Puppet Masters
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused the European Union of turning a blind eye to the Ukrainian troops "directly targeting" civilians in the east of the country.
The Ukrainian military "is directly targeting its fire on residential areas" and "unfortunately many countries, including in Europe, prefer not to notice that," Putin said on Monday.
He added that the goal of pro-Russia forces operating in eastern Ukraine is "to push back [Ukrainian] armed forces and artillery so they cannot fire on residential areas."
The eastern parts of Ukraine have been witnessing four months of fighting between the pro-West government and pro-Russia fighters.
Putin's comments came hours after the European Union threatened to slap new sanctions on Russia. Moscow has already been under European sanctions over its alleged involvement in the deadly insurgency in neighboring Ukraine.
The U.S. Army is now officially getting into the crime-fighting business. According to the Army Times, the Army is training to fight battles in megacities, not against other armies, but to help local authorities root out shadowy criminals, extremists and, wait for it, wait for it, influential political dissidents.
The Army Times reports on this year's Unified Quest war games drill:
When the Army looks to the future, it sees cities. Dense, sprawling, congested cities where criminal and extremist groups flourish almost undetected by authorities, but who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state.
And the service is convinced that these "megacities" of 20 million or more people will be the battleground of the future.
Comment: Why militarize the police when you can bring in the military itself?
No one wants to see anyone suffer, Yazidi or otherwise. What we do want is to know the truth about what is going on in Iraq even as Obama continues airstrikes, and prepares to send in 130 more American troops.
U.S. officials said they believed that some type of ground force would be necessary to secure the passage of the stranded members of the Yazidi group. The military is drawing up plans for consideration by President Obama that could include American ground troops.
So a couple of questions here.
Long before U.S. airstrikes, the defenseless Yazidi people climbed up that mountain for refuge from ISIS, who supposedly wanted to slaughter them. Why didn't ISIS just also climb up and then slaughter them? We know ISIS had mortars and actual artillery, because the U.S. later bombed those. Why didn't ISIS use those weapons to slaughter the Yazidis from afar?
Also, after one or two airstrikes, ISIS became so easy to defeat that the Kurds made it possible for 24,000 Yazidis to walk off the mountain, walk into Syria and then U-turn walk back into Iraq and settle in safely. It begs the question about how surrounded by determined ISIS fighters that mountain really was. It takes a long time for 24,000 people to do anything, and they'd need to be walking a long way during which time they would be vulnerable to ISIS. How could ISIS go from being such a threat that U.S. airpower was essential, to be pushed aside by Kurds who otherwise were having their hats handed to them by ISIS everywhere else?
Comment: According to this article, the whole thing was indeed a pretext to justify a military intervention.
It turns out there were Yazidis already living on the top of the mountain, and while there were some refugees who fled up there, the humanitarian crisis was never what it was made out to be, and an influx of Kurdish PKK fighters from Syria quickly broke the overblown siege.Other sources say that the Yazidis were saved by the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), a group which the US placed on a terrorist list.
The administration just seems grateful that they got an excuse to start a war they've been chomping at the bit for, and even if the excuse didn't exactly pan out, they'll quickly find another.
The Yazidis headed for the hills. Some were stranded without food and water. It was certainly a nasty refugee situation and they needed help. When the US finally got on the mountain, they had to admit, "Uh...the situation is not as bad as we thought." That's because the PKK had already saved them. Western media say "Kurdish militias" saved them, because, remember? The Kurds are our new BFFs.
"Russia is not going to allow Ukraine to become a NATO nation or to fall into the hand of extreme anti-Russians," said James Fetzer, an editor at Veterans Today.
"Russia has lots of cards to play in relation to the pressures from the European nations for more sanctions, including its control of very large proportion of gas that is supplied to those nations," the retired professor from Wisconsin told Press TV on Monday.
The European Union is seeking to impose further sanction on Moscow over the crisis.
The author also noted that the United States has "grossly violated" the sovereignty of Ukraine and other Eastern European nations, helping to "destabilize" and install a "puppet regime" in Kiev.
"The United States has invested some $5 billion to bring about destabilization in the Ukraine," Fetzer said.
Loyal citizens of the old republic want to trust that the State Department, commissioned to serve as the guardian and protector of the country, is conducting foreign policy in the best interests of the nation. There is a reason why the Secretary of State is third in line to succeed the President. That purpose, intended to defend diplomatically and promote the public safety and benefit, has served a very different master for a very long time.
Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg's notorious adage, "politics stops at the water's edge", by no means ever really practiced by the political class a true national defense of the country because it was never the primary goal of the establishment.
Students of world affairs are not strangers to the practice of lies and deception. One of the grand daddies of the Nefarious Warrior Organism, and infamous war criminal, Henry Kissinger has a new book, World Order. An excerpt published in the Wall Street Journal, Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order, spews the same poppycock that underpins the destructive policies and practices that has the world ripe for an apocalyptic conflict, needed to rescue the banksters of international finance from their derivative Ponzi scheme.
"Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.
The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations."
The context for any serious discussion on foreign affairs must start with the admission that the New World Order is the dominant controller of political power, especially in western countries. The NeoCon/NeoLib cabal dictates worldwide compliance. Nations conform to the financial supremacy of banksters, administered by handpicked political stooges. Global governance is the end game destined for all states. Individual nations slated for extinction are doomed as long as the NWO advances their worldwide imperium.
"So far, the EU seems ready to shoot itself in the foot by blocking a project that will increase its energy security and help Europe satisfy increasing energy import needs, at no cost to European taxpayers," Gazprom spokesman Sergey Kupriyanov wrote in a letter to the Financial Times (FT).
It comes as a response to an article by the FT's Energy Editor Guy Chazan published on August 25, where he called the South Stream project "a pipe dream," saying the project "has become one of the biggest casualties of the east-west stand-off over Ukraine."
Kupriyanov says South Stream was designed to put an end to the over-reliance on the Ukrainian gas transit system, adding that countries in south-eastern Europe "probably have at least as many reasons as Gazprom to be 'desperate' to reduce transit risks."
Contrary to northern EU customers, who receive gas supplies from Russia via Nord Stream, south-eastern European countries still have to rely on the Ukrainian transit system.
Comment: It seems that EU pays no attention to the future of south-eastern Europe. No wonder then why people of south-eastern Europe feel like second class citizens.
Comment: For more information see:
Over the past decade, it has become a dangerous behemoth of fascism under the guise of the fraudulent "war on terror."
Going back to 2010, I wrote a piece titled: The Dangers of a Failed Presidency, in which I wrote:
"The new session of the parliament opens under uneasy conditions. Unpredictability remains in the world's economy, and geopolitical risks become deeper, including in connection with complicated international relations over Ukraine," the president said.States producing 60% of the world's GNP use sanctions against each other. It will lead to serious changes in established international economic relations and lower economic growth. This will influence Kazakhstan as well, he said.
The Kazakh president urged to take measures to prevent possible negative challenges for the country's economy, people's welfare and national security and called for coordinated work of the parliament and the government to use opening opportunities.















Comment: Amid all lies and sanctions against him, Putin continues to ask for an end to the slaughter of unarmed civilians in East Ukraine by the Kiev junta army, which is financed and supported by the U.S. and NATO. Who's the villain here?