Comment: Michigan's GOP electors were barred by state police from entering the Capitol building on orders of the governor because of ridiculous "credible threats of violence".



Georgia:


Pennsylvania:


Wisconsin:

An hour after the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed Joe Biden the winner of the Nov. 3 presidential election in the state, Republicans refused to accept the result and met at the state Capitol to put forward their own slate of electors.

While 10 Democratic electors met inside Gov. Tony Evers' office to finalize the state's 10 electoral votes for President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, Republicans convened to cast votes for President Donald Trump.

"We made it," Evers, a Democrat, said after the 10 votes were officially cast by Democratic electors to be sent to Congress. "Today we did our part to continue the long and sacred tradition of our democracy of honoring the will of the people."

Elsewhere in the Capitol, Republicans including party chairman Andrew Hitt and Wisconsin Elections Commissioner Bob Spindell met even though their electors are not supposed to be counted.

Hitt, in a statement, said the electors met "to preserve our role in the electoral process while the final outcome is still pending in the courts."

Comment: Bada bing. Here are some of the conclusions, directly from the report:

1.) ASOG's bottom line is found on page 1: We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.

2.) Item 6: The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.

3.) Item 15: Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years, but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing.

4.) Item 16: Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03pm on November 4, 2020 are missing. Other server logs before November 4, 2020 are present, therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.

5.) Item 19: This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.

6.) Item 22: we conclude that the errors are so significant that they call into question the integrity and legitimacy of the results in the Antrim County 2020 election to the point that the results are not certifiable. Because the same machines are used in 48 other counties in Michigan, this casts doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan.

Just yesterday, MI AG Nessel issued a veiled threat over Twitter:


Maybe the answer to why Sec. of State Benson intervened in the lawsuit is becoming clear.


As all that wasn't enough, now there's this:

Comment: So? Do they think we're so stupid that we don't know that the Chinese already know who in China works for MI6? And that they'd need to rely on in-person verification to figure that out... in the year 2020??

This China-envy stems from the fact that the Davos Set - especially the British - refuse to accept the reality of the New Eurasian Century and its model of win-win cooperation (yeah we know, the concept in practice is far from utopian) vs the status quo of hyper-aggressive, hegemonic, unipolar dominance.

Comment: See also:

• The World Economic Forum clarion call: A breakdown of 'The Great Reset
• 'Part 1: The coronavirus as a global economic reset
• The state's response to this 'virus' is nothing more than a weapon of mass submission
• Coronavirus 'Plandemic' - This IS the global reset
• Justin Trudeau in UN conference call says 'pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset'

Comment: To read the Corman-Drosten Review Report, submitted 27th November, 2020, go here. Included are: a detailed analysis of mistakes, a list concerns and a summary of errors found in the paper.

'Follow the science' they said. What they didn't tell you is that what they want you to follow is not science.

See also:

• Austrian lawmaker denounces 'medical tyranny' after cola drink returns positive result for coronavirus
• Good idea! Germany's Extra-Parliamentary Corona Investigative Commission launching a class action suit against corona criminals
• Flawed paper behind Covid-19 testing faces being retracted, after scientists expose its ten fatal problems
• The test set: Another brick in the covid-19 disinformation game plan

Comment: This (or similar inter-state disputes) could be the key that unlocks the Biden steal. The Supreme Court is not obliged to hear Texas' lawsuit though because it's technically a request for permission to file a lawsuit.

If it's not on solid legal standing, it's nonetheless something of a political shot across the bow.

Most interesting of all is this development has finally, an entire month later, forced the MSM to sit up and take notice rather than just laugh away or ignore the claim...

Both Alabama and Louisiana are supporting Texas in their attempt to challenge the election results in the 4 swing states. Alabama attorney general Steve Marshall expects the Supreme Court to quickly decide whether to hear the case. If they do hear it, expect to see other states signing on as well.

UPDATE 9 Dec 2020

The US Supreme Court is going to hear this case...


...and 17 more states have joined Texas!

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt led his colleagues from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia in filing the amicus brief to the US Supreme Court.


The amicus brief reads:

States have a strong interest in ensuring that the votes of their own citizens are not diluted by the unconstitutional administration of elections in other States. When non-legislative actors in other States encroach on the authority of the "Legislature thereof" in that State to administer a Presidential election, they threaten the liberty, not just of their own citizens, but of every citizen of the United States who casts a lawful ballot in that election — including the citizens of amici States.

UPDATES 10 Dec 2020

Now Trump has entered the fray:


Arizona has become the 18th state to file an 'amicus brief', though its stated reason for doing so is neutral:


Distinct from an amicus brief (which encourages a court to hear another's case) is today's filing by six states (Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah) with a motion to actually join Texas' SCOTUS election lawsuit.

106 GOP House members are now backing the Texas lawsuit:

Comment: The suit was filed on behalf of 46 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and South Dakota did not join. According to CBS News:

Both lawsuits cite Facebook's 2012 purchase of Instagram for $1 billion and a $19 billion deal for WhatsApp in 2014 as examples of its efforts to eliminate competitors.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg's view, expressed in a 2008 email, that "it is better to buy than compete," the FTC said in its suit. "To further entrench its position, Facebook has also imposed anticompetitive conditions that restricted access to its valuable platform — conditions that Facebook personnel recognized as 'anti user[,]' 'hypocritical' in light of Facebook's purported mission of enabling sharing, and a signal that 'we're scared that we can't compete on our own merits.'"

For Facebook, the coordinated federal and state lawsuits represent the most aggressive legal action against the company to date by government authorities, culminating a bipartisan campaign to rein in big technology companies. It's the second time in two months that the government has moved against a tech giant.

"It's time that the courts put an end to Big Tech's specious claim that its products are 'free,' so 'consumer welfare' is not infringed upon and the antitrust laws don't apply," Ed Mierzwinski, U.S.

PIRG's* senior director for federal consumer programs, said in a statement. "Actually, consumers pay with our data, through a Big Tech business model of constant corporate surveillance and manipulation."

*Public Interest Research Group

Comment: Hopefully this won't get buried next to the Killary emails and Epstein files.