Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Nuke

Iranian TV broadcasts confession of Iranian-Swedish academic whose spying for Israel led to assassination of Iranian scientists

Ahmadreza Djalali
© Vida Mehrannia
Iranian-Swedish academic Ahmadreza Djalali, who has been sentenced death, is shown during a court appearance.
Iranian state TV has aired what it calls a confession by an Iranian-Swedish academic who has been sentenced to death on espionage charges.

In the December 17 broadcast, Ahmadreza Djalali, a researcher at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute, admits to supplying information to a foreign intelligence service about Iranian nuclear scientists who were later assassinated.

Djalali, 46, was arrested in April 2016 and later convicted of espionage. He previously has denied the charges.

In the 17-minute broadcast, Djalali said a man he identified as "Thomas" had approached him with a job offer while he was doing research in an unnamed European country.

He said the man later recruited him to that country's foreign intelligence service, adding that the man had promised he would receive citizenship in the country.

On December 12, Amnesty International, the London-based rights watchdog, said the verdict stated that Djalali had worked with the Israeli government.

Fire

The US plan for the Middle East amounts to 'slash and burn' to minimize Iranian influence

Iranianarches
© Getty Images
The US is attempting to sell to the public the next phase of its continued occupation and military operations across the Middle East. Predicated on claims of "rebuilding" Iraq and "fighting terrorists" in Syria, it is in actuality a plan to perpetuate for as long as possible the upheaval currently consuming the region in hopes of overextending and exhausting Iran - and by extension - Russia.

Iranian Roadblock to Western Hegemony

The United States in its pursuit of global hegemony has placed particular focus on encircling, containing, undermining, and if possible, overthrowing the socioeconomic and political order of Iran as a means to secure for itself primacy over the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Comment: There is no excuse for this scenario projection except lessons not learned. When hope, hype and ignorance lead us to think the worst is over, more than not it has yet to come.


Dominoes

Trump-Russia inquiry and why attacks on Mueller are mounting, analysis pro and con

Mueller
© The Atlantic
Why it could matter. Why it might not.
In recent weeks, conservative commentators and politicians have begun arguing, with growing intensity, that Robert Mueller's investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia is the result of an intentional effort by biased investigators to undermine the Trump presidency.

There are a number of components to the case they are presenting, from doubts about the impartiality of Mr Mueller and his team to questions about the integrity of the FBI and the Obama-era Justice Department.

All of it could be setting the ground for new investigations into the FBI or Democrat Hillary Clinton's actions while secretary of state - something Mr Trump himself has suggested - or perhaps even for the president to order the end of Mr Mueller's probe.

Such an action would provoke a major political crisis and could have unpredictable consequences. For Mr Trump's defenders, it may be enough simply to mire Mr Mueller's investigation in a partisan morass. Here are some are some of the ways they're trying to do that.

Comment: See also:


Question

Washington's secret wars and who controls them

ussflagragged
© unknown
The Trump White House Monday issued a so-called "War Powers" letter addressed to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and the president pro tempore of the Senate, Orin Hatch, to "keep the Congress informed about deployments of United States Armed Forces equipped for combat."

In 1973, against the backdrop of the debacle of the Vietnam War, the US Congress, overriding the veto of then-President Richard Nixon, passed the War Powers Act. The aim of the legislation was to prevent future presidents from waging undeclared and open-ended wars with little or no accountability to Congress, which under the US Constitution has the exclusive power to declare war.

It gave the president the right to use military force at his discretion for up to 60 days - itself a huge concession of power to the executive branch - but required withdrawal after a total of 90 days if Congress failed to vote its approval of military action.

While still on the books, the War Powers Act has long ago been turned into a dead letter by the quarter century of interrupted US wars of aggression that have followed the Stalinist bureaucracy's dissolution of the Soviet Union, all waged without a declaration of war by Congress.

Comment: And these are just the surprises to which 'they' have hinted exist. Combat beyond the US borders has consumed military attention and arena. Maybe that is why the police departments are now militarily equipped as the 'stay home' crew.


Monkey Wrench

Why Washington insiders are freaking out over Mueller's receipt of Trump transition team emails

Robert Mueller

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller.
On Saturday, the news broke that Kory Langhofer, counsel to Donald Trump's transition team known as Trump for America, Inc. (TFA), had sent a 7-page letter to House and Senate Committees stating that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office had improperly received "tens of thousands of emails" from the General Services Administration (GSA), a Federal agency, that had been sent or received by members of Trump's transition team.

Both the GSA and Mueller's spokesmen denied that there had been anything improper about the turnover of the emails.

Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, said that "When we have obtained emails in the course of our ongoing criminal investigation, we have secured either the account owner's consent or appropriate criminal process."

Comment: Blackmail material? Mueller obtains tens of thousands of Trump transition emails - potentially illegally


Clipboard

Srzok's "insurance policy" was the Russian "collusion" witch hunt

strzok Page
© Fox News
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page
As previously reported, Fox News published a portion of the approximately 10,000 texts messages sent between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page. Among the messages is an exchange revealing Strzok and Page discussed an 'insurance policy,' against a Trump presidency.

The kicker? Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe may have not only been privy to the conversation, but a part of it.

The discussion took place in his office.

The Wall Street Journal is now reporting the "insurance policy" text was a reference to the Russia investigation.

Fox News' Brett Bair tweeted, "Text-from Peter Strzok to Lisa Page (Andy is Andrew McCabe): "I want to believe the path u threw out 4 consideration in Andy's office-that there's no way he gets elected-but I'm afraid we can't take that risk.It's like an insurance policy in unlikely event u die be4 you're 40."

The dots are connecting. Top FBI brass were working with Hillary Clinton to make sure she was exonerated from her criminal investigation while simultaneously building a case against Donald Trump.

Comey, Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe made sure Hillary Clinton's FBI investigation went smoothly as it was given 'special status'. McCabe also didn't recuse himself from Hillary's investigation until one week before the presidential election despite massive conflicts of interest.

Comment: Strzok got one thing right: Trump won the election. It's actually pretty hilarious that people like Strzok and McCabe were planning since before Trump won to use this Russian collusion nonsense against him, and they seemingly actually believed it. The doesn't reflect too well on the mental capacity of American public servants.

See also:


Arrow Down

Nikki 'Tricky' Haley is not good at foreign policy

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley
© Josh Lederman/Twitter
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley this week gave a speech in front of a missile she says was fired into Saudi Arabia by Houthi fighters in Yemen, but originated in Iran

The most inexplicable part of Haley's charade this week was her insistence on talking about Iran rather than talking to Iran


Nikki Haley is not good at foreign policy. With few discernible achievements to speak of after one year as America's envoy to the UN, her most noteworthy moments have been two incoherent diatribes on Iran. The first-an airing of grievances passed off as justification for killing the Iran nuclear deal-came and went with little fanfare. Yesterday, she doubled down with a speech trying to make the case that Iran is, among other things, supplying Houthis in Yemen with ballistic missiles and "fanning the flames of conflict in the region." There are a variety of problems with Haley's assertions. Three in particular stand out.

First, Haley cited a UN report in her claim regarding Iranian missile transfers to the Houthis. Of course, the UN has reached no such conclusion. Instead, a panel of experts concluded that fired missile fragments show components from an Iranian company, but they have "no evidence as to the identity of the broker or supplier." Asked about Haley's claim that Iran is the culprit, Sweden's ambassador to the UN said, "The info I have is less clear." Analysts from the U.S. Department of Defense speaking to reporters at Haley's speech openly acknowledged that they do not know the missiles' origin. Perhaps most surreal is the very same UN report cited by Haley also says the missile included a component that was manufactured by an American company. Did she disingenuously omit that inconvenient bit from her remarks, or fail to read the entire UN report? The world may never know.

Comment: See also: Nikki "Tricky" Haley attempts to deceive press over Iranian missile threat


Laptop

The almighty "Russian hackers" myth: A deconstruction

Russian hacker bear
© Flickr/ Sunny Ripert
Sometimes things can be made more complicated than they really are. And such is the case with the story that the Russian government hacked the Democratic National Committee so as to help Trump become president.

In July 2016 Wikileaks released a number of documents showing that the nomination of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president had been rigged. A month earlier the DNC had announced it had been "hacked" and the cybersecurity company it hired announced that the Russians had done it - one of the reasons they gave was that the hackers had helpfully left the name of the Polish founder of the Soviet security forces as a clue.

Since then, this story has been broadly accepted and it has spun on and on for eighteen months. But it doesn't really make any sense.

Let us pretend that Moscow wanted Trump to win. Let us further pretend that Moscow thought that there was a chance that he could win despite the fact that almost all news outlets, pollsters and pundits were completely confident that he could not. And let us pretend that Moscow thought that, with its thumb on the scale, Trump could make it. And, the fourth if, let us pretend that Moscow decided to put its thumb on the scale.

Star of David

Not interested in justice: Detained Palestinian teen to be sentenced in a court with a 99.74% conviction rate

Palestinian teen arrested throwing stones, Fawzi al-Junaidi
© Wisam Hashlamoun/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Fawzi al-Junaidi, 16, has been accused of throwing stones.
Fawzi al-Junaidi, 16, will be taken in for a hearing in Israel's military court today, after being held for more than a week in Israeli detention.

Junaidi was detained during clashes that erupted in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron on Dec. 7, the day after U.S. President Donald Trump announced the U.S. would recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

A photo taken by photographer Wisam Hashlamoun during the arrest went viral, as it showed the disoriented and blindfolded teen being manhandled, surrounded by at least twenty fully-armed Israeli soldiers as he was taken away.

Brad Parker, the International Advocacy Officer & Attorney for Defense for Children International - Palestine (DCIP), told Mondoweiss that the photo should be seen as a symbol of Israel's normal practices concerning Palestinian children, and not a special circumstance.

Comment: Calculated dehumanization: The lives of Palestinian children in Israel


Star of David

HBO chief Peplar got his start as hasbara propagandist

Richard Plepler HBO hasbara

Richard Plepler of HBO
Richard Plepler is the CEO of HBO, and this week he told Jeffrey Goldberg that his media career began with hasbara -- or explaining Israel's side to the world.
I had an idea right after the First Intifada started as somebody who cared deeply about Israel - that the coverage of the Intifada was reductive, and that all you were seeing on American television screens was the imagery of young Palestinian kids throwing stones, and Israelis firing back at them, and the idea that I had was that only by bringing context around this complicated story could you illuminate for an American audience- a European audience- how deeply emotional this conflict was, but how potentially insoluble it was, because you had these two competing narratives of history. And so I decided that it might be a good idea to make a documentary which wasn't an apologia for, in any way for Israel... We [Documentary filmmaker Peter Kunhardt and Plepler] made this documentary for public television called, A Search for Solid Ground: The Intifada Through Israeli Eyes, and it was nicely reviewed and that really was a catalyst for bringing me to HBO because the then CEO of HBO, a gentleman named Michael Fuchs, was intrigued by what I had done... I made this in '88, '89... I ended up coming here a year and a half or two later.
You can see 10 minutes of that documentary below, and it's excruciating. It's entirely from an Israeli Jewish perspective; the Palestinians are seen as mindlessly violent terrorists; and there is endless sympathy for the poor Israelis who have little choice but to shoot after getting hailed by stones directed by a fiendish Palestinian leader hiding behind the children; and the Israelis would happily give up land if they could only have security. There is nothing about occupation. And P.S. everything the Israelis say here they are still saying 30 years later...

Comment: