Puppet Masters
Xi has forcefully dismissed the notion that a House of Cards power struggle has been raging at the rarified heights of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Yet at the same time he's adamant; "conspirators", "careerists", "cabals" and "cliques" are attempting to undermine the CCP from within.
Thus, with ironic/poetic justice, a 42-part series on corruption in China - titled In the Name of the People and financed by the Middle Kingdom's top law enforcement agency - is bound to go live before the end of 2016, featuring a CCP stalwart as the bad guy (that's a first). Call him the Chinese Frank Underwood.
This means that what Xi is saying - and acting — live will be mirrored on hundreds of millions of Chinese screens, pitting conflicting factions within the 88 million-member CCP. Xi's war on corruption has produced a rash of severely disgruntled CCP officials - to put it mildly.

"Notes in the picture distributed by the Front victory martyrs were executed as they slept with dozens of bullets (holes on the wall)."
Ahrar al-Sham, which espouses a strict Salafist form of Sunni Islam, reportedly fought alongside the Al-Nusra Front, an internationally recognized terrorist organization, which is not protected by the US and Russia-mediated ceasefire in Syria.
The group admitted responsibility for the raid but claimed that it had not mistreated those who did not resist.
"Civilians were not targeted. On the contrary factions made great effort to spare civilians and deal with prisoners humanely," said an Ahrar al-Sham spokesman in a statement, cited by Reuters.
However, residents of the village who spoke with RT Arabic painted a different picture of events, describing the raid on the settlement as a war crime.
"They killed elderly people, took children and women as captives. We want to find out what happened to them afterwards. We know nothing about them," Abdou Khalifa, a villager, who himself sustained wounds, told the channel.
"Strangers came to our village. Most of them were foreigners, we understood that they weren't from Syria from the way they looked. They attacked our village, many were killed. My brother is among the dead, his children were wounded. They killed entire families," said Ahmad Muhammad al Qasem.
"They perpetrated a massacre," said another villager, Munzer Qasem. "I heard of two or three entire families killed. Abu Naval's family was killed. He was an old man and was killed together with his daughters. They were slaughtered in their own house."
Ireland emerged as America's fourth-largest creditor following China, Japan and the Cayman Islands after the US government revised the way it reports the figures.
Investors in the European nation owned $264.3 billion of Treasuries at the end of March, based on official data issued Monday. China is the largest holder with a $1.24 trillion stake. Japan is next with $1.14 trillion, followed by the Cayman Islands with $265 billion.
Comment: The Cayman Islands, like Ireland, is an off-shore tax haven for Western elites. Not that the Irish people see any of this money...
Ireland's holdings are bigger than the size of its economy, which is worth about $230 billion for a population of less than five million. One potential explanation is the large number of fund managers and other companies based in the country for its tax incentives.
Comment: That's Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland combined. The latter's GDP is just $180 billion - nominally, which means, its real GDP value is far less. So the country that 'suddenly went broke' in 2008 when banksters' private debt was passed to the Irish people holds almost twice as much US govt debt than it is officially worth!
What madness is this?
"It's all just foreign banks, funds and corporates based here," said Owen Callan, a fixed-income analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald in Dublin. "It's probably linked to offshore mutual funds administered here or offshore-retained earnings of US multinationals."
Comment: Whenever they say they're being transparent because "it's the right thing to do", you can take it to the bank - pun intended - that they're up to something.
The 'bombshell' revelation here has to do with how much US debt Saudi Arabia holds, which, the above US Treasury figures claim, is relatively insignificant - a 'mere' $116 billion.
Saudi Arabia had 'threatened' to 'dump' its US Treasury holdings, which were, until this 'act of benevolent transparency', believed to have been massive - somewhere in the region of a trillion+ dollars - if the US Senate gave the go-ahead to families of 9/11 victims to sue the Islamic state over its involvement in the 'day that changed the world'.
Well, that did happen... on the same day that the US Treasury released the above figures. Was this a pre-emptive move on Washington's part? Some sort of defensive maneuver? It's hard to say for sure at this point, but the two events occurring on the same day sure seems coincidental.
In any event, it's clear that money no longer makes the world go 'round; debt does - specifically, US govt debt. Most everyone 'owns' a piece of 'the Indispensable Nation', but what that means in practice is that most everyone will go down with it.
For another case study of the Empire using a small Western country to launder its funny money, see:
The Fed is 'The Great Deceiver': U.S. central bank just laundered $141 billion through Belgium

Suspended Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff addresses supporters after the Brazilian Senate voted to impeach her
Brazil's controversial Senate-coup-imposed President Michel Temer has been largely isolated in Latin America in his first days in office after a the legislative body's decision to suspend Dilma Rousseff, with only Argentina's conservative government of President Mauricio Macri publicly stating support for the newly-installed right-wing government.
The South American bloc UNASUR was one of the first bodies to condemn the decision to remove Rousseff for 180 days to make her face an impeachment trial over accusations of manipulating accounts to hide a budget shortfall.
UNASUR Secretary-General Ernesto Samper insisted that Rousseff remains the "legitimate president of Brazil" and that the impeachment bid against her undermines the "democratic governability" of the entire region in a "dangerous way."

A woman shows poster written in Portuguese “There will not be a coup” next to a picture of Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff, during a rally in her support and of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in Brasilia, Brazil, Friday, March 18, 2016. Silva has been targeted in an alleged corruption investigation involving the Brazil oil giant Petrobras.
Following last week's vote in the Brazilian Senate that led to the suspension of the country's first female president, the left-wing politician herself noted that she "never imagined that it would be necessary to fight a coup in this country."
While Latin America's modern history is riddled with well-documented examples of US operations aimed at overthrowing regimes, some would argue the situation in Brazil is tied to a popular protest movement that has sprang up due to the corruption scandal and slumping economy. However, profiles of those at the center of current events offer clues as to why Washington's hand might be at play.
So of course the US has responded to this mess in the only way it knows how: sending more troops. Well, to be more accurate, the troops have been there for half a year, but the government is just now getting around to announcing their presence...via an anonymous leak in the Washington Post, that is.
Comment: Don't look to the U.S. to 'fix' anything; they merely break things and make sure they stay that way. Just look at Afghanistan: How will the West spin its retreat from Afghanistan?
Further reading on the latest insanity regarding Libya: Idiotic Libya policy: Arm who-knows-who, hope that works
Exactly what military kit is being supposed to be supplied? This is a critical question which needs a whole article devoted to it and cannot be dealt with herein because of space.
To keep it simple, the West has decided to supply 'arms' to a not yet in existence Government of National Accord (GNA) sometimes referred to as a Unity Government yet its core, the nine-man Presidential Council and its Prime Minister were not at all selected by any Libyan but by a combination of the UN, EU, US and UK. Within the EU the primary mover with the most commercial interests of that side being Italy.
Comment: Because this strategy worked so well in Syria... The U.S. should just quit the BS and say it like it is: they want to arm terrorists because they love terrorists, and terrorists are the best way of getting what the U.S. wants. It seems it really is that simple.
Comment: The reverse Midas touch: everything the U.S. touches turns to ashes and gore.
Comment: It's also worth checking out, as a complement to this article, the documentary The Weight of Chains: US/NATO Destruction of Yugoslavia and The Rational Destruction of Yugoslavia by the Empire of Chaos.
The popular narrative is that is that the Western powers dropped these bombs out of humanitarian concern, but this claim falls apart once the distorted lens of Western saviourism is dropped and actual facts are presented. In truth, NATO intervention in Yugoslavia was predicated on the imperialist, colonialist economic and ideological interests of the NATO states, masquerading for the public as a humanitarian effort, that in fact served to dismantle the last remnant of socialism in Europe and recolonize the Balkans.
This becomes apparent when the economic interests and actions of the NATO bloc in the decades leading up the breakup are analyzed, when what actually occurred during the intervention is further explored, and when the reality of life in the former Yugoslavia in the aftermath of the 'humanitarian' intervention is more closely examined. It becomes clear that the most suffering endured by the Yugoslav people since Nazi occupation was the result of the actions of NATO with the United States at its helm.
As the Ottoman Empire crumbled in the late 1800s, the other empires set their eyes on Turkish possessions in the Balkan peninsula. The Slavs of the Balkans struggled for independence, aided by the Russian Empire. In response, the Western powers attempted to prop up the Ottomans to circumvent the growing Russian sphere of influence. Eventually the Great Powers called the Congress of Berlin to redivide the Balkans amongst themselves. Leon Trotsky wrote of this process:
The book made a very understated case that the Israel Lobby has far more power over the US government and media than is good for America or Israel, as it silences constructive critics who are Israel's friends. The two scholars were demonized by the Israel Lobby as advocating the return of the Holocaust.
The Israel Lobby presented itself as just a poor little weak thing unable to stand up to all the Nazis assailing Israel. Meanwhile the US Congress was unanimously passing outrageous resolutions handed to it by the Israel Lobby.
A number of former US Senators and Representatives, including Cynthia McKinney, have publicly stated that they were removed from office by the Israel Lobby for criticizing actions of the Israeli government, such as the Israeli government's attempt to sink the USS Liberty, in which a majority of the American crew were killed or injured.
Instead of defending the US Navy, the cowardly US government was so scared of Israel that the President of the United States and the Admiral conducting the inquiry, Senator John McCain's father, rushed to the defense of Israel and covered up the incident.
The coverup has been so successful that few Americans today know that a vessel of the US Navy was decimated by an Israeli air and torpedo boat attack, and Washington did not even file a protest. Really! The US is a "superpower," and the cowardly government cannot even stand up to Israel?
Comment: More on Roger Waters' commitment to speaking the truth:
- Pink Floyd's Roger Waters: Comparisons between Israel and Nazis 'crushingly obvious'
- Pink Floyd's Roger Waters calls on all musicians to boycott Israel
- UN is an 'entirely corrupt body' - Pink Floyd's Roger Waters to RT













Comment: See also: