Science & Technology
The MIT Technology Review on Wednesday, April 15, cited a paper by Facebook engineers, titled "WES: Agent-based User Interaction Simulation on Real Infrastructure." The paper describes how Facebook created a scaled-down version of the platform, called WW, to simulate user behavior with the help of bots.
In WW, hard-coded and machine-learning-based bots act as users with different goals or agendas which play out differently depending on the scenario set up by the engineers.

This artist’s impression illustrates the precession of the star’s orbit, with the effect exaggerated for easier visualization.
Putting together decades worth of observations, astronomers have shown that S2's orbit isn't a fixed-in-position ellipse; rather, the orbit shifts around like a spirograph drawing - a phenomenon known as Schwarzschild precession.
This is the first time Schwarzschild precession has been detected around a supermassive black hole, demonstrating that it holds true even when we observe the orbits of stars in the most gravitationally extreme environment.
In addition, general relativity equations can be used to accurately predict the orbital changes - and these calculations have precisely matched up with the observations of S2.
A five-year study of captive flocks in Gloucestershire has found that flamingos spend large amounts of time with specific close "friends" in groups of up to four or five.
The report says that some of these friendship groups appear to avoid others they do not get along with. No loners were spotted but some individuals, dubbed "social butterflies" by the researchers, did flit from group to group.
It has long been known that gatherings of flamingos in the wild, which can number up to 2 million individuals, are complex social structures. It is also known that the birds have very different individual characteristics.
With that line, summarizing the approach of many of his critics, biochemist Michael Behe got a laugh of recognition from the audience at the 2020 Dallas Conference Science & Faith this past January.
Behe got a laugh because, as with much of humor, he was caricaturing...but not by a lot. Here Professor Behe invites us to review the sweep of his argument for intelligent design, as he has presented it in his books and other publications, form Darwin's Black Box to Darwin Devolves, from irreducible complexity to the First Rule of Adaptive Evolution. This is, from top to bottom, an empirical argument, as he points out. It can only be fairly evaluated on empirical not religious grounds. Too bad the critics (with some noble exceptions) have avoided doing that.
Comment:
- Michael Behe: One man's battle with Darwinian evolution
- Isolation and Defamation: The Cost of Thinking Differently - Interview with Michael Behe on Intelligent Design
- Why Behe is right about polar bears: Part 1 - Setting the stage
- Why Behe is right about polar bears: Part 2 - The APOB gene and damaging mutations
- Why Behe is right about polar bears: Part 3 - Unacknowledged discrepancies, inconsistent standards
- Why Behe is right about polar bears: Part 4 - The fake mutation chart scandal
- Michael Behe responds to Prof. Lenski: Most random mutations ARE damaging
In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.
Although almost all coronaviruses isolated from bats have not been able to bind to the key human receptor, SHC014 is not the first that can do so. In 2013, researchers reported this ability for the first time in a different coronavirus isolated from the same bat population.2
Comment: Nature has since added the following note to this article:
Editors' note, March 2020: We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.In re-posting this, we are not suggesting that this particular research was directly involved in engineering SARS-CoV-2 - if indeed it was engineered or 'tweaked' at all.
But it's nevertheless instructive that such research is conducted. Obviously, being public research, it is not implicated in any nefarious bio-weapons or 'bio-hacking' experiments. But its findings could readily be used by firewalled, private networks in which research takes place away from any public scrutiny.

This is an illustration of newly discovered exoplanet Kepler-1649c orbiting around its host red dwarf star.
Out of the 2,681 exoplanets spotted by NASA's Kepler space telescope between 2009 and 2018, this one is the most similar in size, and potentially temperature, to our own planet, according to a new study.
Exoplanets are those found orbiting stars outside of our solar system. Researchers recently uncovered the planet in archival data collected by Kepler.
Kepler was retired in 2018, but its data could lead to more discoveries for years to come. Currently, NASA's TESS mission is the latest planet-hunter seeking out exoplanets.
The planet has been dubbed Kepler-1649c. It's 1.06 times larger than Earth and receives about 75% the amount of light that Earth gets from the sun. This suggests that the surface temperature of the exoplanet could be similar to Earth.
There's a lot happening in the northern sky these days, namely lots of comets! Comet ATLAS is still worth watching, but look for the new Comet SWAN (C/2020 F8). And you can still catch a glimpse of our old friend, Comet PanSTARRS (C/2017 T2).
COMET CRAZY
Comet ATLAS (C/2019 Y4) continues to shed fragments while slowly fading and becoming more diffuse. But it ain't dead yet!

The evolution of Comet ATLAS's fragmenting pseudo-nucleus is clearly visible in these images taken between April 6th and 14th. The brightest fragment situated off-axis from the other pieces may be the original nucleus. In the final frame note that it has developed a tiny tail of its own.

The solar wind causes events such auroras, like this one photographed by a U.S. astronaut after docking with the International Space Station. It can also interfere with satellite communications and distort the magnetic field of earth.
In a study published April 14 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison physicists provide an explanation for the discrepancy in solar wind temperature. Their findings suggest ways to study solar wind phenomena in research labs and learn about solar wind properties in other star systems.
"People have been studying the solar wind since its discovery in 1959, but there are many important properties of this plasma which are still not well understood," says Stas Boldyrev, professor of physics and lead author of the study. "Initially, researchers thought the solar wind has to cool down very rapidly as it expands from the sun, but satellite measurements show that as it reaches the Earth, its temperature is 10 times larger than expected. So, a fundamental question is: Why doesn't it cool down?"
Asteroid 2020 GH2 will pass Earth at 19,000 miles per hour and was only discovered on Saturday April 11. With a diameter of between 43 and 70 feet (13-70 meters) wide, GH2 could inflict significant damage were it to crash into our planet. Mercifully, however, it will miss Earth, flying by at a distance of 223,000 miles (359,000 kilometers).
For context, the average lunar distance from Earth is 239,000 miles (385,000 km). For an asteroid to pose a clear and present danger to us, it would need to come within the range of geostationary weather satellites, which operate at a distance of about 22,000 miles (35,000 km) from Earth.
Scientists have modified the neurotoxic venom of a tarantula called the Chinese bird spider (Cyriopagopus schmidti) to produce a protein that acts as a powerful painkiller. So far, it's proven effective in mice.
"Our findings could potentially lead to an alternative method of treating pain without the side-effects and reduce many individuals' reliance on opioids for pain relief," said chemical biologist Christina Schroeder of the University of Queensland in Australia.











Comment: RT writer Helen Buyinski explains why this is such a concerning technological development: