
© Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images
A masked couple waits for the train at Harpers Ferry station in West Virginia, July 3, 2020.
NOTE FROM GLENN GREENWALD: The corporate media has worked very hard to propagate the liberal-pleasing narrative that COVID has become a partisan disease due to vaccine hesitancy on the right, often ignoring the inconvenient truth that
large percentages of politically diverse groups, principally African-Americans and Latinos, remain resistant to vaccination.
Recent reporting from
The New York Times serves to further this distorted narrative, dubbing the positive correlation between support for Donald Trump and COVID death rates "Red COVID," and brandishing it as evidence of a partisan pandemic. But the
Times' report misleads readers through statistical manipulation and data games, as illustrated by this meticulous analysis, presented in an
Outside Voices contribution by Jeremy Beckham:
A widely shared article recently appeared in
The New York Times' "The Morning" newsletter titled "
Red Covid," authored by David Leonhardt. This article, presented as news reporting and not an opinion piece, argues that deaths from COVID-19 are "showing a partisan pattern," with the worst impacts of the disease "increasingly concentrated in red America."
Given that this narrative perfectly flatters a liberal sense of superiority, it has predictably gained substantial traction on MSNBC and on Twitter.
One particular claim in the
Times' article caught my attention: that there is a clear and strong association
on a county level between COVID deaths and support for Donald Trump in the 2020 election. Specifically, the article alleged that those counties which voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump had
more than a four-fold greater mortality rate than those counties which decisively voted against Trump. If true, that would indeed be a striking observation.
Comment: It's highly likely that, as we enter a 'grand' solar minimum and activity on the Sun wanes to levels unknown in our era, formerly inactive bodies, as well as new comers, will show unusually high levels of activity 'surprising' scientists even further; and, perhaps, when taking into account the surge in other unusual, and in some cases disastrous, phenomena on planet Earth, it will sufficiently rouse their curiousity that they'll begin to question their long held theories: Volcanoes, Earthquakes And The 3,600 Year Comet Cycle
See also:
- Comet 67P surprises scientists with 'bright outbursts', collapsing cliffs and rolling boulders during Rosetta mission
- Asteroid Ryugu is surprisingly dry, Japanese spacecraft finds
- Planet-X, Comets and Earth Changes by J.M. McCanney
- Quadruple outburst of Comet 29P - Now at its brightest for 40 years
- Foul odours, strange lights, electrical shocks, paranoia and a comet: The ominous activity surrounding the devastating New Madrid earthquakes of 1812
And check out SOTT radio's: