Puppet Masters
Modi's second five-year term in office will help cement India's multi-aligned foreign policy, which has sought to build close partnerships with all powers central to long-term Indian interests.
Domestically, Modi's big win has averted a nightmare scenario for Indian democracy - an indecisive election verdict fostering political paralysis. Faced with a choice between a stable, firm government and a possible retreat to political drift, voters in the world's largest democracy reposed their faith in Modi and his Bharatiya Janata (Indian People's) Party, or BJP.

One-time advisor of Donald Trump Carter Page addresses the audience during a presentation in Moscow, Russia, December 12, 2016.
In front of a joint session of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees on Aug. 31, 2018, former FBI Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson said she was normally responsible for signing off on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications before they reached the desk of her superiors for approval. Anderson said the "linear path" those applications typically take was upended in October 2016, with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates signing off on the application before she did. Because of that unusual high-level involvement, she didn't see the need to "second guess" the FISA application.
The Page FISA application was filed by the Justice Department and FBI with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in October 2016. A surveillance warrant was granted and three renewals were subsequently approved. The FISA application relied heavily on unverified research in British ex-spy Christopher Steele's dossier on President Trump's ties to Russia, which was compiled through his employment with opposition research firm Fusion GPS with funding from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm.
Particularly unmoved by the democratic process are a collection of Ukrainian 'civil society' groups, who have just issued a lengthy list of "red lines not to be crossed" by the new president, lest he risk provoking a new wave of political instability - that they would presumably instigate.
Issuing their catalog of demands on Thursday, the groups claim to be "politically neutral" but "deeply concerned" about the first actions taken by the comedian-turned-politician Zelensky, including his decision to appoint members of former President Viktor Yanukovych's government to positions within his own government.
Comment: Ukraine thus joins the rest of the West in having the coherent democratic will of three quarters or so of its population being told 'nyet' by a minority of deviant elites who will - as we've seen so far in France - crush them if they dare defy them.
The US imperialists and their ramified networks across Globalistan now 'own' Ukraine, so, while democracy is all well and nice, Zelensky is being reminded that his mandate is what they tell him to do. If he doesn't, they'll whip up political instability and force him out.
See also:
- From joker to peacemaker? Zelensky needs to follow his words with actions to end Ukraine's conflict
- The Saker interviews Dmitry Orlov
- US Staged a Coup in Ukraine - Here's Why and How
- Ukraine one of the poorest nations in Europe & beyond - World Bank
That the US and other western governments enthusiastically picked up those claims should not have made them any more credible.
Scepticism was all the more warranted from the media given that no physical evidence has yet been produced to corroborate the jihadists' claims. And the media should have been warier still given that the Syrian government was already poised to defeat these al-Qaeda groups without resort to chemical weapons - and without provoking the predictable ire (yet again) of the west.
Comment: Which is more likely:
1.) Unknown Islamists (that is, they're pro-Islam, ardently so) terrorists blow up two mosques with pre-placed bombs in two different countries at the same time, for no apparent gain, or
2.) A 'third force' directs terrorists whose atrocities target all 'sides' within target countries, thus keeping them under a 'strategy of tension', disincentivizing foreign investment and development, and providing 'markets' in which foreign mercenaries - usually Western - can 'sell' their expertise, i.e. killing people?
3 killed, 30+ injured after blast rocked mosque full of Friday worshippers in Afghan capital
RT, 24 May, 2019

Afghan security forces keep watch outside a mosque where a blast happened in Kabul, Afghanistan May 24, 2019.
The death toll in the attack in Kabul was confirmed by a spokesperson for the Ministry of Public Health.
One of the people killed in the attack has been confirmed as well-known religious scholar imam Mawlawi Samiullah Raihan. The cleric was known for supporting the Western-backed Afghan government, which is opposed by Taliban militants.
The bomb was apparently planted in the microphone used by the imam, according to Jan Agha, a district police official.
President Ashraf Ghani condemned the mosque attack as a terrorist act.
Comment: Two pre-placed bombs at the pulpits of two mosques, detonated at the same time, during Friday prayers, in Kabul and Pakistan. And no one claims responsibility for either...
Al Jazeera has additional info about today's bombing in Pakistan:
Quetta is the capital of Balochistan, Pakistan's largest and least populated province that is also rich in mineral and fuel resources.And who supports these Balochi separatists?
It has seen regular violence in recent years, with attacks claimed by Baloch separatists, Pakistan Taliban and local affiliates of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, or ISIS).
The province has been at the centre of a series of recent attacks that have killed at least 10 people.
Last week, at least four policemen died when their vehicles were targeted by an explosion as they stood guard outside a mosque during evening prayers.
On May 12, Baloch separatist attackers stormed a five-star hotel in the southern port city of Gwadar, killing at least five people, including a Navy soldier.
Pakistani security forces engaged in an hours-long gun battle with the attackers, with the siege ending after three attackers were killed.
Balochistan is seeing a number of new infrastructure projects erected, including the port at Gwadar, as part of the $60bn China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project, a joint venture between the Pakistani and Chinese governments.
The CIA.
"I don't think that anyone here [in Russia] will be upset about May's leaving," Senator Konstantin Kosachev said, pointing out that May's premiership would be remembered for its "highly likely" approach," meaning unproven accusations against Russia in the infamous Skripal case, which led to the expulsion of dozens of Russian diplomats from the UK and other countries.
Kosachev referred to May's statement claiming that Russia was "highly likely" behind the assassination attempt on former Russian military intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter in March 2018 in Salisbury, England.
The new indictment claims Assange endangered the lives of individuals working for the US government when Wikileaks published leaked documents received from intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in 2010. Under the draconian Espionage Act, which has never before been used against a journalist publishing classified information, Assange faces up to 10 years in prison for each charge.
"Assange was complicit with Chelsea Manning...in unlawfully obtaining and disclosing classified documents related to the national defense," the Department of Justice said in a statement, while National Security Division head John Demers insisted "Julian Assange is no journalist."
Comment: Anyone even half paying attention would have seen this coming. What is amazing is how the mainstream media has seemingly been able to overlook such an obvious progression. Did they really think cozying up to the Deep State would keep them safe in the long run?
- Wikileaks editor warns Assange arrest portends future danger to journalists
- Assange Espionage Act indictment a war on press freedom and threat to First Amendment
- DOJ could build Assange case on Espionage Act, carries possible death sentence
- Whistleblowers and journalists decry flimsy US Assange charges: '5 years for ATTEMPT to crack a password?' - no chance for fair trial
- The US Deep State vs Julian Assange
Getting a clue: Lamestream media's professional Assange bashers finally realize their fate is tied to his
Yes, that Rachel Maddow.
MSNBC's top host began the segment after it was introduced by Chris Hayes, agreeing with her colleague that it's surprising that more news outlets aren't giving this story more "wall to wall" coverage, given its immense significance. She recapped Assange's various legal struggles up until this point, then accurately described Assange's new Espionage Act charges for publishing secret documents.
"And these new charges are not about stealing classified information or outsmarting computer systems in order to illegally obtain classified information," Maddow said. "It's not about that. These new charges are trying to prosecute Assange for publishing that stolen, secret material which was obtained by somebody else. And that is a whole different kettle of fish then what he was initially charged with."
Propelled to the presidency by a vociferous army of online ideologues, including his sons, Bolsonaro's government comprises an uneasy mix of radicals, pragmatists and economic liberals. In his five months in office, Bolsonaro has done little to rein in the extremist fringe, even when they target Congress, the Supreme Court and members of his own administration. The former members of the armed forces, who make up a third of his cabinet and constitute the moderate faction, have endured particularly vicious abuse.
Since the retired generals' intervention, the public mud-slinging has ebbed a little, but the sense of division and improvisation in government has not. Bolsonaro's approval ratings are sliding fast, while prominent erstwhile supporters who hoped for clean, decisive government have recanted, and legislators are beginning to jump ship. Even in financial markets, which helped carry the retired paratrooper to office, hope is fizzling. The real earlier this week reached an 8-month low. The presidency did not respond to a request for comment.
Comment: See also:
- Brazilian President Bolsonaro lowers minimum wage
- Bolsonaro angers Israel saying Holocaust can be 'forgiven'
- Amid Venezuela/Brazil spat, Maduro calls Bolsonaro a 'modern Hitler'
- Looking up old friends: Brazil's Bolsonaro visits CIA before Trump on first US trip
- Brazil's Bolsonaro's first day: Privatization, removal of LGBT ideologies, indigenous rights, loosen gun controls
- Is Brazil's Bolsonaro a Pinochet or a populist? - George Galloway

US President Donald J. Trump delivers remarks to troops at Yokota Air Base on November 5, 2017, in Tokyo, Japan.
Trump confirmed the move on Friday, May 24, telling reporters at the White House that he would send 1,500 troops to the region in a "mostly protective" role. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan said in a Friday statement:
"I approved the combatant commander's request for the deployment of additional resources and capabilities to the Middle East to improve our force protection and safeguard U.S. forces given the ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces, including the [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] and its proxies.There was no word on the location of additional forces or a timeline for the deployment, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
"The deployment will include approximately 1,500 U.S. military personnel and consist of a Patriot battalion to defend against missile threats; additional intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft; an engineer element to provide force protection improvements throughout the region; and a fighter aircraft squadron to provide additional deterrence and depth to our aviation response options."
Shanahan and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford and White House officials agreed to the deployment on Thursday, according to the report.
Comment: To which Iran responded:
Iran is prepared to deploy 'secret weapons' against American warships, a military official in Tehran said, after the Pentagon sent three destroyers to the Persian Gulf amid a wave of increased tensions between the two states.Meanwhile, Iran is confident this is all bluster on the US' part:
Without mincing words, General Morteza Qorbani, an adviser to Iran's military command, cautioned that should Washington "commit the slightest stupidity, we will send these ships to the bottom of the sea along with their crew and planes."
Iran, he promised, would do so "using two missiles or two new secret weapons." He did not specify what type of "secret weapons" he was referring to. [...]
In February, Tehran unveiled and successfully tested its new Hoveizeh long-range cruise missile, which is said to have a range of over 1,350 kilometers.
In the same month, Tehran launched the massive Velayat 97 naval drill, with maneuvers spanning from the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman to the northern Indian Ocean. During the drill, a midget Ghadir-class submarine fired an anti-ship cruise missile for the first time.
Cooler heads among the US population and the army will not allow hardliners to steer the country into an open war with Iran, a senior military official in Tehran said amid growing tensions in the Persian Gulf.They may be right:
"We believe rational Americans and their experienced commanders will not let their radical elements lead them into a situation from which it would be very difficult to get out, and that is why they will not enter a war," Brigadier General Hassan Seifi, an assistant to the nation's army chief, told Mehr News Agency on Saturday.
An open letter signed by 76 retired generals, admirals, and ambassadors calls on US President Donald Trump to stop stoking fears of war with Iran and ditch "ineffective" sanctions and threats in favor of "aggressive diplomacy."
In a letter published on Friday by 'War on the Rocks', which specializes in reports on national security and defense issues, former US military top brass made an urgent plea to Trump to avoid further escalation with Iran and turn to diplomacy, rather than setting the stage for confrontation with military reinforcements.












Comment: The author give a somewhat paranoid account of his Chinese influence, neglecting India's role in making the region 'combustible' by cementing military ties with the US, and says nothing positive about the One Belt One Road, which has become an engine of growth in the region.
However, it is rational for India to view Chinese influence skeptically, due to both the history between the two countries, and their conflicting desires to wield maximum regional influence.
As Darius Shahtahmasebi recently wrote: See also: