© I-System TrendCompass
Then there was EU Commission president Ursula von der Lying who mentioned, in passing, during her State of the Union speech in September that "We are on the brink, if not even at the start of another global health crisis." Then we had warnings from the ECB that the financial system is becoming unstable. Six days after my report, on 27 November, Reuters - the ever truthful news service - announced that, "Bird flu virus could risk pandemic worse than COVID 19 if it mutates..."
According to Reuters, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth of the matter is that the evil, invisible enemy, "could affect healthy individuals, including children, unlike COVID-19." Furthermore, some experts say that people lack antibodies against bird flu and respiratory infections. How do they know? They must have looked into people's antibody tanks and found them empty. Thankfully, "preventative measures exist, including vaccine candidates and antiviral stocks." Well, thank goodness for that - lucky us!
Inflating the fear factor
For the time being, however, we need not worry too much: we are in the clear so long as the evil virus doesn't mutate and acquires the ability to spread to humans. But who can tell what these viruses will do? Maybe one day Reuters will have to announce the terrible news that alas, the virus has indeed mutated and the antibodyless humanity is now in great peril - including children! We might just have to lock down, raise up the impenetrable plexiglass barriers, social distance and mask up all over again!
If the bird flu story escalates, it may be that the banking cartels public health authorities intend to do a rerun of the Covid19 pandemic. Recall, the 2020 lockdowns happened only after about 4 months of escalating scare stories accompanied with images of people dropping dead in the streets of Wuhan, health workers in hazmat suits doing some busywork and frantic hospital medics administering PCR to lifeless mannequins. Overcrowded hospitals forced their staff to kill time by practicing dance choreographies and post the frightful videos on YouTube.
Is fear of viruses justified?
What we must recognize, however, is that our fear is perhaps the greatest risk factor. Given the past few hundred thousand years' history, the fear of viruses may be irrational and unjustified. Most of us know about these horrors from history books, Hollywood films and news reports, but I don't know anybody who knows of them from first-person experience.
Dabbling into health-related advice might be rash on my part since I'm not a medical professional. On the other hand, I could hardly do worse than the actual medical professionals: unlike them, I'm not the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States, so I'll allow myself to say this: fear of pandemics and deadly viruses is probably unwarranted. In absence of sudden exogenous crises like major wars, crop failures or large-scale natural disasters, major epidemics might in fact be extremely rare and unlikely.
You have natural immunity
That may be because each one of us is endowed with an immune system which is probably far more robust and powerful than the experimental shots produced for profit by the big pharma corporations. In his 1995 book The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Stuart Kauffman elaborated on the nature of our immune systems in some detail.
In Chapters 3 and 4 of the book, he characterized the immune system as an adaptive, massively combinatorial, autocatalytic network that solves the problem of protecting an organism against an essentially unbounded universe of possible pathogens with a large but finite repertoire of antibodies and lymphocytes. With roughly 10⁸ antibodies present in our systems, they can cover virtually any possible antigen because of the combinatorial explosion of possible binding patterns.
Unlike classical Darwinian view that imagined antibodies being "instructed" by antigens, Kauffman points to more recent scientific discoveries since the 1970s and 1980s, which showed that our immune system generates its huge diversity in advance, by gene segment recombination and somatic hypermutation:
"The immune system protects us by pre-computing, in advance and at random, roughly 100 million different antibody molecules, each able to bind a small cloud of similar molecular shapes. Because the possible space of shapes is so vast and high-dimensional, this modest number of random antibodies collectively covers virtually all possible antigens. The system is then tuned by deletion and energy so that it does not react to self. In short, the immune system achieves completeness not by matching the world one-for-one, but by a clever combinatorial trick plus selection against self-reactivity."The implications of these findings are extremely important: first, they suggest that our immune systems can mount a defense against any pathogen at all, which further suggests that any claim that "people lack antibodies" for this or that pathogen is some interest group's self-serving lie. These groups might be the ones that would encourage you (or mandate) to inject the defences you lack. Here's why you shouldn't:
Pathogens and the natives holocaust
But there's another important implication to the idea that our immune systems - insofar as they're healthy and intact - can deal with any pathogen. Namely, Western scholars have advanced theories to sanitize the wholesale disappearance of native populations in pretty much all parts of the world colonized by Western imperial powers.
They didn't vanish because their colonizers sought to kill or enslave them. They vanished because Western colonizers unintentionally brought pathogens against which the native populations had no immunity. The colonizers didn't mean no harm, honest! It was them pathogens, you see. Amazingly somehow, the native populations never carried any pathogens that could wipe out their colonizers. So the holocaust only worked in one direction - lucky for the colonizers! The fact that the fragile natives survived for tens of thousands of years until the Western man came was probably only by blind luck!
Talk of pandemic is an admission of failure
Anyhow... back to the lockdowns: it seems to me that the increasing talk about bird flu viruses and mutations should be regarded as an admission that the financial system might be in significant trouble and that a virus-induced panic could be seized upon by the banking cartel to orchestrate another colossal bailout. The ultimate result of that intervention will be an accelerating rate of inflation, which might reach hyperinflationary proportions. Britain, EU and Japan are probably at greatest risk.
It remains to be seen, however, whether they'll be able to pull off another lockdown at all. Back in 2020, most people were unprepared to disbelieve the authorities. They couldn't imagine that their public health officials, politicians and the media would participate in such a colossal trainwreck and even today, many questions about that experience remain unanswered.
For her part, the "right honourable" Baroness Heather Hallett DBE left most of them unanswered. Her central concern was why the 2020 experience was a trainwreck and how to lock us down good and proper the next time. If, for example, that dastardly bird flu virus mutates.
Reader Comments
The new horrible pandemic scheme.
The absolutely necessary war scheme.
The attack of the space aliens scheme.
The climate change is wiping us out scheme.
The toxic environment is killing us scheme.
The collapsing financial system scheme.
And various combinations thereof. Terror on every side! They'll have to pick one soon as people are beginning to realize the ruling oligarchy is the primary problem.
Did I miss some?
Klaus already made his choice. He's calling for a polycrisis. As in all of the above.
Everything in your list points to one thing, enslavement by the do as I say, not as I do gang.
To my great shame I have to admit I nver thought of that. Mind you, I never gave much thought about the original story either. Here in QC a new pandemic would sell as hot cakes, again.
I rationalize it in my head differently. Our type of civilization created more opportunities for diseases.
Aztec, Incan, Myan, all had running water.
Ours was not always so. We also had alcohol, which first nations people didn't, hence their issues with it today.
Our so called civilization was totally different than theirs, it bread more diseases.
The truth is that the military industrial complex is creating bioweapons to attack humanity based on genetics.
Brave AI: " The United States has supported 46 laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites in Ukraine through its Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, specifically the Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP), since 2005. These facilities are owned and operated by Ukraine, not the U.S. military, and the program's goal is to improve biological safety, disease surveillance, and public health measures." Owned by Ukraine? Hmm, does that allow deniability?
One question, did the "covid-19 mRNA vax" set up the next plandemic?
Thats why everything's back on the table. Because humanity is easily played. I thank the scam for it offering a collective view of all humans on earth.
The 60%rule . Its why it all works the way it does.
Most poisons can be disassembled with oxygen, (e.g. vit C, hydrogen peroxide), ultraviolet, the correct frequency whether sound or electricity, it doesn't matter.
The body's answer is to pack them up into parcels then eject them via one or more of the 5 pathways after coating in fat, you know, just the same way the "safe and effective"™ spike protein is got in.