When one thinks about liberation, the first thing that comes to the minds of many is Africa's decolonization cause, which regrettably hasn't yet been completed in full. It therefore naturally follows that if Russia wants to obtain credibility for its global revolutionary manifesto, then it must actively support Africa in finally finishing this process, ergo Lavrov's promise to that end.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov published an article on Friday ahead of his visit to Egypt, Ethiopia, Uganda, and the Congo Republic articulating his country's policy towards the continent. The most important part concerns his pledge that Russia will help its partners there finally complete the process of decolonization. The first step, as he sees it, has already been accomplished upon
the creation of regional integration organizations such as the East African Community (EAC) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD). Then came the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCTFA), which Lavrov regards as "an important step towards the true economic independence of the continent, its final liberation from any manifestations of discrimination and coercion."
There's still a lot more to do, however, which is why the Russian Foreign Minister said that "we stand in solidarity with the demands of the Africans to complete the process of decolonization and we are supporting relevant initiatives at the UN platform." Prior to that declaration,
he reminded everyone of the comprehensive support that his country gave to its African partners over the decades in the economic, military, and political domains, suggesting that Moscow intends to revive that tradition, albeit through mutually beneficial deals instead of pro bono assistance like during the Soviet era. Russia's top diplomat hinted that large-scale infrastructure projects will serve as the flagships in this respect, and he reassured his partners that their forthcoming transactions will be sanctions-proof.
Lavrov's article comes just two days after President Putin shared his global revolutionary manifesto where he essentially committed to liberating the entire world from the Golden Billion's yoke as the only realistic means for sustainably ensuring his civilization-state's national interests. Seeing as how many (but importantly not all) things are coordinated in the world of high-level diplomacy, it can't be discounted that the Russian leader intended for his manifesto to precede Lavrov's more detailed articulation of it in the African context prior to his trip to the continent. After all, when one thinks about liberation, the first thing that comes to the minds of many is Africa's decolonization cause, which regrettably hasn't yet been completed in full.
It therefore naturally follows that if Russia wants to obtain credibility for its global revolutionary manifesto, then it must actively support Africa in finally finishing this process, ergo Lavrov's promise to that end. Objectively speaking,
impressive progress has already been made thus far since the start of the year with respect to African countries' refusal to sanction Russia in spite of considerable Western pressure, which its top diplomat said "deserves deep respect." It should also be noted that
African leaders snubbed Zelensky late last month too since they aren't brainwashed by the West's latest cult. These expressions of
principled neutrality confirm the newly strengthened
sovereignty of African states at this latest phase of the
global systemic transition to
multipolarity.
Nevertheless, the Golden Billion's neocolonial
chains are still wrapped around the economies of many African countries, especially those that still employ the Central and West African Francs. It's going to be extremely difficult to liberate those states in particular, yet the pioneering example shown by the Malian junta inspires hope that progress will nonetheless be made, whether slowly and surely or rapidly and revolutionarily. That said, it's precisely because of these promising trends that there's
serious concern about West Africa becoming a major theater of proxy warfare in the coming future, though
those countries like Mali that once again become victims of Western unconventional aggression can certainly count on Russian support in terms of training, logistics, and intelligence.
What's intriguing about the
New Cold War is how closely it resembles the Old Cold War in many respects, such as the focus on African liberation movements, albeit in a modern context. Instead of the USSR arming freedom fighters against their European colonial overlords, the Russian Federation is committed to helping the continent achieve true economic independence in order to break the neocolonial shackles that continue to deprive some of them of genuine sovereignty. There also isn't a competition over ideological models anymore either, with everything being simplified in terms of the Golden Billion doing its utmost to retain its control over many African countries by proxy while Russia simply wants to provide those same countries with the chance to determine their own futures.
Apart from the ethical aspect of this policy,
the other reason why Russia's practicing it is because it believes that truly independent countries behave more predictably, which in turn stabilizes International Relations. Just like
Ethiopia and
India already do, those other Global South states - especially in Africa - that prioritize the pursuit of their national interests (though importantly not at any third party's expense) are easier to work with and are more peaceful. They wouldn't ever sacrifice their people's energy, food, or even military security simply to please a neocolonial overlord halfway across the world. By facilitating Africa's final liberation from the Golden Billion's economic-financial yoke, Russia is thus ensuring that the continent's future will match its full potential with time.
Reader Comments
The New Multi-Polar World Order is coming into existence, it is just completely different to the one envisaged by the psychos.
And multipolar can end unipolar as well, it's all about consolidation of money & power in fewer and fewer hands of the "elite", which humanity will NEVER get rid off itself, they're to haunt us for eternity apparently.. And all the actions of the "elite" merely reflect true human nature of us all, we've all got the potential for both "good" and "evil".. Just depends on us what do we prefer..
Power in fewer and fewer hands always ends in collapse. The wise men in Eurasia know that from experience and vicariously too. Lobaczewski talks about this at some length. Seems quite apparent to me that some of the Eastern nations have acquired a fair degree of immunity from the creeping hand of pathocracy. To some degree yes, however, psychopaths rule. Has been so for a loonnggg time. That complicates the picture somewhat and the programming runs deep, very deep. The good and evil as far as normal man is concerned, is playing out in the very topic being discussed. As always, context is everything!
On the other hand, it can still be just a play of West vs East global predictor groupings (11+11, thus 22 with 1 true global predictor controlling both = 23) to manipulate the whole humanity as they see fit since the times of Ancient Egypt.. Why is there a hidden (satanistic and ritualist in case of the West) "Elite" across the globe that relies on symbolism and black magic (using the primal "dark" matter as source of power), after all? Or is it a mere distraction for so-called "conspiracy theorists"? Then why has it been going on for centuries and millenia?! I've personally seen many of their symbols and houses decorated by them.. And I won't stop questioning everything until I arrive at the conclusion.
I only hope that the "other side" is not infested by pathocracy as well.. For example Mao Tse Tung and his rise to power surely doesn't seem to me as the "rule of the normal man", including those who were supporting him in that career.. Also, let us not forget who first colonized India & China (it was Great Britain).. And Great Britain, USA & Israel are all close-knit members of the Western pathocratical circle, of course including the Five Eyes as a whole and the EU countries.. If Russia was NOT under the pathocrats control, then it could be humanity's saviour in those regards.. But they're throwing their own soldiers in the meat-grinder too, as well as letting suspicious elitist freaks control their valuable institutions (head of Sberbank for example, just look at his controversial remarks, also he is just as much Russian as am I, just to illustrate.. Also Nabiullina and Yellen seem to have MUCH in common, as anyone who is a part of the Global Bankers Cabal..).. I wish Russia was sovereign and would trash the Covid circus led by Gintsburg in their country (Sputnik vaxx manager, this vaxx kills just as much as any other and contains self-forming microprocessors TOO), that would certainly give me more confidence in the steps they're undertaking.. But since they also happen to install countless cameras in EVERY school across Russia as well as in public places, I believe they're on the Total Control train as well as ANY other country in the whole world.. There truly aren't any resisting and the few African countries that did, they had their presidents killed and their replacements swiftly approved any "measures necessary" to participate in the totalitarian bullshit..
I wonder how all of this fits in..