Puppet Masters
For nearly four days, much of Venezuela has been without power, bringing the country's embattled economy to a near standstill. Though power is now returning, the outage saw U.S. officials and politicians blame the Venezuelan government for the crisis while officials in Caracas accused the U.S. of conducting "sabotage" and launching cyberattacks that targeted its civilian power grid as well as of employing saboteurs within Venezuela.
Although many mainstream media outlets have echoed the official U.S. government response, some journalists have strayed from the pack. One notable example is Kalev Leetaru, who wrote at Forbes that "the United States remotely interfering with its [Venezuela's] power grid is actually quite realistic."
Leetaru also noted that "timing such an outage to occur at a moment of societal upheaval in a way that delegitimizes the current government, exactly as a government-in-waiting has presented itself as a ready alternative, is actually one of the tactics" he had previously explored in a 2015 article detailing U.S. government hybrid warfare tactics "to weaken an adversary prior to conventional invasion or to forcibly and deniably effect a transition in a foreign government."
In addition to Leetaru's claims, others have asserted U.S. government involvement after U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), who is deeply involved in Trump's Venezuela policy, appeared to have prior knowledge that the blackouts would occur when he tweeted about them only three minutes after they had begun.
Friday's release of a transcript of Bruce Ohr's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee revealed several new tidbits. It also raised serious concerns that fake claims of collusion pushed by Glenn Simpson and Democratic opposition research shop Fusion GPS prompted the launch of not one, but two federal investigations: the Russia collusion investigation and investigations into the National Rifle Association (NRA).
During his day-long testimony last August, Ohr, then an associate deputy attorney general, explained his involvement-or non-involvement, if he is to be believed-in the Russia-collusion investigation. Ohr testified that he knew former MI6 spy and dossier author Christopher Steele for more than a decade and was acquainted with Steele's boss, Fusion GPS head Simpson, for many years.
Ohr further explained that from July 30, 2016 until November 2017, both Steele and Simpson provided him "intel" related to supposed collusion between Russia and members of the Trump campaign. Ohr then passed this information on to the FBI, where it was used to, among other things, obtain FISA court orders to surveil and otherwise target the Trump campaign team.
But in an abbreviated aside, Ohr causally revealed one communique with Simpson that indicates the Fusion GPS founder pushed another false story that unleashed multiple federal investigations into the NRA.
Comment: See also:
- The tangled web: Testimony provided by Rosenstein and Simpson contradicts Bruce Ohr's testimony
- Bruce Ohr exhibits a 'poor memory' during testimony over Trump dossier, Steele ties
- New revelation from Strzok: Parts of 'Trump dossier' provided to FBI by Bruce OhrJim Jordan: Bruce Ohr key to answers in Trump-Russia investigation - had close ties to Christopher Steele
- GOP congressman: Bruce Ohr listed 'half dozen' FBI & DOJ officials who knew about Trump dossier ties
- Why does the New York Times keep pushing the idea that Bruce Ohr is a big nobody?
That agreement was revealed in newly released congressional transcripts from Strzok's closed-door testimony at the House Judiciary Committee on June 27, 2018.
When asked by then-majority general counsel Zachary Somers if "the Clinton Foundation was on the server", Strzok testified that he believed it was "on one of the servers, if not the others." But Strzok stressed that due to an agreement between the DOJ and Clinton, they were not allowed to search Clinton Foundation emails for information that could help in their investigation.
The FBI would have been investigating Clinton's emails in 2016, when former President Barack Obama was still in office and when Clinton was running for president against then-candidate Donald Trump.
Comment: More from Zero Hedge:
"What's bizarre about this, is in any other situation, there's no possible way they would allow the potential perpetrator to self-select what the FBI gets to see," said former Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz - former chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee until 2017 and current contributor to Fox News. "The FBI should be the one to sort through those emails -- not the Clinton attorneys."
Chaffetz suggested that the goal of the DOJ was to "make sure they hear no evil, see no evil -- they had no interest in pursuing the truth."
"The Clinton Foundation isn't supposed to be communicating with the State Department anyway," said Chaffetz. "The foundation -- with her name on it -- is not supposed to be communicating with the senior officials at the State Department."Republican-led concerns that the DOJ, under the Obama administration, was too cozy with the Clinton team during the 2016 presidential campaign have grown louder in recent days. Earlier this week, Fox News exclusively reviewed an internal chart prepared by federal investigators working on the so-called "Midyear Exam" probe into Clinton's emails. The chart contained the words "NOTE: DOJ not willing to charge this" next to a key statute on the mishandling of classified information.
The notation appeared to contradict former FBI Director James Comey's repeated claims that his team made its decision that Clinton should not face criminal charges independently.
But Strzok, in his closed-door interview, denied that the DOJ exercised undue influence over the FBI, and insisted that lawyers at the DOJ were involved in an advisory capacity working with agents. - Fox News
'We lost the war in Syria. What next?' is the title of an article recently published by the brand-new online media outlet Tortoise, set up by former Times editor James Harding. The premise of the piece, written by Giles Whittell, a former chief leader writer of the Times, is that "we", ie "the West" lost and that we should all be terribly upset about it. It's a premise that needs to be challenged.
In so doing, there is no attempt to minimize or deny the fact that all sides in the conflict have much blood on their hands. In 2011, many Syrians had legitimate grievances against their government and in particular against the brutality and unaccountability of the state security services (Mukhabarat). The authorities cracked down hard on dissent, but it is also true that outside powers hostile to Syria did their very best, or rather worst, to inflame the situation. They had no interest in political compromises being made, and encouraging dialogue between government and opposition, but wanted to embroil Syria in full-scale war to suit their geopolitical agenda.
"But I gave the prime minister my ideas on how to negotiate it. And I think you would've been successful. She didn't listen to that, and that's fine. I mean, she's got to do what she's got to do. But I think it could've been negotiated in a different manner, frankly."
May's efforts to negotiate the U.K.'s exit from the European Union have faltered.

FBI Director Robert Mueller is sworn in on Capitol Hill on June 13, 2013.
Russiagate allegations that the Kremlin has a subversive hold over President Trump, and even put him in the White House, have poisoned American political life for almost three years. Among other afflictions, it has inspired an array of media malpractices, virtually criminalized anti-Cold War thinking about Russia, and distorted the priorities of the Democratic Party. And this leaves aside the woeful impact Russiagate has had in Moscow-on its policymakers' perception of the US as a reliable partner on mutually vital strategic issues and on Russian democrats who once looked to the American political system as one to be emulated, a loss of "illusions" I previously reported.

A man reacts as he speaks on a mobile phone outside a mosque in central Christchurch, New Zealand, Friday, March 15, 2019. A witness says many people have been killed in a mass shooting at a mosque in the New Zealand city of Christchurch.
The New Zealand police said four people -- three men and one woman -- were in custody in connection with the mass shooting at both places of worship in the city of Christchurch. The charged male suspect is expected to appear in court Saturday, Police Commissioner Mike Bush told reporters at a news conference. He said the principal suspect was a 28-year-old Australian-born citizen who earlier claimed responsibility for the attacks.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said none of the suspects were on any security watch lists.
"These are people who I would describe as having extremist views, that have absolutely no place in New Zealand," Ardern said.
Bush clarified that police found two improvised explosive devices in one vehicle after the shooting. One was disabled and police were working to defuse the second Friday night.
Comment: UPDATE 15/3/2019 7:43: RT summary of events:
This is what we know about the attacks so far.More background on the shooters:
- Police Commissioner Mike Bush has confirmed that 49 people have been killed, over 20 more injured.
- Children were among those with gunshot wounds admitted to hospitals.
- A man in his late 20s was charged with murder and is set to appear in court tomorrow, police said.
- Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said that a number of improvised explosives were found attached to the assailants' vehicles, but it is not clear whether they were planning a suicide attack. The explosives were then defused.
- Four suspects have been arrested; one of them has been confirmed to be an Australian national by the country's prime minister. None of them were on any security watch lists.
- PM Ardern called the tragedy "a terrorist attack" by "extremist right-wing" perpetrators, describing it as "one of New Zealand's darkest days."
- The national security threat level has been changed to "high," the PM said, adding that New Zealand was targeted because of its values, which "cannot be shaken."
- According to police, the attack was a "very well-planned event," and officers will be dispatched around mosques "to ensure nothing further occurs."
- One of the gunmen identified himself on social media as a 28-year-old Australian named Brenton Tarrant.
- Tarrant used a GoPro camera to livestream the attack on the Al Noor Mosque.
- His weapons were inscribed with references to famous European battles against Muslims and neo-Nazi slogans. One of the battles referenced is the 1683 Battle of Vienna against the Ottoman Empire.
- Tarrant posted a lengthy online 'manifesto' in which he declared his hatred toward "Muslim invaders" and cited Norwegian right-wing terrorist Anders Breivik as an inspiration.
- Shortly after the beginning of the livestream, Tarrant reportedly said "Remember lads, subscribe to Pewdiepie," referring to popular YouTube blogger Felix Kjellberg. The YouTuber responded by saying he felt "absolutely sickened having my name uttered by this person." He also offered condolences to the victims.
- The Bangladesh national cricket team was training near one of the mosques and was about to enter the building but fled when shots were heard. All players made it back safely to their hotel.
The man said to be behind the deadly New Zealand mosque shootings is an Australian who vowed to fight against 'Muslim invaders'. Inspired by a Norwegian terrorist, he livestreamed himself while shooting worshippers.UPDATE 15/03/2019 - 22:00 CET
The attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand claimed 49 lives, the police comissioner confirmed. Four people were detained in connection with the tragedy.
The man, identified himself on social media as a 28-year-old Australian named Brenton Tarrant, used a GoPro to livestream the attack on the Al Noor Mosque. The footage was promptly removed by Facebook at the request of police, but parts of it were published by local media. The POV-style video showed the gunman driving up to the mosque and taking firearms out of the trunk of his car.
The weapons contained inscriptions referencing famous European battles against Muslims and neo-Nazi slogans. One of the battles referenced is the 1683 Battle of Vienna against the Ottoman Empire.
Shortly before the attack, he published a 73-page 'manifesto' in which he vowed "revenge" against Muslim "invaders." According to reports, he also wrote that he was inspired by right-wing terrorist Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people in Norway in 2011.
He apparently picked the particular mosque to attack because a church once stood at the same place. He also mentioned a 2017 terrorist attack in Stockholm where five people died. One of them was an 11-year-old girl, who the shooter wrote he would avenge.
New Zealand PM Jacinda Ahern has announced new gun control measures after it's claimed one of the gunmen acquired his weapons in the country legally. Quite how the gunman "got a Category A firearms license in 2017" when he only arrived in New Zealand from Australia in 2019 has not yet been explained...

File photo: The stolen truck used by Rakhmat Akilov to plough into a crowd of shoppers in Stockholm, killing four and injuring 15 on April 7, 2017
The report states that violent Islamism still poses the biggest threat to Swedish national security but the threat has not grown in the past year. Adherents of the radical ideology are still plotting to carry out attacks in Sweden, however.
While the Sapo report unequivocally states it found that "no extensive influence campaigns aiming at influencing the Swedish elections," in 2018, it provided no evidence of or allusions to any attempts either.
The report mentions "around 15" foreign powers that are at least attempting to conduct espionage operations in Sweden, specifically naming Russia, Iran, and China as key figures in this regard, using data from a security survey of 100 public agencies.
One man has come forward as an organizer of the attack, saying it was perpetrated by a group of Venezuelan Army defectors and others. In an exclusive interview with CNN, he recounted how they prepared for the attack, and provided cell phone videos of their drones, explosives, and practice flights in the rural farmlands of Colombia.
"We have tried every peaceful and democratic way to bring an end to this tyranny that dresses itself as democracy," he told CNN on condition of anonymity, referring to the Maduro regime. "We have friends who are in custody, tortured. This was a hard decision."
He also acknowledged that the attack could have killed innocent civilians alongside their target. "That was the risk we had to take," he said. "We cared about that as the Venezuelan people are always the ones feeling the consequences."
The self-declared interim president of Venezuela, its opposition leader Juan Guaido, told CNN he disapproved of the attack.
"Such options are not good," he said. He added that he suspected the attack was staged. "I think this was something internal, done by the government. It ends up making them look like victims."

Rouhani’s visit to Iraq is a slap in the face to Trump
Hassan Rouhani and Barham Salih
As an aspiring journalist, it is hard to keep up with which country is at the top of Donald Trump's "to-bomb" list, given the target appears to change every week or so. Since the infamous days of his campaign trail up until the present day, the US president has held a deep animosity towards Tehran. However, the government's focus appears to shift away from the Islamic Republic periodically - one minute it's North Korea, every April since his election he also decides he briefly wants to bomb Assad in Syria, and most recently, his entire administration has raved incessantly about Venezuela.
No matter how the news cycle goes, and no matter the sort of historical death-squad arming psychopath Trump appoints as Special Envoy to Venezuela, at the end of the day the media focus inevitably continues to fall back on Iran (and with it, Donald Trump's keen and hawkish eye).
Comment: Netanyahu has made it quite clear that he won't stop till he's dragged the world into a war with Iran - because Israel isn't capable of taking Iran on alone: At Trump summit Netanyahu declares "common interest of war with Iran" sparking backlash from Tehran
- The Real Story Behind Israel's Attack on "Iranian" Targets in Syria and Trump's Abandonment of the Iran Deal
- MEK Terrorist Death Cult: Meet Washington's 'Iranian Opposition'
- Pakistan-India showdown: What you're not being told
- Iran 'gets revenge' for West's proxy terrorist attack in Ahvaz by launching missiles on ISIS in Syria
- Behind the Headlines: The Art of The Iran no-Deal: Trump, Israel, And The End of The Atlantic Alliance
- Behind the Headlines: Atlantic Trade War? How Trump Breaking Iran Deal Could Dismantle US Empire











Comment: See also: