Science & Technology
The startup, Kobold Metals, is using data-crunching algorithms to scour the globe for cobalt, in a bet that there may still be significant undiscovered sources of the metal that has become one of the world's hot commodities thanks to its use in electric vehicle batteries.
The company has raised money from Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and Breakthrough Energy Ventures, a fund backed by Gates and a dozen other tycoons including Jeff Bezos, Ray Dalio and Michael Bloomberg, owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News.
Octopus evolution 'weirder than we could have imagined' - edit their own RNA to adapt to environment
In a surprising twist, in April 2017 scientists discovered that octopuses, along with some squid and cuttlefish species, routinely edit their RNA (ribonucleic acid) sequences to adapt to their environment.
This is weird because that's really not how adaptations usually happen in multicellular animals. When an organism changes in some fundamental way, it typically starts with a genetic mutation - a change to the DNA.
Comment: That's a major assumption. Genetic mutations may occur, but they do not 'evolve' species: they damage existing genetic information, the results of which are sometimes adaptive. Random mutations do not result in new proteins or new traits. See:
Those genetic changes are then translated into action by DNA's molecular sidekick, RNA. You can think of DNA instructions as a recipe, while RNA is the chef that orchestrates the cooking in the kitchen of each cell, producing necessary proteins that keep the whole organism going.
But RNA doesn't just blindly execute instructions - occasionally it improvises with some of the ingredients, changing which proteins are produced in the cell in a rare process called RNA editing.
The detailed magnetic and gravity data have been "invaluable but also confounding," said David Stevenson from Caltech, who will present an update of both missions this week at the 2019 American Physical Society March Meeting in Boston. He will also participate in a press conference describing the work. Information for logging on to watch and ask questions remotely is included at the end of this news release.
"Although there are puzzles yet to be explained, this is already clarifying some of our ideas about how planets form, how they make magnetic fields and how the winds blow," Stevenson said.
Comment: Evidently scientific theories are, as of yet, missing some significant pieces of the puzzle:
- Observations of young stars are overturning theories of planet formation
- Standard model for planetary system formation in trouble?
- Planet-X, Comets and Earth Changes by J.M. McCanney
- Saturn's rings are raining at faster rate than previously thought
- Water in Saturn's rings surprisingly like that on Earth, except for moon Phoebe
- Behind the Headlines: Earth changes in an electric universe: Is climate change really man-made?
- Behind the Headlines: The Electric Universe - An interview with Wallace Thornhill
According to the report, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which launched an investigation in 2016 following a fatal Tesla crash, has misinterpreted the data it was provided. Back then, the NHTSA determined that the system wasn't just safe, but actually slashed crash rates by nearly 40 percent.
"After obtaining the formerly secret, underlying data through a lawsuit filed under the Freedom of Information Act against the US Department of Transportation, we discovered that the actual mileage at the time the Autosteer system was installed appears to have been reported for fewer than half the vehicles NHTSA studied," the QCSC report said.
Comment: Evidently the technology for driverless cars has yet to mature and it's no wonder the majority of the public don't trust them:
- Investigation into Uber's self-driving car reports it did detect woman but still hit her
- Another 'self-driving' Tesla car wreck -- this time in China
- Uber suspends self-driving vehicle tests after fatal crash in Arizona

This is an artist's illustration of the Kepler-1658 system, where Kepler-1658 b orbits an evolved subgiant star every 3.8 days.
It's taken so long because the initial estimate of Kepler-1658, the planet's host star, was wrong. This also made the size estimate for the planet incorrect as well, and both of them were underestimated.
The incorrect numbers contributed to confusion that made the planet candidate seem like a false positive, and it was set aside. Then, University of Hawai'i graduate student Ashley Chontos focused her first year graduate research project on re-analyzing host stars of Kepler planet candidates.
Together, Chontos and an international team of astronomers have a paper on the planet that has been accepted for publication in the Astronomical Journal.
"Our new analysis, which uses stellar sound waves observed in the Kepler data to characterize the star, demonstrated that the star is in fact three times larger than previously thought. This in turn means that the planet is three times larger, revealing that Kepler-1658 b is actually a hot Jupiter," Chontos said in a statement.
In a paper published in the journal Science Advances, a team led by Tingyu Gou from the University of Science and Technology of China was able to clearly observe the onset and evolution of a major solar eruption for the first time.
From a distance the sun seems benevolent and life-giving, but on closer inspection it is seething with powerful fury. Its outer layer - the corona - is a hot and wildly energetic place that constantly sends out streams of charged particles in great gusts of solar wind.
It also emits localised flashes known as flares, as well as enormous explosions of billions of tons of magnetised plasma called coronal mass ejections (CMEs).
These eruptions could potentially have a big effect on Earth. CMEs can damage satellite electronics, kill astronauts on space walks, and cause magnetic storms that can disrupt electricity grids.

A polar bear eats a piece of whale meat as it walks along the shore of Hudson Bay near Churchill, Man.
Although it was not the topic of his first post, I will begin with Lenski's discussion of the example with which I open my book - the polar bear genome - because it illustrates some principles that will be useful going forward. For readers who don't have time to read to the end, here are a couple of take-home lessons:
- Experimental evidence strongly supports my conclusion (disputed without good reason by Lenski and others) that highly selected mutations in the polar bear genome work by breaking or blunting pre-existing functions.
- A "function" of a protein is a lower-level molecular feature or activity, such as being a gear or a tether; it should not be confounded with higher-level phenotypic effects, such as "lowers cholesterol" or "makes the organism happy." Ignoring the distinction leads to much confusion.
Almost two centuries after anesthetics revolutionized surgery, a growing body of research is pointing to disturbing side effects that range from delirium to cancer-proliferating immune suppression. Researchers knocked out the sheep last month at the University of Melbourne to try to understand why common open-heart procedures lead to acute kidney injury in up to a third of patients -- part of a broader effort to study the impact of anesthesia on the immune system, brain and other major organs.
Comment: It's rather amazing, given how common anesthesia is, and how widely its used, how little we actually know about it. It's a vital part of health care, yet it seems in many ways that anesthetizing people is shooting in the dark.
See also:
- Researchers finally acknowledge link between anesthesia and memory loss
- Brain-machine interface puts anesthesia on autopilot
- Are patients under anesthesia really unconscious?
- How does the brain handle anesthesia and loss of consciousness
- General anesthesia may disrupt communication between brain areas
- Similarities Between Anesthesia, Coma Discovered
- Repeated Anesthesia Can Affect Children's Ability to Learn
- Brain Responses During Anesthesia Mimic Those During Natural Deep Sleep
The rock, known as 2019 DN, is slated to arrive at its closest point to Earth this coming Friday, March 8th. At its nearest distance the asteroid will still be around 13 lunar distances away. One lunar distance is equal to the space between the Earth and our Moon, so it's clear the asteroid has little chance of disrupting Earth during its flyby, and that's a very good thing considering its size.
The most recent, 5th mass extinction took place about 66 million years ago, when a huge meteorite with a radius of about 10 km crashed on the earth and made a crater with 180 km diameter and 20 km deep in the Yucatan village, Chicxulubin Mexico. The impact created a doomsday scenario.
Superheated dust particles and steam filled the sky preventing sunlight to reach earth for decades killing plant life as they could not carry out photosynthesis. Many volcanoes around the earth became active and spewed lava. There were super-tsunamis drowning land animals and plants. The atmosphere of earth became unsuitable to support most of the existing life forms, leading to the extinction of dinosaurs.
Can the 6th mass extinction occur in a similar manner and all of us would disappear before we figure out what hit us? Michael Rampino and Bruce Haggerty (1984) proposed the 'Shiva hypothesis' (named after Lord Shiva, the Hindu God of destruction) based on an earlier paper of Napier and Clube (1979). According to this hypothesis, the earth experiences large impact events with comets every 30 million years when solar system crosses the plane of Milky Way galaxy. This causes gravitational disturbances in the cloud of comets (Oort cloud) surrounding the solar system and sends some of them hurling towards the inner solar system. These may be propelled to collide with the earth by the 'sling shot' gravitational action of Jupiter (NASA's Voyager-1 and 2 used this effect to escape Sun's gravity).
Modelling studies suggest that an object of 1 km size, depending upon its speed and angle of approach is enough to wipe out the humanity according to Rampino, who gave the 'Shiva hypothesis.' This could throw up enough pulverised rock to block the sun for months. The debris falling back on earth would cause wild fires increasing the surface temperature and killing everything living to death. The earth will then go through a process of cooling and a prolonged winter possibly creating new forms of life millions of years later.













Comment: Self-editing code? Must be an accident of nature, right?