Best of the Web:


Piggy Bank

Flashback Best of the Web: CDC admits number of 'swine flu' cases overestimated because they stopped testing for H1N1 virus and began guessing numbers


Comment: Today's 'coronavirus pandemic' is recent history repeating. The following report came out as hysteria surrounding the 2009 'Swine Flu Pandemic' began to taper off...


h1n1 swine flu vaccines
Have YOU had your shot today?!
If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn't have H1N1 flu.

In fact, you probably didn't have flu at all. That's according to state-by-state test results obtained in a three-month-long CBS News investigation
.

The ramifications of this finding are important. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Britain's National Health Service, once you have H1N1 flu, you're immune from future outbreaks of the same virus. Those who think they've had H1N1 flu -- but haven't -- might mistakenly presume they're immune. As a result, they might skip taking a vaccine that could help them, and expose themselves to others with H1N1 flu under the mistaken belief they won't catch it. Parents might not keep sick children home from school, mistakenly believing they've already had H1N1 flu.

Comment: Of course they didn't; they never do. It's all one-way propaganda from the top down.

'Positive' for H1N1, 'probable' for H1N1, 'negative for H1N1'... the WHO and CDC didn't care what actual medical testing took place and how accurate those results were. They just wanted to boost as many vaccines as possible and - more generally - get everyone onboard with 'doing what the nice man in the white coat - sponsored by Big Pharma - tells you'.

It's all about the vaccines - and/or other medical mafia means of implementing ever finer orders of control.

Like we said earlier in this current 'pandemic', the manufactured 'War on Terror' has nothing on manufactured 'global pandemics' when it comes to 'spooking the herd' and 'creating new facts on the ground'.

Most just 'freeze' in terror, suspend their critical faculties, and hand over more of their sovereignty to the authorities.


Arrow Down

Best of the Web: 'Everything is China's fault': Western media excoriates China over coronavirus response, even as infection rates subside

Shanghai coronavirus
© Reuters / Aly SongResidential community in Shanghai closed for coronavirus protection.
China can do no right in its response to the coronavirus, according to western media. Even as the epidemic appears to be subsiding, Beijing is being slammed for being simultaneously too authoritarian and too weak.

Even as the Chinese government earns plaudits from the World Health Organization and epidemiology experts for its handling of the epidemic, Western media haven't let up on their criticism. Coronavirus has given them license to unleash every stereotype and wild speculation they've ever had about life in China, and they aren't about to let go of that opportunity. Accordingly, nothing Beijing does — or doesn't do — will be enough for the armchair critics of the American press.

Blaming Communism

CNBC has compared the government's response to coronavirus to the reaction of Soviet authorities to the 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl, citing US financial firm Raymond James. However, the company only wrote that it was "receiving questions on whether or not this will be a 'Chernobyl-like' event for China" in their analyst report published February 18. They didn't openly declare it had been one, though they did suggest that "if the virus becomes a true global pandemic, the actions by the Chinese leadership will come under fire as they no doubt contributed to the spread" (emphasis added).

Comment: Western media, as mouthpieces for the establishment, are making the terror of Western elites at the growing power of China all too obvious.


Attention

Best of the Web: The coronavirus is NOT as deadly as they want us to think

ambulance
© Miguel Medina/Getty ImagesA man arrives in an ambulance at a pre-triage medical tent in front of the hospital in Cremona, Italy, on Tuesday.
There are many compelling reasons to conclude that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is not nearly as deadly as is currently feared. But COVID-19 panic has set in nonetheless. You can't find hand sanitizer in stores, and N95 face masks are being sold online for exorbitant prices, never mind that neither is the best way to protect against the virus (yes, just wash your hands). The public is behaving as if this epidemic is the next Spanish flu, which is frankly understandable given that initial reports have staked COVID-19 mortality at about 2-3 percent, quite similar to the 1918 pandemic that killed tens of millions of people.

Allow me to be the bearer of good news. These frightening numbers are unlikely to hold. The true case fatality rate, known as CFR, of this virus is likely to be far lower than current reports suggest. Even some lower estimates, such as the 1 percent death rate recently mentioned by the directors of the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, likely substantially overstate the case.

We shouldn't be surprised that the numbers are inflated. In past epidemics, initial CFRs were floridly exaggerated. For example, in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic some early estimates were 10 times greater than the eventual CFR, of 1.28 percent. Epidemiologists think and quibble in terms of numerators and denominators — which patients were included when fractional estimates were calculated, which weren't, were those decisions valid — and the results change a lot as a result. We are already seeing this. In the early days of the crisis in Wuhan, China, the CFR was more than 4 percent. As the virus spread to other parts of Hubei, the number fell to 2 percent. As it spread through China, the reported CFR dropped further, to 0.2 to 0.4 percent. As testing begins to include more asymptomatic and mild cases, more realistic numbers are starting to surface. New reports from the World Health Organization that estimate the global death rate of COVID-19 to be 3.4 percent, higher than previously believed, is not cause for further panic. This number is subject to the same usual forces that we would normally expect to inaccurately embellish death rate statistics early in an epidemic. If anything, it underscores just how early we are in this.

Comment: So the MSM is dead wrong: this IS in fact less of a problem than most seasonal flu epidemics.

Fake news pushers the whole lot of them.

See also:


Stop

Best of the Web: DNC elites will stop Sanders winning Democratic nomination because, unlike Trump, he represents DIRECT THREAT to their status and livelihood

Super Tuesday
With Bernie Sanders poised for a big Super Tuesday, Krystal Ball discusses the Democratic establishment's panic, Elizabeth Warren's attacks on Sanders, and whether DNC elites are once again alienating the working class voters they lost in 2016.

Guest: Krystal Ball, co-host of Rising and co-author of the best-selling new book, The Populist's Guide to 2020.


Comment: As the video makes abundantly clear, election interference is quite ok to the Democrats - when it's the Democrats who perpetrate it.

This, by the way, is precisely the motivation behind British MPs - of all parties - being so anti-Brexit for so long, dragging the process out through parliament and the courts; it represented a direct threat to their status and their livelihood. Only when the Conservative Party took control of the issue did they feel it safe to 'accept Brexit', although it remains to be seen what exactly constitutes Brexit-in-reality as opposed to Brexit-on-paper.

See also:


Newspaper

Best of the Web: Washington Post: 'Elites should choose president', quietly edits headline after public outrage


Comment: Democracy has already died, and the Washington Post helped kill it.

Keep this in mind as you watch the establishment select Joe Biden - a man who is showing signs of literal senility - to run against Trump this November...


Elites Should Run Elections
The Washington Post is taking heat over a Tuesday op-ed authored by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled "It's time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president."

Azari argues that the Democratic party's primary process is overly-complicated and convoluted, and the process of choosing the nominee should instead be placed in the hands of politicians instead.

After outrage ensued, the Post changed the headline to the far less inflammatory "It's time to switch to preference primaries."


Comment: The author of the WaPo article is clearly in the pocket of DNC political machine. That or she's ideologically possessed and spreading her poison where she can in service to a totally bankrupt political perspective.

See also:


Yellow Vest

Best of the Web: Why I'm voting for Tulsi in Virginia

tulsi gabbard
Tulsi Gabbard: what's not to like?
Four years ago I cast a vote for Bernie Sanders in the Virginia Democratic Primary. It was a triple protest: against a Republican party that I was certain would cheat Donald Trump out of the nomination; against Trump's own waffling on torture and foreign policy; and against Hillary Clinton, the hawkish liberal who at that time seemed the inevitable next president of the United States.

I am, obviously, a moderate swing voter. Since turning 18 my presidential votes have included a Republican nominee (Bob Dole), a third-party nominee (Pat Buchanan), a Democratic nominee (John Kerry), two write-ins (Ron Paul and Rand Paul), and another Republican nominee (Trump). Add my 2016 primary vote for Bernie, and you have an obvious pattern: I'm a NeverClinton, NeverBush voter. McCain and Romney were Bushes in everything but the blood; Obama was not enough of an anti-Clinton even in 2008. (Kerry was lousy, to be sure, but had the advantage of running directly against a Bush.) Bernie and Trump, by contrast, represent a break with the establishment politics of the past 30 years, or at least a serious attempt at one. Whatever their other faults, that is a great virtue.

Russian Flag

Best of the Web: 'May God bless them': Putin says anti-government activists free to protest... so long as they obey laws


Comment: Putin's rolling series of interviews with TASS continues. In this episode (#7 of 20, to run until March 26), another masterclass in good governance...


Vladimir Putin
© TASS / Ruptly
There's only one thing able to unite Russia's notoriously divided 'non-systemic' opposition: hostility to Vladimir Putin and his Kremlin. Thus, they may take his faint praise for their activities with a pinch of salt.

Speaking to TASS news agency, Putin lauded the positive contribution the activists make to the life of the country. "May God bless them," the president said. "I feel that these people are essential. After all, you do understand this is not my first day on the job. So, I believe that they are needed very much. I can tell you that they do have an impact on daily life, locally in particular, on a municipal level in major cities, and so on."

He also noted that in any country, a certain part of society will always disagree with the government of the day. However, he advised Russian oppositionists to keep their activities within the confines of the law - otherwise, he warns, streets will burn and chaos will break out. Reiterating that "it is good that such people exist," he mentioned there are "certain rules for everybody to adhere to, even those who like the authorities and those who do not."

Putin also expressed his belief that history shows those who foment revolution, "as a rule, do not stay in power [for long]," with the Soviet Bolsheviks perhaps being a rare exception.


Comment: Interesting how quickly the West voices outrage at Russia's so-called victimization of protestors, yet the state endorsed police brutality Macron's administration has inflicted on the Gilet Jaunes barely registers in mainstream news.


Tornado1

Best of the Web: 8 dead, hundreds of buildings destroyed as monster tornadoes tear through Nashville, Tennessee - UPDATE: Death toll increases to 25


Comment: The current death toll stands at 22, according to Fox News. And another 150, at least, were left injured.

UPDATE 5 March 2020 - The final death toll from two powerful tornadoes barrelling through downtown Nashville is 25.

Oddly, tornadoes in America's 'tornado alley' have generally been quiet in these climatically chaotic times, but when they hit...


nashville tornado
© Metro Nashville Police DepartmentDamage after the tornado tore through Nashville, as seen from a Metro Nashville Police Department police helicopter.
The Tennessee Emergency Management Agency confirmed the preliminary death toll as first responders search the wreckage. The number of injuries is unknown.

One twister hit downtown Nashville, collapsing about 40 buildings around the city. One was a concert venue that had just held an event for presidential candidate Bernie Sanders ahead of Super Tuesday voting.

Nashville Mayor John Cooper and the sheriffs of Putnam and Benton counties reported the fatalities across a landscape littered with blown-down buildings, snapped power lines and huge broken trees.


Chart Bar

Best of the Web: Bernie Sanders crowd sizes dwarf 2020 Democratic rivals, consistently drawing 10,000 to 30,000 people


Comment: For comparison, Trump drew his largest crowd during the last US presidential election this week 4 years ago in Cleveland, Ohio, when an estimated 29,000 people turned up. A month later, in April 2016, around 28,300 people showed up to one of Sanders' rallies in Brooklyn Park.

For further comparison, apart from Elizabeth Warren, who had a couple of rallies with turnouts of 10-15,000 last autumn, it is rare for establishment-approved candidates for the Democratic nomination to draw more than a thousand people to their rallies.


bernie sanders rally tacoma
Bernie Sanders fills a stadium at last week's rally in Tacoma, Washington
Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign, much like President Trump, loves to boast about crowd sizes.

Having attracted tens of thousands of people to a Presidents Day event, the Vermont senator and 2020 Democrat has some bragging rights.

A press release from the Sanders campaign claimed over 50,000 cumulatively attended rallies in five states from Saturday through Friday. In addition, over 4 million viewed the livestreams of the events online, the campaign said.

"Bernie has built a multiracial, multi-generational, people-driven movement for change that has broad support across the country," Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir said in a written statement. "This is the kind of energy and excitement that will defeat Donald Trump in November and usher in the political revolution that this country badly needs."


Comment: These crowd numbers may just reflect liberal oases in a sea of Republican Red, but if that's the case, then it should also be reflected in Sanders being the Democratic nominee.

We'll get a good idea tomorrow, 'Super-Tuesday' - when some 14 states pledge their delegates behind candidates ahead of the Democratic Convention in June - if the DNC is going to rig it against Sanders like it did in 2016.


Black Magic

Best of the Web: 'They hate everything... and we whip up that hatred. Hate is what unites our camp' - Netanyahu's aide exposed in leaked recording

Netanyahu
© Amit Shabi/pool/Flash90/FilePrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with his then-aide Natan Eshel, on August 28, 2011.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's senior aide Natan Eshel said that "hate is what unites" the right-wing camp led by the Likud party and that negative campaigning works well on "non-Ashkenazi voters" in a leaked recording revealed by Channel 12 on Saturday.

Eshel, a former Netanyahu chief of staff who resigned amid allegations of sexual misconduct, continues to work with the premier, leading the previous two coalition negotiations over the past year.

In the newly revealed recording, he can be heard discussing the party's campaign strategy with an unnamed person whom he is trying to recruit as a political adviser, according to the report. In the tape, Eshel says that Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit's decision to indict Netanyahu in three corruption cases actually helped the premier in his campaign. "He went up by 20 percent" Eshel recalls, though it was unclear what numbers he was referring to.

Comment: Numerous leaks, scandals as well as Israel's government policy over many years show that sentiments like this and similar are shared both by a significant proportion of the voting public and the Israeli establishment. It's also notable that this leak comes just before yet another election for Israel, following a year or more of the leading parties failure to form a government: