
Brain scan studies of large groups of people can tell us things about what the “average” brain looks like. But when the sample itself isn’t average, are the brains?
College students make a convenient study population when you're a researcher at a university. It makes for a biased sample, but one that's still useful for some types of studies. It would be easy to think that for studies of, say, how the typical brain develops, a brain is just a brain, no matter who's skull its resting in. A biased sample shouldn't really matter, right?
Wrong. Studies heavy in rich, well-educated brains may provide a picture of brain development that's inaccurate for the American population at large, a recent study found. The results provide a strong argument for scientists to pay more attention to who, exactly, they're studying in their brain imaging experiments.














Comment: Given the plasticity of the brain, choosing a sample that is reflective of the overall population must be quite difficult, if not impossible. But choosing a sample from more diverse populations will, no doubt, offer more answers to the mysteries of the brain.
See also: