Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 29 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Heart - Black

Blaming the victim: Congressman says Eric Garner's death is his own fault for being fat

Congressman Peter King (R-NY) appeared on CNN on Wednesday night as determined protestors filled the streets of NYC and cities across America to take a stand against the police killing innocent people with impunity.

The Congressman disrespectfully and coldly blamed the unarmed man's death on his weight.

He said "If he had not had asthma, and a heart condition, and was so obese, he would not have died from this."

An article from Think Progress says the congressman, "delivered an extended defense of the police killing of Eric Garner. King said that the officer, who employed an illegal chokehold to bring Garner down, was just doing his job. Ultimately, King pins says Garner was actually responsible for his own death."

Pistol

SOTT EXCLUSIVE: Anti-terror operation in Chechnya: 9 militants dead, 10 police

press house
© RIA Novosti/Said Tsarnaev
The Press House in Grozny, where law enforcement of the Chechen Republic conducted counter-terrorist operation.
Just two days after Putin's announcement of the cancellation of the South Stream project and the beefed up relations with Turkey that will replace what could have been a very good thing for Europe, Chechnya's capital, Grozny, was the site of an encounter between police and members of one of the country's major terrorist groups. The terrorists were traveling in three cars when they were stopped at a checkpoint outside Grozny just after midnight. They opened fire, killing the police, then entered the city and occupied the Press House building in the city center (and possibly others - the video footage and photos show more than one on fire).

Chechen special forces were then called in, who surrounded the occupied building(s) and killed the 10 militants. In all, Chechen authorities are reporting 10 police killed and 28 wounded in the operation.


Newspaper

Finally some American media print the truth about Washington's and NATO's involvement in Ukraine!


Comment: We too gloat along with Patrick Smith, though he fails to mention the work of SOTT.net, which from the very beginning of the U.S./NATO coup d'état in Ukraine, saw what was going on and continually spelled it out.



NATO was the aggressor and got Ukraine wrong. Many months later, the media has eventually figured out the truth

Putin
© AP/Mark Lennihan/Photo montage by Salon
Well, well, well. Gloating is unseemly, especially in public, but give me this one, will you?

It has been a long and lonely winter defending the true version of events in Ukraine, but here comes the sun. We now have open acknowledgment in high places that Washington is indeed responsible for this mess, the prime mover, the "aggressor," and finally this term is applied where it belongs. NATO, once again, is revealed as causing vastly more trouble than it has ever prevented.

Washington, it is now openly stated, has been wrong, wrong, wrong all along. The commentaries to be noted do not take on the media, but I will, and in language I use advisedly. With a few exceptions they are proven liars, liars, liars - not only conveying the official version of events but willfully elaborating on it off their own bats.

Memo to the New York Times' Moscow bureau: Vicky Nuland, infamous now for desiring sex with the European Union, has just FedExed little gold stars you can affix to your foreheads, one for each of you. Wear them with pride for you will surely fight another day, having learned nothing, and ignore all ridicule. If it gets too embarrassing, tell people they have something to do with the holidays.

O.K., gloat concluded. To the business at hand.

We have had, in the last little while, significant analyses of the Ukraine crisis, each employing that method the State Department finds deadly: historical perspective. In a lengthy interview with Der Spiegel, the German newsmagazine, none other than Henry Kissinger takes Washington carefully but mercilessly to task. "Does one achieve a world order through chaos or through insight?" Dr. K. asks.

Comment: As SOTT.net's Harrison Koehli speculated recently:
So what's going on here? Are some in the Western elite starting to see that they're fighting an unwinnable fight against Putin? For a war criminal psychopath like Henry Kissinger to come out and say something that approaches being more than 50% truth, something's gotta be up. Or have Plans A (goad Russia into open military conflict) and B (bring Russia to its knees economically and try to brew up internal dissent among Russia's fifth column) failed, and the Western pathocrats are merely regrouping and coming up with Plan C?



Bad Guys

More reasons to manipulate the oil market - Western leverage over Iran during nuclear talks

Image
© Associated Press / Ronald Zak
Iran’s Bijan Namdar Zangeneh, Minister of Petroleum, speaks to journalists prior to a meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, OPEC, at their headquarters in Vienna, Austria, on June 11, 2014.
A wild card in the seven months of extended negotiations between the U.S. and Iran over its nuclear program is the continuing plunge in global oil prices and its impact on Tehran's finances.

U.S. and European officials said they had a growing sense earlier this year that Tehran and its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei believed they were weathering the West's international sanctions - despite the halving of Iranian oil exports since 2012, largely driven by a European embargo.

Under an interim agreement reached with the West a year ago, Iran has been receiving $700 million in monthly payments from oil revenues frozen in overseas accounts.

Comment: For a better perspective of these talks, check out P5 + 1 meetings in Vienna over Iran's nukes: Much ado about nothing:
Naturally, Iran wants to reach a deal by the deadline, not wishing to prolong negotiations. After all, it has been on the receiving end of the U.S. and Israel's stupidity-cudgel for over 10 years. Just where do the accusations come from that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, anyway?

The original evidence, passed on to the IAEA by the U.S., was ignored on account of its obviously dubious nature and provenance. It was only after two documents 'came to light' that the anti-Iran campaign went into high gear, despite the fact that a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran had stopped weapons research in 2003 and by 2008, had resolved all concerns brought up by the IAEA as regards its nuclear program. Those two documents were subsequently exposed as having been forged by the Israelis. The cold, hard reality here is that there has never been ANY conclusive evidence that Iran has sought to develop a nuclear weapon, as investigative journalist Gareth Porter makes clear in his book Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare.



Bad Guys

SOTT EXCLUSIVE: U.S. jumping for joy over South Stream pipeline closure

Image
© AP Photo/ Gerry Broome
Shouldn't he be dead by now? John McCain.
Anyone who takes the time to fully understand the reasons why Russia cancelled the South Stream pipeline project and then listens to the US response to the news can only conclude that the US government has lost all touch with reality.

US National Security Adviser Susan Rice said on Tuesday:
"The news that Russia has pulled back from its South Stream pipeline to southern Europe... is indicative of the mounting cost that Russia is paying for its behavior," Rice said. "As a result, a major project, which had been championed by Putin and the Russian government, is now not likely to materialize."

"When you look at where the Russian economy is, it has suffered over the last year substantially as a result of sanctions and also as a result of declining oil prices and the combination is pretty powerful."
President Obama also crowed on Wednesday:
[Obama] doubted Russian President Vladimir Putin will change course until politics catch up with the rough economic situation in Russia.

Obama said Putin has promoted a nationalist, backward-looking approach to Russian policy that scares neighbors and hurts Moscow's economy.
Have mercy! The only way Obama and Rice could have come up with that conclusion is if they were somehow mistaking themselves for Putin and US foreign policy for Russian foreign policy. We can almost hear these two earnestly tell the EU: "Don't worry this is going to hurt Russia more than it will hurt you. So man up!" Meanwhile, EU bureaucrats must be 'sweating bricks' at the projected loss of billions for EU economies as a result of the death of South Stream. But what can they do? It is almost certain that they are being blackmailed by the USA, courtesy of the NSA and its pathological voyeurism. This isn't going to end well.

Comment: EU losers! Russia scraps South Stream pipeline project, announces major alternative gas deal - Did Putin just poach Turkey?


Light Saber

Putin's counterpunch to EU: Exit South Stream, enter Turk Stream

Putin-Erdogan
© RIA Novosti/Sergey Guneev
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the concluding news conference in Ankara.
So the EU "defeated" Putin by forcing him to cancel the South Stream pipeline. Thus ruled Western corporate media. Nonsense. Facts on the ground spell otherwise.

This "Pipelineistan" gambit will continue to send massive geopolitical shockwaves all across Eurasia for quite some time. In a nutshell, a few years ago Russia devised Nord Stream - fully operational - and South Stream - still a project - to bypass unreliable Ukraine as a gas transit nation. Now Russia devised a new deal with Turkey to bypass the "non-constructive" (Putin's words) approach of the European Commission (EC).

Background is essential to understand the current game. Five years ago I was following in detail Pipelineistan's ultimate opera - the war between rival pipelines South Stream and Nabucco. Nabucco eventually became road kill. South Stream may eventually resurrect, but only if the EC comes to its senses (don't bet on it.)

Comment: No matter how many times these psychopathic EU leaders shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., with their sanctions on Russia), they fail to realize their mistake. It's the citizens of these nations who pay for it. All because they bought the lies told by their leaders. Or perhaps they do realize, and their leaders just don't care what they think.


Quenelle

Hungary stands up to US: Summons US ambassador over John McCain's "neo-fascist" comment

John McCain
© Screenshot
John McCain
Hungary's Foreign Ministry on Wednesday summoned the U.S. ambassador in Hungary over comments made by U.S. Senator John McCain on Tuesday, calling Prime Minister Viktor Orban a "neo-fascist dictator."

The ministry called in Chargé d'Affaires André Goodfriend over McCain's comments, in which the Arizona Republican called on his Senate colleagues to block the approval of the new Ambassador to Hungary, Hollywood producer Colleen Bell.

Comment: Hungary is part of EU and a NATO member. EU was concerned about Hungary's drift towards Russia. So it's not a surprise to see war-mongering mad dog John McCain barking at Hungary at the behest of the American empire.

Viktor Orban said regarding his priorities:
"The question is not which side Hungary should take but what the Hungarian interest is," Orban told ethnic Hungarian leaders last week. "Peace, energy security and opportunities for commerce. These are what we have to accomplish."
It's not new for the fascist American empire to brand anybody who looks after their own interests, instead of following the empire's orders, or who allies with anybody who defies them as "neo-fascists".

John McCain may be an old fool, but his words generally translate into actions because he is aligned with the most powerful faction in the US. Everywhere he intervenes turns into ask: Egypt, Libya, Ukraine, Bulgaria (he delivered the message in June that Bulgaria was not to participate in the South Stream gas pipeline project), and now Hungary.




Light Sabers

Jon Stewart and Larry Wilmore on "Don't shoot, Hands up" and racism

 Jon Stewart
© YouTube
'Daily Show' host Jon Stewart on June 24, 2014
Daily Show host Jon Stewart and correspondent Larry Wilmore rebuked conservatives on Tuesday for harping on crime statistics in response to the Ferguson demonstrations.

"What would you say to those people?" Stewart asked Wilmore, who will debut as host of the Nightly Show next month.

"I would say they can go f*ck themselves, Jon," Wilmore said. "First of all, can we quit calling it 'Black-on-Black' crime? It's just crime, ok? I mean, 'Black-on-Black' just makes it sound like a category on Redtube."

The conversation about "Black-on-Black" crime, Wilmore argued, is already happening within Black communities.

Comment: Truth from a comedian. Sadly, they're often the best place to look: George Carlin, Bill Hicks... Maybe that's because it really takes a sense of humor to understand the total absurdity of modern civilization.


War Whore

Human Rights Watch: Kiev failed to probe cluster bomb use against Donbass civilians - should invite ICC investigation

Image
© RIA Novosti/Alexey Kudenko
A local resident outside his house destroyed in the Ukrainian army's artillery attack in Donetsk's Oktyabrsky district.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) says Kiev has failed to investigate its army's use of prohibited cluster bombs against civilians in the country's east. It also recommends Kiev invite the International Criminal Court to investigate.

The human rights watchdog is dissatisfied with the investigation conducted by the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office into the use of cluster bombs by the Ukrainian armed forces in the east of the country, Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth told a media briefing in Kiev on Wednesday.

"Instead of analyzing physical evidence," Ukraine's Prosecutor General looked into the"presence of weapons in depots," and said they were not taken anywhere, said Roth.

He explained the watchdog had appealed to Ukraine's Military Prosecutor's Office regarding the use of cluster bombs and Grad multiple rocket launchers by Kiev's military in residential areas. In turn, the prosecutor appealed to the Ministry of Defense. Therefore he said "it's no surprise" the ministry did not find any violations by Kiev's military. In addition, the inspection did not check cluster bombs, but mines, he added.
Image
© RIA Novosti/Mikhail Voxresenskiy
Fragments of cluster munitions used by the Ukrainian military to shell the town of Gorlovka, the Donetsk region.
The HRW is not satisfied with this kind of investigation, he stressed.

Human Rights Watch found out during its own investigation that cluster bombs were used by pro-government forces in residential areas in eastern Ukraine, Roth said.

The area affected by the cluster bombs has a distinctive appearance, so the watchdog can say for sure that it was used in the area, Roth added. In addition, during talks with the defense ministry officials they didn't deny the "possibility" of the use of imprecise weaponry, however rejected the evidence provided by HWR, he said.

Comment: Considering that the ICC is useless, HRW requesting an investigation is an empty gesture.


Cult

Russian bears and Byzantium: Misreading Russian grand strategy

Russian aid convoy
© Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
A Russian convoy of trucks carrying humanitarian aid for Ukraine is parked at a camp near Kamensk-Shakhtinsky, Rostov Region, Aug. 16, 2014.
Common complaints within Intelligence Studies about the examination of foreign intelligence communities, especially those not residing in the west, run the gamut from being too historically driven to being completely ahistorical and thus nothing more than a simple organizational review of facts and details to being too often inevitably compared against a standard framework that uses either the United States or the United Kingdom as the backdrop. While these analyses are all important, they have failed to look at how the competing conceptualizations of culture within the discipline engender entirely different approaches and therefore radically different conclusions about how we view and evaluate said communities. Below is a 'case glance' of the phenomenon utilizing the Russian Federation. Perhaps most interesting and fairly unexpected is how in terms of security affairs American understanding about Russia seems to be hurt more analytically by grand strategic culture and is often never analyzed from a perspective that emphasizes contemporary reality, purpose-based objectives and actual organizational functionality.

Comment: In other words, American analysts are seeing exactly what they want to see regarding Russia while screening out the realities of contemporary Russia's words and actions. When American foreign policy regarding Russia is built on illusions, the result can only be disastrous, as we are witnessing in real time. Worse, the main effects are being visited on others (the EU and EU aspirants). The architects of these policies have yet to really suffer the consequences of their blindness.