A judge-led public enquiry in the UK revealed at least 144 undercover police operations had infiltrated and spied on more than 1,000 political groups in long term deployments since 1968.
These days, rather than using coercion to suppress sedition, there is a body of evidence to suggest the state has devised more nefarious methods for countering subversion. Involving the co-opting of grassroots movements, in its bid to transform the unbridled ideals of activism into genuflections of corporate and political interest.
Indeed, the denaturing of our social movements has engendered a culture of advocacy whereby it is no longer forged in the backyard of community and instead through a series of state sponsored global debates, on authorised issues only, such as climate change.
The environmental movement, not to be confused with the ecological movement, appeals to our god-complex, and fantasises that our species holds dominion over nature, that our actions could somehow compromise the planet's homeostasis.
The banner was seen trailing behind a plane over Manchester City's Etihad stadium on Monday before the club's Premier League game with Burnley. It provoked widespread condemnation and a police investigation, although authorities subsequently concluded that no criminal offense had been committed.
The person responsible for the banner, Burnley fan Jamie Hepple, faced a social media witch hunt although he responded with a Facebook post that said, "I'd like to take this time to apologise... TO ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOBODY!"
However, after a Twitter mob discovered the employment details of his girlfriend Megan, she was fired by Solace Foot Health and Reflexology simply for being guilty by association.
A statement released by the company said they were "willing to try to help Megan by paying for Intensive Racial Sensitivity training" but that Megan had evidently refused to be re-educated and would rather leave, meaning she was effectively fired for being the boyfriend [sic 'girlfriend'] of a man who thinks "white lives matter."
Comment: Someone has re-started a race war. It just looks a bit different than those in the past. Wrongful dismissals for insane reasons need legal investigations and redress before this becomes the trend.

Do you know what your virome is? A normal human virome is full of viruses, even ‘scary’ ones like HIV & hepatitis. It’s time to dispel the myth of a killer virus and learn the truth about the humble virus.
Did you know the normal human virome contains a multitude of different viruses, including many strains of coronavirus? And did you know that some of these viruses sound scary - the type people normally associate with disease - even though the person carrying them may be completely healthy and/or asymptomatic? As discussed in previous articles, the word virome (similar to the word microbiome for bacteria) refers to the community of viruses that naturally and usually live within us. Far from causing harm, they form a vital part of our bodies and immune system, existing in symbiosis with us and playing an important role in our healing response. The COVID coronavirus event has exploited people's ignorance over the nature of the virus and the nature of disease. This is an opportunity for us to educate ourselves, to come out of fear, to understand the base assumptions and deceptions behind the COVID propaganda, and to be prepared when the New World Order (NWO) controllers try to pull their next trick in Operation Coronavirus, the 2nd wave.
Comment: See also:
- Parasite infection closely linked to gastrointestinal microbiome
- First map of tumour microbiomes finds bacteria live in many cancers
- Could gut microbes be key to solving food allergies?
- "Exposome": Scientists measure invisible clouds of matter that orbit every human being
Comment: Unsurprisingly, this set of statements from the most powerful person in the world during an Oval Office interview in late May got precisely zero media coverage when they were finally published on June 8th. After The Federalist, we are apparently the only outlet to even acknowledge that it took place...
President Donald Trump blasted former Defense Secretary James Mattis as "terrible," criticized the power of the "military-industrial complex," and defended his decision to draw down America's military presence in Syria following the United States' successful destruction of the Islamic State there.
Trump's comments about Mattis came before Mattis published a statement attacking Trump and falsely claiming the military had never been used to support law enforcement in responding to violent riots. Trump said opposition from establishment figures like Mattis wasn't driven by personality or tactical disagreements but by entirely different worldviews.
The president was critical of Mattis' failure to achieve victory in Afghanistan and remove troops there after fighting since 2001. "Look, we've been there for 19 years - Mattis was terrible, you know, not very good," Trump told The Federalist during an interview in the Oval Office in late May.
BlackRock's CEO Larry Fink may now be the most powerful man in the world, overseeing not just the Fed's new (potentially $4.5 trillion) corporate slush-fund, but also managing $27 trillion of the global economy (even before the March appointment). As the world's largest asset manager, BlackRock already was managing $7 trillion for its global corporate investor-clients, along with another $20 trillion for clients through its financial risk-monitoring software (called Aladdin).
As Andrew Gavin Marshall has explained, "Unlike a bank, asset management firms do not manage and invest their own money but do so on behalf of their many clients. In the case of BlackRock, those clients come in the form of banks, corporations, insurance companies, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, central banks, and foundations." [1]
The State Is A State Of Mind
The State is a belief system. It is a faith, rather like a religion. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with faith. It doesn't necessarily mean the belief itself is "wrong." Faith can be a powerful force for good. It all depend upon what the belief is.
If your faith dictates that you treat all with love, compassion and respect then your belief is "right." If you live in accordance with your faith then you are living in the truth, regardless of which deity you follow.
However, if your faith teaches you that you are better than "non believers," that yours in the only true way and that those who don't follow your beliefs, or your deity, deserve to be punished, you are "wrong." You are not living in harmony with the truth.
People who believe in the State are called statists. Those who don't, broadly come under the umbrella term anarchists. For statists, the anarchist is despised. Life without their State is unimaginable, therefore those who wish to live without it must be evil. The anarchist has long been reviled by statists as the dangerous subversive.
Comment: See also:
- Objective:Health - Face Masks: Virtue Signalling Our Obedience to the New Normal
- Mandatory masks aren't about safety, they're about social control
- The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses
- Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don't Protect You
- Even the WHO acknowledges that scientific evidence of effectiveness of wearing masks in community settings is NON-EXISTENT
- Russel Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to the Healthy
Professor Robert Dingwall suggested Britain had 'completely lost sight' of the true nature of the disease because 'mostly it isn't' killing people.
His comments illustrate the potential problems facing the Prime Minister as he prepares to set out his lockdown exit plan in an address to the nation on Sunday night.
Polling published yesterday showed almost two thirds of the population are worried about the effects of lifting the draconian curbs too early.
Writing for The Telegraph, Professors Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, from the University of Oxford, said there is little evidence to support the restriction and called for an end to the "formalised rules".
The University of Dundee also said there was no indication that distancing at two metres is safer than one metre.
The intervention comes as two Government ministers suggested on Monday that the rule is likely to be relaxed following a review commissioned by Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister.
On Tuesday, shops experienced daily footfall drops of 41 percent compared to the same day last year, while enormous queues built up outside because of social distancing requirements.
What these experts and officials don't seem to realize is that Americans will never comply with their lockdown orders again. They have burned their credibility to the ground, and they no longer have the moral authority to tell us what to do.
Simply put, the people in charge have shown themselves to be rank hypocrites who care more about politics than science. For months, we were told that large gatherings were deadly because of the coronavirus, but when protests broke out in late May, large gatherings were suddenly okay.
Comment: See also:
- Tired of hypocrisy: Orthodox Jewish activists use bolt cutters to reopen New York park closed under Covid-19 lockdown
- De Blasio tells covid contract tracers not to ask positive cases if they've attended BLM protests
- Worldwide cognitive dissonance: Black Lives Matter 'more important' than coronavirus as protests erupt in UK, Australia and Germany
- WHO scientists confirm coronavirus only spreads at conservative protests
- Tucker Carlson spot on: Blasts doctors for condemning anti-lockdown protests while endorsing Black Lives Matter protests
- How can the virus tell?! Anti-racism protests SAFE from Covid-19, but anti-lockdown protests are NOT, health 'experts' claim
These are massively disingenuous claims. After all, is it really surprising that a British prime minister would defend a memorial devoted to arguably the nation's greatest modern figure? Moreover, Johnson was not initiating anything. He was responding to a movement that has been directing its energy towards the destruction of the symbols of Britain's national history and culture. It takes tremendous bad faith to characterise Johnson's defensive response to an attack on British culture as an attempt to launch a culture war.













Comment: See also: