Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 29 Sep 2021
The World for People who Think

Science & Technology
Map

Robot

'Remote control' contraceptive microchip that alters hormones in body to be available 'by 2018'

MICHROCHIP
© MICHROCHIPS
The chip would need replacing every 16 years (chip pictured is not the one described in the article)
A contraceptive computer chip that can be controlled by remote control has been developed in Massachusetts.

The chip is implanted under a woman's skin, releasing a small dose of levonorgestrel, a hormone.

This will happen every day for 16 years, but can be stopped at any time by using a wireless remote control.

The project has been backed by Bill Gates, and will be submitted for pre-clinical testing in the US next year - and possibly go on sale by 2018.

The device measures 20mm x 20mm x 7mm and will be "competitively priced", its creators said.

Comment: Thankfully, there isn't any sign that this device ever got off the ground. That said, we can see the direction these mad scientists wish to go in with the control of human physiology using the mask of convenience. The acceptance of altering bodies with microchips for convenience forges the path for such devices to be demanded by the popular mind when a bit of manufactured fear is introduced.


Cell Phone

Government's 'wobbly' contact tracing app 'failed' NHS clinical safety and cyber security tests

information security
The government's coronavirus contact tracing app has so far failed the tests needed to be included in the NHS app library, HSJ understands.

The app is being trialled on the Isle of Wight this week, ahead of a national rollout later this month. Senior NHS sources told HSJ it had thus far failed all of the tests required for inclusion in the app library, including cyber security, performance and clinical safety.

There are also concerns at high levels about how users' privacy will be protected once they log that they have coronavirus symptoms, and become "traceable", and how this information will be used.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

Cuban biotech: Potential anti-COVID-19 drug announced by one of its creators

Tech lab
© AFP 2020/ADALBERTO ROQUE
Scientists work at the Genetic Engineering and Biotechnological Centre in Havana, Cuba.
The Cuban biotech industry has offered its own tool to fight the coronavirus disease. Dr. Manuel Limonta, one of the founding fathers of Cuba's biotechnology initiative, has explained how the island nation has mastered itself in producing interferon, a drug chosen by a number of countries to treat COVID-19.

Amid the media buzz about hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria drug lauded by Donald Trump as a potential cure against COVID-19, recombinant interferon remains neglected despite being one of medicines which have proven effective in curbing China's coronavirus epidemic.

Interferons (IFN) are the group of signaling proteins produced by cells to trigger defences of a human immune system in the event of viral attacks. Discovered in 1957 they were named for their ability to "interfere" with the infection process by protecting cells from pathogens. Since then, biotechnologists found the way to artificially produce the substance it has been used as a part of complex treatment against such severe illnesses as HIV, cancer, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, pneumococcal invasive diseases, and considered instrumental against SARS-Cov and MERS-Cov.

The specific drug that came in handy during China's fight with COVID-19 was recombinant Interferon Alpha 2b, developed by Cuba's Centres for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) and manufactured by a joint Chinese-Cuban enterprise.

Cell Phone

Swiss soldiers fight COVID-19 armed with Bluetooth smartphone tracing app

Swiss solder installing COVID app
© AFP/Fabrice Coffrini
Swiss soldiers install the coronavirus tracing app on their smartphones.
Swiss army conscripts are taking the fight to the coronavirus pandemic by field-testing a Bluetooth-based smartphone app aimed at stopping a resurgence of COVID-19.

The rapidly-created app traces people who have inadvertently crossed paths with someone infected with the virus.

It uses wireless technology with each phone registering the others it has come into close proximity with for a sustained period of time.

For the field test, the infantry recruits went through a normal day: physical training, theoretical study and shooting at targets 300 metres away.

"What we did before was lab tests. Now we're gathering data on how this app performs in real life," Simon Rosch, a software engineer with smartphone app developers Ubique, told AFP.

Bullseye

DARPA: US 'germ warfare research' to create Covid-19 test; identify carriers before they are infectious

Sars CoV-2
© Guardian/Alamy
Transmission electron microscope image shows Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19.
Scientists working for the US military have designed a new Covid-19 test that could potentially identify carriers before they become infectious and spread the disease, the Guardian has learned.

In what could be a significant breakthrough, project coordinators hope the blood-based test will be able to detect the virus's presence as early as 24 hours after infection - before people show symptoms and several days before a carrier is considered capable of spreading it to other people. That is also around four days before current tests can detect the virus.

The test has emerged from a project set up by the US military's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) aimed at rapid diagnosis of germ or chemical warfare poisoning. It was hurriedly repurposed when the pandemic broke out and the new test is expected to be put forward for emergency use approval (EUA) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within a week.

Comment: In addition to the new diagnostic test, DARPA scientists are also working toward antibody treatments for the deadly pathogen.

For an organ-to-organ rundown on proposed symptoms related to or affected by Covid-19, see also: How does coronavirus kill? Tracing the ferocious rampage through the body, brain to toes


Microscope 2

How does coronavirus kill? Tracing the ferocious rampage through the body, brain to toes

lungs
© GEORGE WASHINGTON HOSPITAL AND SURGICAL THEATER
The coronavirus wreaked extensive damage (yellow) on the lungs of a 59-year-old man who died at George Washington University Hospital, as seen in a 3D model based on computerized tomography scans.
On rounds in a 20-bed intensive care unit one recent day, physician Joshua Denson assessed two patients with seizures, many with respiratory failure and others whose kidneys were on a dangerous downhill slide. Days earlier, his rounds had been interrupted as his team tried, and failed, to resuscitate a young woman whose heart had stopped. All shared one thing, says Denson, a pulmonary and critical care physician at the Tulane University School of Medicine. "They are all COVID positive."

As the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 surges past 2.2 million globally and deaths surpass 150,000, clinicians and pathologists are struggling to understand the damage wrought by the coronavirus as it tears through the body. They are realizing that although the lungs are ground zero, its reach can extend to many organs including the heart and blood vessels, kidneys, gut, and brain.

Beaker

Paper shows that "mutational load" arguments don't refute ENCODE findings

DNA sculpture steel
© Jarrod Doll/Flickr
Watson and Crick DNA Memorial sculpture by Charles Jencks in Clare College Memorial Court
When the ENCODE project first proposed, on the basis of direct empirical research, that 80 percent of the genome may be biochemically functional, a huge prediction of intelligent design was fulfilled. Evolutionary biologists saw the writing on the wall and were quick to fight back. Perhaps one of ENCODE's staunchest critics has been Dan Graur, a molecular evolutionary biologist at the University of Houston. He argued in 2017 in the journal Genome, Biology and Evolution that ENCODE's empirically based conclusions could not possibly be correct because "Mutational load considerations lead to the conclusion that the functional fraction within the human genome cannot exceed 15%." What exactly is "mutational load"?

Mutational load is based upon the principal that populations of organisms can only tolerate a certain number of deleterious mutations before they reach a critical level and the population crashes. If every element of a genome is functional, then every possible mutation stands to have a non-neutral effect, and could be potentially deleterious. But if only a small portion of the genome is functional, then most mutations will happen to occur in functionally unimportant regions, and this spreads out mutations in a manner that greatly decreases the likelihood of experiencing a deleterious mutation. Thus, when your genome is filled with "junk," you can tolerate a much higher "mutational load."

Comment: More from the ENCODE project


X

Zoological clarification: No, we didn't get coronavirus from bats

fruitbats
© Itay Belson/Weizmann Institute of Science
Young fruit bats NOT the source of coronavirus
A distant relative of the coronavirus afflicting us today was found in a bat in China and that's all it took to demonize the extraordinary flying mammals.

Let's start from the punch line: Bats did not give us the latest coronavirus. Nor were its notorious cousins SARS-1 or MERS, or even the ebola virus, transmitted from bats to humans. So what did happen?

A distant relative of the current coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was isolated in a bat in China. Genetic analyses that looked for similarity between the virus in the bat and SARS-CoV-2, and factored in the theoretical pace at which the virus mutates, estimated that the two viruses parted ways between five and 50 years ago. In other words, one possibility is that about five years ago, the bat coronavirus managed to infect some other different animal - we don't know which one at this time. In that next animal, the coronavirus lived and mutated over those five years, and one day infected a human for the first time. There are other hypotheses as well.

Science doesn't yet know where the coronavirus lurked in wait for the past few years, or when it became dangerous to people, or when the first person was infected, nor do we know which animal infected that first human. The only thing science knows for sure is that the coronavirus isolated from the Chinese bat cannot have infected humans and isn't dangerous to them.

Comment: See also:


Info

Enzyme could hold key to improved allergy treatments says new study

Interleukin33 Protein
© Weill Cornell Medicine/Provided
The protein interleukin-33 (in green) in the cell nucleus (blue) of stromal cells (red) of mucosal tissue that is embedded in visceral adipose tissue (large octagonal purple cells).
A class of immune cells push themselves into an inflammatory state by producing large quantities of a serotonin-making enzyme, according to a study in mice led by scientists at Weill Cornell Medicine.

The study, published March 10 in Immunity, found that the inflammatory and infection-fighting abilities of the cells, called type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), are much impaired without the enzyme. The finding suggests possibilities for new treatments targeting ILC2s, which have been linked to asthma and other allergic disorders, to suppress their activation in inflammatory disorders.

The work also hints at what could be a major mechanism of "cross-talk" between the nervous system, which uses serotonin as a signaling molecule or neurotransmitter, and the immune system.

"There's a lot more to do in terms of understanding the biology of these innate lymphoid cells, but it's an exciting area that offers us potential new approaches to therapeutic intervention," said study senior author Dr. David Artis, director of the Jill Roberts Institute for Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Michael Kors Professor of Immunology in the Department of Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine.

Innate lymphoid cells are a recently discovered family of white blood cells that reside in the skin, airways and other barrier tissues of the body. They appear to have important roles as first responders against environmental pathogens, but scientists also recognize that ILCs may hold the keys to understanding common inflammatory and autoimmune conditions such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease.

Question

Tiny Hero shrews have the most extreme spine in nature — for no discernable reason

hero shrew
© Bill Stanley, Field Museum
Discovered in 2013, Scutisorex thori is one of two known species of hero shrew. It's named after Thor, the brawny god of strength in Norse mythology.
The tiny African mammals have an interlocking and highly flexible spine, new x-rays reveal — but they only deepen the intrigue.

When the Mangbetu people of the Democratic Republic of the Congo introduced Western scientists to a smoky-gray, rat-size animal, they told tales of how a grown man could stand on the mammal's back without hurting it.

That was back in 1910, and since then, studies of the animal in question — which came to be called the hero shrew — have cast light on what may account for such lore. (Another species of hero shrew was discovered, also in DRC, in 2013.)

In 2019, scientists led by Stephanie Smith, a mammologist and postdoctoral researcher at the Field Museum of Natural History, in Chicago, Illinois, took sophisticated x-rays of hero shrews. The scans showed that these little creatures have a spine unlike any other animal on Earth.