Macron speaking during his visit to a hospitality school in Tain l'Hermitage
Emmanuel Macron was slapped in the face by a man during a walkabout in southern France.
The president's security detail immediately pulled the man to the ground and moved Macron away from the crowd, though the president appeared unhurt and determined to continue meeting the public.
Afterwards, the French leader said the assault was "an isolated act" that should be "put into perspective".
"We mustn't let ultra-violent individuals take over the public debate ... There can be no violence, no hatred, not in speech or action. Otherwise it's democracy itself that is threatened."
Comment: When the political elites act violently towards their own people then it is "for their own good", and it is allegedly democratic. But when individuals start fighting back and showing what they really think of their leaders and their policies then they labeled "ultra-violent".
While we do not advocate violence towards leaders (or anyone else) we can see how its the egregious policies of said leaders that have driven people to despair and rage. It is therefore natural, or at least understandable, that we are seeing such incidents as this one.
Comment: See also:
- Apartheid instituted in France: Parliament approves 'Covid-19 passports for large gatherings'
- Macron on the brink: Humiliation for French President as seven more MPs abandon his party
- Meet Emmanuel Macron: Rothschild banker, Bilderberger, 'anti-Establishment' candidate in French election
- President Emmanuel Macron: Will reverse five decades of working-class power
- Torches and pitchforks next? Emmanuel Macron evacuated from theatre as protesters storm entrance trying to find him
- Macron lied about tax evasion: 4Chan /pol/ posts images from Macron's off-shore bank account
- 'You won't rule Europe': Poland's Prime Minister blasts Macron over accusations of isolation, calls him arrogant
© Thakonrat Luepeng / EyeEm via Getty Images
Denmark's National Police Cyber Crime Center (NC3) petitioned for a court order to block the site and ISPs followed suit by blocking access to users.
"The National Police Cyber Crime Center (NC3) has blocked the homepage that your browser has tried to access contact as there is reason to assume that from the website commits a violation of criminal law, which has a background in or connection with the covid-19 epidemic in Denmark," states a message users see when trying to access Bitchute.
It then advises the owner of the website that they will have to contact the authorities in order to try to get the website back online.
"The block appears to be site-wide meaning that Danish citizens aren't just being prevented from viewing alleged COVID-19 misinformation on BitChute - they're being blocked from viewing any BitChute videos, regardless of the topic," writes Tom Parker.
© Liu Jie/Xinhua via Getty Images
Photo taken in Arlington, Virginia, the United States, on June 1, 2021 shows a screen displaying U.S. President Joe Biden delivering a speech commemorating the 100th anniversary of Tulsa massacre in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Photo taken in Arlington, Virginia, the United States, on June 1, 2021 shows a screen displaying U.S. President Joe Biden delivering a speech commemorating the 100th anniversary of Tulsa massacre in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
The first was a January 14 warning, from numerous federal agencies including DHS, about violence in Washington, DC and all fifty state capitols that was likely to explode in protest of Inauguration Day (a threat which did not materialize). Then came a January 27 bulletin warning of "a heightened threat environment across the United States that is likely to persist over the coming weeks" from "ideologically-motivated violent extremists with objections to the exercise of governmental authority" (that warning also was not realized). Then there was a May 14 bulletin warning of right-wing violence "to attack higher-capacity targets," exacerbated by the lifting of COVID lockdowns (which also never happened). And now we are treated to this new DHS warning about domestic extremists preparing violent attacks over Tulsa (it remains to be seen if a DHS fear is finally realized).
Just like the first War on Terror, these threats are issued with virtually no specificity. They are just generalized warnings designed to put people in fear about their fellow citizens and to justify aggressive deployment of military and law enforcement officers in Washington, D.C. and throughout the country. A CNN article which wildly hyped the latest danger bulletin about domestic extremists at Tulsa had to be edited with what the cable network, in an "update," called "the additional information from the Department of Homeland Security that there is no specific or credible threats at this time." And the supposed dangers from domestic extremists on Inauguration Day was such a flop that even The Washington Post — one of the outlets most vocal about lurking national security dangers in general and this one in particular — had to explicitly acknowledge the failure:
Thousands [of National Guard troops] had been deployed to capitals across the country late last week, ahead of a weekend in which potentially violent demonstrations were predicted by the FBI — but never materialized.
Once again on Wednesday, security officials' worst fears weren't borne out: In some states, it was close to business as usual. In others, demonstrations were small and peaceful, with only occasional tense moments.
© AFP / Niklas HALLE'N
FILE PHOTO. A customer scans a QR on their phone.
FILE PHOTO. A customer scans a QR on their phone.
The European Union's executive commission has just announced the introduction of a pan-EU digital identification that citizens of member states can use across the entire bloc that will store important identification and official documents, like a driver's license, prescriptions, diplomas, and presumably Covid-19 test and vaccination certificates. It will also be linked to an e-wallet, which large online platforms will be required to accept.
Comment: This nefarious agenda appears to now be, overtly, going for children: "Stoking fear": Doctors dismiss Scotland's ministers baseless claims that children more at risk from new variants
See also: Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes
And check out SOTT radio's:
- NewsReal #34: Covid By Numbers
- MindMatters: Interview with Rod Dreher: How to Survive the Coming Soft Totalitarianism
- Objective:Health - Deconstructing the Covid Narrative with Investigative Journalist Rosemary Frei
I. A Group Called DRASTIC
Gilles Demaneuf is a data scientist with the Bank of New Zealand in Auckland. He was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome ten years ago, and believes it gives him a professional advantage. "I'm very good at finding patterns in data, when other people see nothing," he says.
Early last spring, as cities worldwide were shutting down to halt the spread of COVID-19, Demaneuf, 52, began reading up on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease. The prevailing theory was that it had jumped from bats to some other species before making the leap to humans at a market in China, where some of the earliest cases appeared in late 2019. The Huanan wholesale market, in the city of Wuhan, is a complex of markets selling seafood, meat, fruit, and vegetables. A handful of vendors sold live wild animals — a possible source of the virus.
Comment: Vanity Fair's article, informative as it is, is also notable for its careful omission of the viral research being done on U.S. soil, specifically at Ft. Detrick. Why would that be?
- Did COVID-19 escape Fort Detrick vaccine trial? Evidence that virus originated in US bioweapons lab
- China asks US for explanation of 2019 respiratory disease outbreak after Biden's new Covid probe: 'Fort Detrick base is full of suspicions'
- China says US lab Fort Detrick could be COVID-19 origin as claims explode on Chinese twitter
- CDC suddenly shuts down US Army's Fort Detrick bioweapons lab due to 'lapses in safety'
- Chinese official speculates Americans may have infected Wuhan at army games, calls for them to be "transparent"
- US gave $3.7million to Wuhan lab that was performing pathogen experiments on bats
- Sen. Tom Cotton rips Fauci, Wuhan gain of function research funding
- Engineering Contagion: Amerithrax, Coronavirus and the Rise of the Biotech-Industrial Complex - Pt. 1 Dark Winter
A U.S. government official reportedly ordered his employees not to publicly acknowledge American connections to and funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the site implicated in a potential lab-leak coronavirus origin theory.
Christopher Park did not want to open the "Pandora's Box" of U.S. funding for gain-of-function research, according to a Thursday Vanity Fair report. The U.S. government indirectly funded gain-of-function at WIV through grants to the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance. That funding was not subject to a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) review board that could have rejected the grant, because the sub-agency that awarded grants did not alert the review board.
Park, the director of the State Department's Biological Policy Staff in the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, reportedly told his employees not to say anything publicly in reference to that funding, an individual who attended the meeting where he gave his order reportedly told Vanity Fair. The individual reportedly described his comments as "so nakedly against transparency" as to be "shocking and disturbing."
Park's comments "smelled like a cover-up," according to Thomas DiNanno, former acting assistant secretary of the State Department's Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance. Park had pushed for the U.S. to resume funding gain-of-function research in 2017, according to Vanity Fair.
"I am skeptical that people genuinely felt they were being discouraged from presenting facts," Park told Vanity Fair. It "is making an enormous and unjustifiable leap ... to suggest that research of that kind [meant] that something untoward is going on," he continued.
EcoHealth Alliance distributed $600,000 in U.S. taxpayer dollars to WIV between 2014 and 2019 for the purpose of studying bat-based coronaviruses. The money was granted to EcoHealth by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Institutes of Health sub-agency led by White House senior medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The money was distributed during a government moratorium on gain-of-function research.
"If you ban gain-of-function research, you ban all of virology," an NIH official reportedly said. "Ever since the moratorium, everyone's gone wink-wink and just done gain-of-function research anyway."
The WIV also received $559,000 from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), according to the report.
Park was not the only government official to oppose pursuing the lab-leak hypothesis, however. DiNanno told Vanity Fair that an intelligence analyst struggled to find a report written by officials working at a Department of Energy lab. DiNanno told the outlet he viewed the report as being intentionally buried within the classified collections system. Department of Energy officials then attempted to block State Department officials from meeting with the report's authors, DiNanno alleged.
Acting Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Chris Ford repeatedly downplayed the lab-leak hypothesis to DiNanno and other researchers. He also wrote a memo arguing that officials should not view the Chinese People's Liberation Army's "involvement in classified virus research [a]s intrinsically problematic, since the U.S. Army has been deeply involved in virus research in the United States for many years."
Ford told Vanity Fair that he was trying to avoid "stuff that makes us look like the crackpot brigade."
During President Joe Biden's term, however, the lab-leak theory has received new attention from a less hostile media. Aaron Blake, a Washington Post reporter, blamed the Trump administration for not pushing hard for the release of intelligence promoting the lab-leak theory. He argued that the administration invited "caution and skepticism" because of the way "Trump handled such things."
Biden ordered the intelligence community to provide an assessment of the origins of COVID-19 within 90 days on May 26.
FILE PHOTO: Deputy First Minister John Swinney: Doctors were forced to intervene after SNP ministers claimed children may be at more risk of serious illness from new Covid variants
Paediatricians intervened on Thursday to reassure parents after John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister, said that the government was investigating whether "something in the new variants" made them more dangerous to children. Humza Yousaf, the SNP Health Secretary, had earlier claimed visiting soft play "could lead to the hospitalisation of children".
Comment: Isn't it rather sinister that the UK's establishment openly declare their intent to drag children into this mass vaccine experiment, despite children being at no risk from coronavirus, and then, suddenly, based on no scientific data at all, certain ministers in the scandal-ridden Scottish parliament begin stoking parents worst fears that their children 'may be hospitalised' by these new variants?
Comment: Here's what a retired paediatrician from the UK had to say about the deplorable manoeuvres by governments to trial these experimental vaccines on children:
See also:
- The Inanity of RNA Vaccines For COVID-19
- Engdahl: Alarming casualty rates for mRNA vaccines warrant urgent action
- Death rate in England is lowest since records began 20 years ago
- NewsReal #34: Covid By Numbers
- Objective:Health - Deconstructing the Covid Narrative with Investigative Journalist Rosemary Frei
- Objective:Health - Gov. Response Killed More Than Covid - Interview with Denis Rancourt
© Inconnu
Now, after what has been effectively a year-long blackout of the lab-leak theory by the corporate media and the scientific establishment, President Joe Biden has announced an investigation to assess its credibility. And as a consequence, what was treated until a few weeks ago as an unhinged, rightwing conspiracy is suddenly being widely aired and seriously considered by liberals.
Comment: It's highly likely that, with the lockdowns, prolonged mask wearing, and in particular the experimental vaccines, on top of the already failing general mental and physical health of the overall population, that what visits our planet next will be a very real pandemic:
- Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made
- The Inanity of RNA Vaccines For COVID-19
- Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes
- NewsReal #34: Covid By Numbers
- Objective:Health - Deconstructing the Covid Narrative with Investigative Journalist Rosemary Frei
Four to five metres of fresh snow has fallen at Mt Hutt Ski Area over the last two days.
Two to three months of rain pelted Canterbury in the space of a few days in the deluge.
Mt Hutt Ski Area manager James McKenzie said four to five metres of snow fell at the summit between Monday and Tuesday.
About 40-50cm has also fallen at the base.
He said they were having access issues getting to the top of the mountain and took a helicopter up.
"It was pretty impressive, right up to the top of our big wind fence up there.
"The Hutt is pretty much buried in snow at the summit."
McKenzie said the snow at the summit is crusted with ice.
Editor's Note: This article has been amended to note that 11 of 13 vaccinated subjects in a recent Ogata study had detectable protein from SARS coronavirus in their bloodstream including three people who had measurable spike protein. Whereas the article referenced a statement from Professor Bridle's group stating that spike protein was present for 29 days in one person, the study in question states that spike protein was found in the person on Day 29, one day after a second vaccine injection with and was undetectable two days later.New research shows that the coronavirus spike protein from COVID-19 vaccination unexpectedly enters the bloodstream, which is a plausible explanation for thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.
"We made a big mistake. We didn't realize it until now," said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario, in an interview with Alex Pierson last Thursday, in which he warned listeners that his message was "scary."
"We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin," Bridle said on the show, which is not easily found in a Google search but went viral on the internet this weekend.
Bridle, a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what's called the "biodistribution study."
Comment: Related: Floods prompt evacuations and rescues in Victoria, Australia - rivers rise significantly beyond major flood warning levels