OF THE
TIMES
On Thursday, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner asked a four-judge Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court panel to stop impeachment proceedings launched against him on November 16 after a vote from the state's House of Representatives.See also:
According to the Associated Press, one of the four judges, Ellen Ceisler, a Democrat, said, "It seems to me that these impeachment proceedings are based on disagreement with public policy and an elected official's discretion. I think that this proceeding could set terrible precedent in the future."
The judicial quartet's makeup is half Republican and half Democrat, with Ceisler counting as one of the latter.
The impeachment stated that Krasner engaged in "misbehavior in office in nature of violation of victims rights," and "misbehavior in office in the nature of violence of the constitution of Pennsylvania by usurpation of the legislative function."
Thursday, Krasner argued that there was no merit behind such claims and also said that the GOP-controlled state general assembly does not have the constitutional power to remove him from office.
Krasner, a Democrat who was re-elected in 2021, is known for progressive policies such as no cash bail and not prosecuting non-violent gun and drug possession crimes. Shootings are up 54 percent in Philadelphia since 2020 and homicides have climbed by 50 percent since Krasner took office. In the wake of the increase in crime, Krasner has called for more gun control. There were a total of seven articles of impeachment alleging Krasner's misconduct, which included his bail policies and lack of prosecuting.
One of the Republican judges on the panel, Judge Patricia McCullough, said, "The problem is you're asking the court to intervene and that is going to set another huge precedent for the people of this commonwealth if the court can usurp its separation of powers principle and stick its hand into a process that the Supreme Court says belongs to the General Assembly. And that's really the issue."
A trial is set for January 18 in the Pennsylvania Senate. The judges did not say when they would announce a ruling.
Maybe in America, when city’s surpass a certain amount of murders they should be awarded something similar.
If I was a believer of the two party paradigm this is what I’d push, because clearly, blue run cities are by far the worst.
I mean, how easy would it be to set up a website and list all the cities with high murder rates and award accordingly. You could have a table like in sports and cities like Chicago and Philadelphia vying for top spot. At the end of the year you see who the top four or six cities are and they go into a playoffs where whoever scored the highest number of murders in the last week of the year wins the Murder Championships. If they are tied then you could break down the population size per murders and whoever is higher wins.
Could have a special online award ceremony lol
Just an idea. 💡
If anyone did anything like this Ya heard it here first and I want royalties 😂