Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Mr. Potato

More signs of a dying empire: Embarrassing speeches

PompeoBolton
© Diario Las Américas
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo • White House National Security Advisor John Bolton
"What are you reading my lord?" - Polonius

"Words." - Hamlet
Something has changed in U.S. politics. And it may finally signal something changing for the better. Since the announcement (but no real follow through) to end our military involvement in Syria what passes for our statesmen - John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo - have been ignored, mocked or both.

Bolton attempted to box Trump in on not leaving Syria while Israel chest-thumped about how they will not yield an inch to Iran. Turkish President Erdogan publicly lambasted him with no response from President Trump.

Or anyone else for that matter.

When was the last time you heard of a major U.S. political figure go overseas and be refused a meeting with a foreign head of state, publicly upbraided and sent home like an irrelevant flunkie?

I can't think of one.

Radar

Ukraine agitating for conflict with Russia in Kerch Strait, but how much will NATO help?

PoroshenkoStoltenberg

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko poses with NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg
A new attempt by Ukrainian military ships to pass through the Kerch Strait will be "more prepared," Lieutenant General Vasily Bogdan said in an interview with the Fakty newspaper.

"This time, NATO and OSCE ships will join us. There are already such agreements," said the Ukrainian general.

Bogdan was confident that Moscow would have to let the Ukrainian ships cross the Kerch Straits because it did not want to "aggravate the situation".

However, the Ukrainian general failed to indicate the concrete date of the passage, noting that "everything has its time."

Comment: The Kiev Junta is anxious for a military confrontation with Russia to deflect from its own awful domestic situation, and to rally the rabid West's military to come to its aid; a losing proposition for the people of Ukraine all-around:


Control Panel

US plans to expand influence over Arctic in attempt to challenge Russia - but can it?

US Navy
© Reuters / US Navy / Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Connor D. Loessin
Washington will send a Navy warship to sail through the Arctic in a demonstration of its growing ambitions in the far North, the US Navy secretary said. But will it be enough to challenge Russia?

The US has long since set its sights upon the Arctic, which it openly sees as a potential new arena for a geopolitical standoff. As the planet's changing climate gradually turns ice-bound wastes into passable waterways, Washington is clearly intending to get its piece of the economic action in a region that might well become a major sea trade lane one day.

Comment: See: Russia will invest $4B to build Arctic port servicing Northern Sea Route


Chess

Palestinian president Abbas plans anti-Hamas measures as split widens

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
© Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gestures during a ceremony marking the 54th anniversary of Fatah's founding, in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank December 31, 2018. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gestures during a ceremony marking the 54th anniversary of Fatah's founding, in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank December 31, 2018.
The decade-long Palestinian split looks set to deepen in the coming months, with president Mahmoud Abbas poised to take multiple measures against Gaza to squeeze its Islamist rulers Hamas.

The moves raise concerns of more suffering for Gaza's two million residents, already under an Israeli blockade and facing severe electricity shortages, while a cornered Hamas could renew violence against Israel.

Analysts say the measures will also widen the gap between Hamas-run Gaza and the occupied West Bank, where Abbas's government has limited self-rule.

Chess

Is Turkey really interested in defeating ISIS?

Erdogan
The Islamic State exploded in the Middle East, gaining control of large sections of Iraq and Syria. No nation was safe from its ambition to create an Islamic caliphate. But Turkey initially accommodated Daesh, even profiting from illicit oil sales. Eventually, the insurgents turned terrorist inside Turkey, forcing the Erdogan government to respond. However, Turkish forces still targeted Kurdish militias as the true threat.

With President Donald Trump apparently planning an American withdrawal from Syria, the administration suggested that Turkey take over the task of finishing off ISIS. Ankara's response? Maybe if the United States does most of the work.

Reported the Wall Street Journal :
"Turkey is asking the U.S. to provide substantial military support, including airstrikes, transport and logistics, to allow Turkish forces to assume the main responsibility for fighting Islamic State militants in Syria." These demands, added the paper, "are so extensive that, if fully met, the American military might be deepening its involvement in Syria."

Eye 2

Dem majority ramps up Trump probes, Schiff want to subpoena Trump's translator for Putin meeting

Adam Schiff Trump
© Reuters / Jim Bourg / Kevin Lamarque
Congressman Adam Schiff (L), President Donald Trump (R)
Newly minted House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff hinted over the weekend that he could subpoena notes or testimony from the interpreter in several meetings between President Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin, a move that would dramatically escalate majority Democrats' investigations into the Trump administration.

The chamber's newly empowered Democratic committee chairmen already are probing a range of Trump controversies, including calling a hearing with ex-fixer Michael Cohen who has detailed Trump's alleged role in making hush-money payments to mistresses.

But a move to obtain interpreter details from Putin meetings would trigger a major confrontation between the executive and legislative branches concerning discussions with foreign leaders. Schiff, D-Calif., weighed in after The Washington Post reported that Trump took possession of the notes from his own interpreter and instructed the individual not to discuss what had taken place in the meeting with other administration officials.

Arrow Down

Trump downgrades EU diplomats and it's a good thing

US EU flags
The EU's diplomats in Washington are fuming. It turns out that they have been quietly downgraded by the State Department. Until now, the EU was treated as if it were a country for protocol purposes. President Trump has decreed that its status should switch from "state" to "international organization."

Since states take precedence over international organizations, this means that the EU's head of mission now has to wait in line behind the ambassadors of El Salvador, Chad, Tonga and every other sovereign entity. "I can confirm that this has not been well received in Brussels," an EU official complained.

I'll bet it hasn't. Eurocrats are notoriously prickly about their status. They get especially irked when they are reminded that the EU is not a state. After all, they have spent the past half-century pretending to be one - or at least acquiring all the gadgets and symbols that go with statehood. The EU now has a currency, a supreme court, a parliament, a president, a diplomatic service, legal personality, and representation on international bodies. It also has a flag, a national anthem (Beethoven's Ninth Symphony - a terrible thing to do to that sublime piece of music), a national day, and a passport.

Comment: Gasanov Kamran of Katahon doesn't share Mr. Hannan's enthusiasm. He feels there's little the EU can do about America's actions, except turn more decisively towards Russia and China:
[I]mplicitly, Trump makes it clear that he does not respect the European Union. The position of Washington was previously voiced by the US ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland. He called the European Commission an archaic and outdated structure that is "divorced from reality" and deals with the regulation of what is not needed.


True enough.


For the European Union, the issue of international recognition is fundamental, because the EU is different from traditional international organizations, such as ASEAN, NAFTA or the African Union. The EU has its own court, a single legal field, the institution of citizenship, the euro currency, the parliament and the executive bodies represented by the European Commission and the Council of the EU.


As Hannan put it, "all the gadgets and symbols that go with statehood."


If you leave the language of diplomacy, then the American president has very specific reasons to put pressure on the European Union. Trump is unhappy that Europe exports too much to the USA and creates for them a trade deficit of more than 100 billion dollars. To patch this hole, the White House introduced trade duties against imports of aluminum and steel from the EU, and also threatens to set tariffs on European cars.

Another "bone of contention" is that Europeans spend little on defense, which is why the entire burden of NATO lies on the United States. Trump requires a minimum of 2% of GDP, up to this figure fall short of only the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece and Estonia. Not only do Europeans save on the US, they are also going to create their own army, as French President Emmanuel Macron said at the end of the year.

Thirdly, the EU does not support the US on international issues, for example, in the sanctions against Iran or Palestine. Brussels criticized Washington's withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear deal in May and agreed with Russia to create a workaround. In the Palestinian problem, the EU opposed the transfer of the American embassy to Jerusalem, which, according to European bureaucrats, breaks the solution to the crisis within the framework of the "two states" principle.

Europe is also increasing its dependence on Russian gas. Trump would like Old World to buy American liquefied natural gas instead of laying the Nord Stream-2. But Angela Merkel made it clear that the Russian gas pipeline will be built, whether Washington likes it or not.

The European Union will not only not respond, but is also ready to turn the second cheek under attack. While Brussels continues to suffer humiliation from the United States, Americans will behave like "occupiers," as Gerhard Schroeder, the former German chancellor, openly said.

With its Iranian sanctions, Washington has already caused Europe damage in the amount of several billion euros. Under the penalty of monetary fines, the largest European concerns left Total: Peugeot, Deutsche Telekom, Deutsche Bahn, Daimler and others. The same thing can happen if the Nord Stream 2 comes under US sanctions. Then the losses will be incurred by the French Engie, the Anglo-Dutch Shell, the Austrian OMV and the German Winterschall and Uniper.

In this situation, the only way out for the European Union is to turn to Moscow and strengthen contacts with Beijing. Otherwise, the White House will continue to spit on Europe and wipe its feet on it.


Washington's arrogance may have unintended consequences. Russia has shown itself to be a honourable, reliable partner in business (China) and in war (Syria). China is driving robust economic growth for many developing nations. Perhaps in their arrogance, the Deep State doesn't think the EU will have the nerve for a major realignment?





Arrow Down

PM May faces Brexit defeat as Tory whip resigns, UK's Labour Party vows to hold no-confidence vote

theresa may
© Getty images
Theresa May
Opposition Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn gave his clearest indication yet that his party is ready to call a no-confidence ballot within days of Theresa May losing a U.K. parliamentary vote on her Brexit deal.

Lawmakers are scheduled to vote Tuesday on the agreement May reached with the European Union, and the prime minister appears no closer to getting the backing she needs than she was in December, when the vote was dramatically pulled after it became clear the government was heading for a defeat.

Speaking on the BBC's "Andrew Marr Show" on Sunday, Corbyn said a confidence vote would be brought "at a time of our choosing, but it is going to be soon, don't worry about that."

Comment: RT reports of another Conservative resignation under May's rule:
MP Gareth Johnson resigns as Tory Whip ahead of Brexit deal vote

Gareth Johnson
© beta.parliament.uk
Gareth Johnson
MP Gareth Johnson has resigned his post as a minister in the Government's Whips' Office, ahead of a highly anticipated vote on Theresa May's Brexit deal. Johnson said in his resignation letter that he could not support the deal.

Addressing his letter to May, Johnson wrote that the current deal being pushed by the government "gives out country no clear, unilateral path out of the European Union and ensures we will be fettered in our ability to negotiate trade deals."

"This agreement prevents us from taking back control and instead could leave us perpetually constrained by the European Union," he added.

He said that the issue has forced him to "place my loyalty to my country above my loyalty to the government."

The deal is expected to be canned in a vote scheduled for Tuesday, and May's cabinet will likely face a co-confidence vote after the deal fails to pass.

On Monday, May went on one-day speaking tour in a last-ditch effort to convince legislators to support the deal. In a speech delivered in the leave-supporting city of Stoke-on-Trent, May accused the parliament of undermining the wishes of the British people.

"As we have seen over the last few weeks, there are some in Westminster who would wish to delay or even stop Brexit and who will use every device available to them to do so," May said. "I ask MPs to consider the consequences of their actions on the faith of the British people in our democracy."

May's government suffered a string of resignations in November after the prime minister announced that her cabinet had settled on a Brexit deal.

Notably, Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab - the man charged with negotiating and finalizing the deal - was among the handful of ministers who resigned. In his resignation letter, Raab said that the Brexit deal in its current form was deeply flawed.

With the support of 200 lawmakers within her Conservative Party, May managed to survive a no-confidence vote on December 12. She may not have the same luck on Tuesday, however. Some 100 MPs of May's own party as well as 10 legislators from the Democratic Unionist Party, a Northern Irish partner in her minority coalition, are likely to vote against her deal. Following the vote, Labour Party's leader Jeremy Corbyn is expected to file a motion of no confidence, potentially leading to a new general election.

See also: Brexit: A Political Farce Based on a Public Lie

And check out SOTT radio's:


Fire

California lawmakers traveled to Hawaii with utility executives as wildfires raged

Camp Fire rages through Paradise, California
© AP
A home burns as the Camp Fire rages through Paradise, California, on Thursday, Nov. 8, 2018.
A group of California lawmakers took a trip to Hawaii with utility companies last year as wildfires wreaked havoc in their state.

During the junket, representatives from utility companies discussed with the bipartisan group of lawmakers just how much responsibility they should bear for wildfires - even as Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) could be on the hook for several billions of dollars in damages for fires it caused over the past few years.

The utility companies are pushing for a new state law that would raise electricity prices to offset costs incurred from wildfires, according to The New York Times.

The annual event, hosted by the nonprofit Independent Voter Project, was held in Maui in November. PG&E executives did not attend the conference because of the wildfires, but representatives from San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison did, KABC-TV reported.

Those in attendance at the Wailea conference included California Assembly members Frank Bigelow, Bill Brough, Ian Calderon, Jim Cooper, Tom Daly, Heath Flora, Jim Frazier, Reggie Jones-Sawyer, Freddie Rodriguez and Blanca Rubio. State Sens. Ben Hueso and Cathleen Galgiani also attended, nonprofit Consumer Watchdog reports.

Star of David

US House bill forces Trump to nominate 'anti-semitism envoy to monitor 'criticism' of Israel

Netanyahu Congress
© AP/IAK
Israeli PM Netanyahu leaves House chamber on Capitol Hill, March 3, 2015
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 411-1 for a bill that would force President Trump to nominate an anti-Semitism envoy, a position that has been vacant since he took office. The definition of anti-Semitism the position uses includes certain criticisms of Israel.

The bipartisan bill upgrades the current position of Anti-Semitism Envoy to an ambassador rank, which requires the job to be filled within 90 days. The law states that the Special Envoy shall "serve as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the U.S. government relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement in foreign countries."

The bill, H.R.221- Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act, was sponsored by Rep. Christopher H. Smith [R-NJ-4] and has 87 co-sponsors. Smith's largest campaign donor was NorPAC, a pro-Israel political action committee.

To become law the bill must next be passed by the Senate and then be signed by the president. If Trump vetoes it, Congress can override this through a two-thirds vote.

The position of anti-Semitism envoy was created in 2004 over the objections of the State Department, which said it wasn't needed. It was urged by Israeli Minister for Diaspora Affairs Natan Sharansky, who had formulated a new definition of anti-Semitism that includes criticism of Israel. Previous envoys before or after serving in the position worked for the Israel lobbying organization AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Comment: Enforced by Congress: The removal of your freedom of speech and opinion.
See also: