Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Binoculars

More than 200 Afghan police and soldiers killed by Taliban, poppy fields secured by militants

afghanpo

Hundreds of members of Afghanistan's security forces have been killed recently fighting insurgent attacks on the main city in the southern province of Helmand, officials said on Friday.

Abdul Majeed Akhonzada, deputy head of the provincial council, and lawmaker Sheer Muhammad Akhon put the number of soldiers and police killed in the past 10 days in and around Lashkar Gah at more than 200.

Separately, they each said 45 civilians had also been killed in the fighting, which saw Taliban militants launch attacks on at least two areas of the city earlier this week.

Akhon says 100 security forces personnel have also been wounded. Both police and soldiers fight on Afghanistan's front lines.

Akhonzada and Akhon both say it is the worst situation the province has faced in the 15 years since the Taliban's regime ended with the 2001 U.S. invasion.

Comment: The last line seems to say it all and may explain why U.S. forces did nothing to help - especially since control of poppy crops are so important to the black budget fund-raising of Empire. At the same time, the Taliban is traditionally against the production of the poppy and kept the crop in relatively low production prior to the US moving into Afghanistan. So, was this recent attack actually the Taliban, or some US-funded and supported group made to look like the Taliban? Or, were they the real thing and the US just lost some prized poppy-growing fields?

See:


Bad Guys

Game of Thrones: Bush and Clinton 'dynasties' don't want Trump to come out on top

obama, bush jr, bill clinton, and bush senior all together
© AP Photo/ Charles Dharapak
The Bushes and the Clintons, the two "political dynasties" expect that Hillary Clinton will maintain the established status quo, if elected, and do not want Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump to occupy the Oval Office, US-based journalist and editor-in-chief of News Junkie Post Gilbert Mercier told Sputnik.

The US' 2016 presidential election resembles nothing so much as a reality show, Gilbert Mercier, a US-based French journalist, author and editor-in-chief of News Junkie Post, deems.

However, to understand the underlying "forces" that drive today's election one should look back into the US' history.

Comment: Due to the entrenchment of the 'deep state' ruling elite in the US and the reality that presidents are essentially figure heads at this point with the real people in power controlling things from the shadows, there's approximately zero chance that Trump could do anything positive for the nation (if he even set out to do so), so the extensive backlash against him is interesting considering that whoever wins the election will be following the status quo.

So is all the backlash against Trump just because the Bush and Clinton 'dynasties' want Killary at the helm, or is there something else going on?


Info

Egypt in balancing act between Moscow and Riyadh

Cairo, Egypt
© Sputnik/ Eduard Peskov
Commenting on the recent public row between longtime allies Egypt and Saudi Arabia over Cairo's vote in favor of two different Syrian resolutions at the UN Security Council, political analysts argue that regardless of the current tensions between the two countries, Egypt is unlikely to break ties with Riyadh for the sake of friendship with Moscow.

Last Saturday Egypt voted in favor of two separate draft resolutions on Syria in the UN Security Council.

Two draft texts, one from France and Spain, and the other from the Russian Federation addressing the conflict in Syria failed to be adopted by the Security Council (UNSC). However Cairo's decision to support the Russian document led to a public spat between Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Comment: More balancing ties with Egypt: Turkey reaches out to mend relations with Egypt


Snakes in Suits

Based on no evidence, Obama vows to continue 'self-defense' strikes on Yemen

Tomahawk Land Attack Missile
© U.S. Navy / Reuters
Washington reserves the right to strike targets in Yemen whenever "necessary and appropriate," President Obama told Congress after the US military carried out its first direct attack in the bloody conflict, using the pretext of self-defense.

This week, for the first time since the 18-month-old conflict began, USS Nitze launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets in Yemen in retaliation for alleged attacks on the US Navy. The initial Pentagon assessment said that the "self-defense" attack resulted in the destruction of three radar sites, with no indications of civilian casualties.

On Friday US President Barack Obama informed Congress about authorizing the strikes "in response to anti-ship cruise missile launches perpetrated by Houthi insurgents." In the "War Powers Resolution" letter, Obama stated that US armed forces targeted radar facilities which the US believes had been involved in "the October 9 launches and other recent attacks."


Comment: No facts required apparently.


"These limited and proportionate strikes were conducted to protect our personnel and our ships and will preserve our freedom of navigation in this important maritime passageway," Obama explained.


Comment: There's that phrase again - "freedom of navigation" - which was also used for increasing tensions in the South China Sea.


Comment: Meanwhile the UK pretends to want peace in Yemen: With blood on its hands, UK drafts UNSC resolution calling for 'immediate' ceasefire in Yemen

See also: Gulf of Tonkin redux? Pentagon sez: 'US Navy destroyer AGAIN targeted by missiles from Yemen' - Houthi rebels deny involvement - UPDATES


Snakes in Suits

With blood on its hands, UK drafts UNSC resolution calling for 'immediate' ceasefire in Yemen

building destroyed in the northwestern city of Amran, Yemen
© Khaled Abdullah / Reuters
A man sits near others amidst rubble of a building destroyed in the northwestern city of Amran, Yemen.
London will present a draft UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Yemen following last week's deadly raid on a funeral. Despite this, the UK is not suspending arms sales to Saudi Arabia, which is involved in the conflict.

"We have decided to put forward a draft Security Council resolution on Yemen calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a resumption of the political process," British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft told reporters in New York.

The resolution will also focus on delivering humanitarian aid to the war-torn country following the escalation in violence after the breakdown of peace talks in August. The draft text is expected to be circulated among the council's 15 members in coming days.

The British initiative follows one of the deadliest air strikes of the conflict by the Saudi-led coalition, which hit a funeral service in Sana'a last week, killing over 100 people and injuring some 600 mourners.

Comment: Then the US strikes Yemen after they 'promise' a review: All talk, no action: US to 'immediately review' support for Saudi-led coalition after Yemen funeral bombing. The UN already claimed to have a ceasefire in the works but no one is listening: UN envoy for Yemen says Houthis agree to 3-day ceasefire, will Saudi Arabia follow suit?


Binoculars

Dishonest Mistake: Saudi investigators blame "bad info" for funeral strike

yemen funeral

Thanks, America, for bringing freedom to Yemen. It really gives the place a certain je ne sais quoi.
A Saudi-led coalition attacked a funeral in Yemen after receiving incorrect information that armed Houthi leaders allegedly were in the area, an investigative body set up by the coalition has concluded.


Comment: From whom? Even if true, are they saying they made no attempt to verify the information?


The Joint Incidents Assessment Team (JIAT) said that coalition air operations officials did not receive an approval for the strike from their commanders, a violation of protocol, according to the statement carried by state news agency SPA, Reuters reported.


Comment: Standard operating procedure: blame the low-level officials, exonerate the commanders.


The JIAT has called for a review of rules of engagement, and compensation for the victims' families.

Comment: What a joke. Does anyone seriously believe the Saudis would condemn themselves for war crimes? "Well, we reviewed all the data and concluded that we deliberately targeted the funeral because we wanted to terrorize and demoralize the Yemeni population. We wanted to send a message that if they keep fighting, they and everyone they love will die. We mean business, we want to win, and if that means bombing funerals, well, that's a step we're willing to take. Actually, it's kind of fun."

Of course they're going to blame "faulty intelligence", misbehaving underlings.

See: SOTT Exclusive: Funeral massacre in Yemen: Houthis blame U.S., mobilize to original Islamic State Saudi Arabia's border - UPDATE


Map

Ramping up: More US fighter jets, troops deployed in East Africa since July

US soldiers and F-16 fighter jet
© AP Photo/ Ahn Young-joon
The US Air Force deployed a fleet of aircraft to east Africa over the summer to respond to potential threats in South Sudan.

A statement released by US Africa Command on October 13 indicates that the Pentagon has been prepared to engage in South Sudan since July, when the US Air Force quietly moved a number of F-16 fighters and KC 135 refueling tankers to Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti.

"[The deployment was a] precautionary measure in order to protect Americans and American interests in South Sudan if required," said a statement from US Africa Command, according to Stars and Stripes.

"These assets have remained in Djibouti out of an abundance of caution in response to that situation in South Sudan." The move included roughly 50 combat-ready troops.

Comment: What is the US preparing for in Africa: U.S. imperialism on tour in East Africa - Kerry makes the rounds championing military interventions


Attention

Pentagon issues new handbook on gender identification in the ranks

Pentagon
© Flickr/ chuck holton
Political correctness remains a central characteristic of the Obama administration's policies. Take the Pentagon's new anti-discrimination policy on what a newly-published handbook calls "gender dysphoria," or "the distress that some transgender individuals experience due to a mismatch between their gender and their sex assigned at birth."

Under the new policies, military commanders are now responsible for approving or denying sex changes for troops who self-identify as the opposite sex, according to the 72-page handbook, Transgender Service in the U.S. Military: An Implementation Handbook, published Sept. 30.

"The commander, informed by the recommendations of the [military medical provider], the [service central coordination cells], and others, as appropriate, will respond to the request to transition gender while ensuring readiness by minimizing impacts to the mission (including deployment, operations, training, exercise schedules, and critical skills availability), as well as to the morale and welfare and good order and discipline of the command," the handbook states.

The handbook is the result of a Pentagon policy adopted in July that permits troops who self-identify as the opposite sex while serving openly in the ranks. In the past, such cross-dressers were limited by the "don't ask, don't tell" policy of hiding sexual orientation.

Comment: Political correctness run amok.

The Health & Wellness Show: The medical and social implications of gender multiplicity


Rocket

Russia agrees to sell S-400s to India, delivery could begin in 2020

Russia S-400
© Mihail Mokrushin / Sputnik
Delivery of Russia's most advanced anti-aircraft defense system, the S-400 Triumph, to India could begin in 2020 according to an agreement signed by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin at the BRICS summit in India.

"An intergovernmental agreement has been signed today, under which the Russian side has undertaken to deliver S-400 [to India]," head of the Russian state-owned defense and technology giant Rostec Sergey Chemezov told reporters on the sidelines of the BRICS summit on Saturday.

"We will then start preparing the contracts and I hope that in the first half of 2017 we will complete and sign these contracts and the production will start. I believe the delivery will begin somewhere in 2020," he added.

Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said the agreement on S-400 delivery is highly important as it shows Russia's willingness to strengthen strategic partnerships with its main allies.

"S-400 it is our newest system. We are currently equipping our own military forces with it and we are making an exception only for our closest allies, such as India and China.

"The fact that we have reached agreements with both India and China [regarding S-400 delivery] shows a lot. It shows that Russia exports its most advanced technologies to the countries it trusts, with which it is building strategic partnerships," he stressed, mentioning Russia's agreement on S-400 exports with China, the first foreign buyer of the system. That deal was announced in the spring of 2015. According to media reports, the transaction amounted to about $3 billion.

Comment:


Blackbox

The great divide: Why do women's groups treat Bill Clinton & Donald Trump differently?

women's rights group
© McClatchy DC
Women's rights groups say sexual misconduct allegations disqualifies Donald Trump but not Bill Clinton
Groups that advocate for women's rights are lashing out at Donald Trump for allegations of groping women and bragging about sexual assaults.

But some of those same groups did not think former President Bill Clinton's allegations of sexual misconduct nearly two decades ago were disqualifying in the same way.

At least three women - Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey - accused Clinton of unwanted sexual advances. Another five, including White House intern Monica Lewinsky, said they had had consensual affairs with him. Clinton was impeached on charges of lying about the Lewinsky affair before a grand jury and of obstruction of justice, but was acquitted and served his full presidential term.

Women's groups largely stayed supportive.

"Feminists have, all along, muffled, disguised, excused and denied the worst aspects of the president's behavior with women," said a lengthy Vanity Fair article from 1998.

"Feminism sort of died in that period," New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd told Yahoo recently. "Because the feminists had to come along with Bill Clinton's retrogressive behavior with women in order to protect the progressive policies for women that Bill Clinton had as president."

Comment: 60% of Americans can't stand Trump or Clinton