Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 04 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Sherlock

Pepe Escobar: Is there a House of Cards power struggle raging within China?

xi jinping
© AP Photo/ Ahmed Omar
Let's start by examining what the Dragon himself - President Xi Jinping - has to say about China being largely derided in influential Beltway circles as a House of Cards.

Xi has forcefully dismissed the notion that a House of Cards power struggle has been raging at the rarified heights of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Yet at the same time he's adamant; "conspirators", "careerists", "cabals" and "cliques" are attempting to undermine the CCP from within.

Thus, with ironic/poetic justice, a 42-part series on corruption in China - titled In the Name of the People and financed by the Middle Kingdom's top law enforcement agency - is bound to go live before the end of 2016, featuring a CCP stalwart as the bad guy (that's a first). Call him the Chinese Frank Underwood.

This means that what Xi is saying - and acting — live will be mirrored on hundreds of millions of Chinese screens, pitting conflicting factions within the 88 million-member CCP. Xi's war on corruption has produced a rash of severely disgruntled CCP officials - to put it mildly.

Bad Guys

Zara, Syria villlagers describe massacre by militant group spared from U.S. terror blacklist

Executed villagers
© Via twitter@Mouqawama
"Notes in the picture distributed by the Front victory martyrs were executed as they slept with dozens of bullets (holes on the wall)."
Eyewitnesses from Zara, an Alawite Syrian village, have revealed brutal killings and kidnappings at the hands of Ahrar al-Sham and Al-Nusra fighters to RT. This week, Western powers blocked the militant group's inclusion on the UN terrorist list.

Ahrar al-Sham, which espouses a strict Salafist form of Sunni Islam, reportedly fought alongside the Al-Nusra Front, an internationally recognized terrorist organization, which is not protected by the US and Russia-mediated ceasefire in Syria.

The group admitted responsibility for the raid but claimed that it had not mistreated those who did not resist.

"Civilians were not targeted. On the contrary factions made great effort to spare civilians and deal with prisoners humanely," said an Ahrar al-Sham spokesman in a statement, cited by Reuters.

However, residents of the village who spoke with RT Arabic painted a different picture of events, describing the raid on the settlement as a war crime.

"They killed elderly people, took children and women as captives. We want to find out what happened to them afterwards. We know nothing about them," Abdou Khalifa, a villager, who himself sustained wounds, told the channel.

"Strangers came to our village. Most of them were foreigners, we understood that they weren't from Syria from the way they looked. They attacked our village, many were killed. My brother is among the dead, his children were wounded. They killed entire families," said Ahmad Muhammad al Qasem.

"They perpetrated a massacre," said another villager, Munzer Qasem. "I heard of two or three entire families killed. Abu Naval's family was killed. He was an old man and was killed together with his daughters. They were slaughtered in their own house."


Comment: See also:


Dollar

The numbers don't add up: Treasury Dept claims Ireland is America's fourth-largest creditor, while Saudi Arabia holds relatively small amount of US debt

wall street
Irish based investors owned $264.3 billion of Treasuries at the end of March new figures show

Ireland emerged as America's fourth-largest creditor following China, Japan and the Cayman Islands after the US government revised the way it reports the figures.

Investors in the European nation owned $264.3 billion of Treasuries at the end of March, based on official data issued Monday. China is the largest holder with a $1.24 trillion stake. Japan is next with $1.14 trillion, followed by the Cayman Islands with $265 billion.


Comment: The Cayman Islands, like Ireland, is an off-shore tax haven for Western elites. Not that the Irish people see any of this money...


Ireland's holdings are bigger than the size of its economy, which is worth about $230 billion for a population of less than five million. One potential explanation is the large number of fund managers and other companies based in the country for its tax incentives.


Comment: That's Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland combined. The latter's GDP is just $180 billion - nominally, which means, its real GDP value is far less. So the country that 'suddenly went broke' in 2008 when banksters' private debt was passed to the Irish people holds almost twice as much US govt debt than it is officially worth!

What madness is this?


"It's all just foreign banks, funds and corporates based here," said Owen Callan, a fixed-income analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald in Dublin. "It's probably linked to offshore mutual funds administered here or offshore-retained earnings of US multinationals."

Comment: Whenever they say they're being transparent because "it's the right thing to do", you can take it to the bank - pun intended - that they're up to something.

The 'bombshell' revelation here has to do with how much US debt Saudi Arabia holds, which, the above US Treasury figures claim, is relatively insignificant - a 'mere' $116 billion.

Saudi Arabia had 'threatened' to 'dump' its US Treasury holdings, which were, until this 'act of benevolent transparency', believed to have been massive - somewhere in the region of a trillion+ dollars - if the US Senate gave the go-ahead to families of 9/11 victims to sue the Islamic state over its involvement in the 'day that changed the world'.

Well, that did happen... on the same day that the US Treasury released the above figures. Was this a pre-emptive move on Washington's part? Some sort of defensive maneuver? It's hard to say for sure at this point, but the two events occurring on the same day sure seems coincidental.

In any event, it's clear that money no longer makes the world go 'round; debt does - specifically, US govt debt. Most everyone 'owns' a piece of 'the Indispensable Nation', but what that means in practice is that most everyone will go down with it.

For another case study of the Empire using a small Western country to launder its funny money, see:

The Fed is 'The Great Deceiver': U.S. central bank just laundered $141 billion through Belgium


Che Guevara

8 Latin America countries show support for Rousseff and reject US-led coup in Brazil

rousseff
© Reuters
Suspended Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff addresses supporters after the Brazilian Senate voted to impeach her
Venezuela and El Savlador have recalled their ambassadors from Brazil, while several other countries have stated they support the suspended president.

Brazil's controversial Senate-coup-imposed President Michel Temer has been largely isolated in Latin America in his first days in office after a the legislative body's decision to suspend Dilma Rousseff, with only Argentina's conservative government of President Mauricio Macri publicly stating support for the newly-installed right-wing government.

The South American bloc UNASUR was one of the first bodies to condemn the decision to remove Rousseff for 180 days to make her face an impeachment trial over accusations of manipulating accounts to hide a budget shortfall.

UNASUR Secretary-General Ernesto Samper insisted that Rousseff remains the "legitimate president of Brazil" and that the impeachment bid against her undermines the "democratic governability" of the entire region in a "dangerous way."

Magnify

3 key signs of US involvement in Brazil coup

brazil coup
© AP/Eraldo Peres
A woman shows poster written in Portuguese “There will not be a coup” next to a picture of Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff, during a rally in her support and of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in Brasilia, Brazil, Friday, March 18, 2016. Silva has been targeted in an alleged corruption investigation involving the Brazil oil giant Petrobras.
As Brazil's left-wing president, Dilma Rousseff, has been suspended from office to face trial for disregarding budget laws, details have emerged on key figures involved in what Rousseff supporters are calling a coup, hinting at a covert plot involving Washington.

Following last week's vote in the Brazilian Senate that led to the suspension of the country's first female president, the left-wing politician herself noted that she "never imagined that it would be necessary to fight a coup in this country."

While Latin America's modern history is riddled with well-documented examples of US operations aimed at overthrowing regimes, some would argue the situation in Brazil is tied to a popular protest movement that has sprang up due to the corruption scandal and slumping economy. However, profiles of those at the center of current events offer clues as to why Washington's hand might be at play.

Bizarro Earth

U.S. special forces in Libya to help fight the jihadis they created - U.S. to arm more jihadis to fight those jihadis

libya
In 2011 NATO rained bombs on Libya to remove the Gaddafi government from power. Openly backing known terrorists in their push to oust Gaddafi, the NATO powers, led by Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy, ended up supporting, fostering and equipping battle-hardened jihadis that they then sent off as a proxy army to begin the destabilization of Syria. But now that proxy army is coming home to roost, with recent reports claiming as many as 6,500 Islamic State fighters are operating in Libya.

So of course the US has responded to this mess in the only way it knows how: sending more troops. Well, to be more accurate, the troops have been there for half a year, but the government is just now getting around to announcing their presence...via an anonymous leak in the Washington Post, that is.

Comment: Don't look to the U.S. to 'fix' anything; they merely break things and make sure they stay that way. Just look at Afghanistan: How will the West spin its retreat from Afghanistan?

Further reading on the latest insanity regarding Libya: Idiotic Libya policy: Arm who-knows-who, hope that works


Mr. Potato

Idiotic Libya policy: Arm who-knows-who, hope that works

Libyan security forces
© AFP 2016/ MAHMUD TURKIA
The decision on Monday in Vienna to provide 'arms' to a Libyan Government that exists in name only, the GNA, has taken the international communities stance from the sublime to the completely ridiculous.

Exactly what military kit is being supposed to be supplied? This is a critical question which needs a whole article devoted to it and cannot be dealt with herein because of space.

To keep it simple, the West has decided to supply 'arms' to a not yet in existence Government of National Accord (GNA) sometimes referred to as a Unity Government yet its core, the nine-man Presidential Council and its Prime Minister were not at all selected by any Libyan but by a combination of the UN, EU, US and UK. Within the EU the primary mover with the most commercial interests of that side being Italy.

Comment: Because this strategy worked so well in Syria... The U.S. should just quit the BS and say it like it is: they want to arm terrorists because they love terrorists, and terrorists are the best way of getting what the U.S. wants. It seems it really is that simple.


Blackbox

How will the West spin its retreat from Afghanistan?

A US soldier at the site of a suicide car bomb attack in Kabul, Afghanistan.
© AP Photo/ Massoud Hossaini
A US soldier at the site of a car bomb attack in Kabul, Afghanistan.
The Obama administration seems to have given up on Afghanistan. It should have done so seven years ago but the military ambushed the just installed Obama administration when the only alternatives it presented on Afghanistan were a huge surge and an even bigger surge in deployed troops. Those additional deployments failed to change the realities on the ground and Afghanistan is slipping back into the permanent local war between "western"-supported warlords and Pakistan-supported Taliban. The latter have the huge advantage of some medieval but largely consistent ideology while the former are only driven by greed. This makes the Taliban the likely winner as the U.S. and others are no longer willing to sacrifice their own men and money for the enrichment of a small class of very greedy Afghan criminals.

Comment: The reverse Midas touch: everything the U.S. touches turns to ashes and gore.


Eye 2

The spread of Balkanization: US Empire's strategy of barbaric dismemberment of sovereign states began in Yugoslavia

serbia nato bombing

Belgrade, Serbia burning in April, 1999 during the NATO bombing campaign
On March 24th, 1999, NATO launched its 78-day round the clock aerial assault on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia without the approval of the United Nations Security Council. Over a thousand NATO warplanes delivered over 2,000 airstrikes in nearly 40,000 sorties, dropping over 20,000 bombs over the former Yugoslavia, killing thousands of civilian men, women, and children, as well as upwards of a thousand Yugoslav soldiers and police.[1] [2] [3] NATO employed weapons considered criminal by international law such as depleted uranium and cluster bombs.[4] [5] [6] [7]


Comment: It's also worth checking out, as a complement to this article, the documentary The Weight of Chains: US/NATO Destruction of Yugoslavia and The Rational Destruction of Yugoslavia by the Empire of Chaos.


The popular narrative is that is that the Western powers dropped these bombs out of humanitarian concern, but this claim falls apart once the distorted lens of Western saviourism is dropped and actual facts are presented. In truth, NATO intervention in Yugoslavia was predicated on the imperialist, colonialist economic and ideological interests of the NATO states, masquerading for the public as a humanitarian effort, that in fact served to dismantle the last remnant of socialism in Europe and recolonize the Balkans.
chinese protester belgrade

Chinese protester after NATO bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade
This becomes apparent when the economic interests and actions of the NATO bloc in the decades leading up the breakup are analyzed, when what actually occurred during the intervention is further explored, and when the reality of life in the former Yugoslavia in the aftermath of the 'humanitarian' intervention is more closely examined. It becomes clear that the most suffering endured by the Yugoslav people since Nazi occupation was the result of the actions of NATO with the United States at its helm.

As the Ottoman Empire crumbled in the late 1800s, the other empires set their eyes on Turkish possessions in the Balkan peninsula. The Slavs of the Balkans struggled for independence, aided by the Russian Empire. In response, the Western powers attempted to prop up the Ottomans to circumvent the growing Russian sphere of influence. Eventually the Great Powers called the Congress of Berlin to redivide the Balkans amongst themselves. Leon Trotsky wrote of this process:

Star of David

Zionist Israel smears truth-tellers to hide its crimes against humanity

Israel wall
© badahos/Shutterstock.com
Israel's apartheid security "fence"
Several years ago two very distinguished American scholars wrote a book, The Israel Lobby.

The book made a very understated case that the Israel Lobby has far more power over the US government and media than is good for America or Israel, as it silences constructive critics who are Israel's friends. The two scholars were demonized by the Israel Lobby as advocating the return of the Holocaust.

The Israel Lobby presented itself as just a poor little weak thing unable to stand up to all the Nazis assailing Israel. Meanwhile the US Congress was unanimously passing outrageous resolutions handed to it by the Israel Lobby.

A number of former US Senators and Representatives, including Cynthia McKinney, have publicly stated that they were removed from office by the Israel Lobby for criticizing actions of the Israeli government, such as the Israeli government's attempt to sink the USS Liberty, in which a majority of the American crew were killed or injured.

Instead of defending the US Navy, the cowardly US government was so scared of Israel that the President of the United States and the Admiral conducting the inquiry, Senator John McCain's father, rushed to the defense of Israel and covered up the incident.

The coverup has been so successful that few Americans today know that a vessel of the US Navy was decimated by an Israeli air and torpedo boat attack, and Washington did not even file a protest. Really! The US is a "superpower," and the cowardly government cannot even stand up to Israel?

Comment: More on Roger Waters' commitment to speaking the truth: