RTTue, 09 Jul 2024 07:01 UTC
© Sergei GAPON / AFPVladimir Zelensky and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk sign an agreement during a meeting in Warsaw, Poland on July 8, 2024.
Warsaw says the details of the new security pact with Kiev need to be cleared with the US-led military bloc
A newly signed pact between Warsaw and Kiev contains provisions that would allow Poland to shoot down Russian missiles and drones in Ukrainian airspace, Vladimir Zelensky has said.Zelensky spoke in Warsaw on Monday, after signing the security deal with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The government in Kiev has been making bilateral pacts with NATO member states over the past several months, in lieu of formally joining the US-led bloc.
The agreement "provides for the development of a mechanism [for Poland] to shoot down Russian
missiles and drones fired in the airspace of Ukraine in the direction of Poland," Zelensky said, according to Ukrainian media.
He added that Warsaw and Kiev "will work together to work out how we can quickly implement this point" of the deal.
Tusk confirmed the existence of the provision but said it merely "indicates the need for talks on this matter," according to Polish media.
"We need clear cooperation within NATO here, because such actions require joint NATO responsibility," the Polish PM added, explaining that it would be in the interest of both Poland and Ukraine to get a "stamp" of international solidarity first."We will include other NATO allies in this conversation. So we treat the matter seriously as open, but not yet finalized," Tusk said, according to Poland's RMF24 Radio.
Zelensky has been asking NATO to shoot down incoming Russian missiles for several months already. He has compared it to what the US and UK did for Israel in mid-April, during an Iranian reprisal bombardment, and argued that it would not directly involve the bloc in the conflict.
"NATO will not become part of the conflict," the bloc's secretary-general, Jens Stoltenberg, replied at the time. "There are no plans to send NATO troops to Ukraine or to extend NATO's air-defense shield to Ukraine," he added.
While US and EU officials
shot down Zelensky's comparison with Israel, they agreed to other things he asked for, from additional Patriot missile launchers and rockets to permitting Ukraine to use the weapons they supplied to strike deep into Russian territory.
During his visit to Warsaw, Zelensky also announced that Poland would raise, train and equip a 'Ukrainian Legion', made up of volunteers. "Every Ukrainian citizen who decides to join the legion will be able to sign a contract with the Ukrainian armed forces," he added.
Tusk did not comment on the legion business, but said that every word in the security pact meant something and that it's about "practical mutual commitments, not empty promises."
Comment: The timing for the agreement came just a day before the NATO Summit in Washington that takes place 9-11 July. It is likely the content of the agreement will be discussed, as well as what red lines are next to be crossed.
Other possible topics are what NATO can give Ukraine. According to the same source,
NATO won't give Zelensky what he wants - AFP (referring to NATO membership), there are hopes for a few more weapons:
When it comes to specific NATO commitments, Zelensky is reportedly poised to receive a promise of new air-defense system deliveries, with other measures to assist Ukraine to be put on "a firmer footing."
According to one diplomat, a promise of new air defenses, in the absence of other substantive commitments, could allow Zelensky to declare the summit a victory for Kiev. "What would you want more? Nice words in a declaration that don't mean much or military support?" the source added.
"A firmer footing" could related to Zelensky claiming he has several brigades that are underequipped.
Also a subject for discussion could be:
Ukraine asks West for submarines.
The head of the Ukrainian navy added that the country does not need large submarines, as "they are useless in the Black Sea."
"Locating only near Odessa means having nothing, we should look further, spread the fleet throughout the Black Sea and use its entire area," he said, expressing hope that Ukraine would turn "from a coastal state into a maritime power."
This is how some of these people are thinking! But behind the begging for more weapons, there is another reality, which is corruption. The positive interpretation of the corruption in Ukraine is that the money that have gone elsewhere has saved a few lives in the conflict, alternatively the negative interpretation is that if there was not the temptation of gaining easy money, but a genuine concern among the elite for the welfare of the Ukrainian people the conflict would have been ended long ago.
Here is a review of the Ukrainian corruption achievements:
A focus on the corruption in Ukraine, overlooks the corruption among the Western sponsors of the conflict. This might be more elusive, but can we believe it does not exist?
Comment: The timing for the agreement came just a day before the NATO Summit in Washington that takes place 9-11 July. It is likely the content of the agreement will be discussed, as well as what red lines are next to be crossed.
Other possible topics are what NATO can give Ukraine. According to the same source, NATO won't give Zelensky what he wants - AFP (referring to NATO membership), there are hopes for a few more weapons: "A firmer footing" could related to Zelensky claiming he has several brigades that are underequipped.
Also a subject for discussion could be: Ukraine asks West for submarines. This is how some of these people are thinking! But behind the begging for more weapons, there is another reality, which is corruption. The positive interpretation of the corruption in Ukraine is that the money that have gone elsewhere has saved a few lives in the conflict, alternatively the negative interpretation is that if there was not the temptation of gaining easy money, but a genuine concern among the elite for the welfare of the Ukrainian people the conflict would have been ended long ago.
Here is a review of the Ukrainian corruption achievements:
A focus on the corruption in Ukraine, overlooks the corruption among the Western sponsors of the conflict. This might be more elusive, but can we believe it does not exist?