Science & Technology
His work was conducted through virtual simulation. It showed that the crowd formation experiencing the worst effects is a circular one, with a 51 percent death rate and 42 percent injury rate, thus reaching 93 percent effectiveness. A person that is in line-of-sight with the attacker, rushing toward the exit or in a stampede was found to be in the least safe position.
The safest way to stand or sit in a crowd, Usmani found, was in vertical rows.
The Queen's-led international study confirms one of Charles Darwin's more controversial theories - first put forward in 1859 and since disputed by many experts - that different species can arise, unhindered, in the same place. Others believe that a geographic barrier such as a mountain or a river is required to produce two separate species. Although focused on how species change over time through natural selection, Darwin's landmark book, The Origin of Species, also speculates that it is possible for different species to develop in the same place.
The team's findings will appear in the international journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Comment: It is ironic that scientists would argue whether these animals demonstrate true language ability. It is clear that, when put into a respective nurturing environment, these animals communicate, demonstrate abstract thinking, teach their young to do the same, have self-awareness and even show the ability to understand humor by joking and swearing inventively :)
Most importantly, they identify themselves with humans. All the 'talking' apes, when sorting the photographs they've been given into two categories, "people" and "animals", confidently put their own photos in the "people" pile -- while relegating the photos of their 'non-talking' peers into the "animals" pile.
When in company of zoo apes, the talking apes also would, after unsuccessful tries, refuse to communicate with them and, visibly distraught, would seek the society of people.
One talking ape, Lucy, was returned back into the wild. When her mentor-scientist found her in the jungle a few months later, Lucy signed to her, "take me away from here". Lucy was later killed by a poacher.
Chantek, an orangutan with a vocabulary of several hundred signs, was at some point transferred to a primate center, where he was confined in small quarters and isolation. He was depressed -- and did all he could to teach the zookeepers sign language.
All of this confirms the point of view expressed long ago by Charles Darwin: the difference between intellectual capabilities of animals and humans is quantitative rather than qualitative. The writer Mikhail Bulgakov approached this from another angle with his sarcastic comment: "having mastered speech doesn't make one human, and there are plenty of people out there who are a living proof of that" *:)
*quoted from an article about Washoe and other talking apes
Last January 11, a missile launched from China's Xichang Space Center destroyed a satellite 537 miles above the Earth's surface. Although the target was a weather satellite belonging to China itself (shot down ostensibly because it was obsolete), the act clearly rattled the U.S. space establishment.
Said one observer, The new space policy says we can defend the heavens with technology. But we can't, and the Chinese just proved it."
Garrett Lisi, 39, has a doctorate but no university affiliation and spends most of the year surfing in Hawaii, where he has also been a hiking guide and bridge builder (when he slept in a jungle yurt).
|
| ©Telegraph |
| The E8 pattern (left), Garrett Lisi surfing (middle) and out of the water (right) |
Comment: Arkadiusz Jadczyk remarks about this work:
After looking through the paper I had the following image: suppose you are to put the Rubik cube in the right order. You proceed and you "almost got it". Yet this is not the way, to really get it. You need to go back to your original point and start with another move at the very start.
There are few nice things there - that are generally expected to have its place: E8 (related to octonions) and Clifford bundles (Waldyr Rodrigues used them extensively in his recent monograph).
I wish Garrett well, yet I have an impression that sooner or later someone will find a serious flaw in his model.
Certainly it is not the solution to the main problem of physics, which is to understand the quantum theory.









Comment: And we know exactly what kind of "special event planning" he is talking about.