
© Strategic Culture Foundation
This was never meant to be Yalta. Although Yalta 2.0 may eventually happen. On the Victory Day parade in Moscow next May 9, celebrating 80 years of the end of the Great Patriotic War and the defeat of Nazi Germany, Putin as the host and Xi Jinping as a top guest will be in town. So might be Donald Trump. Why not have them all board a flight to Crimea and stage a Yalta 2.0 in - where else - Yalta?
"Sweet dreams are made of this", to quote pop metaphysicians Eurythmics. Meanwhile, we didn't have Yalta, not even Reykjavik; we had a long 4.5 hours in the royal palace of Ed-Diriyah in the Wadi Hanifa valley. Russia and the U.S. finally sat down to discuss as adults - for the first time in three years.
A delightful measure of excitement was duly provided - all related to the parties being involved in "work on normalizing diplomatic relations". Until three months ago - under the Cadaver In The White House administration and his Secretary of Genocide - that possibility was as remote as a meteorite crashing on Earth (that will happen, but in a distant future).
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio performed the super-human feat of at least not crashing in front of the Mighty Lavrov - the top diplomat on the planet. Lavrov and Rubio agreed to create a consultation mechanism to eliminate "irritants" (American terminology) in U.S.-Russia relations, and to cooperate on "issues of common geopolitical interest", as per the State Department. BRICS might not be one of them.
Eliminating "irritants" can be easily interpreted as code for Trump 2.0 trying to find ways out of the previous tsunami of sanctions and economic warfare that only produced spectacular blowback.The Americans predictably emphasized that "one meeting is not enough to resolve the Ukrainian conflict." Of course not. Presidential adviser Yuri Ushakov noted that Putin himself will decide when "contacts with the U.S. on Ukraine" will begin, and who will be the Russian negotiators.
Lavrov fully debunked the existence of a three-stage plan on Ukraine, including a ceasefire; elections; and the signing of a final agreement. Carefully examining the record so far,
Lavrov has always maintained that the U.S. is "non-agreement capable".Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff was positively beaming:
"We couldn't have imagined a better result after this session." Well, Witkoff certainly followed the money - Trump's supreme priority - when he and the
American delegation were completely "surprised" to learn that "U.S. companies lost $300 billion from leaving Russia", as revealed by the CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, Kirill Dmitriev.
As with the BRICS fiasco, looks like Team Trump also has not been doing their homework on the business front.
How the geoeconomic war was wonBased on what happened in Riyadh, it's too early to brag that Washington under Trump 2.0 has declared that Ukraine - and his puny narco-Fuhrer - are over. A rump Ukraine will survive in some shape or form, but it's far from clear "what" will be post-war Ukraine.
As for Russia at the forefront of designing a new world order, that seems to be the case. A New Great Game is starting, eons away from the original - British - 19th century concoction, and much closer to how a New Great Game was perceived in the early 2010s, when the Chinese came up with the New Silk Roads concept.
When we have
Washington and Russia now proclaiming to "consider each other's interests", that automatically means the Empire of Chaos losing its previous leverage and now being forced to sit on the table and listen (Lavrov emphasized we actually heard each other).When both delegations stress that a personal Trump-Putin meeting is very complicated to schedule, that can certainly be interpreted as code for
how the U.S. Deep State will be forced to spin what is a de facto unmitigated strategic defeat in a failed proxy war.Beyond the proverbial torrent of spin on what are Trump's real motives to get closer to Russia, generating even delightful intimations of a hallucinatory magic carpet ride - to the sound of Steppenwolf and Jefferson Airplane -
it's all possible this may only be a fictional ride. Or something way more sinister: Trump setting up the European rabble for a new Great War against Russia before 2030, with the Americans watching from afar.What is certain is that Trump wants to normalize Russia to stop losing money in Ukraine - let those European patsies pay up - and concentrate on the real nitty gritty: the tech and geoeconomics war with China, which Beijing in several layers has already won without launching a single HIMARS, instead concentrating on the achievements of the Made in China 2025 plan.
As for the Euro patsies, which Trump positively abhors, they gathered together in Paris for a glorious counter-summitry non-event:
the League of Losers, discussing, what else, their Forever War, and how they are going to dispatch their "peacekeeping" forces - that they don't have, with weapons they don't have - to Ukraine. That mutt posing as British PM is promising to put "boots on the ground" while the toxic Medusa von der Lugen continues to vociferate in her rabid warmongering chihuahua best. Even other rabid dogs such as Poland, alongside poodles Germany, Italy and Spain said "no" to the Brit Dr. Martens avalanche.
As it stands, what happened in Riyadh was just a first step - a U.S.-Russia reconciliation of sorts, like the long detente of the late 1960s and mid-1970s; Gorbachev-Reagan in 1986-1989 and Gorbachev-Daddy Bush in 1989-1991 (that finished with the collapse of the USSR); and Medvedev-Obama in 2009 (that ended with the destruction of Libya).
So for the moment we have zero facts. Apart from what Russian forces are continuing to create in the battlefields of Novorossiya. These new facts on the ground will make things even more dire for the Americans, as the ultra-problematic Ukraine negotiation will stretch for at least a few months.
Let a sobering Lavrov have the last word: "When national interests align, we need to do everything to unite efforts on these tracks, for the sake of mutually beneficial projects, both in the geopolitical sphere and economic affairs."
Lavrov is convinced that the Americans now "have a better understanding of our position."Will that be the case - or will this just be another chapter in a relentless reality show? Let the New Great Game really begin.
Reader Comments
It will begin, it will begin....soon. When more wars are not enough to cover up the dollar's swindling and 36 trillion debt.
When the words that Trump loves Ukraine, loves Greenlanders, and considers Canadians to be great Americans are no longer enough:-)
The American MIC isn't just going to shut down because Trump doesn't want to spend money on Ukraine; they will need to find another military intervention from which to profit.
Will that be a war with Mexican cartels? An African nation? Canada? LOL!!
I don't think the U.S. is ready for a conflict with a military and technological 'peer', so small skirmishes need to continue to keep the USD afloat.
[Link]
IF, Trump and team follow through on slashing the military budget in Half, the MIC will deflate some also, for sure. That would possibly lead to capital flowing to more beneficial outlets, with the hydrants of spending finally tightened.
The revolving door of MIC CEOs in govt and its mouthpieces given "expert" commentator status by MSM/CIA media beating war drums ought to be on the list. Major conflict of interests. Keep cleaning!
The US pulled the F-35 (average price tag 107 Million) from a head to head against Su-57 (average price tag 37 Million)... not because it would outshine.
But why bother, if you never intent to go against a real enemy with it in the first place, and find enough suckers to buy it anyway ?
Without the Swift system, which is used to coerse military spending and force purchase of undesirables... hard to imagine many customers.
Time to brush up on diminished skills like diplomacy, and mutually beneficial trade, before BRICS grows much larger...
Out of time.
Well they do have an unbelievable plateful to look after right at home. I could suggest to settle the Ukraine thing then lay low for a bit while building back better... It's not like the rest of the planet will forget the US overnight.
Trump is signalling the shape of the peace agreement. No NATO membership for Ukraine ever. End of US military and financial support of Ukraine. All military and financial support of Ukraine is the EU responsibility. Calling Zelensky a dictator for not holding elections and lawfare against his opponents, as well as being illegitimate like Bribem. Hegseth stating no US troops on the ground in Ukraine. The current territory held by Russia will remain Russian, Donbass and Crimea. Trump wants an end to war and death. Trump wants MAGA which means sovereignty of the USA, and BRICS stands for that too. I see this as Framing the context of the peace agreement which is probably already planned out with some contingencies.
The Middle East is a question mark, even though Israel is committing genocide of Palestinians. There is more to the story, in my view, of Trump having Soleimani drone murdered and bombing parts of Syria. Both could be connected to Iranian nuclear weapons development, which makes Iran part of the question mark. Iran is part of BRICS and Russia supports Iran.