Puppet Masters
Not sparing his words, Trump said on Saturday that he'd had a "great" and "excellent" meeting with his Russian counterpart a day earlier. He mentioned that the pair discussed trade and that he thinks the "two great countries" should work towards better economic cooperation.
Risking a further meltdown for Russiagate adherents and describing Putin in more colorful detail, Trump called him a "great guy" and a "terrific person."
For his part, Putin said the closed-door conversation was as a "good meeting, business-like, pragmatic" and said that the pair agreed that bilateral economic ties should be strengthened.
"I think we both understand that we need to somehow resolve the current situation," Putin said. Both nuclear powers, he argued, needed to "somehow find the strength to turn the page and move forward."
The military bloc's new space policy, which has just been unveiled, calls for using outer space the same way as land, sea, air or cyberspace. Not many details are known about the strategy, but a major question arises here - is the world's biggest military alliance giving itself free rein to deploy weapons into orbit, just like the leeway it permits itself when it comes to dozens of non-NATO countries?
Mikhail Khodarenok, a Russian military expert and retired air defense colonel, believes that it will take some time until NATO creates a viable space force. No country will deploy weapons in space in the short term, because "anti-satellite devices are currently under development in all of the major countries," he told RT.
However, it doesn't mean that the militarization of Earth's spheres of orbit won't ultimately come true. "The US is likely to become pioneers in this area," the expert suggested, adding that China, Russia and India will follow. "Militarization of space is inevitable in the foreseeable future."
As for NATO, it "doesn't play any independent role" in outer space, mainly because designing and sending weapons into outer space is an American prerogative. Thus, the alliance is simply following the US' suit in publishing its policy.
And remember when that oxymoronic single-currency-for-many-nations-with-distinct-monetary-policies was launched in 1999?
And remember when Goldman Sachs helped Greece cook its books so it could join the eurozone in 2001?
And remember how that blew up in the EU's face a decade later with the onset of the Greek Crisis?
And remember how the Greek Crisis triggered the EUpocalypse and brought panic to Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain?
And remember how the EU (read: Germany and France) just started calling them all PIIGS and treating them like unruly children?
Yes, like some demented game of hot potato, the ill-conceived, ill-fated scheme to mash all the economies of Europe together under one currency has left whoever is holding the bag at any given moment facing a full-blown existential crisis. Now it seems that it's Italy's turn once again in the hot seat.
Don't worry. If you're just catching this story mid-stream, here's the skinny.
The Libyan Civil War might be entering a new phase if the forces led by Libyan National Army (LNA) leader General Haftar do good on their leader's threats to attack Turkish ships and companies that he accused of helping the internationally recognized Government of National Accord (GNA), a well as to arrest Turkish citizens in the country. The popular warlord has already succeeded in capturing most of the country with the notable exception being the capital of Tripoli, which has only held out as long as it has supposedly because of Turkish support.
The Libyan Civil War was directly caused by NATO's 2011 War on Libya and the subsequent scramble for influence in the energy-rich and geostrategically positioned North African state, with Turkey playing a leading role in the latter because the de-facto Muslim Brotherhood-led country envisions restoring its Ottoman-era empire through the establishment of ideologically allied governments in this vast trans-continental space. The GNA is comprised of Muslim Brotherhood fighters and their offshoots who came to power after 2011, which is why Erdogan supports them so strongly and has a stake in their continued leadership of the country, something that Haftar is adamantly opposed to because he sees his countrymen's collaboration with Turkey as treasonous.

Palestinians in Gaza City hold banners on June 25, 2019, denouncing the U.S.-led Peace to Prosperity conference in Bahrain.
Let me make it clear at the outset that I am a fan of imagining the future. During the Clinton Administration my mantra with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian process was that what was needed was "a vision of the future that was so compelling people would be drawn to it." Back then, there was still the hope that a political solution could be found leading to an independent Palestinian state in the territories that Israel had occupied in 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
It was such a vision that led Yasser Arafat to imagine, that with independence, Gaza could become like Singapore. With peace and freedom, Palestinians could connect the West Bank to Gaza. They could build a seaport and airport, attract investment, start businesses and become a commercial hub and a tourist destination.
Comment: Unfortunately, Dr. Zogby's hope is based on the laughable idea that Israel would abide by any agreement it is party to. Who will police them and make sure that Palestinian's potential economic development is not strangled any more than it already is? Certainly not the US.
- 'Made in Palestine' market choked by Fascist Israel
- UN report - Without Zionist occupation, Palestinian economy would double
- Airbnb prevents Palestinian hosts from listing homes in occupied West Bank
- What does the future hold for Gaza under an unsustainable Israeli blockade?
- Gaza's hospitals fall victim to power outages and shortages due to Israel's decade long blockade (VIDEO)
- Gaza will be uninhabitable in less than 5 years - UN report
"Iraq expresses its condemnation for the two Turkish warplanes that have heavily bombarded the Sulaymaniyah Governorate, resulting in the deaths of four citizens and wounding of four others and the intimidation of innocent civilians," the statement said.
According to the statement, Turkish attacks violated Iraqi sovereignty and the principle of good neighbourliness. Baghdad urged the Turkish side to stop bombings on the country's territory.
At the same time, the press service of the Turkish military said later in the day, that the country's air forces did not carry out any military operations in Sulaymaniyah province.
"We did not conduct operations in Sulaymaniyah, we publish data on all operations that we conduct," the press service said.
Sound far fetched? You're not alone.
A primary patent examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) thought so too. But then the Chief Technical Officer (CTO) of the Naval Aviation Enterprise personally wrote a letter addressed to the examiner claiming that the U.S. needs the patent as the Chinese are already "investing significantly" in these aerospace technologies that sound eerily similar to the UFOs reported by Navy pilots in now well-known encounters. This raises the question, are the Chinese developing or even already flying craft leveraging similar advanced technology and is the Navy now scrambling to catch up?
The Wondrous Inventions Of Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais
Comment: See also:
- Navy source reveals that UFO sightings were 'daily occurrence' across multiple squadrons in 2014-15
- US senators receive classified briefing on UFO sightings
- Russia and China create joint data center, sign agreement to cooperate on lunar and deep space research
- Russia develops electromagnetic weapons which could 'neutralize entire armies'
- Putin details why Russia's military tech changes balance of power
China has agreed to purchase "large amounts of agricultural product from our great Farmers" in return for his concessions on Huawei, the US president said, admitting that American big tech was lobbying for the lifting of the ban.
"At the request of our High Tech companies, and President Xi, I agreed to allow Chinese company Huawei to buy product from them which will not impact our National Security."
Comment: Trump has had to make some concessions because the US has been suffering the worst of the trade war:
- Are Rare Earth Metals China's Ultimate Weapon?
- IMF says Trump's trade war with China will not reduce US trade deficit
- China rejects US 'sanctions' on Iranian oil, vows to protect its energy security
- US chipmakers quietly lobby to ease Huawei ban
- Huawei seeks more than $1 billion from Verizon for over 230 patents
According to a story on ZDNet, the deal was signed on Wednesday June 26 in Brussels, Belgium, where NATO defense ministers met this week.
It is thought to be the first time that two countries have integrated parts of their military networks. But it must be noted that the nations have worked very closely together since 1995, so this latest deal builds upon that.
Integration is a grand aim of NATO, but it has not yet happened despite the availability of the technology to do so. This latest move will therefore be a test that will be watched closely by other NATO members. In the future, NATO hopes that members can share military networks and shared standards can be implemented across states.
"The outcomes are always good whenever President Trump meets world leaders, be it Putin, Xi Jinping or North Korean [Kim Jong-un]," political analyst Andre Vltchek commented, speaking on the outcome of the high-profile gathering in Osaka but noting that, in a week or a month, Trump could wake up and tweet something on Venezuela, North Korea that completely contradicts his earlier words.
"There was a lot of theatrics going on" at the G20, Paul Ingram, executive director of the British American Security Information Council, pointed out.
Donald Trump was saying a lot of things that were clearly designed to make the headlines. But what's really going on underneath here is anybody's guess.














Comment: From FRN: Trump says there MUST be trade between Russia and US From RFE/RL: Putin: US-Russia to resume nuclear arms talks