Big-Pharma - guilty of lying, cheating, stealing, bribery, and a history of exposing the public to dangerous and even deadly drugs - is being given billions to develop a Covid-19 "vaccine." Would you trust your health to these criminals?
Coronavirus Disease 2019 or "Covid-19″ hysteria is sweeping the globe - with mass media-induced public panic paralyzing entire nations, gutting economies of billions as workplaces are shutdown and the public shuttered indoors all while exposed to 24 hour news cycles deliberately fanning the flames of fear.
The West's healthcare industry is already profiting both monetarily and in terms of artificial credibility as a panicked public turn to it for answers and safety. Waiting to cash in on offering "cures" and "vaccines" for a virus is the immensely corrupt Western pharmaceutical industry in particular - notorious corporations like GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Novartis, Bayer, Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Lilly, and Gilead.
All corporations - without exception - pursuing government-funded vaccines and therapies for Covid-19 are corporations guilty and repeatedly convicted in courts of law around the globe of crimes including falsifying research, safety, and efficacy studies, bribing researchers, doctors, regulators, and even law enforcement officials, and marketing drugs that were either entirely ineffective or even dangerous.
Government funding from taxpayers across the Western World are being funneled into supposedly non-profit organizations like the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI) which are in actuality fronts created and chaired by big-pharma to avoid investing their own money into costly research and development and simply profit from whatever emerges from state-funded research.
Comment: Sure, why not? All has merged into one giant global CorpGovt anyway. At least they're acknowledging they no longer hold the powerful in check. Heck, let's not reinvent the wheel and just call it the Umbrella Corporation...

Newspapers and other souvenirs are pictured at a store, near Parliament Square, London
The Treasury published details of the eyebrow-raising financial boost for Britain's print newspaper industry on Thursday, revealing that the millions will be spent over "the next three months" to communicate coronavirus guidance and advice to the public.
The sizable injection of taxpayers' money into the mainstream print media - which is largely bankrolled by billionaires such as Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothermere - has riled many people on social media.
Comment: Whilst this has been going for decades obviously now the establishment no longer feels it has to hide it anymore, and perhaps the need to control and suppress the coming blowback from the manufactured coronavirus hysteria, lockdown, and the resulting economic meltdown necessitated the payoff:
- Britain secretly funded Reuters in 1960s & 1970s declassified docs reveal
- The Guardian's collusion with Britain's Secret Service
- War Propaganda: The false BBC report that gave Israel the excuse to attack Syria
- BBC deliberately broadcasts 'coded negative imagery' of Corbyn, top British lawyer claims
Comment: To all those who really, *really* want to believe that the lockdown saved lives... it didn't.
Now even the Wall Street Journal is cottoning on to that fact.

A theater is closed in response to the coronavirus outbreak in Winterset, Iowa, April 1.
Comment: The lockdown wasn't just "a" factor in killing those who have gone down as "Covid-19 deaths" - it is the PRIMARY cause of unnecessary deaths in people over the past 6 weeks. Governments have, essentially, killed thousands of the most vulnerable in society while hundreds of millions of people CHEERED...
Do quick shutdowns work to fight the spread of Covid-19? Joe Malchow, Yinon Weiss and I wanted to find out. We set out to quantify how many deaths were caused by delayed shutdown orders on a state-by-state basis.
To normalize for an unambiguous comparison of deaths between states at the midpoint of an epidemic, we counted deaths per million population for a fixed 21-day period, measured from when the death rate first hit 1 per million — e.g.,‒three deaths in Iowa or 19 in New York state. A state's "days to shutdown" was the time after a state crossed the 1 per million threshold until it ordered businesses shut down.
Comment: There seems to be an uptick in mainstream media publications taking an honest look at the effectiveness of the lockdown, and they all seem to be singing the same tune: The lockdown was a mistake and we've destroyed the economy for nothing. If this trend continues, and once the true implications of the shut-down economy begin to set in, the populace is going to be mightily pissed off with the elites who ruined them.
See also:
- Flipping the script: WHO lauds lockdown-ignoring Sweden as a 'model' for countries going forward
- The secondary harms caused by the lockdown get worse every day
- UK lockdown extended until June, but what comes after that? Interview with Peter Hitchens
- Leading scientist claims lockdown & quarantine is a "human catastrophe"
- Wanting the UK lockdown to end does not make you a nasty right-wing capitalist
- Belarus President Lukashenko on why he's resisted Coronavirus lockdown: 'People will raise me up on pitchforks'
- 'FREE AMERICA': Elon Musk divides opinions after calling lockdown 'fascist' and tweeting 'give people their freedom back!'
- The Farce and Diabolical Agenda of a 'Universal Lockdown'

Photo by: Chris Carlson
In this April 16, 2020, photo a gloved hand points to a holding cell at the hospital ward of the Twin Towers jail in Los Angeles. Across the country first responders who've fallen ill from COVID-19, recovered have begun the harrowing experience of returning to jobs that put them back on the front lines of America's fight against the novel coronavirus.
The response to the coronavirus is hyped. And in time, this hype will be revealed as politically hoaxed.
In fact, COVID-19 will go down as one of the political world's biggest, most shamefully overblown, overhyped, overly and irrationally inflated and outright deceptively flawed responses to a health matter in American history, one that was carried largely on the lips of medical professionals who have no business running a national economy or government.
The facts are this: COVID-19 is a real disease that sickens some, proves fatal to others, mostly the elderly — and does nothing to the vast majority.
That's it.
That, in a nutshell, is it.
Or, in the words of Dan Erickson and Artin Massih, doctors and co-owners of Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield, California: Let's get the country reopened — and now.
"Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no. Do we need businesses to be shut down? Emphatically no. ... [T]he data is showing it's time to lift," Erickson said, in a recent interview.
He's right. They're right.
The data to keep America closed and Americans closed in simply doesn't exist.
Comment: If the political class figure out a way to get out of this without getting lynched by the mob, we will very likely see this happen every time
- The Data Are In: A Nationwide Lockdown Was Never Necessary
- The Farce and Diabolical Agenda of a 'Universal Lockdown'
- UK lockdown extended until June, but what comes after that? Interview with Peter Hitchens
The stay-at-home lockdown laws seem draconian and after it is lifted we will face higher taxes and a broken economy. Is the lockdown really worth risking mental health, domestic violence, and other problems created out of keeping people as prisoners in their own homes in a police state fashion?
Peter Hitchens discusses his views about what will happen after the coronavirus lock down is lifted, the damage to our economy, and our future once this madness calms down.
Open up is code, of course, for return to normal. You're kidding, right? Where I live, the future happened ten years ago. Main Street is nothing but consignment shops, that is, old stuff people got rid of, mostly for good reasons. The one thing you can't get there is food, unless there's a bowl of mints next to the cash register. Oh, and the Kmart in town shuttered exactly a year ago, so the supply of new-stuff-waiting-to-be-old-stuff has been cut off, too. Welcome to America, the next chapter.
The public is understandably frantic to bust out of their quarantine bunkers. Seven weeks of jigsaw puzzles bears an interesting resemblance to the old Chinese water torture. (Can you even say that? There, I said it for you.) What will they find as they emerge blinking from the doleful demi-life of the sequester? It's liable to be a society in which just about everything no longer works the way it was set up to work.

A sculpture representing Louis Pasteur is seen outside the Pasteur Institute headquarters in Paris amid the Covid-19 outbreak France, April 20, 2020.
Tests on samples from 97 French and three Algerians infected with Sars-CoV-2 suggest that the virus may have been around in France before the pandemic started.
The sixteen-page study, by researchers affiliated with the prestigious Pasteur Institute in Paris, was first reported by Hong Kong's South China Morning Post, and says that already on 10 January, France implemented "strengthened surveillance of Covid-19 cases," five days after the World Health Organisation issued the first "Disease Outbreak News" on a "pneumonia of unknown cause" which was first reported by China on 31 December 2019.
Genetic analysis of the samples revealed that the dominant types of viral strains in France belonged to a "clade" or group with a common ancestor that did not come from either China or Italy.
"The French outbreak has been mainly seeded by one or several variants of this clade... we can infer that the virus was silently circulating in France in February," write the researchers.
Comment: And possibly even earlier than that... There are anecdotal reports from France and other countries of spikes in bad pneumonias in late 2019, before the virus was supposed to have spread from China. For example:
Comment: The Western powers would be toast if it emerged that this thing has been innocuously circulating 'in the wild' since December 2019.
Over the last few days, I along with some 5 million other Americans watched a video of 2 ER doctors in California discussing our current status and situation regarding COVID. They had their own spin on the government's own numbers. They said a few things that I categorically disagree with. I disagree with lots of things I read and see. That is part of having a human mind that can think critically. The ER docs' overall take was that the current lockdown approach was not helping and very likely making things worse — not only with the viral epidemic, but certainly with our economy.
I will confirm for you that for the last three weeks, my number of COVID patients has been absolutely dwarfed by the number of patients with acute anxiety, depression, wife beating, child beating, suicidal ideation, and any number of young grown men crying like babies on televisits or in my office. Large numbers of people are losing their livelihood, and they are freaking out. We are headed for a severe tragedy in this society, and its name is not COVID.
I will also tell you that I am on a conference call every day with some of the pre-eminent epidemiologists and infectious disease doctors in this country. Just Monday, one of the brightest epidemiologic minds in this nation basically stated - and I am paraphrasing - "I am certainly not minimizing this virus. This thing is evil. But it, like its cousins, is not really amenable to our current approaches. The immunity response is looking more and more like it is variable and incomplete. Therefore vaccines and immunity testing are going to be very unreliable if not impossible with our current abilities. That may change in the future, but who knows how long that will take. More importantly, a fundamental aspect of public health — herd immunity — may be very different with this current virus than we have experienced before. This virus is most definitely not measles. We just do not know the extent yet, but things are certainly not going to be what we are used to. Because of this, the current lockdown approach may not be of any help at all; it may actually be making things worse. We just do not know — and the stakes are enormous. We absolutely have a tiger by the tail. We are walking through the undiscovered country."
In four US state prisons, nearly 3,300 inmates test positive for coronavirus -- 96% without symptoms

The exterior of the Marion Correctional Institution where there have been positive cases of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Marion, Ohio, U.S., April 22, 2020.
"We weren't always able to pinpoint where all the cases were coming from," said Annette Chambers-Smith, director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. As the virus spread, they began mass testing.
They started with the Marion Correctional Institution, which houses 2,500 prisoners in north central Ohio, many of them older with pre-existing health conditions. After testing 2,300 inmates for the coronavirus, they were shocked. Of the 2,028 who tested positive, close to 95% had no symptoms.
Comment: These isolated populations, like prisons and cruise ships, offer a very interesting perspective. If in a captive population not everyone is getting it and, more importantly, almost all the people who do get it are asymptomatic, what does this say about the 'deadly pandemic' raging across the planet? This virus is a dud, but the world has reacted to it by making everyone a prisoner in their own homes. Heads should roll for this.
See also:
- China launches study into asymptomatic coronavirus cases and shared immunity
- Danish study reveals that coronavirus may be almost 20x less deadly than WHO predicted
- The coronavirus is NOT as deadly as they want us to think
- Six new studies show Covid-19 infected millions more than 'experts' predicted across US
- The lockdown is not backed by science. And now the economy is flatlining
- Millions infected? NY Gov. Cuomo claims antibody tests suggest Covid-19 is 'less fatal than previously thought'
- The 'everyone's got it' theory: We're undercounting COVID cases, but by how much?
- The Australian: 'We May be Over-reacting to an Unremarkable Coronavirus'
Prices have collapsed and storage is nearly full. The only option for many producers is to shut in their wells. That means no income. Most have considerable debt so bankruptcy is next.
Peggy Noonan wrote in her column recently that "this is a never-before-seen level of national economic calamity; history doesn't get bigger than this." That is the superficial view.
Coronavirus has changed everything. The longer it lasts, the less the future will look anything like the past.
Most people, policy makers and economists are energy blind and cannot, therefore, fully grasp the gravity or the consequences of what is happening.
Comment: See also:
- The Undeniable Correlation Between Lockdown And The Unprecedented Destruction of Economies, Jobs And Lives
- Ehret: Might the current global crisis revive the Wallace/FDR grand design for Russia-China-US cooperation?
- Alastair Crooke: Danse macabre' and a fear of the abyss: We all fall down









Comment: