© Injecting Freedom
A meta-analysis of existing flu shot studies of healthy children by Cochrane (effectively owned by vaccine zealot Bill Gates) concluded that despite decades of published studies, it "could find no convincing evidence that [flu] vaccines can reduce mortality, hospital admissions, serious complications, or community transmission of influenza."
Read that carefully: no convincing evidence — none — that flu shots lowered the chances of dying, being admitted to the hospital, suffering serious complications from the flu, or transmitting the flu to others.
In fact, studies have found those vaccinated for flu have a statistically significant increased rate of respiratory illnesses. Meaning, it increases the risk of having other respiratory illnesses.
For example, a placebo-controlled efficacy (not safety) study by researchers at the University of Hong Kong compared children receiving influenza vaccine with those who did not receive the vaccine. The study found no statistical difference in the rate of influenza between the groups but did find the vaccinated had a four times increased rate of non-influenza infections ("recipients had an increased risk of virologically confirmed non-influenza infections (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8)").
As another example, researchers at Columbia University found that the risk of "influenza in individuals during the 14-day post-vaccination period was similar to unvaccinated individuals during the same period (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.60, 1.52])" but that the risk of "non-influenza respiratory pathogens was higher [in the vaccinated individuals] during the same period (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.14, 2.38])."
A study by the Cleveland Clinic of 53,402 of its employees across multiple states even found an increased risk of influenza among those vaccinated for influenza, explaining that the "cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated."
© Injecting FreedomFrom the Cleveland Clinic study.
That said: get a flu shot, don't get a flu shot. That's freedom. Everyone should be free to choose. But nobody should be coerced to get this or any medical product, especially, ironically, when the data reflects it has a net overall increase in infections.
If you do choose to get this product and are injured, you are always free to call our firm to represent you in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
Reader Comments
This medical propaganda has been drilled into the heads of children and parents through education and advertisements for decades. This has become a belief system for many educated people. This led to many taking the covid-19 bioweapon.
Will they ever learn or the stupid are eliminated?
[Link]
That said his predictions very interesting I would say: For sure thinking is being shutdown and I would agree he got that right. This I am not agreeing completely with this, since: "develop the thought of existence of soul and Spirt" vs being actually soulless, has similar effects. And in general, not being able to think (his first prediction) would also lead to the result of his second prediction... Materialistic viewpoint(IMO) is because of the programming of culture not vaccines I think(though they could contribute). For example, venerating possession of things(materialism), or consumerism ( https://youtu.be/DnPmg0R1M04) over wisdom...
Some of his publications on Waldorf:
An Introduction to Waldorf Education (GA 24, 1919) The Education of the Child in the Light of Anthroposophy (GA 34, 1909) A Lecture on Pedagogy (GA 36, 1922) The Study of Man (GA 293, 1919) Practical Course for Teachers (GA 294, 1919) Discussions with Teachers (GA 295, 1919) Education as a Social Problem (GA 296, 1919) The Spirit of the Waldorf School (GA 297, 1919)
“The soul will be abolished by a medicine. Out of a ‘healthy view’ one will find a vaccine by which the organism will be worked on in such a way in the earliest possible youth, if possible right at birth, that this human body will not come to the thought: There is a soul and a spirit … The materialistic physicians will be given the task of expelling the souls from mankind … Spiritual science is not a gimmick, is not merely a theory, but spiritual science is a real duty towards the development of mankind. ”—Rudolf Steiner: ‘Collected Works’, pgs 97–98"
What is our current context? The many vaccines given to children before the age of 24 months. The Krspr technology of modifying genetics. The mRNA vaccines that can manipulate genes. The nanotech that can respond to 5G and that can generate behavior like spinning and dying.
What does it mean? There is a soul and the evil intent in the world will attempt to block its development.
Thanks for the link, it never hurts to collect a few more dots to connect to the puzzle we seem to be experiencing.
The book has various protocols for various issues. One of the key elements to remember is that DMSO is used to transport many drugs into the body, and therefore one must be careful not to apply DMSO where it can transport perfume, soap, nail polish, or other chemicals into the body.