• Indispensable or obsolete? Reheated Cold War rhetoric can't patch fractured NATO that lacks sense of purpose & vision for future
• Senior NATO general: Aspects of NATO 'obsolete,' adaptation needed
• Trump calls out NATO: Warns member states to pay up, stop whining about Russia, and start fighting terror
• Stratfor founder: NATO foundations have crumbled, an anachronism with no military or mission
• NATO bends to Trump's will, Secretary General says his message is 'having an impact'

Last week, it was reported that Google plans to stop advertisers from using voter data to create targeted ads. Data such as public voter records and political affiliations will be off-limits to advertisers during the election campaign.

"We're limiting election ads audience targeting to the following general categories: age, gender, and general location (postal code level)," said a Google spokesman. "Political advertisers can, of course, continue to do contextual targeting, such as serving ads to people reading or watching a story about, say, the economy."

In a tweet, Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale said Google's "arbitrary" rule change will "lead directly to suppressing voter turnout." He also shared a statement from the Trump campaign, the RNC, the NRSC, and the NRCC, which declared a similar position.

"There can be no denying that President Trump and his campaign have built the greatest digital operation in all of politics, and that Google's decision will disproportionately impact both the Trump operation and all of the Republican candidates and organizations that derive strength from it," said the statement.

"What's more, given the growing and documented cases of anti-conservative bias in Silicon Valley, we are highly skeptical that such a ban would be applied equally to conservative and liberal organizations."

"Google has made an extraordinarily poor decision which will lead to less-informed voters, lower voter engagement, and voter suppression," concluded the statement, which called on Google to "immediately reverse its decision."

Read the full statement here.

• Made in Russia: Kremlin wants to replace foreign tech with their own
• Russian tech giant dumps SWIFT in favor of domestic alternative
• Huawei looks to Russian technology to replace Google's Android, testing under way
• '5G now America-free': China's Huawei assembles latest phones without US parts
• Huawei slams US for trying to hack its systems, recruit spies & bully employees
• Huawei threatens to pull its communications infrastructure out of hostile Western countries
• Huawei, Tech War and Geopolitics

Having personally witnessed brutal clashes and spoken to key figures on both sides of the barricades, RT America's Michele Greenstein paints a comprehensive picture of the protest's origins and handlers.

The market area is on Hebron's once-bustling Shuhada Street, the Old City's main commercial artery. It has been shut down by the Israeli army since 1994, forcing many businesses to close.

Hebron Mayor Taysir Abu Sneineh warned that the "dangerous" decision by the defence ministry would lead to escalations in the "entire region", Wafa news agency said.

Hebron, the largest city in the West Bank, was divided into two areas and forms of control in 1997 - H1 and H2.

With some 200,000 Palestinians living in the area, H1 is under the control of the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority. Some 33,000 Palestinians reside in H2, alongside several hundred Jewish settlers who live under Israeli civil law.

In the H2 area, Palestinians live under Israeli military control, with their freedom of movement heavily restricted due to the presence of checkpoints and the imposition of curfews.

The Bennett plan, he wrote on Twitter, "is the first tangible result of the US decision to legitimise colonisation".

Sunday's statement said the planned new building project would "double the number of Jewish residents in the city".