© acemyproject.com
Budgeting for threats, reassurances, and bogus adversaries.
Statements warning of a so-called "Russian threat" to US security are linked to discussions in Congress on next year's military budget, said a Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, noting
the idea of this "threat" has been a "top-seller" for the Pentagon. "We were not surprised by the loud statements of US security officials who saw Russia as the main threat to US national security," said Russia's Ministry of Defense spokesman, Igor Konashenkov.
"It is not a thing to be impressed by," he said, adding that the statements have the same timing each year. "The reason is simple - the discussion of the military budget in Congress for the next year."
He pointed out that the idea of a so-called Russian threat is not new. "One needs to remember that
the 'Russian threat' has been the best-selling threat delivered by the Pentagon not only to Congress, but also to NATO partners since the middle of the previous century," he said.
"What would they do without us?"
Earlier in February, the Pentagon proposed a $582.7 billion defense budget that emphasizes emerging threats from Russia, China, and Islamic State militants (IS, former ISIS, ISIL).
The proposed budget would quadruple the last year's request for the European Reassurance Initiative (ERI) to $3.4 billion in a bid to reassure NATO allies.
Moscow's statement comes as General Philip Breedlove, Commander of US European Command (EUCOM), outlined major security challenges in Europe while speaking before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday. He said that
the top two were a "resurgent, aggressive" Russia and IS. "Russia continues to foment security concerns in multiple locations around the EUCOM AOR. Concurrently, we deal with a variety of transnational threats that largely emanate from instability in Iraq, Syria, North Africa, and the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)."
Comment: Same time next year..."In Fear We Trust." The US funds the narrative, not the truth, and in doing so gets what it pays for.