Puppet Masters
Not only did Kelland write a 2017 story that Monsanto asked her to write in exactly the way Monsanto executive Sam Murphey asked her to write it, (without disclosing to readers that Monsanto was the source,) but now we see evidence that a draft of a separate story Kelland did about glyphosate was delivered to Monsanto before it was published, a practice typically frowned on by news outlets.
"I am satisfied that what was disclosed didn't contain information that would breach the Official Secrets Act," the UK's counter-terrorism chief and Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner, Neil Basu, said.
"The leak did not cause damage to the public interest at a level at which it would be necessary to engage misconduct in a public office. It would be inappropriate to carry out a police investigation in these circumstances."
However, it caused massive damage to Williamson's political career, as he was found to be responsible for it. Unlike the police, Prime Minister Theresa May considered the disclosure to be "extremely serious" and "unprecedented," firing the defence secretary over loss of confidence earlier this week.

Attorney General William Barr testifies before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., May 1, 2019.
So I give you: the Bill Barr perjury allegation.
We are all entitled to our own opinions. But are we entitled to our own facts? Daniel Patrick Moynihan's bon mot says no, but Washington makes you wonder. Like when spleen-venting about the supposedly outrageous, unbelievable, disgraceful invocation of the word "spy" to describe episodes of government spying is instantly followed by a New York Times story about how the spying - er, I mean, court-authorized electronic surveillance - coupled with the tasking of spies - er, undercover agents - green-lighted by a foreign spy - er, intelligence service - was more widespread than previously known.
If I were a cynic, I'd think people were trying to get out in front of some embarrassing revelations on the horizon. I might even be tempted to speculate that progressives were trotting out their "Destroy Ken Starr" template for Barr deployment (which, I suppose, means that 20 years from now we'll be reading about what a straight-arrow Barr was compared to whomever Democrats are savaging at that point).
"I am continuing to monitor the censorship of AMERICAN CITIZENS on social media platforms," Trump tweeted on Friday, putting Facebook and other sites on notice. "This is the United States of America - and we have what's known as FREEDOM OF SPEECH!"
Trump's warning echoed the words of his son Donald Trump Jr., who called on conservatives to "fight back" against Big Tech's "next level" censorship, in a tweet posted earlier on Friday.
Comment: Comment: RT provides more coverage on Facebook's censorship:
Some are calling for Facebook to be regulated as a polticial or media entity: are calling for Facebook to be regulated as a media
Facebook needs to be regulated as a "political actor" because of its censorship practices, Ben Harris-Quinney, chairman of think tank 'The Bow Group' told RT, accusing the Silicon Valley giant of curtailing free speech.Trump Jr weighs in saying the censorship is only going to get worse:
"If Facebook wants to be a political actor, then it needs to be regulated as a political actor or regulated at the same level as all other media outlets," Harris-Quinney said, stressing that the social media behemoth is "clearly putting itself on one side of the political debate."
Facebook banned Infowars, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos and other prominent conservative voices such as Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan from the social network, citing the firm's policies on "hate organizations."
"This is an absolute curtailment of the free speech because they're saying these individuals are dangerous. Well, many people, as myself, see them as perfectly reasonable actors in a political debate," said the chairman of the independent, UK-based think tank, which champions conservative opinions.
Donald Trump Jr. has lashed out at what he called the "purposeful and calculated" silencing of conservative voices on social media, following the latest Facebook ban against Alex Jones and other right-wing commentators.
Tweeting about the platform's controversial move to ban Jones and other popular figures, including Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer and Louis Farrakhan, Trump Jr. said the censorship should "terrify everyone."
He said the latest step, which has been Facebook's most severe measure yet against the likes of Jones and others, showed that they were taking their "censorship campaign" to the next level. "Ask yourself, how long before they come to purge you? We must fight back," he wrote.
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have been taking heat from conservatives for months over what they claim is a coordinated effort to silence them by slapping them with unwarranted suspensions and bans. Twitter has also been accused of 'shadowbanning' prominent Republican figures.
President Donald Trump himself has even weighed in on the controversy, accusing social media companies of discrimination against conservatives - an accusation which led to a surprise Oval Office meeting with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey last week.
'Nothing to do with hate speech': Gavin McIness slams 'un-American' Facebook censorshipTrump retweets some of the censored content by the banned users:
Facebook's recent crackdown on right-wing figures is "un-American," and "has nothing to do with hate speech," Vice Media co-founder and Proud Boys leader Gavin McInnes told RT.
The social media giant purged a raft of accounts from its own platform and from Instagram on Thursday, calling them "extremists" and "dangerous." For three of the accounts, InfoWars' Alex Jones, gay conservative provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos and activist Laura Loomer, their association with McInnes was used as evidence for the ban.
"They make you into a supervillain and you go 'wait, that's not me!' and they cut you off...because they can't win," McInnes told RT. "Anyone with a dissenting opinion from the mainstream media has to be silenced."
Facebook's purge did not affect some of the most prominent fake news merchants: The mainstream media, he said. "The mainstream media has pushed the Brett Kavanaugh serial rapist lie, they've pushed the Covington High School kids, the Russia conspiracy thing...the mainstream media has done way more fake news than us, but we are being censored," McInnes added.
Trump defends Facebook banned 'extremists,' attacks 'radical left-wing' mediaLiberals are shamelessly cheering on the totalitarian tip toe towards total censorship, meanwhile Conservatives are becoming proponents for the idea that private businesses should have social obligations:
How was your morning? President Donald Trump started his day by retweeting a barrage of content from Paul Joseph Watson - banned from Facebook for alleged "extremist" content, and slating the "radical left wing media."
Trump kept up the Twitter offensive on Saturday, tweeting an InfoWars clip featuring black Trump supporters declaring their love and support for the president. As well as banning InfoWars and its host Alex Jones, Facebook announced on Thursday it would ban users posting InfoWars content.
The president went on to retweet content from InfoWars' Paul Joseph Watson - a conservative vlogger who rails against political correctness and vehemently denies the "extremist" label.
Trump also broadcast a clip from an account named 'Deep State Exposed' featuring an Islamic preacher declaring his desire to "conquer America," and a warning from Rebel Media's Lauren Southern that establishment conservatives will be the next voices silenced on social media.
Trump finished off his Saturday tweetstorm with a post of his own, wondering why the "Radical Left" New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC are "allowed to be on Twitter and Facebook" after pushing the "Russia Collusion Delusion" story for two years.
Some proponents of Facebook's recent purge have argued that as a private company, Facebook can ban whoever it wants from using its services. The ensuing argument has centered around whether Facebook is defined as a 'publisher' or a 'platform,' with different legal protections afforded to speech depending on the definition.
A platform exists to facilitate speech, and is not responsible for the content posted. A publisher curates and distributes content, and is therefore responsible. Facebook has always presented itself as a platform, but CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Congress last year that his company is 'responsible for the content" posted, a step towards the 'publisher' role.
Trump appeared to side with the 'platform' argument on Saturday, retweeting a post from Daily Wire co-founder Jeremy Boreing, in which Boreing suggests that as a platform, Facebook can't simply "ban anyone for any reason."
It is unclear what Trump actually intends to do about the "censorship of American citizens" he decried on Twitter. However, his recent executive order protecting free speech on college campuses could serve as a template.
Liberal Twitter in free speech conundrum after Facebook bans Jones, Yiannopoulos and FarrakhanMore on the encroaching 'Digital gulag' from both supporters and objectors:
Liberals seem to be torn between applauding Facebook's censorship of "wrongthink" users and sticking up for free speech, a principle the Left once championed unconditionally.
After Facebook and Instagram announced they were not only banning controversial figures like Jones, Yiannopoulos and Farrakhan, but also anyone who reposted content from Jones' Infowars and removing any groups or events that promoted any of the blacklisted "extremists," citing the platform's policy on "Dangerous Individuals and Organizations," Twitter erupted in...applause?
Facebook claims the blacklisted users violated its policy on "Dangerous Individuals and Organizations," which covers "terrorist activity, organized hate, mass or serial murder, human trafficking, and organized violence or criminal activity" and says its policies have not changed. Some on Twitter actually claimed the censorship hadn't gone far enough, calling for Twitter to follow Facebook's lead and even suggesting more names for the blacklist.
Others warned that the bans wouldn't stop with easy targets like Jones and Laura Loomer, a lesson we should have learned the last time Facebook engaged in mass ideological deplatforming in 2018.
The "but it's a private company" argument was dutifully trotted out.
...and shot down by conservatives, for a change.
"There is no First Amendment protection, because they are not the government, but absent legislation, absent something that is created by the courts or by the legislature or congress, I submit that one day we should treat these platforms as utilities," legal analyst Lionel told RT, weighing in on the controversy. "It's their terms of service, and we need legislation and courts to intervene."
Much was made of the media's categorization of Farrakhan as "far-right," as if that would make the banning morally acceptable, with some sarcastically weighing in to congratulate Facebook on its weaponization of Farrakhan to silence criticism from the right.
And as some activists found out, even talking about the ban on Facebook leads to a Big-Brotheresque "the people who manage this Page will review your post."
Facebook has banned Alex Jones from its platform before, an unprecedented move when it happened last year that was followed with a wave of deplatformings that included several popular progressive pages. Those who refuse to learn from history are, apparently, condemned to repeat it.
Jeers and cheers after Facebook purge of Alex Jones, Infowars, Farrakhan & others
Bans of several anti-establishment figures on Facebook and Instagram has conservatives and moderates crying censorship and calling the measure "Orwellian" and a "digital gulag," while left-wing activists demanded more, and faster.
Facebook announced on Thursday it was banning the accounts of InfoWars, Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer, Paul Nehlen, and Louis Farrakhan, calling them "extremists" and "dangerous." The ban applies to Facebook and Instagram, also owned by the Menlo Park-based company.
Anyone who shares any Infowars content on Facebook platforms is facing a potential ban as well, the company said.
Watson, an editor at Infowars, confirmed he had been banned, and said he was not given a reason, nor had he broken any rules.
"In an authoritarian society controlled by a handful of Silicon Valley giants, all dissent must be purged," he tweeted. "They're now just banning people for wrongthink. There's no pretense of enforcing rules. If you challenge them, you're gone."
Reacting to the ban, Loomer told a reporter that she lived in a "digital gulag." Pointing out that she's a Zionist, Loomer also objected to being purged by "Nazis in Silicon Valley" on Holocaust Remembrance Day and lumped in with Farrakhan and Nehlen, whom she described as "vile Jew haters."
"It's disgusting. But I don't expect anything else from these people who want me dead," Loomer said, adding that she would rather kill herself than "let them take the victory lap."
Almost everyone banned on Thursday had backed Trump to some extent since 2016, with the notable exception of Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam leader and prominent Black nationalist. His inclusion in the ban, along with mainstream media outlets labeling him "right wing," has raised more than a few eyebrows.
"Just as in interventions past, those who oppose war are labeled supporters of dictators and haters of 'freedom,'" Omar tweeted on Friday. "We saw this playbook in Iraq."
"The situation in Venezuela is dire and the Trump Admin is making it worse. We must support diplomacy, not war."
Comment: See also:
- Washington Goes For The Jugular: Puppet 'Leader' in Venezuela Launches 'Military Coup' Against Maduro Government
- Craig Murray: The Violent Coup Attempt in Venezuela Forces a Binary Choice
- "Crimes against humanity": Former UN rapporteur says US sanctions on Venezuela like a "medieval siege"
- Trump betrays MAGA over Venezuela
- MindMatters: What Is A Pathocracy?
- NewsReal: US Regime Change Operation in Venezuela - This Time It's Legit?
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan speaks during the opening of “Turkey Innovation Week” which was organized by the Turkish Exporters' Assembly (TIM) in Istanbul, Turkey on May 3, 2019.
Europe is indebted to Turkey for hosting 4 million refugees, Turkey's president said on Friday.
"If European countries are living in peace today, it is thanks to Turkey for hosting 4 million refugees," Recep Tayyip Erdogan said in the Istanbul Congress Center, where he attended a week-long event on innovation.
Turkey has been the main route for refugees trying to cross to Europe, especially since 2011, the beginning of the Syrian civil war.
Underlining that Turkey has been unable to find sufficient support in its efforts to rebuild Syrian security, Erdogan said Turkey would not allow any threat against itself remain in Syria.
Comment: Erdogan has a point: were those refugee's to have entered Europe, the situation would be even more chaotic than it already is; Syria does belong to Syrians; and there has been a concerted effort by some to initiate a coup in Turkey.
See also: Terrorists continue to stage attacks in Idlib, Syria, 'this cannot go on forever' - Lavrov
And check out SOTT radio's: The Truth Perspective: Weapons of Mass Migration: Interview with Michael Springmann on Europe's Migrant Crisis
They were fired from the Hodo peninsula in the east of the country, said South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff.
If confirmed, it will be the first missile launch since Pyongyang tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in November 2017.
Last month Pyongyang said it had tested what it described as a new "tactical guided weapon".
That was the first test since the Vietnam summit between the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, and US President Donald Trump, which ended without agreement.
Comment: North Korea has been open to cooperation with everyone from the US to South Korea, so evidently they're not intent on threatening anyone or starting any fight, however without any deal to rely on, they will need to continue developing their defenses. As noted in Why Kim really sought out Putin:
Putin declared during the recent meeting in Vladivostok that North Korea needs internationally recognized security guarantees before any denuclearization may take place. That obviously would have to include more countries than the US.See also:
"Hamas is robbing the children of Gaza of their future, and attempts to rob the children of Israel of theirs. We won't let them. No country would," the IDF said, releasing images of young Palestinians in green bandanas receiving what appears to be military training.
"While children in Israel ran for shelter from incoming rocket fire from Gaza, these children in Gaza graduated from kindergarten," the tweet added.
Comment: Israel: the land of hypocrisy, double standards, and religious-ethnic supremacy. What's not to like?
There's a special place in hell for people like those behind the IDF's Twitter page.
See also:
- US State Department Condemns Rocket Attacks on Israel, Doesn't Condemn Killing Children and Journalists
- Gaza: Over 150 rockets fired by Hamas causing one serious injury; IDF retaliates - UPDATES
- The Truth Perspective: Match Made in Heaven: The Surprising Similarities Between Radical Islam and Talmudic Judaism
"The United States strongly condemns the ongoing barrage of rocket attacks by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad from Gaza upon innocent civilians and their communities across Israel. We call on those responsible for the violence to cease this aggression immediately. We stand with Israel and fully support its right to self defence against these abhorrent attacks," Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus said in a statement released late Saturday.
The statement added that as noted in the State Department Travel Advisory, US citizens should "exercise caution and remain alert to emergency situations" in the area.
Comment: Always starting the story in the middle. It is almost ALWAYS the rocket attacks which are the retaliatory attacks, not the Israeli responses. The Israelis have been murdering children, medics, journalists and unarmed civilians every Friday for the past year or so. No word of condemnation from the U.S. State Department there. But when groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad (reprehensible as they, too, may be) respond, it is those mostly impotent retaliations that get all the condemnation. Hamas and Islamic Jihad have actually been remarkably restrained in their retaliations against the Israelis. They know the Israelis have a much better PR strategy, and the Gaza protesters have been trying to show the world their plight and their resolve by peacefully protesting and getting killed in the process. Many ordinary people can see what's going on. But the U.S. is and will continue to be Zionist-occupied territory for the foreseeable future. The IDF can do no wrong, no matter how much they lie, cheat, steal, torture, and murder.
See also:
In a contentious hearing this week on Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, Democrats accused Barr of sounding like President Donald Trump's personal lawyer. But some Republicans encouraged him to lay out the contours of the nascent surveillance probe that he made clear is among his top priorities.
Barr told the Senate Judiciary panel that he has assembled a team to determine whether there was any improper "spying" on the Trump campaign in 2016, including whether intelligence collection began earlier than previously known and how many confidential informants the FBI used. He also suggested his focus was on senior leaders at the FBI and Justice Department at the time.
"To the extent there was overreach, what we have to be concerned about is a few people at the top getting it into their heads that they know better than the American people," Barr said.
Comment: See also:
- Barr thinks 'spying did occur' against Trump campaign
- AG Barr reveals he is reviewing FBI's 'conduct' in the original Russia probe
- Time to turn the tables and put the FBI, Steele and the rest of the 'witch hunters' under investigation
- James Clapper denies FBI was spying on Trump team, then says it was a good thing they were doing so















Comment: The International Agency for Research on Cancer is under fire for withholding 'carcinogenic glyphosate' documents