Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Stormtrooper

Yemen rebels shoot down imperial drone, target another during Gulf of Oman false-flag incident

MQ-9 Reaper
© USAF/Lt. Col. Leslie Pratt
An MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicle
According to US Central Command, a US drone was downed over Yemen earlier this month, and another was shot at during the Gulf of Oman crisis, both of which point to "Iranian assistance." However, there's no reason to assume the Cold War-era missiles are Iran's doing: dozens of countries use the model.

"A US MQ-9 was shot down over Yemen by what we assess to be a Houthi SA-6 surface-to-air missile on June 6, 2019," said CENTCOM spokesman Lt. Col. Earl Brown in a Sunday statement. He noted the altitude of the drone "indicated an improvement over previous Houthi capability, which we assess was enabled by Iranian assistance."

Then last Thursday, there was another attempted shootdown of a US drone, this time over the Gulf of Oman by what CENTCOM says was "a modified Iranian SA-7 surface-to-air missile."

According to CENTCOM, the goal was "to disrupt surveillance of the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps] attack on the M/T Kokuka Courageous. The MQ-9 had arrived minutes earlier at 6:20 a.m. local time at the motor tanker (M/T) Altair and had observed the ship on fire. The SA-7 was ineffective and its closest point of approach to the MQ-9 was approximately one kilometer," CENTCOM said.

Comment: The aim is to create enough validation for war - even if it means 'crying wolf', falsifying accusations or employing false-flags. In the Yemen drone attacks and the attack on Kokuka Courageous, CENTCOM is conflating multiple 'no evidence' incidents to implicate Iran and create justifiable causes for retribution, despite ongoing expertise to the contrary.


Arrow Up

Markets turn optimistic: Trump to meet with President Xi at the G-20 summit

Xi Trump
© Unknown
Presidents Xi and Trump
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping "will be having an extended meeting next week at the G-20 in Japan." In a tweet, Trump said that he and Xi "had a very good telephone conversation," and that "our respective teams will begin talks prior to our meeting."


Chinese state media reported shortly following the announcement that Xi had agreed to meet with Trump at the summit, scheduled for June 28-29 in Osaka.

Xi said he hoped that the U.S. treats Chinese companies fairly, according to Chinese media - a possible reference to Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications giant that faces a ban because of what the U.S. calls national security issues.


Comment: Zero Hedge has market updates following announcements of the meeting:
The much-watched account of Hu Xijin, Editor-in-chief of the Global Times, tweeted a warning managing expectations about the enthusiasm over a Trump-Xi meeting:
"President Xi Jinping did agree to meet with US President Donald Trump at G20 and they will discuss fundamental issues in China-US relations. This phone call brings a slim hope to break the current deadlock between the two countries."
However, within seconds, the tweet was deleted.

Meanwhile, Yuan has extended gains.
Yuan Chart
The bears are suffering a terrible trifecta today.

First, Draghi threw in the towel said he would be cutting rates soon; second, Powell is expected to unleash the dovish floodgates tomorrow; Third and final, moments ago, Trump restored hope that a trade deal may be forthcoming at next week's G-20 when he tweeted that contrary to conventional expectations, he will in fact be having an "extended meeting" with Xi next week..
Dow chart
... the Dow soaring more than 300 points...
Dow futures
... the Chinese yuan spiking...
S&P500
So what does this mean for the Fed: with the ECB providing a dovish tailwind to US equities, with a glimmer of hope now appearing that trade war may be ending, and with the S&P at all time highs, Powell's job just got even more difficult: how can the Fed justify a preview to a rate cut tomorrow? We'll find out in just over 24 hours.



Dominoes

Acting Sec. of Defense Shanahan quits, replaced by Army's Mark Esper

EsperShanahan
© STARS AND STRIPES
Army Secretary Mark Esper • Former Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan
Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan has withdrawn from consideration to head the Pentagon, President Donald Trump has said, announcing that the current Secretary of the Army Mark Esper will become the new acting secretary.

The abrupt move was announced Tuesday by the US president on Twitter, his social media platform of choice. Shanahan's decision was explained by his desire to "devote more time to his family," according to Trump.
Shanahan's decision has been reportedly triggered by the background check process, that comes as a part of the confirmation for the Pentagon chief office. Earlier on Tuesday, US media reported that the FBI had been investigating a 2010 domestic fight between Shanahan and his then-wife.

Comment: More on this switch-up from Moon of Alabama:
On May 9 the White House announced that it would nominate Shanahan for the Secretary of Defense position. But it never sent the nomination request to Congress to have Shanahan confirmed. During the usual FBI background check before a confirmation, a 2010 domestic violence incident Shanahan was involved in came up. It seems that it now ended his short career at the Pentagon.

Shanahan had zero experience in the military. He is a former Boeing manager. A recent Politico portrait of Shanahan described him as weak leader who allowed the war hawks in National Security Council to directly talk with regional commanders without even informing him. He was no counterweight for Bolton and Pompeo who are eager to wage war on Iran.

Yesterday ABC News reported that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo would meet with talk with the Central Command and Special Operations Command leaders without Shanahan being there. It was extremely unusual:
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will travel to Florida on Monday to meet with leaders from U.S. Central Command and Special Operations Command on Tuesday. The U.S. is considering "all options," including military force, to respond to Iran's reported attack on two oil vessels, Pompeo said on Sunday, raising concerns of a U.S. strike.
...
Pompeo will meet with CENTCOM and Special Operations Command at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida on Tuesday to "discuss regional security concerns and ongoing operations," according to Ortagus, after calling several world leaders over the weekend to discuss America's evidence that Iran was behind last week's attacks.
There is no information what plans those talks were about.

Another very unusual sign is that the old war criminal Henry Kissinger visited the Pentagon yesterday and today.

It is unlikely that the U.S. would launch a war without a Secretary of Defense in place. Bolton and Pompeo obviously want a war on Iran and they try their best to instigate it. They need a new SecDef in place as soon as possible.
See also: FBI examining 2010 domestic fight involving acting defense secretary Shanahan; accounts differ on aggressor


Laptop

Clinton emails: State Dept. identifies 23 violations, 'multiple security incidents' in ongoing investigation

HCLINTON
© Unknown
Former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton
The State Department revealed Monday that it has identified "multiple security incidents" involving current or former employees' handling of Hillary Clinton's emails, and that 23 "violations" and seven "infractions" have been issued as part of the department's ongoing investigation.

The information came in a letter to Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is responsible for overseeing the security review.

"To this point, the Department has assessed culpability to 15 individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents," Mary Elizabeth Taylor, the State Department's Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Legislative Affairs, wrote to Grassley. "DS has issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents. ... This number will likely change as the review progresses."


Red Pill

Trump whisperer? Tucker Carlson advice to Trump: War with Iran not 'in anyone's interest'

CarlsonTrump
© Fox News/YouTube
Fox News' Tucker Carlson • President Donald Trump
In the upper echelons of the Trump administration, hawkish voices on Iran predominate - most notably Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton. But as tensions between the U.S. and Iran have escalated over the last few weeks, there's been another, far different voice in the president's ear: that of Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

A source familiar with the conversations told The Daily Beast that, in recent weeks, the Fox News host has privately advised Trump against taking military action against Iran. And a senior administration official said that during the president's recent conversations with the Fox primetime host, Carlson has bashed the more "hawkish members" of his administration.

While some Fox News hosts have argued that a conflict with Iran would be justified, Carlson has consistently criticized U.S. military intervention abroad, particularly in the Middle East. In recent weeks, he has questioned whether war with Iran would be "in anyone's interest." Last month, he publicly chided Bolton, saying he was intentionally escalating tensions, and that a potential conflict would "be like Christmas, Thanksgiving, his birthday wrapped into one."

Comment: See also:


Lemon

Ukrainian oligarch sues lobbyist over failure to procure Trump inauguration VIP tickets - US media cries 'RUSSIA!'

Pavel Fuks
© Krysja/Shutterstock
Ukrainian businessman Pavel Fuks
What does an Ukrainian tycoon suing an Ukrainian-born lobbyist over access to Trump inauguration have to do with Russia? Nothing, unless you're a mainstream US media outlet, in which case it's - everything.

Pavel Fuks, a real-estate developer from the Ukrainian city of Kharkov, apparently really wanted VIP access to President Donald Trump's inauguration in January 2017, and paid $200,000 to Ukrainian-born lobbyist Yuri Vanetik to arrange it. Fuks is now suing Vanetik in a federal court in California, saying the lobbyist cheated him out of the money.

Vanetik says the money was at least in part a payment for legal work on behalf of Gennady A. Kernes, the mayor of Kharkov, and not for the inauguration - because foreigners are not allowed to buy tickets, you see. He is disputing the allegations and says he will counter-sue.

So how did this story come to the attention of the New York Times? Because it is never specified that Vanetik was born in Ukraine (at least if one hasn't bothered to read his Wall Street Journal piece from back in April), and Fuks is described as "Ukrainian-Russian" because he has done business in Moscow - including, reportedly, interest in the Trump Tower project that never came to pass.

Quenelle

Israelis livid as New Zealand government website map replaces Israel with Palestine

NZ Map of Palestine
© New Zealand Immigration
New Zealand's immigration website deleted a fact sheet about Palestine from its website after it caused outrage for identifying Israel as Palestine on a map.

The government website published the map as part of a fact sheet about Palestinian immigrants in New Zealand, showing Israel highlighted in blue and marked as 'Palestine'. The West Bank is not included in the highlighted area.
The Israel Institute of New Zealand called on the immigration minister to "immediately apologize for the offending image and confirm that it does not reflect government policy." It also called for an investigation.

Comment: Word to the staffer who did this!


Attention

Propaganda alert! Russians, Ukrainian to face murder charges over downing of Flight MH17

memorial MH17
© Reuters/Alexander Ermochenko
Toys are placed at a memorial to victims of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 plane crash ner to village of Hrabove in Donetsk Region, Ukraine, June 19, 2019.
Three Russians and a Ukrainian will face murder charges for the deaths of 298 people aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 that was shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014, the international investigative team said on Wednesday.

The suspects are likely to be tried in absentia in proceedings set to start in the Netherlands next March. Dutch authorities said Russia has not cooperated with the inquiry and is not expected to surrender defendants.


"These suspects are seen to have played an important role in the death of 298 innocent civilians," Dutch Chief Prosecutor Fred Westerbeke said.

"Although they did not push the button themselves, we suspect them of close cooperation to get the (missile launcher) where it was, with the aim to shoot down an airplane."

Comment: The authors of this embarrassing propaganda piece should hang their heads in shame. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence proving Ukraine's guilt in the shoot-down. The media gatekeepers such as Reuters, BBC, CNN and others are hiding the truth.

Over to RT for some reporting from the real world:

[...]

The JIT includes representatives from Australia, Belgium, Malaysia, Ukraine and the Netherlands. Kiev lauded the accusations against the four, raised by the JIT, praising the international team of investigators.

"Ukraine welcomes the conclusions of the Joint Investigation Team on MH17. The President of Ukraine hopes that... those who are guilty of this brazen murder of innocent children, woman and men, will be put in the dock," recently elected President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a statement.

Pointing out "inconsistencies" in the probe, Moscow said the Dutch-led team was reluctant to search or study evidence that contradicted the theory that rebels were responsible for the incident. Moscow stands accused of providing the Buk launcher and missile, an allegation that it denies.

Moscow also blamed the JIT of failing to pressure Ukraine into providing radar data for the day when MH17 was shot down. It published its own radar data as well as records related to production and transportation of Buk missiles in Soviet times. According to Moscow, the data and records point to Ukraine as the culprit in the case. In particular, the warhead that destroyed the plane was of an older model that is no longer in use in Russia while its serial numbers, which were recovered at the crash site, point to a projectile that had been shipped to Ukraine.

Russia also criticized the JIT for relying on so-called 'open source evidence' like videos published on social media as well as opinions of 'civilian journalists' like the UK-based group Bellingcat in its reporting. Moscow says such evidence is not always reliable.

Bellingcat published its own report with a longer list of people, whom it accused of shooting down the airliner. The four suspects named by the JIT are on that list. Notably, the report was issued just hours before the JIT press conference.


Meanwhile, Russia is not the only country that has reservations about JIT's work. Last month Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said his country was not convinced by the evidence uncovered about either Russia's involvement or Ukraine's innocence in the case.


Russia slams the JIT's accusations as 'baseless':
On Wednesday, the Dutch-led Joint Investigations Team (JIT) accused three Russians nationals and a Ukrainian of playing a significant role in the downing of MH17 over Ukraine in 2014. All 298 people onboard died back then.

On top of that, the allegations were not backed up by reliable evidence and followed a "not quite coherent" line of argument. At the same time, the ministry maintains, JIT still opts to ignore information provided by Moscow.

That includes declassification of military data on the Buk missile, publication of radar data and an experiment conducted to show the exact effect that the projectile has on a plane cockpit

"Since day one after the tragedy Russia was most interested in establishing the truth and willing to cooperate with the investigation," the ministry said.

That includes declassification of sensitive military data on the Buk missile, radar data and "documents" proving the projectile that downed the passenger jet was a Ukrainian one.

The foreign ministry noted that while Russia was only given a secondary role in the investigation, Kiev enjoyed full membership. That allowed Ukraine "to fabricate evidence" and ditch any responsibility for not closing its airspace. The decision to keep the airspace open was criticized by the 2015 report of the Dutch Safety Board (which led the technical part of the probe into the crash).
Under such circumstances, we have legitimate questions about the work of the JIC. That underscores our previous concerns about the [investigation] process being biased and one-sided.
That said, Moscow is still ready to cooperate on the matter to bring the actual perpetrators to justice.



Mr. Potato

Pentagon wants $4.5 billion to counter China with theoretical robotic ships

Sea Hunter
© REUTERS / Steve Dipaola
The autonomous ship "Sea Hunter".
The US Navy is eyeing a large-scale introduction of robotic surface ships of various sizes as a counter to China's boosted capabilities. The vision, however, relies on not-yet-proven technologies and may even be a bluff.

The world's largest navy feels threatened by Beijing, whose advancements in anti-ship missile technologies and large investments in its own naval assets over the past years mean that a conflict near China's shores may not end in US favor. Among the Pentagon's plans to deal with the problem is to switch away from larger ships in favor of smaller ones and make scores of them robotic.

A drone ship would be cheaper to build and operate since it doesn't need all the facilities for the meatbags and the drones may be spread over wider areas.

Comment: If previous US output is anything to go by, this will be yet another scheme where taxpayers money goes to die, or just goes missing: "Astonishing fraud": Pentagon stashes billions, spends it later to avoid accountability

See also:


Eagle

Pompeo lays out red line for Iran: Death of a single US service member will trigger military response

american carrier jets
© REUTERS / Jeff Sherman/U.S. Navy
The United States continues to amass military forces in the vicinity of Iran, following tanker incidents near the Strait of Hormuz and the alleged threat that Iran poses to US forces operating in the Middle East.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, one of the architects of Washington's hard-line policy on Iran, has relayed a message to Tehran that the death of a single US service member would trigger a military response, the Washington Post reports.

According to the broadsheet, one such message was sent during Pompeo's emergency visit to Baghdad, after the White House picked up intelligence allegedly showing that Iran or its proxies were threatening US interests in the Middle East.

A person with knowledge of the situation was quoted as saying that Pentagon officials, including outgoing Acting Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan, have been "the ones putting the brakes" on hawks at the State Department and the White House.

Comment: That may be why Pompeo seems to have broken protocol on several occasions by talking to military commanders without Shanahan present. Pompeo and Bolton want war, and they'll steamroll over anyone in their way to get it. Luckily, however, so far they haven't been successful - in North Korea, Venezuela, or Iran. If anonymously sourced reports are anything to go by, it seems that Trump is at least attempting to keep them on the leash, too.

However, Shanahan's upcoming departure from Pentagon's top slot is understood to have raised concerns that the more belligerent Trump administration will push the military aside and involve it in further escalation of the conflict.

Comment: If that is the line, it leaves many opportunities for Iran and their allies to make life miserable for the Americans and their allies without triggering a military response. (Barring a false flag that blames the Iranians for the death of one or more American service members, of course.) Whether or not they have begun to do so yet is unverifiable, but the possibility is there.