Puppet Masters
Speaking to reporters from TIME and three of Europe's leading publications, the President explained that, despite getting caught up in the impeachment inquiry now unfolding in Washington, D.C., Ukraine still needs the support of the United States.
Otherwise his country does not stand much of a chance, Zelensky said, in its effort to get back the territory Russia seized from Ukraine in 2014, starting with the Crimean Peninsula. Nor can Ukraine rely on steady financial support from abroad if President Donald Trump and his allies continue to signal to the world that Ukraine is corrupt, Zelensky said. "When America says, for instance, that Ukraine is a corrupt country, that is the hardest of signals."
During the interview in his office in Kyiv, the comedian-turned-president denied, as he has done in the past, that he and Trump ever discussed a decision to withhold American aid to Ukraine for nearly two months in the context of a quid pro quo involving political favors, which are now at the center of the impeachment inquiry in Congress.
Ironically, what comes across in the interview is her desire to shift the narrative from the mountain of evidence that exposed her anti-Trump hate during the bureau's Russia investigation. Page, along with other former senior Obama officials, are doing everything in their power to shift the narrative before DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report goes public on Dec. 9.
Page is hoping the American public has a short term memory. After all, so much has happened since her text messages with her former lover, now fired FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok were released to the public by Congress and the IG.

A Titan Missile shown from above at the Titan II Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) site in Arizona, decommissioned in 1982.
"As recently as, like, two weeks ago, Russia wants to make a deal very much on arms control and nuclear. And that's smart. And so do we. We think it would be a good thing. Russia wants to do something badly and so do we. It would be a great thing to do."The deal would either involve China right from the start, or Beijing would be brought in later, Trump added. He also told reporters that Chinese diplomats expressed eagerness for such a deal during their trade negotiations with the US.
Comment: See also:
- Trump's INF withdrawal is a Deep State dream & global nightmare
- Beijing slams Trump's plan to ditch 'crucial' INF treaty, bodes 'multilateral negative effect'
- Is the American suspension of INF Treaty aimed at China?
- Russia to work on keeping INF Treaty even if US withdraws from it
ICC judges in April rejected the request of prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to examine atrocities allegedly committed between 2003 and 2014, including alleged mass killings of civilians by the Taliban, as well as prisoner torture by Afghan authorities and to a lesser extent by U.S. forces and the CIA.
Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow, speaking as a "friend of the court" in the case, said that the prosecutor was wrong to "press ahead" with seeking to open an investigation when the United States is not a member of the court. In addition, under the "complementarity principle", the ICC has jurisdiction only when countries themselves are unwilling or unable to prosecute war crimes.
"The U.S. is demonstrably both willing and able to investigate its own cases, so on the basis of complementarity (this investigation) should be thrown out," he said.
Comment: The ICC received more than 1 million statements from Afghans who say they were victims of war crimes at the hands of the Taliban, Afghan forces, terrorists, warlords, and international forces including US personnel, several media outlets reported last February.
See also:
- International Criminal Court's Afghanistan war crimes probe a sham and cover-up for US
- Russian UN envoy: ICC won't revive reputation after dropping US war crimes probe
- ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda - the woman who hunts tyrants - seeks Afghanistan war crimes investigation against US
Talks on the replacement of the defunct INF Treaty cannot be focused only on the prospects of China joining in, the Kremlin's spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters on Wednesday:
"First, we need to talk about the Western European countries, on whose territories the mid-range and short-range missiles are also located. We need a new treaty because the old one, unfortunately, is already gone - it was done so not by our initiative. We cannot exist in a state of vacuum, where nothing is being regulated by international law" [anymore].US President Donald Trump has been saying for months that China should join a new arms control pact in the future, without any concrete suggestions for negotiations. So far Beijing said it is not interested.

A general view shows the town of Majdal Shams near the ceasefire line between Israel and Syria in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
Passed in a 91-65 vote with 9 abstentions on Tuesday, the resolution called on Israel to abandon the Golan after over 50 years of occupation, insisting that nations may not acquire territory by conquest, a core principle of international law:
"The continued occupation of the Syrian Golan and its de facto annexation constitute a stumbling block in the way of achieving a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region," the resolution said, demanding that "Israel withdraw from all the occupied Syrian Golan."In addition to the Golan resolution, the General Assembly passed four other measures related to Israel on Tuesday, one urging "respect for, and the preservation of" occupied Palestinian lands - including the West Bank and East Jerusalem - and reaffirming the "illegality of Israeli settlement activities." The other resolutions recognized the work of UN departments devoted to Palestine issues, and requested the continuation of a "special program" to disseminate information on Palestine and related UN decisions. The United States voted against all five measures in tandem with Tel Aviv.
Comment: Mondoweiss, 3/12/2019: UN says Israeli occupation cost Palestinian economy $48B
This week, the United Nations attempted to put a figure on exactly how much the occupation was costing Palestinian officials. The number it arrived at — an estimated $48bn between 2000 and 2017 — was larger than many folks expected.Palestine Post 24 30/11/2019: International law is clear: Israel's settlements are illegal
According to Mahmoud Elkhafif, from the UN's Geneva-based trade body, UNCTAD, the losses were roughly three times the size of the entire Palestinian economy in 2017, and easily enough to pay off Ramallah's budget deficit.
UNCTAD counted money that should have been made available to Palestinian officials under the terms of the so-called Paris Protocol, part of the Oslo Accords that were inked by Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization in the 1990s.
[A] 60-page report, The Economic Costs of the Israeli Occupation for the Palestinian People: Cumulative Fiscal Costs, will be discussed by the 193-nation UN General Assembly on Tuesday.
The clarity of international law on the issue of Israeli settlements arises in part from the unusual fact that they have been formally declared illegal by the most authoritative sources of international guidance.
Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that an occupying power "shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies".
International Court of Justice in 2004 strongly reaffirmed the unlawfulness of Israel's settlement construction in occupied territory - and with a 14-1 ruling, the court showed a highly unusual degree of unity.
December 2016, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2334, deeming by a vote of 14-0 that the settlements had no legal validity. The US abstained from the vote.
No country [The USA] can, by its decree, influence the legal status of Israeli settlement activity.
Washington's negotiating tactic is "nothing but a foolish trick hatched to keep the DPRK bound to dialogue," designed purely to use the issue of talks in domestic election campaigns, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ri Thae Song said in a statement on Tuesday.
"So, no one will lend an ear to the US any longer," the diplomat warned, speaking about the looming year-end deadline set by Pyongyang for America to change its attitude toward the negotiation process.
What is left to be done now is the US option and it is entirely up to the US what Christmas gift it will select to get.
Comment: Fickle diplomacy exemplifies the all-too-pathetic caliber of US foreign relations expertise. Whatever happened to Trump's 'art of the deal'? One would think progress towards an agreement would be a significant stroke in his pre-election 'win' column.
RT, 3/12/2019: Trump will use US might if he has to
Trump believes he has saved the world from a major war by reaching out and befriending North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, but added he may yet unleash all the military power of the Pentagon against him.
The statements, blending together a call for peace and threats of war, came from the US leader on Tuesday after officials in Pyongyang complained that the nuclear negotiations between the two nations were going nowhere. Trump praised his handling of North Korea, claiming that "if you would have listened to President Obama, we would have been in a World War III right now."
The US president took credit for defusing the conflict with North Korea by fostering a good personal relationship with Kim. He said he is probably "the only one he has such a good relationship with in the world."
Trump said he was in no rush to declare the negotiations process dead, but warned he had the world's most powerful military at his disposal. "We are by far the most powerful country in the world, and hopefully we won't have to use it. But if we do, we'll use it. If we have to, we'll do it," he said.
Unipolarism's Grave: 'We Came, We Saw, He Died'
Putin's successful intervention in Syria and utilization of not just Iranian interests but also those of NATO member Turkey has demonstrated that even a country with 'an economy the size of that of the Netherlands' can foil American plans for color revolution and inflict great damage to America's interests and reputation in foreign affairs through effective diplomacy and measured military means. By exposing the new Washington style of hubris, cynicism, and corruption in Syria, Putin's Syria intervention put the last nail in the coffin of the United States' ability to dictate outcomes anywhere across the globe and define the future. Events in Syria are but the latest confirmation of this fact, but many in Washington and Brussels still do not see it. NATO expansion without Russia continues to push the West on the same dangerous road of radicalizing Russian anti-Westernism, strengthening the Sino-Russian strategic partnership, and creating a phalanx of authoritarian regimes strongly opposed to American and even Western interests. Thus, the world is not only no longer unipolar. It is becoming bipolar or multipolar in ways exceedingly detrimental to Western interests and international stability and security. This is a disaster not just for Washington and Brussels but for the world, and mantras about Russian imperialism and totalitarianism will prove of no help.
Comment: All 'good' things come to an end. Thank the heavens for that.
Abdel Mahdi is not responsible for the longstanding corruption in Iraq where, as in Lebanon, the political system is controlled by "whales," political parties that control the ruling system and share the wealth among themselves. However, as commander in chief of the security forces, he is responsible for the killing of a large number of protestors. Most of these protestors are not beholden to Iran, the US, or any other country in the region. They are the new Middle Eastern generation, unwilling to accept the submissiveness of their parents and ancestors to a long-dominant, unfair and corrupt ruling system.
The US liberated Iraq from Saddam Hussein but committed serious mistakes, starting from the beginning of their rule in Mesopotamia. Iran imposed its influence when a vacuum arose, but Iran also made mistakes. The Marjaiya in Najaf became involved in the political process after the liberation of Iraq from Saddam Hussein; it became directly involved in parliamentary politics. The Marjaiya pulled out of politics when it realised the impossibility of navigating within Iraq's corrupt political system and took its distance until the recent protests. Iraq's culture differs from other Middle Eastern countries; it is more susceptible to rumours and manipulated mobs. Today, Iraqis are taking over the streets with one agenda: changing everything and everybody. Moqtada al-Sadr and other regional and international players (the US and the United Arab Emirates mainly) seek to manipulate this protest movement. Where is the country headed? What roles will the US and Iran play in Iraq's future?

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (left) shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a meeting in Jerusalem in March.
"We're seeing the Iranian empire totter," Netanyahu said on December 4 before departing for Lisbon, citing anti-government demonstrations in Iran, Lebanon, and Iraq.
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed "tremendous" sanctions on Iran, he said. "It's important to increase this pressure against Iranian aggression."
Netanyahu and Pompeo, who will be on his way home from a NATO summit in London, are to meet in the Portuguese capital late in the day, according to the U.S. State Department.
Israel, which has the Middle East's sole but undeclared nuclear arsenal, has accused Tehran of seeking to obtain nuclear weapons and strongly opposed a 2015 deal that gave Iran access to world trade in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program.
Comment: Quite surprising to see RFE/RL include this fact... Officially, Israel's illegal nuclear arsenal doesn't exist, and it is U.S. government policy to never bring it up. Doing so would require an end to Israeli aid according to U.S. law, which prohibits giving handouts to rogue nuclear states.
Trump, a strong Netanyahu ally, in May 2018 withdrew the United States from the agreement, and has since reimposed crippling sanctions on the Iranian economy. Meanwhile, Tehran has gradually reduced some of its commitments under the accord.
Comment: Imagine if the headline were "Putin to press Trump for more pressure on Ukraine". Only Israelis are allowed to tell American politicians what to do. It's a national tradition.












Comment: Page has done herself no favors. She has reaffirmed the depth of her bias towards the president and the culpability of the FBI to influence and direct the 2016 election outcome. Her sympathy ploy is a page out of Hillary's manual on public manipulation.
See also: