- Phenomenology of Ice Ages
- What causes interglacials - part 1
- Part 2: The real cause of interglacials - Resonant dust clouds

Fig 1: “…to an observer in space the Moon must appear as a normal planet, traveling in an elliptical orbit with the Sun in one of the foci.” (Moore 2001)
The 100,000 and 400,000 year cycles in the ellipticity of the Earth's orbit are caused by regular gravitational effects of the other planets as they orbit the sun, particularly those of Jupiter and Saturn. Every 100,000 years the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn align themselves so that their net gravity perturbs the Earth's orbit causing it to elongate and become more elliptical. This cycle reaches a maximum every 400,000 years in regular fashion.
The moon also is effected by the same regular (Milankovitz) induced variation in its orbit around the sun. This also causes an increased elliptical orbit of the moon around the Earth. Tidal forces vary as 1/r^3 so small changes in distance can have large effects on tides.
The gravitational force of the sun on the moon is more than twice that of the Earth. For an observer in outer space the moon appears to orbit the sun just like any other planet. It's orbit is perturbed by the Earth's gravity making it slightly concave. It is only from Earth that it appears to us to be in an elliptical orbit around the Earth.














Comment: The 'new research' they need is already available in the Thunderbolts Project's Electric Sky and Electric Universe.
According to conventional astronomical theory, brown dwarfs are small stars nearing the end of their life because their 'internal Fermi reactions' are decreasing due to lack of fuel (hydrogen), making them progressively dimmer and dimmer. However, there are several problems with this model. For starters, brown dwarfs emit X-rays: So, in standard astronomical models, brown dwarfs are 'supposed to be' too cool and too small to maintain fusion reactions in their cores. The minimum temperature 'should be' three million degrees kelvin and the mass should be at least seven percent of the Sun's mass, but some previously classified 'brown dwarfs' have actually not met those requirements, and, as a result, are too small to generate a gravitational collapse to trigger nuclear fusion and subsequent X-ray radiation.
But a brown dwarf presents no such anomaly in electric models. It's simply a star that is not glowing because the local electric field is too weak. From this perspective it's not the size (and therefore the limited gravitational field) that makes a star dark, but the electric stress. If the electric stress is too low, the star (whatever its size) doesn't glow. Thus the maximum size determined by mainstream science to define brown dwarfs is irrelevant.