesses, obviously, every country has excesses", the diplomat said.
The Iranian foreign minister stressed that Iranian citizens were on whom the state relied for the country's defence, prosperity, economic development and scientific achievements.
"We build our own weapons, these are the people who are building those weapons... So if it is a moral obligation for someone to observe human rights, for us it is a matter of national security. We make mistakes, people commit excesses, but that does not mean that others are in position to give us lectures about human rights," Zarif stressed.
"The Sudanese side expressed interest in participation of the Russian companies in constructing of the Trans-African railway over Dakar - Port Sudan - Cape Town," said the commission in a document seen by TASS.
It added that "The Russian side confirmed readiness to work out the opportunity for participation... but asked for [the] provision of all the financial and legal characteristics of this project."
The situation in parts of eastern Syria, controlled by the US-backed and Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), remains "deeply concerning," Shoigu wrote in a letter to Pentagon chief James Mattis earlier this week.
Washington does little to nothing to restore peace and help the devastated region to recover from the long war, while its airstrikes continue to rack up civilian deaths, the defense minister said. He noted that at least 1,500 civilians have been killed in recent months as the SDF was clearing the last remaining pockets of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) resistance.
President Trump on Friday named White House budget director Mick Mulvaney as his new acting chief of staff, saying the former South Carolina Republican congressman will replace John Kelly as his top aide.
"I am pleased to announce that Mick Mulvaney, Director of the Office of Management & Budget, will be named Acting White House Chief of Staff, replacing General John Kelly, who has served our Country with distinction," Trump tweeted. "Mick has done an outstanding job while in the Administration. I look forward to working with him in this new capacity as we continue to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
In a two-year period since the group of 15 major oil producers formed an alliance with Russia, OPEC's smaller members have been marginalized, their voices have been diminished and Saudi Arabia seems to prioritize its partnership with Moscow above all else. An unlikely partnership between Saudi Arabia and Russia is causing dissension within OPEC, with one of the oldest members announcing it would withdraw from the organization in January just days prior to the talks. With Russia tightening its grip over OPEC's decisions and the United States officially reaching net oil exporting status in late November for the first time in decades, even if only briefly, the new world oil order is now dependent on three energy superpowers: Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United States.
Following the brutal murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, western media and various entities, including the CIA, appear to have turned their back on Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (MBS). In response to the scandal, the Guardian released a video which its celebutante, Owen Jones, captioned "Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest threats on Earth. Time to stop propping up its repulsive regime."
The Guardian was not alone in its condemnation. "It's high time to end Saudi impunity," wrote Hana Al-Khamri in Al-Jazeera. "It's time for Saudi Arabia to tell the truth on Jamal Khashoggi," the Washington Post's Editorial Board argued. Politico called it "the tragedy of Jamal Khashoggi."
Even shadowy think-tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Atlantic Council released articles criticizing Saudi Arabia in the wake of Khashoggi's death.















Comment: See also: