An 87-page document, released by the Justice Department on Thursday under the Freedom of Information Act, reveals that Mueller's investigators "accidentally" or deliberately wiping their devices when the DOJ inspector-general asked for them.

As many as 31 phones may have been affected, including the devices that had been "reassigned."

Weissman was Mueller's principal deputy. He is generally considered to have actually been in charge of the 'Russiagate' probe, especially after the former FBI director couldn't recall much of anything during his July 2019 testimony before Congress.

Another discovery in the document was that the phone belonging to FBI lawyer Lisa Page got "lost" by the Mueller team, and the name of the official who had custody of it: Christopher Greer. It was eventually retrieved, but the IG report found that it had been wiped two weeks after Page had left the special counsel team.

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) penned a letter to the Justice Department on Friday, asking DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to launch a probe after documents surfaced this week showing that Mueller's team scrubbed information from up to 31 devices amid the Russiagate investigation.

"These reports are troubling and raise concerns about record retention and transparency," Johnson wrote.

Therefore, I respectfully request that your office open an investigation into this matter to determine what, why, and how information was wiped, whether any wrongdoing occurred, and who these devices belonged to

Asking the DOJ to respond within a week's time, Johnson also called on the department to answer a number of specific queries about the phones, including when Justice officials became aware that they had been wiped, and whether data could still be retrieved from the devices.

• UK admits OPCW didn't confirm source of Novichok while OPCW denies presence of BZ in Skripal samples
• Russia's 13 questions to OPCW over Skripal case
• Russia's envoy to OPCW exposes 'eight London lies' in Skripal case
• 'We didn't forget how to negotiate': US, Russia agree on adding Novichok & NATO-made chemicals to OPCW blacklists
• Newly leaked evidence OPCW suppressed, altered findings on Douma 'chem attack'
• Wikileaks provides further evidence of OPCW Douma cover up
• New OPCW whistleblower defends Douma investigators who challenged chemical weapons cover-up; claims other staffers 'frightened into silence'

• A massive scandal: How Assange, his doctors, lawyers and visitors were all spied on for the US
• UC Global director at center of Assange spying accusations claims ambassador ordered espionage
• Julian Assange's lawyers were placed under surveillance. But that's not the whole story
• 'The American friends': New court files expose Sheldon Adelson's security team involved in US spy operation against Julian Assange

• Trump says he will ban TikTok in the US by September 15... 'unless the Chinese sell it to Microsoft'
• US Army follows Navy in banning soldiers from using TikTok over security concerns
• Trump threatens to ban TikTok in US, Pompeo confirms action will come this week - Microsoft may buy the Chinese company
• Mark Zuckerberg reportedly encouraged Trump to crack down on TikTok, and now it's planning to sue

York reveals Vindman, who retired from the Army in July after being fired from the National Security Council in February, was the driving force for Democrats' impeachment in his new book, "Obsession: Inside the Washington Establishment's Never-Ending War on Trump."

"It didn't take a real rocket scientist that the source of this, the original source of this, was Lt. Col. Vindman," York told "The Ingraham Angle" Wednesday night, laying out the facts of the case.

"If you remember early on in the Ukraine matter, the Democrats said they wanted the whistleblower to testify, and then they changed their mind and they didn't want the whistleblower to testify and they began to shut off any Republican attempts to find out who the whistleblower was," he said.

The Washington Examiner chief political correspondent asked, "So the question is if the whistleblower wasn't in the White House, how did he learn what was going on?"

He points out Vindman was one of several people who listened to Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, "but [Vindman] was the only one who was disturbed by what took place. He was the only one who thought there was a problem there."

[...]

Trump reacted to an excerpt on Vindman in York's book Thursday.

"No, Vindman knew the call itself to the Ukrainian President was 'perfect', but also knew the whistleblower report described the call incorrectly, way off. Why didn't Vindman say so? That's why Shifty didn't want the whistleblower to testify. A big scam!" Trump tweeted.

York also claimed former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, formed in May of 2017, knew early on there wasn't evidence for Trump-Russia collusion but continued to investigate.

"[Mueller] looked into everything, but what was happening was Trump lawyers could see that Mueller wasn't getting anywhere and by the fall and certainly by the end of the year, they knew that collusion was a dry hole for Mueller," York said. "He had not come up with what he was supposed to find."

• Political hack Alex Vindman: Living proof that the Deep State exists, and is corrupt
• Deep State's National Security Council: Col. Vindman, the 'expert' with an agenda
• Medal of Honor recipient says Vindman's own peers at Ranger School tried to get rid of him

According to the officer, Iranian forces detected a concentration of US drones trying to gather information in the exercise areas. "These activities were detected by the army's signal detection systems, and the drones were warned by the air defences," he said.

"Since then, we have been witnessing a noticeable change in the activities of American drones," Irani added. "They were forced to leave the area after seeing the level of readiness of the surveillance, identification and defence systems of the Iranian military," the senior naval officer said.