© Celal Gunes / Gettyimages.ru
The incident unfolded against the backdrop of heated discussions at the conference about the U.S.-Israeli military actions in Iran. It was not the unified show of support Trump allies had hoped for - and it signaled deeper fractures in the MAGA base over foreign policy.
Those cracks are widening on Capitol Hill. Republican lawmakers, once solidly behind Trump, are now openly breaking ranks over the escalating conflict in Iran, warning that any deployment of U.S. troops could trigger a political backlash severe enough to cost the party in the midterms. Leading the charge is South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, who has repeatedly drawn a hard line against "boots on the ground."
"If there are boots on the ground, public sentiment on this war changes overnight in a flash... people are not going to go for it," Mace told ZeroHedge after a closed-door briefing. She has vowed to vote against any funding that would send American troops into Iran, stating plainly: "If a single boot of a single American soldier sets foot on Iranian soil, I will vote against this. I will not vote to fund sending South Carolina's sons and daughters to die in a ground war in Iran." Mace even stormed out of a House Armed Services Committee briefing, later telling colleagues "we were misled" about the scope of operations.
Her concerns are shared by other GOP voices who are far from the usual anti-interventionist suspects. Texas Rep. Chip Roy expressed "a lot of concern" among constituents, demanding clarity on objectives, timeline, and what "victory" would look like if troops are committed. Fellow Texas Rep. Brandon Gill stressed that voters reject "a long prolonged Middle East" engagement or nation-building. Even Sen. Rand Paul warned of an "uprising" at the gas pump if prices spike to $5 a gallon, noting that working families already squeezed by rent, food, and fuel costs will turn against the war the longer it drags on.
The GOP unease intensified after a Pentagon supplemental funding request reported at $200 billion - far beyond the White House's initial framing of the operation as lasting mere "days" or "weeks." Lawmakers were briefed on expanded objectives that reportedly include seizing Iran's oil export hub at Kharg Island, targeting nuclear material, and even hints of regime change - options that could require thousands of ground troops. As of this week, roughly 7,000 U.S. forces from units like the 82nd Airborne are already heading to the region.
Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley highlighted the broader economic pain: voters want lower gas prices, cheaper healthcare, and rising wages - not endless foreign spending. Rep. Lauren Boebert echoed the "America First" frustration, saying she is "tired of the Industrial War Complex" while families back home struggle to afford basic living costs.
The CPAC episode and the congressional revolt come at a precarious moment for the Trump administration. What began as targeted strikes is now raising fears of another Middle East quagmire in a country twice the size of Iraq. With midterm elections looming, GOP members worry that prolonged conflict - especially one accompanied by higher energy prices and no clear exit strategy - could alienate the very MAGA voters who delivered Trump's victory.
Trump may have even less time to wrap this up than previously thought...
Reader Comments
I guess some retarded Dems think they're going to change the outcome and they're going to stop the war that's a f****** lie. First of all they have no saying when the war stops The people who got attacked do.
unless we pack up our bags from the region and never come back and Israel packs up its bags and leave the region and never comes back no matter who's in office in this s*** hole changes nothing
And if you are about that, put the rest of the past presidents still alive beside him on the dock, as they deserve the same.
Impeach and rules being broken extend all the way into local jurisdictions from sea to shining sea.
Those who don't believe that. Just look at the data centers being forced into communities all across the land, while citizens object.
Epstein wasnt revealed to end it or so punishment could start. They were just letting everyone know exactly who they are. Because they don't care if you wake up now. It's too late. Oh your awake now because their telling you exactly who they are.
And I don't believe you look to 1913. Hell 1912 something as significant happened.
But look to 1865 when the union backed by the bankers took over the souths commerce. And Lincoln I'm sure had plans for the citizens after winning. So had to go. It was warned a lot before this. 1912 killed the only people keeping the fed from being started after 1865. They were on the Titanic.
1913 it just became law the bankers owned you.
Anyway...
Have a great day
And as Trump has so impressively shown lately, the aisles in the US congress only differ in the flavor of global hegemony they prefer. None of them really understands their run is over.
This Trumpster war on Iran for the sake of an apartheid regime in isreal, which even abuses its own people when it is expedient, will end the Trumpster tenure for good. The Iranian admin will make sure of that by simply doing what they are doing. The USadmin should have taken the off ramp when it was offered long ago. The decimation of US garrisons around Persia shows that the USadmin's military prowess isn't what it was. If this war goes how i think it will, the Gulf states are going to be left with a feeling of being swindled...for years and years. All the promises, protection money, and favours, will ultimately amount to nothing.