Puppet Masters
The certification, issued on Tuesday, applies to certain Venezuelan government and Central Bank property held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or any other US insured banks.
"This certification will help Venezuela's legitimate government safeguard those assets for the benefit of the Venezuelan people," State Department spokesman Robert Palladino said in a statement.
As the title implies, "Russia Watchers" don't reside in Russia. Indeed, many have never have done so, at any stage, and some haven't even 'lowered' themselves to visit. Instead, like Peter Sellers' Chance the Gardener, they "like to watch" and are elevated beyond their station by credulous hacks, in a severe case of the blind leading the blind.
And, in a reasonable world, with assiduous and scrupulous media standards, you wouldn't know of their existence and they'd be left to exchange their conspiracy theories with other fantasist busybodies and amateur enthusiasts on Reddit or obscure blogs.
But we don't live on that sort of planet. Sadly, Western coverage of Russia is so dysfunctional that various chancers and charlatans flood the media space debating things like the 'Gerasimov Doctrine' and whether Vladimir Putin has Aspergers or Spine Cancer, or is about to invade the Baltics, or Belarus, or Poland. All on the same weekend. In addition to other topics which either don't exist or would require expertise, and access, these spoofers can't boast.
While the Google-owned video giant has often courted controversy over some of the content that finds its way onto its platform, the company does have policies in place that serve as a guide to what is, and isn't, allowed. Some of these videos are eventually taken down. But then there is content that YouTube refers to as "borderline" - it doesn't breach any policies, per se, but at the same time many people would rather not see them.
Comment: This is a dangerous move on the part of YouTube, although it's unlikely many will see it as such. At the end of the day, who decides what is labelled as 'conspiracy'? Any opinion expressed that counters the mainstream narrative is often labelled as such, even when accompanied by established facts. More and more, those who aren't fully supportive of the views of 'the party' are being marginalized and silenced. There won't be much left of the internet once the opinion-shapers are done with it - just an infinitely deep echo chamber with dissent nowhere to be found.
See also:
- Leaks reveal Google regularly manipulates YouTube search results
- YouTube removes 58 million videos featuring hateful or inappropriate content
- YouTube shuts down Syrian Government accounts and provides only cryptic reasons for censorship
- Syrian state YouTube channels 'terminated' amid fears of looming false-flag chemical attack
- YouTube censors SouthFront's latest video analysis "Russian Military Campaign in Syria 2015-2018"
- BuzzFeed cheers YouTube for tagging wrong-think videos with liberal propaganda
- YouTube plans to decide for users what is and is not 'reputable news'
- Youtube bans video tribute to Gaza victims as 'sensational incitement'

Demonstrators hold banners in front of a mock wall on the Northern Ireland-Republic of Ireland border on Saturday.
Simon Coveney, the Irish foreign minister and deputy prime minister, insisted the backstop - the mechanism to ensure there will be no hard border between the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland if Britain and the EU fail to strike a free trade deal - was "part of a balanced package that isn't going to change". In a forceful interview, he insisted it was only part of the withdrawal agreement because of the UK's red lines.
On Tuesday Tory Brexiters may get the chance to vote for amendments that would signal their willingness to back May's Brexit deal subject to the backstop's either being removed or time-limited.
Comment: See also:
- Still Confused About Brexit? It's Actually Pretty Simple...
- Brexit: A Political Farce Based on a Public Lie
- NewsReal: Yellow Vest Protests, Brexit Farce - Revolutionary Climate in Western Europe?
- NewsReal: Yellow Vest Protests, Brexit Farce - Revolutionary Climate in Western Europe?
George Galloway breached broadcasting impartiality rules when he used his radio show to cast doubt on Russian involvement in the poisoning of Yulia and Sergei Skripal in Salisbury last year, according to media regulator Ofcom.
The former MP used his weekly programme on TalkRadio to repeatedly criticise claims of Russian involvement in the incident. He mocked those who agreed with the UK government that the Kremlin was behind the novichok nerve agent attack on the former Russian security agent and his daughter.
Comment: In other words, Galloway is guilty of 'wrong-think' and expressing an opinion not in league with the establishment narrative.
Ofcom said it was minded to sanction TalkRadio, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch's News UK, for broadcasting the discussion last March without giving enough time to people with opposing views.
Comment: So opposing views are required to be impartial while the establishment view is allowed to be aired unquestioned and lacking even the slightest hint at impartiality. This is a complete farce. Galloway should fight this in the highest courts (although, depressingly, he would more than likely lose).
See also:
- "Absurd...the same kind of canard that led us to the disaster of the Iraq war" - George Galloway on Skripal (VIDEO)
- George Galloway: UK crackdown on rich Russians is 'politically driven by Cold War mentality'
- Theresa May's explosive Skripal allegations may blow up in Syria
- Censoring information for the greater good? The new internet police protecting you from freedom of thought and speech
- May's Skripal story fails the bottle test: Coroner cannot rule novichok as cause of death
- Shock Files: What Role Did Integrity Initiative Play in Sergei Skripal Affair?
- Dead as a doorhandle: Why the UK and BBC's explanation for the Skripal poisoning simply doesn't work
Two sweeping indictments allege that Huawei, its affiliate in Iran and Meng stole confidential information and obstructed justice as part of an elaborate and "illegal" economic scheme. Prosecutors are seeking Meng's extradition to the U.S. She was arrested in early December by Canadian authorities at the request of the U.S. government.
In response, China said Tuesday the "unreasonable crackdown" on Huawei should be stopped, adding that Beijing will "firmly defend" its companies. A foreign ministry statement read on the state-run TV news didn't say whether Beijing would retaliate for the charges against Huawei, which the company denied.
The U.S. has long suspected that Huawei is a front for espionage and a national security risk.
Comment: And yet chose to act now?
Comment: As has been noted in other articles, China has little need to steal US technology these days. So, considering the timing of the allegations and that they've waited nearly 8 years to address these 'claims', naturally one wonders whether there is some intention to scupper any cooperation between the US administration and China: Engdahl: Is Canada's Huawei arrest an attempt to sabotage Trump-Xi talks?
See also:
- US navy ship sails in disputed South China Sea amidst trade talks with Beijing
- Why the West fears 'Made in China: 2025'
- China's top economic official's unexpected appearance at US trade talks signals their importance to Beijing
Over the past two years Canadian officials have campaigned aggressively against President Nicolás Maduro. Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland has repeatedly criticized Caracas' democratic legitimacy and human rights record. Recently she said, "the Maduro regime is now fully entrenched as a dictatorship" while in September Ottawa asked (with five South American nations) the International Criminal Court to investigate the Venezuelan government, which is the first time a government has been formally brought before the tribunal by another member.
In recent weeks Canadian diplomats have played an important role in uniting large swaths of the Venezuelan opposition behind a US-backed plan to ratchet up tensions by proclaiming the new head of the opposition-dominated National Assembly, Juan Guaido, president. The Canadian Press quoted a Canadian diplomat saying they helped Guaido "facilitate conversations with people that were out of the country and inside the country" while the Globe and Mail reported that "Freeland spoke with Juan Guaido to congratulate him on unifying opposition forces in Venezuela, two weeks before he declared himself interim president." Alongside Washington and a number of right-leaning Latin American governments, Ottawa immediately recognized Guaido after he proclaimed himself president on Wednesday. Canadian officials are lobbying European leaders to recognize Guaido as president as well.
Comment: Canada has shown itself to be merely a lackey of US-UK foreign policy, although it clearly seeks to derive as much benefit to itself in the process, with another current example being its actions in the Huawei case: Trudeau fires envoy to China after he embarrassed him with truth on Huawei case
See also:
- Trump betrays MAGA over Venezuela
- Venezuelan coup must be resisted
- BoE refuses to return Venezuela's $1.2 billion in gold, US intends to use it to fund illegitimate Guaido
- NewsReal: US Regime Change Operation in Venezuela - This Time It's Legit?
- NewsReal #23: It's a Trap! The Left vs Right Paradigm
These Washington agencies have also filtered more than $14 million to opposition groups in Venezuela between 2013 and 2014, including funding for their political campaigns in 2013 and for the current anti-government protests in 2014. This continues the pattern of financing from the US government to anti-Chavez groups in Venezuela since 2001, when millions of dollars were given to organizations from so-called "civil society" to execute a coup d'etat against President Chavez in April 2002. After their failure days later, USAID opened an Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) in Caracas to, together with the NED, inject more than $100 million in efforts to undermine the Chavez government and reinforce the opposition during the following 8 years.
Graham, recalling his conversation with Trump a couple weeks ago, said: "He [Trump] said, 'What do you think about using military force?' and I said, 'Well, you need to go slow on that, that could be problematic.' And he said, 'Well, I'm surprised, you want to invade everybody.'"
Graham laughed. "And I said, 'I don't want to invade everybody, I only want to use the military when our national security interests are threatened.'"

Russian S-400 Triumph medium-range and long-range surface-to-air missile systems
"We are holding negotiations with our Chinese partners. The most important thing is to avoid disparities in other sectors due to the transition to mutual settlements in national currencies," the service's chief Dmitry Shugayev told NTV.
He added: "However, the sanctions have another negative aspect, namely to intimidate our partners quite unceremoniously."













Comment: The noose is tightening around Venezuela in ever possible way. What will Russia and China do about it?