Science & Technology
New USGS data show how cities have higher or lower risks of blackouts during a powerful sun storm depending on their regional geology
Our sun is a restless star. When it's particularly active, it can eject effervescent packages of magnetic energy and charged particles known as solar flares. If it releases a minor flare aimed at Earth, the solar material can produce harmless but spectacular displays of auroras when it slams into our atmosphere.
However, more powerful solar outbursts can give birth to geomagnetic storms that wreak havoc in Earth's magnetic bubble, potentially delivering serious damage to the planet's electrical infrastructure. (See pictures of solar storms being made in the lab.)
And, as it turns out, your city's ability to weather a powerful geomagnetic storm may depend on the types of rocks below your feet.
Recent research by the U.S. Geological Survey analyzed how different flavors of rocks interact with geomagnetic storms in the northeastern U.S. The work shows that the potential damage to electrical networks can either be significantly amplified or dampened based on the regional rock types. People living in the New England Highlands, for example, have a higher risk of experiencing major damage during a geomagnetic storm, the study shows, while those in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain have a far lower risk.
Scientists have known for a while that geology plays a key role in solar storm damage. But Love's study, published in December in the journal Space Weather, goes a step further by precisely quantifying how geological differences control the damage potential in specific locations in the U.S. northeast. And although this study only focused on one part of one country, it has global implications.
"We are going to burn the boats if you will and move forward with this technology," Rear Adm. Ron Boxall said during the Booz, Allen, Hamilton and CSBA Directed Energy Summit 2019.
The service is targeting 2021 to install a High Energy Laser and Integrated Optical-dazzler with Surveillance weapon system aboard a West Coast Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA destroyer, Boxall said.
In the months that OSIRIS-REx has been studying Bennu, the spacecraft has observed this ejecta no fewer than 11 times. Since we've never seen such a thing, it suggests our understanding of asteroids may be pretty poor.
"The discovery of plumes is one of the biggest surprises of my scientific career," said principal investigator Dante Lauretta of the University of Arizona.
OSIRIS-REx has been making observations of Bennu since December last year, when it parked itself in orbit around the asteroid. Its aim is to study the rock to learn about the early Solar System, since it's thought Bennu formed at that time.
And, ambitiously, the craft is going to be taking a sample from the asteroid with a robotic arm, with intention to bring it back to Earth.
Froghoppers
"Froghopper insects can perform explosive jumps with some of the highest accelerations known among animals," say three scientists in PNAS. The little hemipterans can withstand 400 g's as they accelerate at 4,000 meters/second squared. They belong in a different suborder and family from the planthoppers that Evolution News wrote about in 2013, whose nymphs have gears on their legs to store elastic energy for their leaps.
More on Gleiser:
"There is all this stuff that science has discovered, but there are so many questions we still have no clue about. Because nature is so much smarter than we are, we're always playing this game of catch-up," he says. "So I look at science as this kind of flirt with the unknown, and what motivates this spirit of discovery is awe and the joy of being part of this process." --Colin Dwyer, "Marcelo Gleiser Wins Templeton Prize For Quest To Confront 'Mystery Of Who We Are'" at NPRDarwinian evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne is not pleased:
Well, once again the canny John Templeton Foundation has awarded its million-pound Templeton Prize to someone who's not a religious figure but a scientist who enables religion and criticizes materialism and atheism. This time the Big Dosh went to Marcelo Gleiser, a professor of Physics and Astronomy at Dartmouth College. He's a theoretical physicist and also a prolific popular writer, having produced six books, some of which seem to emphasize the limits of science. And that's apparently what he got he Prize for: for adhering to Sir John Templeton's program that science and spirituality (aka religion) were both required to apprehend the "ultimate truths" about the Universe and answer the "Big Questions." --Jerry Coyne, March 19, 2019, "Templeton Prize awarded to physicist for blending science and woo" at Why Evolution Is TrueBut then, in Jerry's books, Templeton can do wrong just doing its job.
Comment: How dare a scientist criticize materialism and atheism, which are philosophical belief systems. The true orthodoxy must uphold and maintain the dogmas of materialism and atheism, and not allow any criticism. Because criticism shows them to be dogmas, and nothing more. What is it about Gleiser that rubs Coyne the wrong way? Something like this perhaps:
A physics and astronomy professor whose specializations include cosmology, 60-year-old Gleiser was born in Rio de Janeiro, and has been in the United States since 1986.Sounds like a sane approach, which is precisely why true believers like Coyne are upset.
An agnostic, he doesn't believe in God - but refuses to write off the possibility of God's existence completely.
"Atheism is inconsistent with the scientific method," Gleiser told AFP Monday from Dartmouth College, the New Hampshire university where he has taught since 1991.
"Atheism is a belief in non-belief. So you categorically deny something you have no evidence against."
"I'll keep an open mind because I understand that human knowledge is limited," he added. --AFP, "Physicist Marcelo Gleiser: 'Science does not kill God'" at Phys.org

To build the library, researchers grew tens of thousands of strains of algae in plastic plates. The project, which took nine years, allows researchers to explore genes involved in photosynthesis and other aspects of plant biology. Photo courtesy of the researchers
Now a team led by Princeton University researchers has constructed a public "library" to help researchers to find out what each gene does. Using the library, the team identified 303 genes associated with photosynthesis including 21 newly discovered genes with high potential to provide new insights into this life-sustaining biological process. The study was published this week in Nature Genetics.
"The part of the plant responsible for photosynthesis is like a complex machine made up of many parts, and we want to understand what each part does," said Martin Jonikas, assistant professor of molecular biology at Princeton. "This library, we hope, will be one of the foundations that people will build on to make the next generation of discoveries."
Unlocking the role of each gene could allow researchers to engineer plants to grow more quickly, potentially meeting future world food needs. Plants could also potentially be altered to absorb more carbon dioxide, helping to address climate challenges.
Comment: Like the flagellum, it appears that a plant's mechanism for photosynthesis is also composed of many parts so crucial to its function that one could say that it is irreducibly complex. If that's the case, this lends even more weight to the theory of intelligent design and not 'happenstance by random chance', aka the Darwinian theory of evolution. See also:
- Rotary engine technology can be found in living cells
- The impossible protein: Research confirm's Doug Axe on the rarity of functional proteins
- Nobel chemistry research validates intelligent design concept of irreducible complexity
- The Truth Perspective: Mind the Gaps: Locating the Intelligence in Evolution and Design
Here's the headline:
And here is the text of the report, note the highlight:
Comment: The Guardian managed to get it right the first time: HUGE meteor exploded over Russia's Far East in December last year - Blast was 10 times more powerful than Hiroshima
As with so many other first world problems, however, technology has leveled the playing field. NVIDIA Research has developed GauGAN (yes, that's an intentional reference to the post-impressionist painter Paul Gauguin): a deep learning model that allows you to turn the most basic of sketches into photorealistic masterpieces that Ansel Adams would envy. We're talking WAY beyond Bob Ross (Rest In Paint, sir) here.

ANIMAL MAGNETISM Like birds, bacteria and other creatures with an ability known as magnetoreception, humans can sense Earth’s magnetic field (illustrated), a new study suggests.
Birds, fish and some other creatures can sense Earth's magnetic field and use it for navigation. Scientists have long wondered whether humans, too, boast this kind of magnetoreception. Now, by exposing people to an Earth-strength magnetic field pointed in different directions in the lab, researchers from the United States and Japan have discovered distinct brain wave patterns that occur in response to rotating the field in a certain way.
These findings, reported in a study published online March 18 in eNeuro, offer evidence that people do subconsciously respond to Earth's magnetic field - although it's not yet clear exactly why or how our brains use this information.
Venus is the hottest planet in the solar system as temperatures on its surface can reach a staggering 465 degrees Celsius (870 degrees Fahrenheit). However, simple forms of life may still have survived in the atmosphere, according to Ludmila Zasova, co-chair of the joint Russian-US 'Venera-D' ("Venus-D") project.
Clouds on Venus are mostly made of sulfuric acid but there's also 15-20 percent of water in them, the scientist said, adding that temperature and atmospheric pressure in the lower layer of the cloud cover is similar to those on Earth.















Comment: New Executive Order points to devastating space event, unprecedented government response - and public's lack of preparedness