Puppet Masters
Hundreds of members of Afghanistan's security forces have been killed recently fighting insurgent attacks on the main city in the southern province of Helmand, officials said on Friday.
Abdul Majeed Akhonzada, deputy head of the provincial council, and lawmaker Sheer Muhammad Akhon put the number of soldiers and police killed in the past 10 days in and around Lashkar Gah at more than 200.
Separately, they each said 45 civilians had also been killed in the fighting, which saw Taliban militants launch attacks on at least two areas of the city earlier this week.
Akhon says 100 security forces personnel have also been wounded. Both police and soldiers fight on Afghanistan's front lines.
Akhonzada and Akhon both say it is the worst situation the province has faced in the 15 years since the Taliban's regime ended with the 2001 U.S. invasion.
The US' 2016 presidential election resembles nothing so much as a reality show, Gilbert Mercier, a US-based French journalist, author and editor-in-chief of News Junkie Post, deems.
However, to understand the underlying "forces" that drive today's election one should look back into the US' history.
Comment: Due to the entrenchment of the 'deep state' ruling elite in the US and the reality that presidents are essentially figure heads at this point with the real people in power controlling things from the shadows, there's approximately zero chance that Trump could do anything positive for the nation (if he even set out to do so), so the extensive backlash against him is interesting considering that whoever wins the election will be following the status quo.
So is all the backlash against Trump just because the Bush and Clinton 'dynasties' want Killary at the helm, or is there something else going on?
Last Saturday Egypt voted in favor of two separate draft resolutions on Syria in the UN Security Council.
Two draft texts, one from France and Spain, and the other from the Russian Federation addressing the conflict in Syria failed to be adopted by the Security Council (UNSC). However Cairo's decision to support the Russian document led to a public spat between Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
This week, for the first time since the 18-month-old conflict began, USS Nitze launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets in Yemen in retaliation for alleged attacks on the US Navy. The initial Pentagon assessment said that the "self-defense" attack resulted in the destruction of three radar sites, with no indications of civilian casualties.
On Friday US President Barack Obama informed Congress about authorizing the strikes "in response to anti-ship cruise missile launches perpetrated by Houthi insurgents." In the "War Powers Resolution" letter, Obama stated that US armed forces targeted radar facilities which the US believes had been involved in "the October 9 launches and other recent attacks."
Comment: No facts required apparently.
"These limited and proportionate strikes were conducted to protect our personnel and our ships and will preserve our freedom of navigation in this important maritime passageway," Obama explained.
Comment: There's that phrase again - "freedom of navigation" - which was also used for increasing tensions in the South China Sea.
Comment: Meanwhile the UK pretends to want peace in Yemen: With blood on its hands, UK drafts UNSC resolution calling for 'immediate' ceasefire in Yemen
See also: Gulf of Tonkin redux? Pentagon sez: 'US Navy destroyer AGAIN targeted by missiles from Yemen' - Houthi rebels deny involvement - UPDATES

A man sits near others amidst rubble of a building destroyed in the northwestern city of Amran, Yemen.
"We have decided to put forward a draft Security Council resolution on Yemen calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a resumption of the political process," British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft told reporters in New York.
The resolution will also focus on delivering humanitarian aid to the war-torn country following the escalation in violence after the breakdown of peace talks in August. The draft text is expected to be circulated among the council's 15 members in coming days.
The British initiative follows one of the deadliest air strikes of the conflict by the Saudi-led coalition, which hit a funeral service in Sana'a last week, killing over 100 people and injuring some 600 mourners.
Comment: Then the US strikes Yemen after they 'promise' a review: All talk, no action: US to 'immediately review' support for Saudi-led coalition after Yemen funeral bombing. The UN already claimed to have a ceasefire in the works but no one is listening: UN envoy for Yemen says Houthis agree to 3-day ceasefire, will Saudi Arabia follow suit?

Thanks, America, for bringing freedom to Yemen. It really gives the place a certain je ne sais quoi.
Comment: From whom? Even if true, are they saying they made no attempt to verify the information?
The Joint Incidents Assessment Team (JIAT) said that coalition air operations officials did not receive an approval for the strike from their commanders, a violation of protocol, according to the statement carried by state news agency SPA, Reuters reported.
Comment: Standard operating procedure: blame the low-level officials, exonerate the commanders.
The JIAT has called for a review of rules of engagement, and compensation for the victims' families.
Comment: What a joke. Does anyone seriously believe the Saudis would condemn themselves for war crimes? "Well, we reviewed all the data and concluded that we deliberately targeted the funeral because we wanted to terrorize and demoralize the Yemeni population. We wanted to send a message that if they keep fighting, they and everyone they love will die. We mean business, we want to win, and if that means bombing funerals, well, that's a step we're willing to take. Actually, it's kind of fun."
Of course they're going to blame "faulty intelligence", misbehaving underlings.
See: SOTT Exclusive: Funeral massacre in Yemen: Houthis blame U.S., mobilize to original Islamic State Saudi Arabia's border - UPDATE
A statement released by US Africa Command on October 13 indicates that the Pentagon has been prepared to engage in South Sudan since July, when the US Air Force quietly moved a number of F-16 fighters and KC 135 refueling tankers to Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti.
"[The deployment was a] precautionary measure in order to protect Americans and American interests in South Sudan if required," said a statement from US Africa Command, according to Stars and Stripes.
"These assets have remained in Djibouti out of an abundance of caution in response to that situation in South Sudan." The move included roughly 50 combat-ready troops.
Comment: What is the US preparing for in Africa: U.S. imperialism on tour in East Africa - Kerry makes the rounds championing military interventions
Under the new policies, military commanders are now responsible for approving or denying sex changes for troops who self-identify as the opposite sex, according to the 72-page handbook, Transgender Service in the U.S. Military: An Implementation Handbook, published Sept. 30.
"The commander, informed by the recommendations of the [military medical provider], the [service central coordination cells], and others, as appropriate, will respond to the request to transition gender while ensuring readiness by minimizing impacts to the mission (including deployment, operations, training, exercise schedules, and critical skills availability), as well as to the morale and welfare and good order and discipline of the command," the handbook states.
The handbook is the result of a Pentagon policy adopted in July that permits troops who self-identify as the opposite sex while serving openly in the ranks. In the past, such cross-dressers were limited by the "don't ask, don't tell" policy of hiding sexual orientation.
Comment: Political correctness run amok.
The Health & Wellness Show: The medical and social implications of gender multiplicity
"An intergovernmental agreement has been signed today, under which the Russian side has undertaken to deliver S-400 [to India]," head of the Russian state-owned defense and technology giant Rostec Sergey Chemezov told reporters on the sidelines of the BRICS summit on Saturday.
"We will then start preparing the contracts and I hope that in the first half of 2017 we will complete and sign these contracts and the production will start. I believe the delivery will begin somewhere in 2020," he added.
Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said the agreement on S-400 delivery is highly important as it shows Russia's willingness to strengthen strategic partnerships with its main allies.
"S-400 it is our newest system. We are currently equipping our own military forces with it and we are making an exception only for our closest allies, such as India and China.
"The fact that we have reached agreements with both India and China [regarding S-400 delivery] shows a lot. It shows that Russia exports its most advanced technologies to the countries it trusts, with which it is building strategic partnerships," he stressed, mentioning Russia's agreement on S-400 exports with China, the first foreign buyer of the system. That deal was announced in the spring of 2015. According to media reports, the transaction amounted to about $3 billion.

Women's rights groups say sexual misconduct allegations disqualifies Donald Trump but not Bill Clinton
But some of those same groups did not think former President Bill Clinton's allegations of sexual misconduct nearly two decades ago were disqualifying in the same way.
At least three women - Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey - accused Clinton of unwanted sexual advances. Another five, including White House intern Monica Lewinsky, said they had had consensual affairs with him. Clinton was impeached on charges of lying about the Lewinsky affair before a grand jury and of obstruction of justice, but was acquitted and served his full presidential term.
Women's groups largely stayed supportive.
"Feminists have, all along, muffled, disguised, excused and denied the worst aspects of the president's behavior with women," said a lengthy Vanity Fair article from 1998.
"Feminism sort of died in that period," New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd told Yahoo recently. "Because the feminists had to come along with Bill Clinton's retrogressive behavior with women in order to protect the progressive policies for women that Bill Clinton had as president."












Comment: The last line seems to say it all and may explain why U.S. forces did nothing to help - especially since control of poppy crops are so important to the black budget fund-raising of Empire. At the same time, the Taliban is traditionally against the production of the poppy and kept the crop in relatively low production prior to the US moving into Afghanistan. So, was this recent attack actually the Taliban, or some US-funded and supported group made to look like the Taliban? Or, were they the real thing and the US just lost some prized poppy-growing fields?
See: