Puppet Masters
Neither will carry my articles because of my 'pro-Russian leanings.' I won't play a part in mainstream media's orchestrated anti-Russian rhetoric. Be proud of me; my candid nature suggests that, in the Euro Weekly News at least, you enjoy a free press.
A fiction usually directed at Russia is that it doesn't have a free Press; rhetoric without substance. Let us instead take a look at the so-called free Press in the West.
William Colby, ex-director of the Central Intelligence Agency, is a man who should know Western media: "The CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
Not long after becoming a whistle-blower Colby died in a freak canoeing accident.
There is no disguising the sinister and insidious nature of CIA tentacles: "In the US 90 per cent of all TV, newspapers, radio, magazines are owned and controlled by six mega corporations. You can't get a word in there that connects to the real world." So says American political analyst Mark Mason.
Former BBC Director-General, Greg Dyke, wrote in his autobiography: "When it came to discussing the war in Iraq, staff found it so difficult to find any member of the public prepared to speak in favour that they ended up planting people in the (Question Time) audience."
German intelligence estimates that the total number of people who have been killed in Ukraine is almost 50,000, including both civilians and the military, the German media reported on Sunday.
The estimates are ten times higher than the officially released death toll figures. The official data is clearly too low, German intelligence sources told a Frankfurt-based newspaper, Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung.
Speaking at a Munich Security Conference on Saturday, Ukrainian President Poroshenko said that 1,200 combatants and 5,400 civilians have been killed during the conflict.
"We are part of a common civilization with Russia," said Sarkozy, speaking on Saturday at the congress of the Union for a Popular Movement Party (UMP), which the former president heads.
"The interests of the Americans with the Russians are not the interests of Europe and Russia," he said adding that "we do not want the revival of a Cold War between Europe and Russia."
Regarding Crimea's choice to secede from Ukraine when the country was in the midst of political turmoil, Sarkozy noted that the residents of the peninsula cannot be accused for doing so.
Comment: First Hollande, now Sarkozy. It seems as if some kind of sanity virus is spreading in Europe. We wonder how long it will last? Here's what Hollande recently said regarding autonomy for Donbass:
On Saturday, Hollande said that the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Lugansk need "rather strong" autonomy from Kiev.See also: Five hours in Moscow: The Hollande-Merkel-Putin talks
"These people have gone to war," Hollande explained. "It will be difficult to make them share a common life [with Kiev]."
The French President also revealed part of the joint document under negotiation between Berlin, Moscow, Paris and Kiev. He said it will feature a 50- to 70-kilometer demilitarized zone on each side of the current line dividing militia-held and Kiev-controlled territories.
From the crisis in Ukraine to the ISIS in Iraq, from increasingly extreme weather to surviving in a world ruled by psychopaths, your hosts, their colleagues (and occasional guests) explore the deeper truths driving world events by exposing the manipulations behind what passes for 'news'.
This week on Behind the Headlines, your hosts examine the extraordinary series of meetings that took place in Europe this week concerning the civil war in Ukraine.
Behind the Headlines airs live this Sunday, 8 February 2015, from 2-3.30pm EST / 11am-12.30pm PST / 7-8.30pm UTC / 8-9.30pm CET.
Running Time: 01:42:00
Download: MP3
They have apparently continued for 5 hours and are still not finished though it seems some sort of document is being prepared for tomorrow.
Three comments:
1. If negotiations go on for 5 hours that does not suggest a smooth and conflict free discussion.
2. One of the most interesting things about the Moscow talks is that they mainly happened without the presence of aides and officials i.e. Putin, Hollande and Merkel were by themselves save for interpreters and stenographers. Putin and Merkel are known to be masters of detail and given his background as an enarque I presume Hollande also is. However the German and French officials will be very unhappy about this. The Russians less so because since the meeting is taking place in the Kremlin they are listening in to the discussions via hidden microphones.

Ukraine's President Petro Poroshenko holds Russian passports to prove the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine as he addresses during the 51st Munich Security Conference at the 'Bayerischer Hof' hotel in Munich February 7, 2015.
On Saturday, Poroshenko was again engaged in physical theatre, this time in Munich. Holding up Russian passports, he alleged that they belonged to Russian soldiers who had been found on Ukrainian soil. Citing "mountains of (Russian) lies and propaganda," the Ukrainian President stood on a German stage and, well, lied.
Speaking of 'propaganda,' Yahoo news called the Russian (civilian) passports - which all Russians traveling abroad carry - 'military ID's' which is certainly a new one.
Russian soldiers cannot use their passports while on active service - they must hand them in. Everybody who has ever lived in Russia knows this. Indeed, even contract soldiers are forced to hand in theirs while on army business and, like the troops, they get a replacement military ID. This is why Sochi's bars are crawling with off-duty Russian military - they can't go abroad without their travel documents.
Comment: Poroshenko joins the ranks of war theater of the absurd with this latest stunt. The propaganda can be no more blatant, but if history is any measure, Westerners will blindly accept event the most ridiculous of lies in favor of supporting the neo-liberal cause of spreading 'freedom'.
Germany's Der Spiegel magazine said that the US vice president's remarks were made at a special meeting of leaders of the European parliament factions at the EU headquarters in Brussels. Biden called on European countries to 'stand firm' against Russia's alleged threats to the region's unity.
"Putin continues to call for new peace plans as his troops roll through the Ukrainian countryside and he absolutely ignores every agreement that his country has signed in the past... including in Minsk," Biden said, referring to "little green men", but failing to provide any exact details of Russia's alleged military presence in the region.
Critics of the policy of sanctions against Moscow should be aware that they also benefited from the current low price of oil, Biden said. He deemed complaints made by some European states about costly sanctions against Russia "inappropriate and annoying."
Comment: European officials appear to be slowly coming to the conclusion that the US foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia is at direct odds to the interests of Europe. Further inflaming the situation by sending US weapons into Ukraine would achieve nothing more than escalating chaos both within Ukraine and beyond it's borders. While Biden may find Europe asserting their own will 'annoying', the cost of following the US' war party line would have much more disastrous consequences.
Though a far-fetched idea at first glance, many factors suggest that remonetization in gold may be a logical next step for Moscow.
First, for years Moscow has been expressing its unwillingness to remain at the monetary mercy of the US and its NATO allies and this view has been most vehemently expressed by President Putin's long-time economic advisor, Sergei Glazyev. Russia is prepared to play strategic hardball with the West on the issue: the governor of Russia's central bank took the unusual step last November of presenting to the international media details of the bank's zealous gold-buying spree. The announcement, in sharp contrast to that institution's more taciturn traditions, underscores Moscow's outspoken dismay with dollar hegemony; its timing suggests coordination with the top rungs of government to present gold as a possible currency-war weapon.
Second, despite international pressure, Russia has been very wary of the sell-off policies that led the UK, France, Spain, and Italy to unload gold over the past decade during unsuccessful attempts to prop up their respective ailing economies - in particular, of then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown's sell-off of 400 metric tons of the country's reserves at stunningly low prices. Moscow's surprise decision upon the onset of the ruble's swift decline in early December 2014 to not tap into the country's gold reserves, now the world's sixth largest, highlights the ambitiousness of Russia's stance on the gold issue. By the end of December, Russia added another 20.73 tons, according to the IMF in late January, capping a nine-month buying spree.
Third, while the Russian economy is structurally weak, enough of the country's monetary fundamentals are sound, such that the timing of a move to gold, geopolitically and domestically, may be ideal. Russia is not a debtor nation. At this writing in January, Russia's debt to GDP ratio is low and most of its external debt is private. Physical gold accounts for 10 percent of Russia's foreign currency reserves. The budget deficit, as of a November 2014 projection, is likely to be around $10 billion, much less than 1 percent of GDP. The poverty ratefell from 35 percent in 2001 to 10 percent in 2010, while the middle class was projected in 2013 to reach 86 percent of the population by 2020.
Comment: More information about the currency wars and the role of gold:
The real reason Washington feels threatened by Moscow
"I want to appeal to the Ukrainian people, to the mothers, the fathers, the sisters and the grandparents. Stop sending your sons and brothers to this pointless, merciless slaughter. The interests of the Ukrainian government are not your interests. I beg of you: Come to your senses. You do not have to water Donbass fields with Ukrainian blood. It's not worth it."Washington needs a war in Ukraine to achieve its strategic objectives. This point cannot be overstated.
- Alexander Zakharchenko, Prime Minister of the Donetsk People's Republic
The US wants to push NATO to Russia's western border. It wants a land-bridge to Asia to spread US military bases across the continent. It wants to control the pipeline corridors from Russia to Europe to monitor Moscow's revenues and to ensure that gas continues to be denominated in dollars. And it wants a weaker, unstable Russia that is more prone to regime change, fragmentation and, ultimately, foreign control. These objectives cannot be achieved peacefully, indeed, if the fighting stopped tomorrow, the sanctions would be lifted shortly after, and the Russian economy would begin to recover. How would that benefit Washington?
It wouldn't. It would undermine Washington's broader plan to integrate China and Russia into the prevailing economic system, the dollar system. Powerbrokers in the US realize that the present system must either expand or collapse. Either China and Russia are brought to heel and persuaded to accept a subordinate role in the US-led global order or Washington's tenure as global hegemon will come to an end.
Comment: In Ukraine one thing seems clear: Washington has created another quagmire/tinderbox par excellence. And the next shoe could drop far sooner than this summer, as the article suggests. The only question that remains at this point seems to be just how far the U.S. is willing to go to achieve its objectives for world hegemonic power. We are watching the moves and the countermoves - with no end in sight -and many millions of lives hanging in the balance.
See also: Ukraine crisis analysis: Hollande/Merkel trip suggests situation dire - peace prospects dim
Ladies and gentlemen,
Mr. Wolfgang Ischinger included in the agenda the topic of "the collapse of world development". It is impossible not to agree that the events unfolded not by the optimistic scenario. But you cannot accept arguments of some of our colleagues that a sudden, rapid collapse of the world order, which existed for decades, had occurred.
On the contrary, the events of the past year have confirmed the validity of our warnings regarding deep, systemic problems in the organization of European security and international relations in general. I would like to remind about the speech by President Putin spoken here eight years ago.
Comment: You can watch the rest of the Q&A in the video above. It must be difficult - to say the least - for Lavrov to have to field such asinine questions from uninformed people. His patience knows no bounds.














Comment: The majority of these losses are probably civilians and Ukrainian troops. See also: Hackers claim to reveal true number of Ukrainian army casualties, official censorship. This war has not played out the way Kiev wanted it to. And they have been waging an information war in response.