
Tim Walz, Ilhan Omar, Hodan Hassan, Mohamud Noor, Omar Fateh
The United States has long comforted itself with a story about immigration. People arrive poor and traumatized, they struggle, and over time they assimilate. Languages fade, loyalties widen, and civic norms take root. That story has been true often enough to feel like a law of nature.
But it is not a law. It is a wager. And in the case of Somali immigration, particularly in Minnesota, the wager is failing in plain sight.
The failure is not mysterious. It has a name, a structure, and a logic. What is routinely described as fraud, mismanagement, or isolated criminal behavior is more accurately understood as the Somali patronage system. This is not a rhetorical invention. It is the standard term in academic and policy literature for a deeply entrenched social and political order organized around clans, sub clans, and binding kinship obligations. It predates the modern Somali state by centuries and survived because it had to. In Somalia, it replaced the state. In the West, it is colonizing one.
The system arose in conditions of chronic insecurity. When there is no reliable government,
survival depends on who you know and who owes you. The clan, or qabiil, became the primary unit of power. It was identity, insurance, enforcement, and politics rolled into one. Loyalty moved inward, never outward. The individual served the family, the family served the sub clan, the sub clan served the clan. The state was, at best, incidental.
Comment: "Members of the public..."
Interesting euphemism for the non-Dutch population of The Netherlands.
It's not just the above report, by the way. Search for reports on this church fire in Amsterdam in all European press and you'll notice they're unanimously suggesting that fireworks (accidentally) burned down the church.
At the same time, everyone in European cities knows that those behaving irresponsibly with fireworks on NYE tend to be migrant youths and/or from majority-Muslim countries.
So, once again, we see that the media is deliberately fanning the flames of 'race war', even as it feigns shock when Europeans 'vote against embracing more diversity' in elections.
'The Network' knows who it wants you to blame:
Was it 'the Muzzies' though? And if so, did they 'have help'?