© www.whydontyoutrythis.com
This is about distance, and detachment, and a kind of
historic decoupling between the top and the bottom in the West that did not, in more moderate recent times, exist.
Recently I spoke with an acquaintance of
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and the conversation quickly turned, as conversations about Ms. Merkel now always do, to
her decisions on immigration. Last summer when Europe was engulfed with increasing waves of migrants and refugees from Muslim countries, Ms. Merkel, moving unilaterally, announced that Germany would take in an astounding 800,000. Naturally this was taken as an invitation, and more than a million came.
The result has been widespread public furor over crime, cultural dissimilation and fears of terrorism. From such a sturdy, grounded character as Ms. Merkel the decision was puzzling—uncharacteristically romantic about people, how they live their lives, and history itself, which is more charnel house than settlement house.
Ms. Merkel's acquaintance sighed and agreed. It's one thing to be
overwhelmed by an unexpected force, quite another to invite your invaders in! But, the acquaintance said, he believed the
chancellor was operating in pursuit of ideals. As the daughter of a Lutheran minister, someone who grew up in East Germany, Ms. Merkel would have natural sympathy for those who feel marginalized and displaced. Moreover she is attempting to provide a kind of
counter-statement, in the 21st century, to Germany's great sin of the 20th. The historical stain of Nazism, the murder and abuse of the minority, will be followed by the moral triumph of open arms toward the dispossessed. That's what's driving it, said the acquaintance.
It was as good an explanation as I'd heard. But there was a fundamental problem with the decision that you can see rippling now throughout the West. Ms.
Merkel had put the entire burden of a huge cultural change not on herself and those like her but on regular people who live closer to the edge, who do not have the resources to meet the burden, who have no particular protection or money or connections.
Ms. Merkel, her cabinet and government, the media and cultural apparatus that lauded her decision were not in the least affected by it and likely never would be.
Comment: It appears that Ukraine is now resorting to terrorism against Crimea (and thus Russia), despite the fact that nearly 97% of Crimeans voted to leave Ukraine, and over two years after they reunited with Russia. Perhaps the leaders of Ukraine have decided that they aren't flushing their country down the toilet fast enough and are hoping to speed up the process by murdering innocent civilians in a country whose patience for Ukraine's tactics is likely wearing very thin.