The president re-raises a question that has roiled the nation since Jimmy Carter: To what degree should we allow idealistic values trump vital interests in determining foreign policy?
On the matter of who ordered the killing of Khashoggi, Trump does not rule out the crown prince as prime suspect:
"King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman vigorously deny any knowledge of the planning or execution of the murder... (but) it could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge."Yet, whether MBS did or didn't do it, the Saudis have "agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States." And a full fourth of that is for "military equipment from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and other great U.S. defense contractors."
"Foolishly" cancel these contracts, warns Trump, and Russia or China will snap them up. Moreover, the Saudis have agreed to pump oil to keep prices down.
Trump is unabashedly putting U.S. economic and strategic interests first. He is not going to damage our relationship with Riyadh and its royal family, even if the future king ordered a cold-blooded killing of a U.S.-based Saudi journalist he regarded as an enemy.















Comment: Buchanan is right on both fronts: Trump is basically opting for a pragmatic foreign policy along the lines of that practiced by Russia. But at the same time, his justifications for this specific relationship are completely delusional. He accuses Iran of the very types of crimes which he excuses Saudi Arabia for, and then uses those crimes (which don't affect the Saudi relationship) as a reason for allying with Saudi Arabia (which actually commits those crimes). It is incoherent, because American foreign policy is incoherent - at least on the level of its public rationalization. Trump is honest about the Saudi relationship. He should be just as honest about Iran: the U.S. doesn't like Iran because Israel doesn't like them.
Like Buchanan, Glenn Greenwald is also clearsighted when it comes to Trump's statement: