Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Rocket

Syrian Army to reduce airstrikes on terrorists to assist civilians leaving besieged territory

Aleppo
© Sputnik/ Michael Alaeddin
The Syrian army will reduce airstrikes and shelling in eastern Aleppo to allow the civilians to leave the besieged territory, the general command said in a statement Wednesday.

Aleppo has seen intense fighting over the past few months, with the Syrian army and local militia forces managing to encircle large groups of militants in the eastern districts of the city. "The command of the army made a decision to reduce the number of air forces and artillery strikes against the positions of terrorists to help the civilians who wish to leave for safer regions," the statement said, as quoted by the SANA news agency

Comment: Over the past few weeks, the West been ramping up their propaganda by depicting both Russia and the Syrian Army as intentionally targeting civilians. Not only is the reverse true (that it is actually the US and their terrorist proxies targeting civilians), but it is clear that the Syrian Army and Russia are doing all they can to keep the people of Syria from harm.


Chess

Russia politely lets Pentagon know it has deployed missile air defense systems all over Syria

s-300 syria

From Russia with love
Russia's Defense Ministry has cautioned the US-led coalition of carrying out airstrikes on Syrian army positions, adding in Syria there are numerous S-300 and S-400 air defense systems up and running.


Comment: Eh... if they're saying what we think they're saying, then the announcement earlier this week that just one S-300 system had only just arrived in Syria was a decoy... the Russians apparently have lots more of them stationed elsewhere in the country.


Russia currently has S-400 and S-300 air-defense systems deployed to protect its troops stationed at the Tartus naval supply base and the Khmeimim airbase. The radius of the weapons reach may be "a surprise" to all unidentified flying objects, Russian Defense Ministry spokesperson General Igor Konashenkov said.

According to the Russian Defense Ministry, any airstrike or missile hitting targets in territory controlled by the Syrian government would put Russian personnel in danger.

The defense official said that members of the Russian Reconciliation Center in Syria are working "on the ground" delivering aid and communicating with a large number of communities in Syria.


Comment: Konashenkov also pointed out:
Konashenkov also pointedly reminded the US that the Syrian military itself possesses S-200 and BUK surface to air missile systems supplied by Russia. Though the S-200 system is now old (it dates back to the 1960s) Konashenkov warned that it had been thoroughly updated and therefore also presents a threat to US missiles and aircraft.

Konashenkov's statement incidentally confirms that the decision to deploy S-300VM Antey-2500 systems to Syria was taken in response to the US air attack on the Syrian military defending Deir Ezzor.

The systems were apparently delivered to Syria by sea rather than air, so the decision to deploy them was made too early to have been influenced by the latest threats coming from Washington. This is consistent with Konashenkov's claim that they were deployed in response to the US attack on the Syrian military defending Deir Ezzor.

The fact the Russians decided to deploy these systems in response to this attack incidentally shows that the Russians do not believe the US explanation that this attack was a mistake.

Though the deployment of S-300VM Antey-2500 systems to Syria was not made in response to the latest threats from Washington, Konashenkov's warning shows that it has happened at what the Russians must think is an opportune time.
The US has essentially just been checkmated. It's all out of options to 'regime change' Syria.

See also: Russia Checkmates US in Syria: Expect More Terrorism, Not Nuclear War


USA

Truly, this is not about Trump: The age of decline, apple pie and America's chosen suicide bomber

Donald Trump
© Brian Snyder/Corbis
This is not about Donald Trump. And I mean it.

From the moment the first scribe etched a paean of praise to Nebuchadnezzar into a stone tablet, it's reasonable to conclude that never in history has the media covered a single human being as it has Donald Trump. For more than a year now, unless a terror attack roiled American life, he's been the news cycle, essentially the only one, morning, noon, and night, day after day, week after week, month after month. His every word, phrase, move, insult, passing comment, off-the-cuff remark, claim, boast, brazen lie, shout, or shout-out has been ours as well.

In this period, he's praised his secret plan to destroy ISIS and take Iraqi oil. He's thumped that "big, fat, beautiful wall" again and again. He's birthered a campaign that could indeed transport him, improbably enough, into the Oval Office. He's fought it out with 17 political rivals, among others, including "lyin' Ted," "low-energy Jeb," Carly ("Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?") Fiorini, "crooked Hillary," a Miss Universe ("Miss Piggy"), the "highly overrated" Megyn Kelly's menstrual cycle ("You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever"), always Rosie O'Donnell ("a slob [with] a fat, ugly face"), and so many others.

He's made veiled assassination threats; lauded the desire to punch someone in the face; talked about shooting "somebody" in "the middle of Fifth Avenue"; defended the size of his hands and his you-know-what; retweeted neo-Nazis and a quote from Mussolini; denounced the outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs and products while outsourcing his own jobs and products; excoriated immigrants and foreign labor while hiring the same; advertised the Trump brand in every way imaginable; had a bromance with Vladimir Putin; threatened to let nuclear weapons proliferate; complained bitterly about a rigged election, rigged debates, a rigged moderator, and a rigged microphone; swore that he and he alone was capable of again making America, and so the world, a place of the sort of greatness only he himself could match, and that's just to begin a list on the subject of The Donald.

Flashlight

According to 'sources', Trump reportedly unhappy with Pence's VP debate win

Mike Pence
© Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
Republican U.S. vice presidential nominee Governor Mike Pence.

Comment: These sources are unnamed and don't specify whose campaign the sources are close to. In a way, this flaw is reporting is the opposite of an ad hominem attack; the claims are true because some 'authority' believes it.


Although Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has praised his vice presidential pick Mike Pence's debate performance on Twitter, sources close to the campaign say Trump is upset the Indiana governor upstaged him and threw him under the bus.

Conventional wisdom says that Pence won the vice presidential debate over Democrat Tim Kaine on Tuesday night. Pence's background as a talk radio host appeared to help his cause, while the senator from Virginia came across as the attack dog defense attorney he once was.

Pence scored his victory, however, by not only declining to defend Trump's offensive statements, but denying that the billionaire businessman hadn't said the things he's been recorded as saying.

Instead, the Indiana governor "spent most of the debate defending a Trump that doesn't exist," the Washington Post's Amber Phillips wrote, while National Review Executive Editor Rich Lowry said: "Pence evidently decided to pretend that he is on a ticket with an utterly conventional Republican... [and his] sidestepping of Trump is the big asterisk on his night."

On Twitter, Trump supported his VP, saying that Pence did "a great job" and that he "won big." Of the nearly 50 messages about the debate that Trump tweeted or retweeted, only three appear to have been written by Trump about Pence's performance. The rest were either written by others or were attacks on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton or Kaine.

Newspaper

Hypocritical double standard: NYT suddenly embraces international law to condemn Russia

New York Times propaganda rag
© Russia Insider
As the Syrian Arab Army dug in for a fight against the self-declared Islamic State on September 17, they were struck by an air raid that killed 62 soldiers and injured 100 more. The culprit was a foreign military that has never been attacked by, and has not declared war on, Syria. Two weeks later, that same nation's military killed 22 soldiers in a strike inside Somalia, another country which it had never been attacked by nor declared war on. The very next day the New York Times published a stinging editorial decrying flagrant violations of international law by an "outlaw nation."

The Times, of course, was not referring to the perpetrator of both attacks: the United States government. Each act was a clear violation of Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter prohibiting the use of force against another nation and demanding respect for its sovereignty. But the "supreme international crime" of aggression did not merit mention in the Times, who saw something far more sinister than carrying out illegal massacres across countries and continents in the actions of "Vladimir Putin's Outlaw State."

Russia, according to the Times' righteous defenders of international law, is guilty of violating "not only the rules intended to promote peace instead of conflict, but also common human decency." The editorial board finds not only disregard for the law, but the absence of standard ethics accepted by civilized people and societies. It is a pretentious way of saying that Russia's leaders are sociopathic, lacking the humanism and benevolence of Americans and their allies.

Comment: The New York Times is consistent at ignoring history and facts: The New York Times has totally lost the plot on Russia. And rarely gets it right: New York Times op-ed: The Russians are not to be feared


Wolf

Suspect arrested in Cardiff carrying USB disguised as cufflink - contained ISIS terrorist plans

isis
© AFP
A Cardiff man has been charged with six terrorism-related offenses, including concealing plans for a terrorist attack on a USB stick disguised as a cufflink.

Samata Ullah, a computer technician from Grangetown, a suburb of the Welsh capital, stands accused of supporting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).

The 33-year-old, who has also been charged with the possession of written materials on guided missiles for "a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of terrorism," will appear at Westminster Magistrate's Court on Wednesday.

Ullah was arrested last month following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police counter terrorism command with support from the Welsh extremism and counterterrorism unit.

His alleged offenses took place between December 31, 2015 and September 22, 2016.

Dollars

Clinton Foundation suddenly decides to file three years of taxes

clintons
© Samantha Sais / Reuters
The Clinton Foundation refiled three years of tax forms after it emerged that the charity failed to disclose all of its donors.

Both the Foundation's Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) and Clinton Healthcare Access Initiative (CHAI) re-filed financial statements on Tuesday. Foundation officials told CNN that the charity may not have filed "certain supplementary financial information" for three years. The large charity has 10 offshoots, the largest of which is CHAI, which files its own financial statements in New York.

The news comes a day after New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman ordered the Trump Foundation to cease soliciting donations as it had failed to register as a charity, which followed revelations that Donald Trump may have avoided paying taxes for up to 18 years.

While Clinton was quick to blast her rival on his tax returns, Republicans are likely to jump on her foundation's own apparent tax omissions.

"It has come to our attention that the copies of the Clinton Foundation's consolidated audit reports filed with the Charities Bureau from 2012-2014 may not have included certain supplementary financial information related to affiliates of the Foundation,"said foundation officials.

Missing from the filings are details of foreign donors to these affiliate arms of the foundation.

Comment: Considering Killary's own non-profit didn't file taxes for three years, it was rather hypocritical of her to criticize Trump during the first presidential debate for his refusal (so far) to release his filed tax returns.


Bell

White Helmets Campaign for War NOT Peace - RLA & Nobel Peace Prize Nomination should be Retracted

white helmets
© 21st Century Wire
The awakened world is still reeling in shock from the Right Livelihood Award being given to the US and NATO state construct, the White Helmets. The White Helmets have been proven to be no more than a support network for Al Nusra Front and associated extremist terrorist groups. In many documented instances, the White Helmets are more than a support group and have been accused of carrying out criminal acts alongside the recognised US coalition armed and funded terrorist factions. Ultimately, the White Helmets contravene all international laws regulating the behaviour of a proclaimed humanitarian NGO.

Bad Guys

Top Washington officials discuss bombing Syria in order to protect al Qaeda

pentágono al-qaeda
Top Washington officials are discussing striking positions of the Syrian military without a UN Security Council resolution. Bombing air force runways with missiles fired from coalition planes and ships is being considered.

Barack Obama holds the keys to World War Three in his hands.

Top Washington Officials, the Clinton Campaign, and main stream media (including The Washington Post and New York Times) have thrown their full support behind Al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria, in an effort to not have the last terrorist strong hold of East Aleppo be liberated by the internationally recognized Syrian government.

The WaPo is talking about Russian war crimes. Talk about a parallel universe. Russia, the country that has been invited legally under international law, is being accused of war crimes because it is fighting to liberate Aleppo from Al Qaeda and ISIS control...while the uninvited (in Syria illegally) United States, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey fight to keep Al Qaeda alive.

Comment: Further reading: Al-Qaeda good or bad? U.S. is dead-set against fighting al-Qaeda in Syria - wants it safe and strengthened


Eye 1

World War III is growing in Syria

bomba nuclear
© Google
The Syrian war is a world conflict involving all the Great Powers and all the ideologies of the modern world.

Whilst many are eerily forecasting the possibility of a Third World War which would begin in Syria, there is another question that ought to be asked.

Has the Third World War already begun there?

Syria is the crucible in which all of the major world powers are fighting and each is fighting for a specific ideology in addition to the more utilitarian matters of control over territory and the economic enrichment which this implies.

Comment: Further reading: Battle of Armageddon: Will it come on Obama's or Clinton's watch?