Comment: President Trump turned out to be wiser than they thought. The PTB couldn't let that happen.
See also:

Comment: See also:

Comment: It would not be unreasonable if Putin did snub Biden, considering the slam game against Russia by the Democrats for the past four years! Putin, however, is far more honorable than they will ever be.

Comment: Not to be outdone, Canadian PM Trudeau threatens Christmas:

"We are facing [a] winter that's going to drive people inside more and more, and we're really at risk of seeing caseloads go up, and hospitals get overwhelmed, and more loved ones dying. So we need to do everything we can right now to slow the spread of Covid-19, to stop the spike in its tracks. A normal Christmas is quite frankly right out of the question."

Meanwhile Trudeau brushed off claims that Ottawa would use emergency powers to re-introduce its own national-style lockdown, saying he is "not looking to bring in a federal hammer to try and do things."

Chief Public Health Officer Dr Theresa Tam warned "we are not on a good trajectory" as she discussed the latest Covid modelling. "I think across the board, across Canada, we have to say the time is now, with urgency, that we limit contacts."

Covid-19 has been a gift to authoritarian leadership, especially those with a lockdown-the-herd mentality.

Comment: If you listen to Powell's above interview with Howie Carr, she guesses that "probably, at least, 10 million fraudulent votes went to Joe Biden, maybe more."

Comment: Trump's lawyers are planning a new Georgia lawsuit which attorney Jordan Sekulow says will be "shocking."

"It's nothing that we have talked [about] before. It's not what you heard in the press conference [on Thursday] either.

Sekulow, the son of Trump personal attorney and impeachment defender Jay Sekulow, said it is "something completely separate" from the allegations contained in the press conference held by lawyers Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, and Rudy Giuliani.

"They've got to be outcome determinative, but I will tell you, the Lt. Gov. [Geoff Duncan] in Georgia, the Secretary of State in Georgia [Brad Raffensperger] in Georgia, they're in for quite a shock on Monday and Tuesday about how poorly they run and they ran — there's going to be a proof — of how poorly run they ran the elections in one of their major counties," Sekulow said.
...
Sekulow said that his team is working on a constitutional case, while Powell, Giuliani, and Ellis are working on a case involving voting machines and allegations of fraud.

A state judge has rejected the final pending Arizona lawsuit (brought by two private citizens), which alleged election officials failed to follow proper procedures.

Laurie Aguilera had claimed she was denied the right to vote because she was not given a new ballot after her vote was rejected by the tabulation machine. Meanwhile, Dovocan Drobina claims that his vote was not properly counted by the machines.

"I believe that it is the appropriate resolution and that is what I'll be doing," Mahoney said at the bench without elaborating on her reasons for dismissing the case with prejudice. She added that she would be issuing an order with her decision in writing at a later time.

Aguilera believes her ballot was rejected because she had used a sharpie to fill it out. Her lawyers had asked the judge for injunctive relief to allow Aguilera to cast a new ballot prior to the state's certification of the election results.

State officials had previously said that sharpies would not affect the ballots.

Former 8chan admin and cyber expert Ron Watkins points out that, despite officials saying nothing to see here, using sharpies can cause an error. Officials say that's fine, because the vote can then be tabulated manually. But that's the problem. Software techs can then tabulate the vote any way they want. Poll observers don't watch them do it.

A federal judge shot down the campaign's latest lawsuit in Pennsylvania:

US District Court Judge Matthew Brann has ruled to dismiss the lawsuit from the Trump campaign on Saturday, saying the president's legal team failed to present "compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption" which would have warranted the court "disenfranchising almost seven million votes."

"That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence," Brann said in the 37-page statement.

The court refused Trump's legal team the right to amend the complaint on the grounds that it had already been amended once, and pointing to the looming Monday deadline for Pennsylvania to certify the votes.

The lawsuit, filed by the Trump campaign on November 9, claimed that electoral officials in some of the state's counties allowed voters to cast provisional ballots if they ran into any problems with mail-in ballots, such as the lack of "secrecy envelope," while other counties didn't. The complaint argued that the different treatment of voters in such cases amounted to a breach of the US Constitution.

Brann dismissed the argument, calling the legal challenge a "Frankenstein's monster" which did not justify the remedy proposed by the Trump campaign - to invalidate allegedly illegal votes.

Responding to the ruling, the Trump campaign's legal team, headed by Rudy Giuliani, said that although they were "disappointed" that they "did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing," they would seek "an expedited appeal" to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, which has a conservative majority.

The campaign apparently found a silver lining in the ruling - which is seemingly another blow to the president's legal efforts to contest the election - saying the decision "turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the US Supreme Court."

Trump himself vowed to appeal the decision, blasting it on Twitter as "a continuation of the never ending Witch Hunt."

Comment: That is some brazen gaslighting!

What a liar!

• NY Times says "Great Reset" is a "conspiracy theory" on same day World Economic Forum celebrates it
• The 'Great Reset' is trending: Here's why
• Whose Great Reset? The fight for our future - Technocracy vs. the republic
• Has the post-Covid future already been decided?
• Archbishop warns Trump about "The Great Reset" and tyranny of globalism
• Covid-19 is a Trojan Horse for 'The Great Reset': Sky News Report on Klaus Schwab and the Davos Set
• The dystopic Great Reset and the fight back: Population reduction and hope for the future

Comment: We're inclined to believe Powell regarding the scale of the fraud she is suggesting took place; this election was probably rigged to the tune of millions of votes 'flipped' from Trump to Biden.

Powell's idea that the rigging was meant to be more straightforward fits with what we saw happen. Digital flipping of votes occurred 'mid-stream', on the night, as they came in... but that there were too many for Trump so the system became overwhelmed somehow ("the algorithm crashed"), forcing the 'pause', followed by manual dumps of fraudulent ballots for Biden over subsequent hours and days.

Having said that, we're also wary of QAnon-like claims about 'justice being served any day now'. It's been 4 years and Killary is still very much free. The 'Venezuela-Cuba-China-Commies-did-this-to-us' angle is also, of course, pure BS. We're scratching our heads as to why the Trump legal team would sully their case with such provably false claims. Powell DOES also keep name-dropping the CIA, so at least she occasionally hones in on the most likely perps...

What Powell appears to be doing, in general, is drumming up popular support for Trump's case - and thus 'pressure' that can be applied on US Supreme Court judges when they do finally hear and see the evidence Powell, Giuliani et al present of mass vote fraud.

People can question the wisdom of this, but don't forget that those judges will be coming under far greater pressure from the deep state to certify the election of Joe Biden, 'or else'...

As things stand, Trump's going to need a 'hail mary' from 'on high' to 'un-steal' this election.

UPDATE 23 Nov 2020

In the space of a few hours, from conducting press conferences side-by-side with Powell to retweeting her interviews, the other lawyers representing Trump's re-election campaign have suddenly distanced the president from her:


And Powell's response:


Trump's chances of re-elections likely just took another dive.