Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Padlock

US to shut embassy and consulates in Saudi Arabia over security concerns

Image
© Flickr/ hamza82
The US diplomatic mission in Saudi Arabia said that the United States is planning to shut down its Saudi embassy in Riyadh and two consulates general for the next two days.

The United States is planning to shut down its Saudi embassy in Riyadh and two consulates general for the next two days over security concerns, the US diplomatic mission in Saudi Arabia said Sunday.

A statement issued by the embassy said that, "Due to heightened security concerns at U.S. diplomatic facilities in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. Embassy and Consulates have cancelled all consular services in Riyadh, Jeddah and Dhahran for Sunday, March 15 and Monday, March 16, 2015."

Comment: Seems strange it is only for two days.


Blackbox

Where's Putin? Probably working, as usual

putin
On the topic of persistent questions asked in the comments regarding "Putin's disappearance" from the media field.

My personal subjective view is that he will show up in public in the coming few days. Furthermore, this appearance will be associated with the development of the situation in the Ukraine, which is currently hanging in the balance, on the border of a large-scale war. Actually, the way I see it is that the effective undermining of the Minsk agreements by the junta is a sufficient reason for him to think and prepare to make certain decisions.

Today is the last official day when the Verkhovnaya Rada of Ukraine should pass a bill that implements the special status of the former Donetsk and Lugansk regions. If this decision won't be made today, then this will be a direct violation of the "complex of measures for the implementation of the Minsk agreements". The temporal interval between the 15th and the 20th of March also starts tomorrow. This interval is indicated by various sources as a possible time of the resumption of large-scale military action by the initiative of the Kiev junta.

Comment: This is probably the most reasonable explanation for Putin's recent lack of media appearances. But if you want ridiculous, just check out these: 5 Most Ridiculous Theories About the Whereabouts of Vladimir Putin


Mr. Potato

Gen. Rob 'Kill Russians' Scales: Whuh? They watch Fox in Russkiyland?

robert scales
© YouTube/American Security Project
Robert H. Scales: Don't misunderstand me. I didn't say 'kill Russians'. I said 'kill Russians!"
Seemingly unfazed by the outrage his comments on Fox Business Channel have caused, the former US general who thinks the only solution to the Ukraine conflict is to "start killing Russians" has defended his stance, again speaking to Fox.

Robert H. Scales, the retired United States Army major general whose outburst was aired by Fox on Tuesday, did not have to justify his comments as such, as he was invited for a cozy conversation with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren to jokingly discuss the reaction to his remarks.

Responding to the news that the Russian Investigative Committee has opened a criminal probe into his statements on charges of public calls for starting an aggressive war made in the media, and that his remarks violated article 20 of the United Nations' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that bans any propaganda of war and instigation of discrimination, hatred or violence, Scales shrugged it off by branding it "a Russian form of war."

"It's the Russia version of the First Amendment - five years in prison if you say something that makes [Russian President] Vladimir Putin angry," Scales told Fox News.

Comment: If this is the mental quality of American generals, it sure explains a lot. You can bet a country is on a sure path to destruction when its media can 'jokingly' discuss genocidal comments. But that's what happens when you let psychopaths take over.


Attention

Ex-CSIS scurries to deny CSIS-ISIS link

boisvert

Ex-CSIS assistant director Ray Boisvert spins stories for his former employer.
Ray Boisvert, a former assistant director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), has been busy trying to deflect blame from his former employer in the developing scandal involving an alleged CSIS asset who helped three British schoolgirls and others join ISIS.

Boisvert's impetus is to shield CSIS and the Canadian state when their hand is exposed in duplicitous activity at home and abroad. He has frequently appeared as a pundit on mainstream media programs, and unsurprisingly was trotted out by the usual suspects to comment on revelations that a Syrian national who spied for CSIS was acting as a liaison for ISIS, helping Westerners travel through Turkey to join the militant group in Syria.

The former CSIS big-wig told media that:
If [the suspected ISIS liaison Mohammed Mehmet] Rashid worked in some capacity for CSIS, and based on reports his computer contained images of passport and travel documents of several apparent ISIL recruits, it's conceivable he was actually gathering intelligence for CSIS about those recruits and the methods, logistics and contacts for spiriting them into Syria.

Comment: And we suppose all those U.S./UK helicopters and jets just have really bad coordinates when they drop all that aid and weaponry for ISIS in Iraq and Syria! Oh, and those U.S./Israeli 'military advisers' for ISIS found in Iraq? Top-secret double agents working hard for their countries to gather useful intelligence in the war against ISIS. Give us a break, Boisvert. No one's buying it.


Comment: Since when have Western intelligence agencies allowed anything so trivial as the law to get in their way? Does this guy think we're all naive idiots? And as for "the spy agency's current mandate", oh please! "Official mandates" are designed for public consumption. CSIS's mandate may have 'prevented' Rashid from stopping the girls from reaching Syria, for sure. But that could have been the point.

See also: Canadian intel agent linked with getting British schoolgirls into Syria to join ISIS


Георгиевская ленточка

Behind the Headlines: Interview with Charles Bausman, Russia Insider

Charles Bausman
This week on Behind the Headlines we spoke with Charles Bausman, founder and Editor-in-Chief of Russia Insider. Charles has worked in finance in Russia since the early 1990s. Noticing strong anti-Russian bias in Western media that didn't square with the country they knew, Charles and some friends pooled together last summer to create their hard-hitting news portal, and have recently launched a crowdfunding appeal on Kickstarter as they seek to grow their not-for-profit project to topics beyond Russia.

Running Time: 01:51:00

Download: MP3


Megaphone

'Freedom in jeopardy': Thousands rally across Canada against new anti-terror law

Image

A still from YouTube video by Brent Morton
Thousands of demonstrators have united across Canada to take action against proposed anti-terrorism legislation known as Bill C-51, which would expand the powers of police and the nation's spy agency, especially when it comes to detaining terror suspects.

Organizers of the 'Day of Action' said that "over 70 communities" across Canada were planning to participate on Saturday, according to StopC51.ca.


The biggest gatherings were reported in Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, Ottawa and Halifax.

"I'm really worried about democracy, this country is going in a really bad direction, [Prime Minister Stephen] Harper is taking it in a really bad direction," protester Stuart Basden from Toronto, the Canadian city which saw hundreds of people come out, told The Star.

"Freedom to speak out against the government is probably [in] jeopardy...even if you're just posting stuff online you could be targeted, so it's a really terrifying bill," Basden added.


The ruling Conservative government tabled the legislation back in January, arguing that the new law would improve the safety of Canadians.


Comment: See also: Canada's State Policeman's Bill: C-51, legal opinion


War Whore

Why the media silence on Lindsey Graham's vow to use the military to force vote in Congress?

Image
© Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Senator Lindsey Graham
The protracted 2016 presidential campaign cycle has already begun, and with it the close attention of the media to the statements made by prospective candidates in hopes of discovering even the slightest "gaffe" that can be turned into a political news item.

All the more odd then that the remarks made at a New Hampshire town hall meeting by one Republican presidential hopeful, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have been virtually blacked out by all of the major print and broadcast outlets.

Asked by a member of the audience what he would do about automatic cuts to the Pentagon budget that would go into effect because of sequestration, Graham responded that the problem had left him sick to his stomach.

He continued: "And here is the first thing I would do if I were President of the United States: I wouldn't let Congress leave town until we fix this. I would literally use the military to keep them in if I had to. We're not leaving town until we restore these defense cuts. We're not leaving town until we restore the intel cuts."

The statement is extraordinary. A candidate for the presidency of the United States vows that, once elected, he would use the military to impose his—and its—will upon a recalcitrant Congress. Presumably, troops would hold members of the House and Senate at gunpoint until they produced the results demanded.

Comment: It sure doesn't read like a joke. And, it's not funny. Just another sign of creeping fascism in the United States.


Bad Guys

Berlin professor sees Germany as the "taskmaster" of Europe

Image
© Claudia Höhne/Körber-Stiftung
"In the long run, the role of 'paymaster' can only be played by one who is also ready to play the difficult role of 'taskmaster'," writes Herfried Münkler in his new book Macht in der Mitte (Power in the Center). The Berlin political scientist openly argues for German hegemony in Europe. Germany has "become the central power in Europe," writes Münkler, and must "play the corresponding role."

Münkler justifies German claims to hegemony on the grounds that "the European integration process has come to a standstill" and its resumption cannot "be expected for the time being."

"The idea that a European nation could one day emerge from the European project" has failed, says Münkler. Due to the longstanding economic crisis in France, the "Berlin-Paris Axis" has "become in the last years a German center." Under these circumstances Germany is obliged as the "power in the center" to take on the task of "holding Europe together" and of "getting Europeans into line."

"Germany must lead in Europe," demands Münkler. He adds that the country will have to proceed carefully, something that "should not be confused with hesitancy and indecision." The role of a "power in the center" can "no longer be confined to that of a financial regulator," but includes "determined political and economic leadership."

Attention

Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg - Donbas conflict not NATO's responsibility

Image
NATO General Jens Stoltenberg said in an interview to Sky News that the conflict in southeastern Ukraine is not the responsibility of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

The conflict in southeastern Ukraine (Donbas) is not the responsibility of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the alliance's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has told Sky News.

"Our main responsibility is to defend and to protect all NATO allies and no NATO ally has been attacked," Stoltenberg said on Friday, reminding that Ukraine is not a member of NATO "so there is a difference between Ukraine and NATO members, because the security guarantee is for NATO allies."

A military conflict started in southeastern Ukraine in April, 2014, when Kiev launched a military operation against independence supporters who refused to recognize the new coup-installed government. The Kiev authorities, as well as Western countries and NATO have been accusing Russia of being involved in the situation in Ukraine, going as far as to claim that Russia has sent weapons to Donbas independence supporters.

Stoltenberg told Sky News that adherence to the Minsk truce is crucial to the stabilization of the situation in Ukraine.

"The most important thing now is to support the implementation of the Minsk agreements, meaning respecting the ceasefire, making sure that all their weapons are withdrawn from the frontline," Stoltenberg said.

Meanwhile on Thursday, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko announced that Ukraine continues to build up its military potential and defense capability, having resumed regular military training, which will be conducted with the participation of NATO instructors.

Comment: Can there be a more mixed message than this? On the one hand "not NATO's problem" but on the other hand training and arming Ukraine as it prepares to ditch Minsk 2.0. "Believe what we say, not what we do." Psychopathic hypocrisy at its best.


Star of David

Barney Frank - Israel & AIPAC lobbied Congress to push for Iraq war

Barney Frank

Barnett "Barney" Frank is an American politician who served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Massachusetts from 1981 to 2013.
The Forward's Nathan Guttman reports that the Netanyahu speech has enraged not just liberal Jews but centrist establishment types, who are finally becoming critical of Israel. The hardworking Guttman reports on an explosion in Washington ahead of the speech:
On March 2, [Florida Rabbi David] Paskin, who attended the AIPAC annual conference in Washington that coincided with Netanyahu's speech, was among dozens at a packed closed-door session on pro-Israel outreach to progressives. There, the discussion quickly turned heated when former Democratic congressman Barney Frank (who is [AIPAC operative] Ann Lewis's brother) chided the lobby for not speaking out against Netanyahu's visit and for avoiding any criticism of Israeli policies. According to two session participants, Frank argued that this reluctance causes pro-Israel activists to lose their credibility among progressives.

Tempers flared even more, they said, when Frank claimed that Israel and AIPAC had lobbied members of Congress a decade ago to support the war in Iraq. Similar arguments in the past have been hurled at the lobby by anti-war activists from the left and have always been vehemently denied. Frank, faced with vocal resistance from AIPAC members in the room, clarified that while calling for war was not the lobby's official position, some of its top members advocated for it personally in their meetings with him and other members of Congress.

Efforts to contact Frank to ask about this exchange were unsuccessful.
Remember that Walt and Mearsheimer were tarred as anti-Semites for saying in 2006 that the Israel lobby pushed the Iraq war. I supported the two scholars' argument because I had heard as much myself; in 2002, my brother shocked me when he said, "I demonstrated against the Vietnam War, but my Jewish newspaper said this war could be good for Israel."The Jewish community has never had an honest conversation about this matter; no, Jeffrey Goldberg and Marty Peretz and friends shut it down by calling Walt and Mearsheimer anti-Semites. That conversation would include asking Tom Friedman, David Remnick, Peter Beinart, and Kenneth Pollack if they pushed the Iraq war in part out of concern for Israel's security. And did they believe that Jeffrey Goldberg and Judith Miller were carrying water for Israel when they put out their bogus reports on Saddam's WMD? This is another great benefit of the Netanyahu speech, problematizing the issue of what Joe Klein called divided loyalties inside American Zionist life. Not a witchhunt, an accounting.

By the way, Barney Frank voted against the Iraq war.

Comment: Perhaps. ever so slowly, the tide against Zionism is starting to shift. The crimes of Israel are becoming too large for their supporters in US to ignore. The question is, will there be a Palestine left before it finally does.