Science & Technology
Now, a groundbreaking experiment has provided the clearest proof yet that this quantum effect - which Albert Einstein famously dismissed as 'spooky action at a distance' - is in fact real. Quantum entanglement describes how the state of one sub-atomic particle can instantly influence the state of the other, no matter how far apart they are. This offended Einstein, since passing information between two points in space faster than the speed of light is supposed to be impossible.
In 1964, the scientist John Stewart Bell devised an experiment designed to rule out hidden variables that could offer a non-weird explanation for 'action at a distance'. But all the 'Bell tests' performed still contained 'loopholes' that, according to critics, could invalidate proof of entanglement. Now, writing in the journal Nature, scientists say two of the most important loopholes have been closed by a new version of the test.
The biomarker is associated with chronic inflammation, perhaps due to microbial infection, and predicts death from infection up to 14 years in the future, said researchers today in the journal Cell Systems.
But, the researchers warned further research was needed before a test for the biomarker would be warranted.
In the past year, scientists have found that when a collection of common proteins called GlycA is elevated in the blood, a person is more likely to die prematurely.
"Per unit increase of GlycA, you get an increased risk of death, from any cause, of between 40 and 50 per cent," said Dr Michael Inouye from the University of Melbourne's Centre for System Genomics. But little was known about the biology of the GlycA biomarker, and how it could lead to early death.
"We wanted to understand why, because without that you can't remove the risk," said Dr Inouye.
He and colleagues analysed data, much of it electronic records, on over 10,000 adults from Finland and found that those who had elevated GlycA tended to be more likely to die from sepsis and pneumonia.
"As GlycA increases, your risk of disease increase," Dr Inouye said.
"There were some strong associations. People who had one unit increase in GlycA levels were at 2.2 fold increased risk from sepsis, which makes up the majority of systemic infections."
Importantly, the study showed that when GlycA levels became elevated they tended to remain so for up to a decade, and GlycA predicted death from infection up to 14 years in the future.

Nikolai Nikiforov, Minister of Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation, at the meeting of the BRICS communications ministers.
"All BRICS states are interested in cooperation in the sphere of information and communications technologies (ICT)," Nikolay Nikiforov, said on Thursday in Moscow.
Each BRICS state has advantages in a particular sphere of ICT, "But today, information technologies are a driver of economic growth for all [BRICS countries], without exception," Nikiforov said.
One of the key problems is that the US has a monopoly in the ICT sphere, from the minister's point of view.

This skull is from an individual of the Yamnaya people, a group that moved into Central Asia in early Bronze Age (c. 5000 years ago). The group belonged to a culture that is one of the Bronze Age groups carrying Y. pestis.
Researchers analyzed teeth from the remains of 101 individuals that were collected from a variety of museums and archaeological excavations. They found DNA of the bacterium that causes plague, called Yersinia pestis, in seven of these people. The earliest sample that had plague DNA was from Bronze Age Siberia, and dated back to 2794 B.C., and the latest specimen with plague, from early Iron Age Armenia, dated back to 951 B.C.
Previously, the oldest direct molecular evidence that this bacterium infected humans was only about 1,500 years old.
"We were able to find genuine Yersinia pestis DNA in our samples 3,000 years earlier than what had previously been shown," said Simon Rasmussen, a lead author of the study and a bioinformatician at the Technical University of Denmark.
The finding suggests that plague might be responsible for mysterious epidemics that helped end the Classical period of ancient Greece and undermined the Imperial Roman army, the researchers said.
The new study also sheds light on how plague bacteria have evolved over time, and on how it and other diseases might evolve in the future, the investigators added.
Plague is a lethal disease so infamous that it has become synonymous with any dangerous, widespread contagion. It was one of the first known biological weapons — for instance, in 1346, Mongols catapulted plague victims into the Crimean city of Caffa, according to a 14th-century Italian memoir. The germ is carried and spread by fleas, as well as person-to-person contact.
Yersinia pestis has been linked with at least two of the most devastating pandemics in recorded history. One, the Great Plague, which lasted from the 14th to 17th centuries, included the notorious epidemic known as the Black Death, which may have killed up to half of Europe's population at the time.
But is there a limit to how many friends you can profitably have?
Let's start with conversation size. It's easy to chat with one or two people, but after that it gets more complicated. The maximum number of people who can converse at once—sharing alternating viewpoints and responding to one another—is about five.(2) When more than five people gather, there is simply too much distance for everyone to hear everyone else (though this upper limit varies with the level of ambient noise). There may also be something more aesthetically pleasing to us about smaller groups of people. A 2014 study of famous paintings from all over the world, ancient and contemporary, found that over 50 percent of paintings with people in them feature fewer than three.(3) Larger groups are rare.
Scaling up from conversation size, we get community size. How big can that be? The most famous estimate was introduced in 1993 by anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who looked at nonhuman primates and found that the volume of a primate species' neocortex (the wrinkled sheet on the outside of the brain) correlated with the numbers of individuals in their social groups. Extrapolating from human neocortex volume, he predicted that humans would cluster into groups between 107.6 and 248.6, with an average group size of about 150. This is "Dunbar's Number," which Malcolm Gladwell popularized in his bestselling book, The Tipping Point.
Modern hunter-gatherer societies, it turns out, tend to group themselves into communities with, on average, 148.4 individuals, according to census-like records Dunbar studied. These villages or clans tend to be built out of smaller living groups of about 30-50 individuals, and several villages or clans can unite to form tribes or sub-tribes with between 250 and 2,500 individuals. Dunbar proposed that these larger groups were not built upon personal relationships, however, but on some group identity.
Eighty years after Einstein dismissed the idea of quantum entanglement as "spooky", Dutch scientists say they have proved the effect is real, and that simply observing one particle can instantly change another far-away object.
Researchers detailed an experiment in the journal Nature this week that showed how two electrons at separate locations 1.3 km apart on the Delft University of Technology campus demonstrated a clear, invisible and instantaneous connection.
Importantly, the new study closed loopholes in earlier tests that had left some doubt as to whether the eerie connection predicted by quantum theory was real or not.
Einstein famously insisted, in a 1935 scientific paper, that what he called "spooky action at a distance" had to be wrong, and that there must be undiscovered properties of particles to explain such counter-intuitive behaviour.
Maris, who aims to digitize DNA, stressed during a Wall Street Journal technology conference in California that our genomes "aren't really secret," urging those protective of their genetic information to loosen the reins a bit.
Noting that genetic material is constantly left lying around in public, Maris addressed those who remain nervous about the digitization of DNA. "What are you worried about?" he said on Tuesday, adding that a person could easily gather information by fishing a used cup out of the trash and taking it to a lab for analysis.
We may never be able to look at "germs" with quite the same disdain again.
Scientists have discovered that bacteria - commonly reviled as primitive single-cell organisms that make us ill - can communicate with each other in a similar way to nerve cells in the human brain.
Researchers in the US found that - like human nerve cells - bacteria could use electrical signals to "talk" to each other. In this way, the seemingly primitive organisms can synchronise the actions of a colony of billions of microscopically small individuals to function "like a microbial brain". It was even speculated that separate colonies could communicate with each other and co-ordinate their actions.
The discovery came after the scientists noticed that once "biofilms" - slimy colonies of bacteria - reached a certain size, they grew in a series of periodic cycles.
By examining the colonies using a voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye, they discovered that the bacteria were sending signals to each other by releasing waves of electrically charged potassium particles called ions.
The tactic effectively allowed bacteria in the centre of the colony to tell those on the outer edge that they were "hungry". This prompted the bacteria at the colony's outer "frontier" to stop using nutrients to divide to form new cells and increase the size of the group. Instead they let nutrients flow to their "hungry" colonists in the middle. To confirm the communication mechanism, the scientists removed from the bacteria the channel that allowed the electrically charged potassium particles to flow in and out of the organisms. The electrically-based communication stopped.
Researchers have found that strong pulses of magnetic energy to the brain, called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can be used as probes to identify undamaged, untapped brain regions that may be recruited to move the arm.
The stimulation did not outright cure stroke patients of their paralysis, the researchers said in their study, but it did improve their motor function, and ultimately may "teach" the brain how to move the paralyzed arm.
Rachael Harrington, a Ph.D. student at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, D.C., presented this research Tuesday (Oct. 20) at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Chicago.
Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, killing about 130,000 Americans annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A stroke occurs when blood flow to the brain is cut off, starving brain cells of oxygen.
The majority of strokes are ischemic, which means they are caused by a clot in a blood vessel. Only about 15 percent of strokes are hemorrhagic (caused by a burst in a blood vessel), but these strokes are behind about 40 percent of all stroke deaths, according to the CDC.
Regardless of stroke type, nearly 90 percent of stroke sufferers will have mild to severe paralysis of a limb on one side of their body, such as an arm and a wrist, or a leg and an ankle. Standard treatment for this paralysis is dedicated physical, occupational and speech therapy for several hours each week.
Scientists have previously presumed that we are in a relatively safe period for meteor impacts, which are linked with the journey of our sun and its planets, including Earth, through the Milky Way. But some orbits might be more upset than we know, and there is evidence of recent activity, which could mean that we are passing through another meteor shower.
Showers of meteors periodically pass through the area where the Earth is, as gravitational disturbances upset the Oort Cloud, which is a shell of icy objects on the edge of the solar system. They happen on a 26-million year cycle, scientists have said, which coincide with mass extinctions over the last 260-million years.
The most recent shower happened 11 million years ago. But that doesn't mean that the Earth is safe, according to a new study.














Comment: With action at a distance seemingly confirmed, how long will it be before scientists accept the even 'spookier' action at a distance, i.e. psi? If it is considered reasonable that consciousness has a direct impact on matter to some extent, then the above research confirming 'spooky action at a distance' opens the door further to the possibility of human activity and the human experience having a direct impact on the cosmic environment and events.
The human-cosmic connection is introduced by Laura Knight-Jadczyk in her book 'Comets and the Horns of Moses' where she shows that some ancients realized the connection existed. The topic was further explored in a subsequent book 'Earth Changes and the Human Cosmic Connection.' A description of the book reads in part: