Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 24 Sep 2021
The World for People who Think

NPC

The Leftist obsession with Twitter alternative Parler reveals their infatuation with thought control

Brandon Smith
Alt-Market.us
Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:00 UTC
mind control
In my recent article 'Power Is An Illusion, Control Is A Facade' I outlined the realities behind power structures and how people dominate other people by conditioning them with false assumptions and misplaced fears. For example, many people make themselves easy to control by remaining dependent on governments during crisis events and emergencies; if you actually believe the government will protect you from any and all eventualities then why would you ever learn to protect and provide for yourself? The infantization of a society makes citizens easy to dominate.

Another example would be instilling a fear of "standing out" among one's peers - Many people are uncomfortable with the idea of being seen as aberrant or in opposition to the "majority" and will seek to fit in, even when they fundamentally disagree. A ruling elite merely need to manufacture the assumption or impression that the "majority" of the population are in agreement with oppressive measures. Even if this is not the case, the perception of a majority can be used to control those people that would otherwise rebel.

Controlling a population is more about thought control or "perception management" than it is about direct force. Power is an illusion, no large group of people can be controlled by force alone; eventually, they will find a way to wear down the totalitarian system and destroy it. So, the people must be tricked into enslaving themselves and each other. The people must police the very prison they are trapped in, otherwise they could simply walk away anytime they wished. It's the only way a tyranny can survive in the long term.

Comment: Speaking of MSNBC, watch Chris Hayes try to completely dismiss valid allegations of election fraud without a shred of actual investigation on his part - in pure 'Orange Man Bad' style. The Queen of Russiagate Rachel Maddow would be proud:



      Read More...
Dollars

What is Mark Zuckerberg's election money doing in Georgia?

Scott Walter
The Federalist
Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00 UTC
Mark Zuckerberg/Georgia
© www.autospost.com/1-images/Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images/KJN
Mark Zuckerberg and State of Georgia precincts
Imagine if a billionaire of conservative or libertarian leanings — Charles Koch, say — had given $350 million to a nonprofit run by Republican operatives who previously worked at a "dark money" outfit tied to Karl Rove where they trained digital activists and campaign workers.

Then imagine this nonprofit group re-granted the millions of dollars to local election officials to "help" them carry out the 2020 election — buying drop boxes for ballots, hiring temporary staff, conducting "voter education," and the like.

Finally, imagine that in 2020, a state that usually voted for the other party in presidential elections narrowly flipped to the donor's preferred party, and counties receiving "help" were disproportionately ones that helped the Republican win the state, with many counties shifting dramatically from their historical patterns in a red-ward direction.

Even supposing there were perfectly ethical and legal reasons for all this, because of the appearance of election influence from private parties with deep pockets, it would be front-page news. The New York Times would be outraged a nonprofit gave the appearance of acting in a partisan basis in an electoral process. Elected officials in the disfavored party would be loudly objecting, threatening lawsuits, demanding investigations of the election officials who accepted the funds, and insisting election laws be changed to prevent any such effort in the future.

As head of Capital Research Center, a watchdog on the use and abuse of nonprofits, I would sympathize with the angry politicians and happily critique the scheme publicly. But I know of no such effort by right-leaning donors or nonprofits.

Comment: Did Mark Zuckerberg help to buy the election for Biden? Did he confine his calculated 'philanthropy' to Georgia's precincts or were other states willing recipients in this pay-to-influence scheme?



      Read More...
Control Panel

The Covid-19 Vaccine: Is The goal Immunity or Depopulation?

Mike Whitney
The Unz Review
Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00 UTC
covid19 vaccine
"There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic... You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease. You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects." Dr. Mike Yeadon PhD, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory Disease
"What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempt at making the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually make vaccinated people sicker when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus." Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Here's what I think is currently going on in our country and across much of the western world. A public health crisis - that was manufactured and gamed - out before the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China - has been used to short-circuit long-held civil liberties, strengthen the authority of political leaders, collapse the economy, dramatically remake basic social relations, and impose absolute control over work, school, gatherings and recreational activities. Public policy is now set by unelected technocrats who operate behind the cover of lofty-sounding organizations that are entirely controlled by the world's biggest corporations and richest oligarchs. President Dwight Eisenhower anticipated this troubling scenario 70 years ago when he said:
"Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."
      Read More...
Camcorder

No, the Georgia vote-counting video was not 'debunked' - not even close

Mollie Hemingway
The Federalist
Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:52 UTC
georgia state farm arena
A Big Tech-backed "fact" "checking" outfit claimed to debunk explosive evidence in support of Republicans' claims of significant election problems at a Thursday Georgia Senate hearing. It didn't. Not even close.

Newly discovered security footage from Georgia's State Farm Arena showed dozens of ballot counters, media, and Republican observers leaving en masse at the same time from the ballot-counting area for Fulton County. After they left, a small remnant of about four workers began pulling trunks containing thousands of ballots from underneath a table with a long tablecloth and running them through machines.

The footage supported claims from Republicans that they were told counting had stopped for the night, only to find out hours later that it had kept going on. You can and should watch the 12-minute portion of the testimony from Jacki Pick here.


On Friday morning, a group called Lead Stories published a "hoax alert" falsely claiming to have debunked the security video. The Washington Post, Newsweek, and other outlets followed along, criticizing non-leftist journalists for giving the video traction. In fact, none of the claims made by the Republicans were debunked.

Lead Stories' "fact" "check" says government officials told them everything was fine with the counting, that the ballots were in "containers — not suitcases," and that "party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night."

Leaving aside whether relying solely and uncritically on government officials' claims constitutes anything close to a "fact" "check," let's look at the claim that party observers were never told that counting was over for the night. In Lead Stories' regurgitation of the government officials' claims, only the people who cut open the absentee ballot envelopes were sent home, while ballot counters and scanners were retained and kept working — and no one told the press or other observers they were done counting.
      Read More...
Bullseye

Your personal medical rights: The significance of the Nuremberg Code

Evelyne Shuster, Ph.D.
The New England Journal of Medicine
Thu, 13 Nov 1997 16:44 UTC
Nuremberg trial doctors
© DPA/PA Images
Of the 23 Nazi doctors and scientists tried at Nuremberg, seven were executed in 1948
The Nuremberg Code

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

Comment: The Nuremberg Code's application to forced vaccinations is glaringly clear.

      Read More...
Attention

Cover-up: Royal Commission to suppress evidence in Christchurch terror attack report for 30 years


tvnz.co.nz
Sat, 28 Nov 2020 00:01 UTC
christchurch terror attack memorial
Evidence from Government ministers and public sector bosses at the Royal Commission into the Christchurch terrorist attack will be kept secret for 30 years.

The Commission has been looking into the attacks since April last year, investigating whether state agencies like the police and the security intelligence service could have prevented the shootings.

The Commission's report will be released on the 8th of December. It's expected to detail any failings by government organisations leading up to the mosque attacks, including how the terrorist was able to obtain a licence for semi-automatic firearms.

Comment: As we wrote at the time, the Christchurch massacre was in all likelihood a multi-site mass terror attack carried out by deep state operatives, the fall guy for which (Tarrant) was a globe-trotting, sheep-dipped phony 'conservative radical'. The New Zealand government knows this, so they're deep-sixing evidence exposing that fact.

      Read More...
Chess

Trump says 'no surrender' in Georgia, as enormous post-election rally crowd chants 'STOP THE STEAL'


RT
Sun, 06 Dec 2020 20:10 UTC
Trump georgia election fraud rally georgia
© AFP / Getty Images; Spencer Platt
Donald Trump meets his supporters in Valdosta, Georgia, on December 5, 2020 in his first rally since election day.
President Trump showed no sign of backing down in his fight over contested election results as he spoke at a rally in Peach State, where upcoming elections to the Senate will decide who gets a legislative majority in Washington.

Donald Trump has met his supporters in Valdosta, Georgia, in his first rally since election day, to support Republican senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler in the upcoming January election. That's while the president himself is contesting results in the swing state, which has officially been called for Joe Biden. The former Vice President won the state by nearly 12,000 votes, according to certified results after recounts.

Trump, however, insists he won the election in the state, saying earlier he received "more LEGAL votes by far."

Comment: Thousands that couldn't attend in person watched on one of the few fringe news outlets that will carry Trump events:
On Saturday night President Trump held his first rally since the Democrats pulled off their stolen election.

President Trump is still fighting for truth and justice to prevail. We are all praying for truth to prevail.

Right Side Broadcasting Network televised the massive rally. There were 258,000 people watching President Trump during most of the rally.

Joe Biden delivered a Thanksgiving Day Teleprompter message on the Wednesday before the holiday. Only 1,000 people watched his statement live.

What a complete joke!

But Democrats and their media want you to believe Joe Biden is the most popular Democrat and American politician in history.

They don't care how about their how ridiculous their lies appear. They really don't care.

More...


And even more Americans watched the President when considering two other additional YouTube channels - Georgia rally livestreams:
RSBN; 276,605 watching now

NTD: 159,008 watching now

DJT: 69,295 watching now
Total = 504,908

Update: More than 3.5 million have viewed the rally less than 12 hours later:

NTD 1,638,926 views

RSBN 1,317,602 views

DJT 369,313 views

Fox News 88,360 views

Fox Business 75,024 views

NewsNOW on Fox 58,163 views

11Alive 13,086 views

JeffMAC 6,156 views

RT 4,707 views

Total 3,571,337 views
It was a great speech actually, and is worth watching in full:




      Read More...
Eagle

James Corbett: Bretton Woods 2.0 - Your guide to the great monetary reset

James Corbett
The Corbett Report
Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00 UTC
Bretton Woods 2.0
Do you know what it means when the Managing Director of the IMF warns of a "new Bretton Woods moment?" How about when the head of the BIS revels in the total surveillance power that digital currencies will afford the central bankers? Well, you're about to. Don't miss this info-packed edition of The Corbett Report podcast where James peels back the layers of the great currency reset onion and uncovers the New World (Monetary) Order.


Comment: Corbett isn't alone in seeing the massive economic and political sham that the 'Great Reset' represents.

Listen to what Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has to say about it:



      Read More...
Chalkboard

Numbers expert claims to have cracked algorithm that stole the election for Biden in Georgia

Edward Solomon
thedonald.win
Fri, 04 Dec 2020 20:23 UTC
mathematics algebra
© Shutterstock
Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta.

Affidavits signed.



Watch the video. You will know.

Summary: Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325

Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.

All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700. That is 18.49%. If we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.

That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.

The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.

Comment: An attempt at a layman's explanation, from Twitter user @KingMakerFT:
Here is Edward Solomon explaining his reverse engineering to determine the Dominion algorithm used in GA. He concludes it gave Biden over 200,000 votes, the majority from Fulton County, plus a handful of precincts in other counties. He builds on the transfer of ratios he first observed in PA. He found the same phenomenon in most precincts in Fulton County and in some precincts in a handful of other counties. He explains in this video how he reverse engineered from there, deriving an intricate fractal pattern diagramed as vectors on a wheel, representing the roots and branches of the ratios used. He also explains that this pattern of these ratios cannot be random or coincidental- they are designed to produce a certain percentage of votes for Trump, sufficiently low to give Biden the win. The ratios are applied only for discreet periods of time, shifting over time to other precincts. He describes the precincts during periods for which ratios are applied as being "virtual precincts" meaning the algorithm has taken over vote counting temporarily. This is hard to follow, but he's convinced he's found the smoking gun.

Two issues I think need to be addressed, the first of which Solomon mentions in passing, is how use of the algorithm squares with ballot stuffing that apparently went on in Fulton County, and why wouldn't the recount expose the 200,000 plus votes shifted to Biden?
See the Twitter discussion linked above for speculation on the questions raised. In a nutshell, it would require injections of fraudulent votes for Biden, and removal of Trump ballots. This can be achieved in several ways, including via the duplicate adjudication process (where Dominion employees manually 'cure' problem ballots), test ballots, and other means of counterfeiting ballots for injection into the batches. But it would require coordination between the programmers and the ballot stuffers.

We also lack details of how exactly the 'hand recount' was conducted, and how accurate it was. There are some allegations of precincts simply reporting their original numbers, others that counting was done using the same machines (thus the same algorithm), and no word on how the digital adjudication was 'hand counted' during the recount. Were all of the latter re-adjudicated? Or were the digital ballot images simply recounted by Dominion employees, as they were during the first count?

      Read More...
Arrow Up

The Nuremberg Tribunal: 75 years later and still the basis for humanity's survival

Matthew Ehret
Strategic Culture Foundation
Sun, 29 Nov 2020 00:00 UTC
Nuremberg Trials
© Facebook/History of Sorts
Nuremberg Trials
"The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant and so devastating, that Civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flushed with victory and stung with injury, stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captives to the judgement of law, is one of the most significant tributes that Power ever paid to reason." -Justice Robert Jackson, Nov. 21, 1945
It is often forgotten what sort of a battle occurred after WWII to establish the Nuremberg Trials which gave the world a revolutionary code of law which even today offers many of the remedies to the Gordian Knots blocking our way to a peaceful future. By the end of the war, many European leaders of the allied nations wished to simply put leading Nazis against a wall to face a firing squad and return to "business as usual".

As I've outlined in many recent writings, it was only through the intensive efforts of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, and his leading allies in both the USA and Russia that a different course of action was decided upon and an official international tribunal was sanctioned that generated a total legal paradigm shift in international law that has been too easily taken for granted (due largely to the lack of effect these laws have had on post-WWII practice).

Among those revolutionary reforms included the unprecedented mandate that wars of aggression would henceforth be illegal in the eyes of the law. The tendency for those higher officials carrying out inhuman orders to escape responsibility for their actions or omissions of correct action were deemed insufficient defenses under the higher moral principle of "known or should have known".
      Read More...
Amazon Smile
Revolt! T-shirts