Cruz and the other senators claim the Nov. 3 election "featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud and illegal conduct."
Joining Cruz are Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; James Lankford, R-Okla.; Steve Daines, R-Mont.; John Kennedy, R-La.; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Mike Braun, R-Ind.; as well as Sens.-elect Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Roger Marshall, R-Kansas; Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala.
Their effort is separate from one announced by Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who said this week that he will object to what he claims was the failure of some states -- most notably Pennsylvania -- to follow their own election laws.
"Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed," the lawmakers said Saturday in a statement. "By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes."
While the Trump campaign has challenged the results in dozens of lawsuits, judges have dismissed them due to a lack of evidence. Attorney General William Barr said last month that "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
The Kafkaesque imprisonment of Julian Assange reveals the US mythology about 'freedom' and 'tyranny'

A billboard van calling for an end to extradition proceedings against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange waits at traffic lights in Parliament Square in London, England, on September 14, 2020.
Persecution is not typically doled out to those who recite mainstream pieties, or refrain from posing meaningful threats to those who wield institutional power, or obediently stay within the lines of permissible speech and activism imposed by the ruling class.
Those who render themselves acquiescent and harmless that way will — in every society, including the most repressive — usually be free of reprisals. They will not be censored or jailed. They will be permitted to live their lives largely unmolested by authorities, while many will be well-rewarded for this servitude. Such individuals will see themselves as free because, in a sense, they are: they are free to submit, conform and acquiesce. And if they do so, they will not even realize, or at least not care, and may even regard as justifiable, that those who refuse this Orwellian bargain they have embraced ("freedom" in exchange for submission) are crushed with unlimited force.

IT Expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, the inventor of platform known as ‘QR Code'
Prior to today we've requested that President Donald J. Trump write an Executive Order mandating that the ballots and images in select states be audited and reviewed for fraud by Jovan Pulitzer.
We first learned of Inventor Jovan Pulitzer a few weeks ago and reported that he is able to audit millions of ballots in a day based on his method for reviewing ballots and images. His biography and ideas were provided in our article. He believes there was fraud in the 2020 election and that he can prove it quickly.
Today in Georgia Mr. Pulitzer gave a presentation that all of America should see and hear:
Comment: During his testimony, Pulitzer revealed that ballots were printed with different identifying information depending on which precinct they were for - some with seemingly deliberate alignment errors that would throw off digital scans. Later in the hearing, he revealed quite the bombshell. His team had accessed one poll center's polling device - as he spoke.
Here are some more highlights from the hearing:
But here's perhaps the biggest news:
Here's the full hearing:
UPDATES: According to Pulitzer, just hours after the vote to allow him to audit the ballots in question, moving trucks pulled up to the facility storing the ballots:
I'd like your permission of you and your fine audience that as I answer you that I have your permission to piss you off... The very minute that order went through and that order was followed, and all the legal notices were done, it didn't even take four hours later where moving trucks with this stuff was backed up to those buildings trying to get rid of the evidence.Will they shred them?
During this livestream, he shared what was going on with the poll pad. A SmartTV was communicating via a hidden connection with the poll pad, sending and receiving data back to its manufacturer in China.

The person who tested positive for coronavirus in December had been vaccinated just hours before their Jan. 21, 2021 death.
The COVID vaccines are mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, which are completely new. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. There are no other therapies or prophylactics on the market that use the same approach, despite a handful of efforts.
Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a virus ("live" or inert), as well as adjuvants such as aluminum and mercury, to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-human sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. So the vaccine is hijacking the protein-makeup machinery.
Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
The Moderna vaccine is given in two doses, 28 days apart. The Pfizer vaccine will require two shots, three weeks apart.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines also include the traditional toxic adjuvants.
Comment: The titanic struggle for the highest office on Earth continues...

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) speaks to reporters in Washington on April 21, 2020. Gaetz is one of dozens of Republcian lawmakers who plan on contesting electoral votes during the Jan. 6, 2021, joint session of Congress.
Twenty-four representatives and representatives-elect, who will enter office several days before the session, plan on filing objections. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is the only member or member-elect of the upper chamber to commit to an objection.
"You've got 74 million Americans who feel disenfranchised, who feel like their vote doesn't matter. And this is the one opportunity that I have as a United States senator, this process right here, my one opportunity to stand up and say something, and that's exactly what I'm going to do," Hawley said on Wednesday.
Comment: Hawley isn't backing down:
"Josh Hawley's latest: he's all in on overthrowing our democratic elections. Another pointless and dangerous attempt to undermine the will of the people," Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) said in a statement.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said on CNN that Hawley's actions are undermining the democratic process, calling the planned objection a "reckless stunt."
Hawley responded to the claims during an appearance on Fox.
"First of all, I don't recall hearing the Democrats make any such outrageous claims when they were the ones who were objecting during the Electoral College certification in 2004 and 2016," he said.
"Democrats have done this for years in order to raise concerns about election integrity. Now, when Republicans — 74 million Americans — have concerns about election integrity, we're supposed to just sit down and shut up? I mean, somebody has to stand up here. You've got 74 million Americans who feel disenfranchised, who feel like their vote doesn't matter. And this is the one opportunity that I have as a United States senator, this process right here, my one opportunity to stand up and say something, and that's exactly what I'm going to do."
...
Hawley said he plans to object to make the point that "we had states like Pennsylvania that did not follow their own laws, their own state law, in the election process." He also hopes to draw attention to how technology companies like Twitter came out in favor of Biden by censoring Trump in recent months. "I'm going to try to force a debate about all of these points," Hawley said.
Objections are filed in writing and must have support from at least one member of each chamber. If they do, they trigger a two-hour debate and a vote by the House of Representatives and the Senate. A simple majority in each chamber is required to uphold the challenge.
Rep.-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) told The Epoch Times that the group plans to file objections against the votes from six states, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, and Nevada. They're mulling an objection to votes from New Mexico.
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) was the first to announce plans to file an objection.
Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey, has embedded himself in some of the most powerful global influencer complexes. His techno-mining of African potential and the increasing use of Twitter as a surveillance tool for the corporatocracy have generated the opportunity for Dorsey to play an increasingly pivotal role in the roll-out of the World Economic Forum's Great ResetIn Part 1 of this series on the emergence of the "celebrity humanitarianism" complex of the 21st century and its role in the ongoing Covid-19 crisis, I covered the evolution of Hollywood actor Sean Penn from anti-Iraq-war activist to establishment narrative endorser and advocate for the predator class factions dominated by the Clinton family cabal and globalism.
Penn was one of the three men together on a beach holiday that was featured in a Daily Mail article in November 2020. Another of the three global influencers strolling on the beach with Penn was "technology entrepreneur" and the CEO and co-founder of Twitter, Jack Dorsey. Dorsey's meteoric rise to fame as a leading innovator in the world of data technology began to falter in 2016/17 when 247 Wall Street listed Dorsey among the twenty worst CEOs in America.
In this article, I will investigate Dorsey's involvement in the narrative management of Covid-19 and his potential contribution to the roll out of the World Economic Forum's Great Reset that has been accelerated by the Coronavirus "pandemic" exercise.
"Of course we knew it was possible that social distancing could control a respiratory virus," says Neil Ferguson, the Imperial College professor whose maths is now for ever associated with the lockdown. "But there is an enormous cost associated with it."
Comment: No, they did not know that it was possible that "social distancing could control a respiratory virus." The idea was first bruited in a high school project, by the daughter of a 'senior scientist', just over a decade ago. Her project work didn't even win first prize because it is long since scientifically and medically established that respiratory illnesses caused by aerosolized viruses cannot be controlled by keeping people apart.
Back in 2019, about the time someone was getting infected by a bat, no European country's pandemic plans seriously entertained the prospect of putting a country on pause.
Comment: No one was infected by a bat. Sars-CoV-2 is a laboratory-tweaked coronavirus. It either leaked directly from a lab, or leaked through person-to-person transmission when people vaccinated with this experimental virus began spreading it to non-vaccinated people.
Then, that's what China did. "I think people's sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March," Professor Ferguson says.
He is speaking in a short hiatus in another busy day. In the morning, he has spent two hours briefing a Commons select committee on the new Kent variant, which his calculations suggest spreads faster. In the afternoon, in part on the basis of those calculations, Matt Hancock, the health secretary, will put another swathe of the country into stricter restrictions. Just hearing that the professor's maths is behind another lockdown this month will at this stage in a politicised pandemic provoke some to fury.
Comment: 'A minority of people are not like us' - he wishes!
In reality, he is part of the minority that believes in the pseudo-reality they have built in their minds. And such people will not rest 'until all think and see as I do'...
Let's take a look at some of the hard numbers. In New York City, the number of murders has risen 41 percent compared to 2019...
Comment: There are a number of factors to consider, and they include the redirection of police resources, budget cuts, the deteriorating economic situation that is years in the making, and then there's the lockdowns that have destroyed businesses, opportunities, and are, overall, tearing society apart.
As we said at the outset of the Covid-19 scamdemic, it will break civilization. The elites believe they can 'fix it' via their 'resets' and 'climate agendas', but they can't. It's all over bar the crying.
And, as always, it comes from his complicit Secretary of State who undermines Trump with his every move to turn the State, Defense and Intelligence apparatuses of the U.S. against Russia.
Pompeo goes on Mark Levin's show, whose ratings are through the roof right now, to tell all the slavering normie-conservatives that it was definitely the Russians who hacked our government.
Comment: We may, in fact, be treated to an overturning of the election. We'll just have to wait and see,
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) recently released a report detailing the findings of an investigation his staff began in February 2019 into the relationship between World Vision and ISRA.
The probe found that World Vision was not aware that ISRA had been sanctioned by the U.S. since 2004 after funneling roughly $5 million to Maktab al-Khidamat, the predecessor to Al-Qaeda controlled by Osama Bid Laden.
However, that ignorance was born from insufficient vetting practices, the report said. Grassley said in a statement:
"World Vision works to help people in need across the world, and that work is admirable. Though it may not have known that ISRA was on the sanctions list or that it was listed because of its affiliation with terrorism, it should have. Ignorance can't suffice as an excuse. World Vision's changes in vetting practices are a good first step, and I look forward to its continued progress."The investigation was sparked by a July 2018 National Review article in which Sam Westrop, the director of the Middle East Forum's Islamist Watch, detailed MEF's findings that the Obama administration had approved a "$200,000 grant of taxpayer money to ISRA." Government officials specifically authorized the release of "at least $115,000" of this grant even after learning that it was a designated terror organization, Westrop wrote.
Comment: Wrists slapped. USAID is a front organization for the CIA. What does this suggest when it awarded World Vision the $723,405 grant? Either World Vision needs corrective lenses or it saw quite clearly the intent and performed its function.










Comment: As we can see from the 'pathway' this ploy opens up, it too is unlikely to overturn the 'official election result' for Trump.
But it might buy him some time and political momentum.
There's no way around the stark choice before Trump: to prevent a complete totalitarian takeover by the US establishment, he must effectively declare, "by the powers invested in me as president," that he does not recognize the 'Congress-approved Electoral College vote', and that he is therefore remaining as president after January 20th.