Puppet Masters
Recently speaking on private Italian broadcaster LA7, Monti warned that there was a definite risk of the conflict in Ukraine spilling over.
"For now it's a limited war, but be careful, you [advocates of arming Ukraine] are creating among Europeans a climate of mistrust and mutual misunderstanding that could take us too far," he said.
When asked how he felt about Washington's recent proposal that it could send defensive lethal arms to the Ukrainian military, including anti-tank and anti-mortar systems, Monti said he believed such a move would prove "intolerable" to Russia.
"I believe that the United States does not always realize that Europe has its problems, and cannot be seen only as a tool of the global interests of the United States," he said.
Monti also noted how the West had to make a choice in its decision to break with Russia, noting that it might be forced to pay a high cost while losing an ally "in containing terrorism."
Long viewed as a technocratic leader and Brussels insider, Monti, who took over the reins from Silvio Berlusconi in 2011, has been a perennial voice of moderation in Europe.
A press release issued from Congressman Roskam's website implies the legislation intends to leverage U.S. trade to protect Israel's economic security:
This bipartisan bill would counter the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel and strengthen the U.S.-Israel economic relationship. Over the past several years, a growing contingency of countries across the globe have sought to isolate and delegitimize Israel through BDS. This bill leverages ongoing trade negotiations to discourage prospective U.S. trade partners from engaging in economic discrimination against Israel...."The U.S-Israel Trade and Commercial Enhancement Act will ensure that American free trade partners never engage in this harmful and illegitimate political protest against Israel, while also protecting U.S. companies from foreign lawsuits targeting their associations with Israel."Israeli news reports and several American Jewish publications have reported the proposed legislation although it has yet to be picked up by any mainstream U.S. news publication.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (C) shakes hands with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko (R) during a meeting on February 11, 2015 in Minsk.
The deal was brokered by the leaders of France, Germany and Russia, who joined their Ukrainian counterpart on Wednesday for marathon overnight negotiations.
The deal was signed by the so-called "contact group," which includes the leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, a representative of the OSCE, Ukraine's former President Viktor Kuchma and the Russian ambassador to Ukraine.
Here is a breakdown of the deal:
1. A comprehensive ceasefire in eastern Ukraine. Comes into force at 00.00 (Kiev time) on February 15.
2. A pullout of heavy weapons. The parties agreed to a compromise disengagement line. Kiev is to pull artillery and other hardware from the current frontline while the rebels would do it from the frontline as it was in September, before they gained ground in a January counter-offensive. The OSCE-monitored safety zone would be 50 km to 150 km wide for weapons, depending on their range. The pullout is to be completed by March 1.
Comment: After a marathon 17-hour series of meetings, a framework is - theoretically - in place to bring peace to eastern Ukraine.
Will it work?
It depends on the goodwill of all parties concerned.
Far from becoming breakaway republics, Donetsk and Lugansk would remain in Ukraine.
More importantly, however, the Kiev regime would no longer be on a war footing. This will present the regime with big problems. The glue that has held this collapsing country together since the coup last February is war. Without war, and faced with having to actually fix ALL of Ukraine, how long will a rabidly anti-Russian, ultra-capitalist regime last?
And then there's the 'silent party' behind these talks. Without a war on Russia's and the EU's doorstep, how can the US keep Europe on a war footing with Russia? If EU-Russian relations normalize, and strengthen via mutual cooperation in terms of both increased trade and security, America loses.
The question is, will the 'Greatest Nation on Earth' go quietly?
Alas, as of this moment, that does not appear to be the case, and as Reuters reports citing a Kiev presidential aide, that Minsk talks on Ukraine crisis could last six more hours. "We've got another 5-6 hours of work. At least. But we should not leave here without an agreement on an unconditional ceasefire. There's a battle of nerves underway," aide Valeriy Chaly said in a Facebook post.
Well, if it is indeed a "battle of nerves", something tells who the victor will be, considering all his peers are just a little more preoccupied with the potential collapse of their artificial monetary and political union.
Yet, just like the previous Minsk "agreement", even if by some miracle there is a solution this time around, the probability peace will be maintained is slim to none.
Let's start with oil. Over the past couple of weeks, we have seen a nice rally for the price of oil. It has bounced back into the low 50s, which is still a catastrophically low level, but it has many hoping for a rebound to a range that will be healthy for the global economy.
Unfortunately, many of the experts at the big banks are now anticipating that the exact opposite will happen instead. For example, Citibank says that we could see the price of oil go as low as 20 dollars this year...
Comment: The elite are playing an economic house of cards. Will this be the year when it all comes tumbling down? The signs are looking more and more likely that the time is not too far off; meanwhile billions of people around the globe are suffering from the economic noose that is tightening around their necks.
The problem of trying to have a conversation with imbeciles is that they are simply incapable of understanding anything outside of their obtuse reality. They suffer from cognitive dissonance and are proud of it. In fact, the more cognitively dysfunctional, the more the imbecile is celebrated as being strong. Imbeciles cannot be enlightened; their ignorant and boorish way of looking at the world is impervious to any different, even more correct perspective. Indeed, they have a visceral aversion to correction, which only retrenches their imbecility all the more.
The problem in dealing with vassals is that they are powerless to change course - even if they have a residual ability to think independently and to recognise an alternative perspective as being more correct, or at least reasonable.
Thus we have the dilemma facing Russia in its dealings with Washington and its European allies over the Ukraine conflict.
Comment: It sure was painful to hear some of the questions Lavrov was given during the Minsk press conference.
As the Normandy Four are set to meet in Minsk on Wednesday to discuss possible ways out of the deteriorating military conflict in eastern Ukraine, Stephen Lendman forecasts that the US won't drop its idea of waging a full-size war in the region.
Washington under the Democrats or Republicans wants war, not peace, he said. "In the post-9/11 era alone, not a single day of peace has followed. Multiple US direct and proxy wars rage. US Special Forces (trained killers) operate covertly and overtly in over 130 countries disruptively."
'Ignore What Germany and France Say Publicly; Follow What They Do'
He says that "Merkel and Hollande (Germany and France) are bedrock US-dominated NATO members." "Ignore what they say publicly; follow what they do," he advised. "Throughout the Ukrainian crisis, they haven't gone their own way against Washington...nor has Britain's David Cameron."
"I'm sure Merkel and Hollande tried to get Putin to largely bend to Washington's will; in other words, [they] do nothing to stop its chokehold on Ukraine, including NATO forces encroaching on Russia's borders."America maintains an empire of bases in over 150 countries, he added, noting that Russia and China are increasingly surrounded by US bases, which he called "so-called defensive missiles for an offense target: their heartlands."
Washington wants all sovereign independent governments eliminated, Lendman stated. "Replaced by pro-Western stooge ones. America's ultimate aim is unchallenged global dominance; it's willing to wage wars to achieve its objectives."
Comment: Mr. Lendman's words are starkly accurate. Whether or not Washington will be able to implement its plan for world-domination is still to be seen. More and more countries are finally waking up to the US' psychopathic goal. If they can band together as has begun with the BRICS there may be some hope for a different outcome.
Comment: As predicted, that whole 'no boots on the ground' schtick was all BS to begin with.
All of the details of the AUMF are not finalized, according to administration officials, but some were shared with reporters. The new AUMF would limit military operations to three years but wouldn't put any geographic limitation on the battlefield. Instead, the authorization would enable military action against the Islamic State and associated forces.
Comment: How convenient. And how utterly in violation of that little thing called 'national sovereignty', the very thing Obama and his government have accused Russia of violating.
The proposal will also seek the use of limited ground troops in situations such as the search-and-rescue of US soldiers or intelligence operations, but would prohibit the use of ground troops in "enduring offensive ground operations."
The White House has indicated it is ready to work with Congress to get the authorization passed.
Comment: Naturally.
Comment: The U.S. should listen to people with an ounce of sanity. For example, John Mearsheimer: "Sending weapons to Ukraine will not rescue its army and will instead lead to an escalation in the fighting." And European Parliament Deputy Martin Shulz: "This conflict is occurring on the border with the EU, therefore the US ought to pull back. I think it would be best if the Europeans were to solve this problem themselves."
Comment: What is the word for 'repercussions' when the act leading to those 'repercussions' did not occur? Unilateral aggression based on false pretenses?
The White House said Mr Obama reiterated US support for Ukraine's sovereignty in his call with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and emphasised the importance of reaching a diplomatic resolution.
Comment: We guess 'supporting' a country's sovereignty is synonomous with violating it for the U.S. It is the U.S. that violated Ukraine's sovereignty when they sponsored the coup there in 2014.
"However, if Russia continues its aggressive actions in Ukraine, including by sending troops, weapons, and financing to support the separatists, the costs for Russia will rise," the White House said in a statement.
Comment: And yet the U.S. has been financing regime change, sending military aid, and is planning on sending lethal weaponry (if NATO isn't already) to Kiev. Double standard?
The company ran a branch that gave out "bricks" of hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash in foreign denominations and provided its wealthy clientele with advice on how to commit tax fraud, according to the reports.
These facts have for years been been in the possession of international financial regulators and governments throughout the world—including those of Britain, France and the United States—which systematically covered them up. Neither the bank, nor its executives, nor any of the clients that utilized its tax dodging services have been criminally prosecuted.
Comment: Given HSBC's track record so far, this really comes as no surprise:
Drug money banking, terror dealings exposed at HSBC
The Argentina headquarters of HSBC raided by tax officers
HSBC targets account of Syrian refugees in the UK
HSBC to pay $249 million fine for U.S. mortgage abuse















Comment: There are some sane voices in Europe. Aside from Le Pen, none of them are currently in office, which should be telling in itself. Those in office should heed the words of advice coming from the former diplomats who are more willing to speak their minds about the reality behind the current drive to war with Russia, which is that such a situation will not benefit Europe, but rather be incredibly detrimental.