Science & Technology
Arnold, a professional meteorite hunter from Kingston, Ark., found the 1,400-pound space rock two weeks ago in Kiowa County's Brenham Township. Using a metal detector mounted on a three-wheel vehicle, he discovered it more than 7 feet underground and dug it up.
Idaho sheep ranchers couldn't figure out why, in the decade after World War II, a random batch of their lambs were being born with strange birth defects. The creatures had underdeveloped brains and a single eye planted, cyclopslike, in the middle of their foreheads. In 1957 they called in scientists from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to investigate.
The scientists worked for 11 years to solve the mystery. One of them, Lynn James, lived with the sheep for three summers before discovering the culprit: corn lilies. When the animals moved to higher ground during droughts, they snacked on the flowers. The lilies, it turned out, contained a poison, later dubbed cyclopamine, that stunted developing lamb embryos. The mothers remained unharmed. The case of the cyclopamine and the one-eyed Idaho lambs remained a freakish chemistry footnote for the next 25 years; researchers never could uncover why cyclopamine caused birth defects.
Comment: As is usual in this crazy world of ours, serious issues get reduced down to slogans and talking points that obscure the complexity of the underlying reality. In the case of the Internet, we have a situation where the technology that enables the net grew out of the needs of the US military-industrial complex to have a communications network that would resist the threat of nuclear war. The solution was a network of nodes where data could be moved around via myriads routes. If one node was taken out, communication between the other nodes remain intact and secure.
This is a great step forward when the net became available to everyone because it permitted a quick and easy way for the grass roots to connect with one another. The growing anti-globalisation movement used the net to effective measure as it stood up against the plans of international capital to open the markets of the world. We are told, on the other hand, that it has permitted those evil villains at al Qaeda to hook up and organise their terrorist attacks.
The Powers That Be do not want the grass roots to have this type of political weapon: the ability to share information outside of the official channels and to organise responses. Our flash animation, Pentagon Strike, has been seen by half a billion people around the globe. It is not only China, Cuba, or Iran, the three countries named in the article, who wish to control the flow of information: all countries have the same interest. Often, the question comes down to one of means: is this censorship down openly, or is it down on the sly? IS it down by the outright banning of access to certain sites or types of information, or is it done by weighing search results and corporate filters justified through appeals to employees wasting their time at work surfing the net? The same result is achieved through the two approaches, yet the soft approach permits the culprit to accuse the first of heavy-handed censorship and anti-democratic oppression of its people.
The Internet is now a world-wide resource. In a perfect world, everyone would have a say in its management. Obviously, we live in a less-than-perfect world. Representative forms of democracy tend to obscure political control rather than guarantee it is in the hands of the governed.
It is normal that other countries wish to have a say. The level of trust one can put in the United States has plummeted in recent years with the innumerable lies that have come out of Washington. Although the US claims it is an arbiter of freedom of speech, wishing to protect the Internet, it is clear that this is a political stance it is using against those countries that use the hard methods of censorship. The US monitors all Internet traffic, from the content to the simple fact of who is in communication with whom. We would be naive to think otherwise.
Prognostications go from creating phoney bodies to give the appearance of input to multiple Internets to allow certain countries to more directly control the content. The upshot for the public is that no matter which side wins, or what kind of compromise is achieved, the Internet as we have known it will change to the detriment of freedom of speech and access to information.
The clampdown that is coming will be world-wide.
Comment: David Wolman is a left-handed writer in Portland, Oregon. His new book, A Left-Hand Turn Around the World: Chasing the mystery and meaning of all things southpaw, is published this week by Da Capo Press at £14.50/$23.95
A group of travellers brought farming to Europe about 7,500 years ago. But did their children thrive and hand down the skill? Researchers studying ancient DNA say instead that the idea was stolen by more successful locals, as the farmers failed to leave their mark on Europe's genes.
Using a high-precision absolute-dating method (techniques involving electron spin resonance and uranium series), Jack Rink, associate professor of geography and earth sciences at McMaster, has determined that Gigantopithecus blackii, the largest primate that ever lived, roamed southeast Asia for nearly a million years before the species died out 100,000 years ago. This was known as the Pleistocene period, by which time humans had already existed for a million years.





Comment: Yeah, they are "conspiracy hoaxes" when someone exposes what the US is doing to stifle free speech, but when the UN tries to wrest control away from the CIA - which is spying on everybody via the internet - suddenly it is a "serious, ominous effort..."