Comment: Wait a minute; why would Britain need to convince America in order to convince Europe that it is serious about its security? Isn't British security a British domestic concern?
"Over the next four years, besides adding the present UK EEAS budget to our contribution to NATO, we will need to move as quickly as we can to devoting 2.5 percent of GDP to NATO to be seen as serious," Owen said in his address. He warned that "only in a revived NATO, where European countries are no longer as President [Barack] Obama rightly accused us of being 'freeloaders,' and we make a greater financial contribution, will Europe redress the imbalance between us and President Putin's Russian Federation."
Comment: Is Lord Owen British or is he American? Which country does he work for? Why is he repeating Pentagon propaganda about Russia?
On the relationship with Europe, Owen argued: "When the EU recognizes that the UK is even more committed to European stability as well as security then Brexit will be seen in a different light as strengthening the wider Europe." Before committing to an extra 0.5 percent, the British government may want to check [that] it is actually meeting its stated obligations.
Comment: Hang on a second: is Britain in the EU or is it not? If it's not, then why is it still talking about putting its military in Europe? Last time we checked, British borders end at the Cliffs of Dover, not eastern Poland.
Comment: This is demented beyond words. How did Jeremy Corbyn end up with this colonial era fool? He's no less crazy than Boris Johnson!